Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 10

Question 90

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Controlled Folder Access enabled policy
  2. App Control for Business allow policy
  3. Group Policy Object security baseline
  4. Local Administrators group restrictions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

GPOs apply scoped policy to AD joined desktop devices. This addresses the stated need to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

CFA restricts unauthorized changes to guarded folders. This is relevant when the task is to prevent untrusted processes from modifying protected user folders on a session host; it does not directly meet the requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU.

B:

Application control applies allowlisting decisions to code execution. This is relevant when the task is to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers; it does not directly meet the requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU.

D:

Local group membership controls guest administrative privileges. This is relevant when the task is to prevent ordinary pooled desktop users from escalating to local admin privileges on shared hosts; it does not directly meet the requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU.

Question 91

A support analyst validates Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor following the change to verify changes made during temporary network isolation eventually reach approved remote storage providers. Which measured result is expected?

  1. Local cache remains available during the short outage and writes are queued for synchronization
  2. Sync backlog returns to normal and recovered provider contains the post-outage profile update
  3. Host disk metrics show adequate headroom under peak concurrent cached profiles
  4. Test user remains usable and updates synchronize when provider connectivity returns

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor: sync backlog returns to normal and recovered provider contains the post-outage profile update. Local write buffering requires successful later provider synchronization. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache local profile cache on session host, used to tolerate brief loss of the remote SMB profile provider while an active session keeps working. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor satisfies the current requirement to verify changes made during temporary network isolation eventually reach approved remote storage providers.

C:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache local disk free-space monitoring, used to prevent profiles from failing to attach because local Cache directory grew beyond planned VM disk capacity. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor satisfies the current requirement to verify changes made during temporary network isolation eventually reach approved remote storage providers.

D:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache provider failover drill, used to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor satisfies the current requirement to verify changes made during temporary network isolation eventually reach approved remote storage providers.

Question 92

A peer reviewer inspects FSLogix Profile Container for Office user data after it was introduced to preserve Outlook and Teams-related user application state between pooled desktop VM sessions. Which result should be documented?

  1. Web Office login is permitted with expected CA conditions and no unexpected prompt loop
  2. Separate eligible users open Office successfully with shared computer activation status
  3. Office settings and supported cache contents follow the user via the mounted profile VHDX
  4. Corporate sync succeeds and consumer account enrollment is blocked by policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for FSLogix Profile Container for Office user data: Office settings and supported cache contents follow the user via the mounted profile VHDX. The full profile container carries Microsoft 365 profile data. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Office browser sign-in test behind Conditional Access, used to verify M365 web apps can be accessed inside an AVD session under the enterprise's intended security policy. It does not establish whether FSLogix Profile Container for Office user data satisfies the current requirement to preserve Outlook and Teams-related user application state between pooled desktop VM sessions.

B:

That evidence concerns Shared computer activation for Microsoft 365 Apps, used to allow multiple entitled users to activate Microsoft 365 Apps on the same AVD Windows multi-session VM. It does not establish whether FSLogix Profile Container for Office user data satisfies the current requirement to preserve Outlook and Teams-related user application state between pooled desktop VM sessions.

D:

That evidence concerns OneDrive enterprise sign-in restriction, used to block personal consumer OneDrive accounts on regulated pooled desktops while allowing organizational accounts. It does not establish whether FSLogix Profile Container for Office user data satisfies the current requirement to preserve Outlook and Teams-related user application state between pooled desktop VM sessions.

Question 93

The runbook says Session host maintenance drain and user notification was enabled to clear active sessions responsibly before rebooting a pooled host without surprising users. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Controlled idle test reaches the configured session state after the selected threshold
  2. Disconnect preserves processes while logoff removes the user session
  3. Users receive notification and no new sessions land during the planned drain
  4. Assignment list maps the employee to the intended VM and repeat sign-in returns there

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Session host maintenance drain and user notification: users receive notification and no new sessions land during the planned drain. Maintenance combines communication and controlled session placement. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Idle-session timeout policy, used to enforce a maximum period of user inactivity before a desktop session is disconnected or ended. It does not establish whether Session host maintenance drain and user notification satisfies the current requirement to clear active sessions responsibly before rebooting a pooled host without surprising users.

B:

That evidence concerns Session logoff versus disconnect policy, used to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff. It does not establish whether Session host maintenance drain and user notification satisfies the current requirement to clear active sessions responsibly before rebooting a pooled host without surprising users.

D:

That evidence concerns Personal desktop assignment before sign-in, used to direct an employee to a particular personal VM instead of allocating an arbitrary pooled desktop. It does not establish whether Session host maintenance drain and user notification satisfies the current requirement to clear active sessions responsibly before rebooting a pooled host without surprising users.

Question 94

The team implemented SSD provisioned Azure Files share to provide predictable high IOPS and low latency for large logon bursts with heavy profile traffic. Which test result demonstrates that the requirement is satisfied?

  1. Session hosts mount the supported SMB volume and measured profile I/O meets the agreed target
  2. Share metrics sustain the provisioned throughput and storage latency target under concurrent logon load
  3. The existing session remains operational during a short provider outage and later sync resumes
  4. Distinct session hosts mount the same authorized user's profile container from one SMB share

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for SSD provisioned Azure Files share: share metrics sustain the provisioned throughput and storage latency target under concurrent logon load. Provisioned SSD files capacity can address demanding profile workloads. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure NetApp Files SMB volume, used to use managed high-performance enterprise file storage for FSLogix profile shares with strict service requirements. It does not establish whether SSD provisioned Azure Files share satisfies the current requirement to provide predictable high IOPS and low latency for large logon bursts with heavy profile traffic.

C:

That evidence concerns FSLogix Cloud Cache with two providers, used to tolerate an intermittent remote storage interruption while users work with locally cached profile data. It does not establish whether SSD provisioned Azure Files share satisfies the current requirement to provide predictable high IOPS and low latency for large logon bursts with heavy profile traffic.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure Files SMB share for roaming profiles, used to store thousands of pooled-user FSLogix VHDX profile containers on shared SMB storage. It does not establish whether SSD provisioned Azure Files share satisfies the current requirement to provide predictable high IOPS and low latency for large logon bursts with heavy profile traffic.

Question 95

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to provide an alternative region with preprovisioned session capacity for a regional desktop outage. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Secondary region entitlement/workspace feed preparation
  2. DR runbook with ordered dependency recovery
  3. Disaster recovery failback procedure
  4. Secondary-region AVD hostpool readiness

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Regional failover requires a usable secondary desktop platform. This addresses the stated need to provide an alternative region with preprovisioned session capacity for a regional desktop outage without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Recovery requires published app groups and user access. This is relevant when the task is to give workers a discoverable alternative desktop resource when switching to a backup region; it does not directly meet the requirement to provide an alternative region with preprovisioned session capacity for a regional desktop outage.

B:

Documented recovery dependency sequencing reduces failover errors. This is relevant when the task is to bring back identity, profile storage, session hosts and AVD application delivery in a tested order; it does not directly meet the requirