Cisco 642-902 (Implementing Cisco IP Routing (ROUTE v1.0)) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. Cisco 642-902 Implementing Cisco IP Routing (ROUTE v1.0) exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the Cisco 642-902 certification exam dumps & Cisco 642-902 practice test questions in vce format.

A Foundational Guide to the 642-902 Exam and Core Routing Principles

The 642-902 ROUTE exam was a cornerstone of the Cisco Certified Network Professional (CCNP) certification track for many years. It served as a critical benchmark for network engineers, validating their skills in implementing and verifying complex routing solutions in enterprise environments. While the 642-902 Exam itself has been retired and succeeded by newer versions, the principles it tested remain timelessly relevant. The knowledge domains covered, such as EIGRP, OSPF, BGP, and route manipulation, are the very bedrock of modern networking. Understanding the structure and depth of this exam provides a historical context and a solid theoretical framework for anyone pursuing a career in network engineering today.

Studying the topics of the 642-902 Exam is not merely an academic exercise; it is an exploration of the fundamental logic that governs how data traverses global networks. The protocols and technologies are not relics; they are living, breathing systems that have evolved but whose core functions persist. For aspiring network professionals, dissecting the blueprint of the 642-902 Exam offers a structured path to mastering routing. It forces a deep dive into the why and how of routing decisions, preparing an engineer not just for a specific test but for real-world scenarios where troubleshooting and optimization are paramount.

The curriculum of the 642-902 Exam was meticulously designed to build a comprehensive skill set. It began with fundamental concepts of routing and gradually introduced layers of complexity. This included understanding the differences between distance-vector, link-state, and path-vector routing protocols. A candidate was expected to not only configure these protocols but also to understand their underlying algorithms, convergence properties, and scaling characteristics. This level of detail ensured that certified professionals were equipped to design, implement, and maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures, a requirement that has only grown more critical in the age of cloud computing and digital transformation.

Furthermore, the transition from the 642-902 Exam to its successors reflects the evolution of the networking industry itself. While the core protocols remain, new features and new challenges like IPv6 integration, enhanced security, and automation have come to the forefront. By looking back at the 642-902 Exam, we can trace this evolution. It allows current students of networking to appreciate the foundational knowledge that today's advanced concepts are built upon. It provides a roadmap for learning, ensuring that no critical building blocks are missed on the journey to becoming a proficient network engineer.

Understanding IP Addressing and Subnetting

At the heart of any routing discussion, including every topic within the 642-902 Exam, is a masterful understanding of IP addressing and subnetting. This is the logical addressing scheme that enables devices to locate and communicate with each other across different networks. An IP address provides a unique identifier for a device on a network, much like a street address identifies a house in a city. The exam required candidates to be fluent in both IPv4 and the more modern IPv6, understanding their structures, address classes (in the context of IPv4's history), and the concept of public versus private address spaces as defined in RFC 1918.

Subnetting is the process of dividing a single, large network into multiple smaller, more manageable subnetworks, or subnets. This practice is essential for network organization, security, and performance. By creating smaller broadcast domains, subnetting reduces unnecessary network traffic and allows administrators to apply specific security policies to different segments of the network. For the 642-902 Exam, proficiency in subnetting was non-negotiable. Candidates needed to be able to quickly calculate subnet masks, network addresses, broadcast addresses, and the range of usable host addresses for any given scenario, often under tight time constraints.

The technique of Variable Length Subnet Masking (VLSM) was a particularly important concept. VLSM allows network administrators to use different subnet masks for different subnets within the same major network. This provides immense flexibility and efficiency in IP address allocation. Instead of being forced to use a single, fixed size for all subnets, an administrator can create a small subnet for a point-to-point link that only needs two addresses and a much larger subnet for a user segment that needs hundreds of addresses. This conservation of the IP address space was a key practical skill tested in the 642-902 Exam.

Beyond just the mechanics of calculation, a deep understanding of the implications of subnetting was required. This included how routing protocols summarize routes based on subnet boundaries and how improper planning could lead to inefficient routing or connectivity issues. Route summarization, or aggregation, is a direct application of a well-designed subnetting scheme. It allows a router to advertise a single, consolidated route representing multiple smaller networks, which significantly reduces the size of routing tables on upstream routers. This improves router performance and network stability, concepts central to the 642-902 Exam syllabus.

The Role of Routing Protocols

Routing protocols are the mechanisms that allow routers to dynamically learn about available networks and determine the best path to reach them. Without routing protocols, network administrators would have to manually configure static routes for every possible destination on the network. While static routes have their place for small, predictable networks, they are completely unscalable in large, dynamic enterprise environments. The 642-902 Exam focused heavily on the implementation and verification of dynamic routing protocols, which automatically adapt to changes in the network topology, such as a link failure or the addition of a new network.

The exam categorized routing protocols into two main types: Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) and Exterior Gateway Protocols (EGPs). IGPs are used to exchange routing information within a single autonomous system (AS), which is a network under a single administrative control. The 642-902 Exam curriculum covered several key IGPs, including EIGRP and OSPF. Each of these protocols has its own unique algorithm, metric calculation, and operational characteristics. A significant portion of the exam was dedicated to ensuring candidates could choose the appropriate IGP based on network requirements and configure it correctly.

Exterior Gateway Protocols, on the other hand, are used for routing between different autonomous systems. The one and only EGP in widespread use today is the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which was another major topic of the 642-902 Exam. BGP is the protocol that runs the internet, managing the exchange of routing information between internet service providers (ISPs) and large organizations. Unlike IGPs that typically focus on finding the fastest path, BGP uses a complex set of attributes to make policy-based routing decisions, giving administrators granular control over how traffic enters and leaves their network.

Understanding the fundamental differences in how these protocols operate was crucial. For instance, distance-vector protocols like RIP (though less emphasized on this exam) learn about the network from their neighbors' perspectives, a concept sometimes called "routing by rumor." In contrast, link-state protocols like OSPF build a complete, synchronized map of the entire network topology on every router. EIGRP, an advanced distance-vector protocol, uses aspects of both. Knowing these distinctions was essential for predicting routing behavior, troubleshooting convergence issues, and successfully passing the 642-902 Exam.

Foundations of EIGRP

The Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) was a significant component of the 642-902 Exam, largely because of its widespread use in Cisco-centric networks. EIGRP is a proprietary Cisco protocol known for its rapid convergence and efficient use of network resources. It is often classified as an advanced distance-vector protocol, but it incorporates features more commonly associated with link-state protocols. This hybrid nature makes it both powerful and complex, and the exam required a thorough understanding of its inner workings.

At the core of EIGRP is the Diffusing Update Algorithm, or DUAL. DUAL is the engine that ensures loop-free paths and enables fast recovery from network topology changes. To achieve this, EIGRP maintains a topology table that stores all the routes it has learned from its neighbors. For each destination, DUAL identifies a primary path, called the successor, which is the best route and is installed in the main routing table. More importantly, DUAL also identifies a backup path, called a feasible successor, if one is available. This feasible successor is a pre-calculated, loop-free alternate route.

The existence of a feasible successor is what gives EIGRP its signature fast convergence. If the primary path (the successor) to a destination fails, the router can almost instantly switch to the feasible successor without having to perform any new computations or send out queries to its neighbors. This switchover is so fast that it is often imperceptible to end-users. A key part of preparing for the 642-902 Exam was understanding the feasibility condition, the mathematical rule DUAL uses to determine if a backup path is loop-free and can be considered a feasible successor.

EIGRP also uses a sophisticated composite metric to calculate the desirability of a path. By default, this metric is calculated based on the minimum bandwidth and the cumulative delay of the path. However, it can also include factors like link reliability and load. This provides administrators with significant flexibility in influencing path selection. Candidates for the 642-902 Exam were expected to know the formula for the EIGRP metric, understand the role of the K-values that weigh the different components, and know how to manipulate these values to achieve specific routing outcomes.

Introduction to OSPF

Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is arguably one of the most widely deployed Interior Gateway Protocols in large enterprise networks. As an open standard, it offers interoperability between equipment from different vendors, making it a highly popular choice. The 642-902 Exam dedicated a substantial portion of its blueprint to OSPF, demanding a deep and practical knowledge of its operation. Unlike distance-vector protocols, OSPF is a link-state protocol. This means that every router running OSPF develops a complete and identical map of the network topology within a given area.

This comprehensive view of the network is achieved through the exchange of Link-State Advertisements (LSAs). Each router generates LSAs to describe its own local links and their states (up or down) and costs. These LSAs are then flooded throughout the OSPF area, ensuring that every router receives all the information. Each router collects these LSAs into its Link-State Database (LSDB). Once the LSDBs are synchronized, each router independently runs the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm, also known as Dijkstra's algorithm, to calculate the shortest, loop-free path to every destination. This process results in a highly stable and predictable routing environment.

To enhance scalability and manageability, OSPF uses a hierarchical design based on the concept of areas. An OSPF network can be divided into multiple areas, with all areas connecting to a central backbone area known as Area 0. This design limits the scope of LSA flooding. Intensive routing calculations and topology information are contained within an area, and routes between areas are summarized. This significantly reduces the processing overhead on routers and improves overall network stability. The 642-902 Exam required candidates to understand the different OSPF area types, such as stub areas and not-so-stubby areas, and their specific use cases.

Another key concept in OSPF is the election of a Designated Router (DR) and a Backup Designated Router (BDR) on multi-access network segments like Ethernet. Instead of every router forming adjacencies with every other router on the segment (which would create a quadratic number of adjacencies), they all form an adjacency with the DR and BDR only. This greatly reduces the amount of OSPF traffic and protocol overhead. Understanding the DR/BDR election process, which is based on router priority and router ID, was a fundamental skill needed for the 642-902 Exam.

Route Redistribution and Manipulation

Real-world networks are rarely homogenous. It is common for a large organization to run multiple different routing protocols simultaneously, perhaps due to a merger, a phased migration, or different requirements in various parts of the network. The process of exchanging routing information between these different routing domains is called route redistribution. This was a complex and critically important topic on the 642-902 Exam, as improper redistribution can lead to routing loops, suboptimal routing, and network instability.

The core challenge of redistribution lies in the fact that different routing protocols use different metrics and algorithms. For example, EIGRP uses a composite metric of bandwidth and delay, while OSPF uses a simple cost based on bandwidth. When a route from EIGRP is redistributed into OSPF, the EIGRP metric is meaningless to OSPF. Therefore, the administrator must define a seed metric for the redistributed routes. Choosing an appropriate seed metric is crucial for ensuring that these external routes are propagated correctly and have a sensible path cost within the new routing domain.

The 642-902 Exam required candidates to master the configuration of redistribution in both directions between protocols like EIGRP, OSPF, and even RIP. This involved not only setting the seed metric but also understanding the concept of administrative distance (AD). AD is a value from 0 to 255 that a router uses to rate the trustworthiness of a routing source. When a router learns about the same destination from two different protocols, it will prefer the one with the lower AD. During redistribution, it is possible for a route to be learned back into its original protocol with a less trustworthy AD, creating potential routing problems that need to be managed.

To manage and control the flow of routing information, administrators use tools like route maps and distribute lists. These tools act as filters, allowing an engineer to specify exactly which routes are allowed to be redistributed and to modify their attributes in the process. For example, a route map can be used to set the metric, change the metric type in OSPF (E1 vs. E2), or set tags that can be used for policy decisions elsewhere in the network. A deep understanding of these policy control mechanisms was essential for tackling the advanced redistribution scenarios presented in the 642-902 Exam.

EIGRP Fundamentals and Neighbor Relationships

The Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) stands out as a sophisticated routing protocol, and its mastery was a primary objective for any candidate of the 642-902 Exam. At its most basic level, EIGRP establishes relationships, known as adjacencies, with other EIGRP-speaking routers on the same network segment. This relationship is the foundation upon which all routing information is exchanged. For two routers to become neighbors, several key parameters must match. These include being in the same autonomous system (AS), passing authentication if it is configured, and having matching K-values, which are the weights used in the metric calculation.

The process begins with a router sending out Hello packets on its EIGRP-enabled interfaces. These packets are sent to the multicast address 224.0.0.10. When a neighboring router receives a Hello packet that meets the necessary criteria, it responds, and a neighbor relationship is formed. This relationship is maintained by the continued exchange of Hello packets. If a router stops receiving Hellos from its neighbor within a specified period, known as the hold time, it will declare the neighbor down and DUAL will be initiated to find an alternate path. The 642-902 Exam often tested troubleshooting scenarios where neighbor relationships failed to form due to mismatched parameters.

Once the neighbor adjacency is established, the routers exchange their full routing tables. After this initial exchange, EIGRP operates with remarkable efficiency. Unlike some protocols that send periodic full updates, EIGRP only sends partial, bounded updates. This means that when a change in the network occurs, a router sends an update only containing information about the affected route, and it sends it only to the neighbors that need to know. This behavior significantly reduces the amount of bandwidth consumed by the routing protocol itself, making EIGRP highly scalable and suitable for both slow and fast links.

Verifying the status of EIGRP neighbor relationships is a daily task for a network engineer. The primary command for this is show ip eigrp neighbors. This command provides a wealth of information, including the neighbor's IP address, the interface through which it is reached, the hold time, uptime, and the Smooth Round-Trip Time (SRTT). The SRTT is a measure of how long it takes for a packet to reach the neighbor and for an acknowledgment to be received. This value is used by EIGRP's Reliable Transport Protocol (RTP) to manage the reliable delivery of updates, ensuring no information is lost in transit. A solid grasp of this output was critical for the 642-902 Exam.

The DUAL Algorithm: Successor and Feasible Successor

The crown jewel of EIGRP, and a concept that required deep understanding for the 642-902 Exam, is the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL). This algorithm is the engine that guarantees loop-free paths and enables the rapid convergence for which EIGRP is famous. DUAL operates on the information gathered from neighbors, which is stored in the EIGRP topology table. This table contains a list of all destinations advertised by neighbors, along with the metrics that each neighbor reports for reaching those destinations. It is a much more comprehensive view of the network than what is found in the main IP routing table.

For each destination network in its topology table, DUAL calculates the best path. This path is known as the successor. The successor is the neighboring router that has the lowest calculated metric to reach the destination. This successor route is then installed into the IP routing table and is used for forwarding all traffic to that destination. The metric associated with this path is known as the Feasible Distance (FD). The FD represents the total cost from the local router to the destination network through that specific successor.

The true genius of DUAL lies in its proactive calculation of a backup path, known as the Feasible Successor (FS). An FS is a neighbor that provides a loop-free alternative path to the same destination. To qualify as an FS, a neighbor must meet a strict criterion called the feasibility condition. The feasibility condition states that the neighbor's advertised distance (its own metric to the destination) must be less than the local router's current Feasible Distance for that same destination. This simple check brilliantly ensures that the backup path is not pointing back toward the local router, thus preventing a routing loop.

If the primary route through the successor fails, EIGRP's response is incredibly fast. If a pre-calculated Feasible Successor exists in the topology table, the router immediately promotes the FS to become the new successor. This new route is installed in the IP routing table almost instantly, often in milliseconds. No further computation or communication with other routers is needed. It is only when a successor fails and there is no Feasible Successor available that the router must actively query its neighbors for a new path, a process that takes more time. The 642-902 Exam would often present scenarios requiring the analysis of the topology table to identify successors and feasible successors.

EIGRP Metric Calculation and K-Values

The metric used by EIGRP to determine the best path is one of the most complex among all Interior Gateway Protocols. The 642-902 Exam required candidates to not only understand the components of the metric but also to be able to interpret and influence it. EIGRP uses a composite metric that can be based on up to five variables, known as K-values: bandwidth (K1), load (K2), delay (K3), reliability (K4), and MTU (K5). By default, however, only bandwidth and delay are used to calculate the metric. This is controlled by setting K1 and K3 to 1, and K2, K4, and K5 to 0.

The formula for the EIGRP metric is quite intricate. It involves scaling the minimum bandwidth and the cumulative delay of a path using a specific equation. The bandwidth component is based on the slowest link along the entire path to the destination, while the delay component is the sum of the delays of all the links along that path. These values are not measured dynamically; they are static values configured on the router's interfaces. A deep understanding of this was crucial, as an incorrect bandwidth or delay setting on an interface could lead to suboptimal routing choices across the entire network.

For two EIGRP routers to become neighbors, their K-values must match exactly. This is a fundamental requirement. If one router is configured to use only bandwidth and delay (the default), while its neighbor is configured to also include reliability in the metric calculation, they will not form an adjacency. This is a common source of EIGRP configuration errors and was a popular topic for troubleshooting questions on the 642-902 Exam. While it is possible to change the K-values, it is a practice that is strongly discouraged in production networks unless there is a very specific and well-understood reason, as it can cause network-wide instability if not implemented carefully.

An engineer can influence EIGRP path selection by manipulating the interface-level bandwidth and delay values. For example, if there are two equal-cost paths to a destination and an administrator wants to prefer one over the other, they could slightly increase the delay on the less-preferred link. This would make its calculated metric higher (less desirable), causing EIGRP to choose the other path as the successor. This technique, along with understanding how to set these values and verify the resulting metric in the topology table, represented a key practical skill for the 642-902 Exam.

EIGRP Configuration and Verification

The practical application of knowledge is paramount in networking, and the 642-902 Exam thoroughly tested a candidate's ability to configure and verify EIGRP in a simulated network environment. The basic configuration begins in global configuration mode with the router eigrp command, followed by an autonomous system (AS) number. This AS number is a value between 1 and 65535 and must be the same on all routers that are intended to be part of the same EIGRP routing domain. It is a common mistake for junior engineers to use different AS numbers, which completely prevents neighbor relationships from forming.

Once inside the EIGRP process, the network command is used to specify which of the router's interfaces will participate in EIGRP and which connected networks will be advertised. The network command can be followed by a classful network address or, more precisely, by an IP address and a wildcard mask. Using a wildcard mask allows an administrator to be very specific about which interfaces are enabled for EIGRP. For example, a wildcard mask of 0.0.0.0 would enable EIGRP only on the interface that exactly matches the specified IP address. This precision is considered a best practice and was expected knowledge for the 642-902 Exam.

Verification is just as important as configuration. After setting up EIGRP, an engineer must confirm that it is operating as expected. The first step is typically to check for neighbor adjacencies using show ip eigrp neighbors. If neighbors are present, the next step is to inspect the EIGRP topology table with show ip eigrp topology. This command reveals all the paths EIGRP has learned, identifies the successor and any feasible successors, and shows the metric calculations. Finally, show ip route will display the main IP routing table to confirm that the best EIGRP routes (the successors) have been successfully installed and are being used to forward traffic.

Troubleshooting EIGRP problems, a key skill for the 642-902 Exam, often involves a systematic process of using these verification commands. If a neighbor is missing, one would check for mismatched AS numbers, K-values, or authentication settings. If a neighbor is present but a specific route is not in the routing table, the show ip eigrp topology command is the next logical step. It might reveal that the route is known but does not have a valid successor, or perhaps it is being filtered by a distribute list. A methodical approach to verification is the hallmark of an experienced network engineer.

EIGRP Summarization and Stub Routing

As an EIGRP network grows, so does the size of its topology and routing tables. Large tables can consume significant router memory and CPU resources. More importantly, instability in one part of the network can propagate throughout the entire autonomous system. To combat this and improve scalability, EIGRP supports route summarization. Summarization allows a router to aggregate multiple specific network prefixes into a single, less-specific summary route. This summary is then advertised to its neighbors, effectively hiding the details of the individual subnets. This was a critical scalability feature tested on the 642-902 Exam.

EIGRP can perform summarization in two ways: automatically at classful network boundaries or manually on any interface. Auto-summary, the default behavior in older IOS versions, would automatically summarize routes to their classful equivalent (e.g., all 10.1.x.x subnets) when advertising them out an interface belonging to a different major network (e.g., 172.16.x.x). However, this behavior is often problematic in modern networks that use discontiguous subnets and is now disabled by default. The best practice, and the one emphasized for the 642-902 Exam, is to disable auto-summary and implement precise manual summarization where needed.

Manual summarization is configured on a per-interface basis using the ip summary-address eigrp command. This gives an administrator granular control over where and how summarization occurs. A common use case is at the edge of a distribution layer, where a router can summarize all the routes from its access layer switches before advertising them to the core of the network. This not only reduces the routing table size in the core but also contains the scope of EIGRP queries. If a link in the access layer fails, the query for a new path does not need to propagate beyond the summarizing router, leading to faster network convergence.

A related feature for enhancing scalability, particularly in hub-and-spoke topologies, is EIGRP Stub Routing. A router configured as a stub will announce to its neighbors that it is at the edge of the network. As a result, the hub router will not send any queries to the stub router when it is searching for an alternate path to a destination. This is highly efficient, as a remote branch office router typically has only one path out of its local network—through the hub. Sending it queries is pointless and consumes bandwidth and CPU cycles. The 642-902 Exam required knowledge of how to configure a router as a stub and the different options available, such as advertising only connected or summary routes.

OSPF Operation and Neighbor States

Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a robust and widely deployed link-state routing protocol, making it a central pillar of the 642-902 Exam curriculum. Unlike distance-vector protocols that rely on secondhand information from neighbors, OSPF routers build a complete topological map of the network. This process begins with establishing neighbor adjacencies. OSPF-enabled routers send Hello packets out their interfaces to a multicast address (224.0.0.5 for all OSPF routers). For two routers to become neighbors, the contents of their Hello packets must agree on several key parameters, including the Area ID, authentication settings, and Hello/Dead interval timers.

The journey from discovering a potential neighbor to forming a full adjacency involves progressing through several distinct states. These states are Down, Init, 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange, Loading, and Full. Understanding this progression was vital for troubleshooting OSPF issues on the 642-902 Exam. For instance, if a router is stuck in the 2-Way state on an Ethernet segment, it often indicates a mismatch in the DR/BDR election process. If it is stuck in ExStart or Exchange, it can point to an MTU mismatch between the two routers, preventing them from successfully exchanging their database description packets.

The 2-Way state is a significant milestone. At this point, bidirectional communication has been established, and on multi-access networks, the DR and BDR election has occurred. The routers have seen each other's Hello packets. On point-to-point links, the routers will proceed directly toward a full adjacency. However, on broadcast networks, only the routers elected as DR and BDR will form a full adjacency with all other routers on the segment. All other routers (DROthers) will remain in the 2-Way state with each other, reducing the amount of redundant OSPF traffic.

Once past the initial states, routers begin to synchronize their Link-State Databases (LSDBs). This happens in the ExStart, Exchange, and Loading states. The routers exchange Database Descriptor (DBD) packets, which are summaries of their LSDBs. Each router compares the received DBDs with its own database to see if its neighbor has more up-to-date information. If it discovers it is missing information or has older LSAs, it sends a Link-State Request (LSR) to ask for the full details. The neighbor responds with a Link-State Update (LSU) containing the requested LSAs. When both routers have fully synchronized databases, they enter the Full state, and routing can commence.

OSPF Link-State Advertisements (LSAs)

The foundation of OSPF's operation is the exchange and maintenance of Link-State Advertisements (LSAs). LSAs are small data packets that contain routing and topology information. Each router generates LSAs to describe its own status, including its connected interfaces, the neighbors it has formed adjacencies with, and the IP addresses configured. These LSAs are then flooded throughout an OSPF area, allowing every router in that area to build an identical Link-State Database (LSDB). The 642-902 Exam required a detailed understanding of the different LSA types and their specific functions.

The most common LSAs are Type 1 and Type 2. A Type 1 LSA, or Router LSA, is generated by every router and describes its directly connected links within an area. It is flooded only within that area. A Type 2 LSA, or Network LSA, is generated only by the Designated Router (DR) on a multi-access segment. It describes all the routers that are connected to that segment. Together, Type 1 and Type 2 LSAs provide all the information needed to build a complete topology map of a single OSPF area.

When working with multi-area OSPF networks, other LSA types become critical. A Type 3 LSA, or Summary LSA, is generated by Area Border Routers (ABRs). ABRs use Type 3 LSAs to advertise routes from one area into another. This is how routers in Area 1 learn about networks that exist in Area 0, for instance. A Type 5 LSA, or AS External LSA, is used to advertise routes that are external to the OSPF autonomous system, such as routes learned from another protocol like EIGRP or BGP. These are generated by an Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) and are flooded throughout the entire OSPF domain.

Other important LSA types include the Type 4 LSA, which an ABR uses to advertise the location of an ASBR, and the Type 7 LSA, which is used in Not-So-Stubby Areas (NSSAs) as a temporary placeholder for external routes before they are converted into Type 5 LSAs. A deep dive into the OSPF LSDB using the show ip ospf database command allows an engineer to see all these different LSA types. For the 642-902 Exam, being able to analyze this output to diagnose routing problems was an essential skill. For example, a missing Type 3 LSA could indicate a problem with an ABR configuration.

OSPF Area Types and Network Design

To ensure stability and scalability in large networks, OSPF employs a hierarchical design built around the concept of areas. An area is a logical grouping of routers and links. This design helps to limit the scope of LSA flooding and reduce the size of the LSDB on each router. All OSPF networks must have a backbone area, designated as Area 0. All other areas must connect directly to Area 0. This creates a hub-and-spoke topology where inter-area traffic must pass through the backbone. The 642-902 Exam placed a strong emphasis on understanding and implementing multi-area OSPF designs.

Beyond the standard backbone and non-backbone areas, OSPF defines several special area types designed to further control LSA propagation, particularly for external routes (Type 5 LSAs). The simplest of these is the Stub Area. A stub area does not allow Type 5 LSAs to be flooded into it. Instead, the Area Border Router (ABR) for that area injects a single default route (0.0.0.0/0) to allow devices within the stub area to reach external destinations. This is ideal for remote sites with limited router resources and few exit points.

A variation of the stub area is the Totally Stubby Area, which is a Cisco-proprietary concept. This area type is even more restrictive. It blocks not only Type 5 external LSAs but also Type 3 summary LSAs for inter-area routes. The ABR again injects a default route, which becomes the only path for any traffic destined outside of the local area. This drastically simplifies the routing table on the internal routers of the totally stubby area, making it extremely efficient.

Another important area type is the Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA). An NSSA is useful when a stub area needs to import external routes from a local source, such as a small branch office that has its own connection to another network running a different protocol. The NSSA allows these external routes to be injected as Type 7 LSAs. These Type 7 LSAs are then converted into standard Type 5 LSAs by the ABR as they are advertised into the OSPF backbone. The 642-902 Exam expected candidates to know the rules for each area type, how to configure them, and when to use each one in a network design.

OSPF Path Selection and Cost Calculation

Once an OSPF router has a fully synchronized LSDB, it runs the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm to calculate the best route to every destination. The "best" route in OSPF is defined as the path with the lowest total cost. The cost of an individual link is a metric that is, by default, calculated based on its bandwidth. The formula is Cost = Reference Bandwidth / Interface Bandwidth. The default reference bandwidth is 100 Mbps. This means a 100 Mbps FastEthernet link would have a cost of 1, while a 10 Mbps Ethernet link would have a cost of 10.

A critical consideration for the 642-902 Exam was understanding the implications of this formula in modern high-speed networks. With the default reference bandwidth of 100 Mbps, any link faster than FastEthernet, such as GigabitEthernet (1000 Mbps) or 10-GigabitEthernet (10000 Mbps), would also calculate a cost of 1. OSPF cost is an integer value, and the result of the division is rounded down. This would make OSPF unable to differentiate between these faster links, potentially leading to suboptimal routing. The best practice is to change the reference bandwidth network-wide using the auto-cost reference-bandwidth command to a value higher than the fastest link in the network.

The total cost of a path is the sum of the costs of all the outgoing interfaces along that path from the source router to the destination network. The SPF algorithm builds a tree with the local router as the root, and calculates this cumulative cost for every possible destination. The resulting lowest-cost paths are then installed into the IP routing table. If two paths to the same destination have an identical cumulative cost, OSPF will, by default, install both routes into the routing table and perform equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) load balancing.

Administrators have several ways to influence OSPF path selection. The most direct method is to manually set the cost of an interface using the ip ospf cost command. This overrides the automatic calculation based on bandwidth. This technique can be used to force traffic over a preferred path, even if it has lower bandwidth, or to make a backup link less desirable. Manipulating path cost is a powerful tool, but it must be done with a clear understanding of the network topology to avoid unintended consequences like routing loops or black holes. This practical skill was a key component of the 642-902 Exam.

OSPF Authentication and Virtual Links

Securing routing protocols is a critical aspect of network security. OSPF provides mechanisms to authenticate routing updates, ensuring that a router only accepts information from trusted sources. Without authentication, a malicious actor could potentially connect a rogue device to the network, form an OSPF adjacency, and inject false routing information, leading to a denial-of-service attack or traffic redirection. The 642-902 Exam covered the configuration and verification of OSPF authentication.

OSPF supports two main types of authentication: plain text and Message Digest 5 (MD5). Plain text authentication is simple to configure but is highly insecure, as the password is sent unencrypted within the OSPF packet and can be easily captured. MD5 authentication is the recommended method. It uses a pre-shared key and a sequence number to generate a cryptographic hash that is appended to the OSPF packet. The receiving router performs the same calculation, and if the hashes match, the packet is accepted as authentic. This provides protection against unauthorized updates.

Authentication can be enabled on a per-interface basis or for an entire OSPF area. When enabled, the authentication type and the key (password or MD5 key) must match exactly on all routers on a given network segment for them to form an adjacency. A mismatch in authentication settings is a common reason for OSPF neighbor failures and a frequent subject of troubleshooting scenarios on exams like the 642-902 Exam. Careful configuration and verification are essential.

In rare network designs where it is impossible for a non-backbone area to connect directly to Area 0, OSPF provides a feature called a Virtual Link. A virtual link is a logical tunnel that connects a disconnected area to the backbone through a transit area. This is essentially a workaround to satisfy the fundamental OSPF rule that all areas must attach to Area 0. While virtual links can solve certain design problems, they add complexity and are generally considered a temporary fix rather than a permanent design solution. Knowledge of when and how to configure a virtual link was another specialized topic within the 642-902 Exam blueprint.

Introduction to the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)

The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the routing protocol that forms the backbone of the global internet. Unlike Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) like OSPF or EIGRP, which are designed for routing within a single administrative domain (an autonomous system), BGP is an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) designed for routing between autonomous systems. The 642-902 Exam included a significant section on BGP because enterprises often use it to manage their connections to one or more Internet Service Providers (ISPs). Understanding BGP is essential for controlling how traffic enters and exits an organization's network.

BGP's primary role is not to find the fastest path, as is the case with IGPs. Instead, BGP is a path-vector protocol that makes routing decisions based on a wide array of path attributes. These attributes provide a rich set of tools for implementing complex routing policies. For example, an organization can use BGP to prefer a connection from one ISP over another, to provide a backup internet connection, or to influence how other networks on the internet reach its public servers. This focus on policy control is what distinguishes BGP from other protocols and makes it uniquely suited for its role.

There are two main flavors of BGP: External BGP (eBGP) and Internal BGP (iBGP). eBGP is used when forming a peering relationship between routers in different autonomous systems, such as between an enterprise and its ISP. iBGP is used for sessions between BGP routers within the same autonomous system. The purpose of iBGP is to ensure that all BGP routers within an AS have a consistent view of the external routes learned via eBGP. The rules for how routes are advertised are different between eBGP and iBGP, a distinction that was critical to understand for the 642-902 Exam.

Configuring a basic BGP peering session involves defining the BGP process with an autonomous system number, and then specifying a neighbor's IP address and their AS number. BGP forms its peering sessions over a TCP connection on port 179. This reliance on TCP means that BGP neighbors do not need to be directly connected; as long as there is underlying IP reachability between them, a BGP session can be established. This allows for great flexibility in network design but also requires a stable underlying IGP to provide that reachability for iBGP peers.

Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use Cisco 642-902 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. Cisco 642-902 Implementing Cisco IP Routing (ROUTE v1.0) certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using Cisco 642-902 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.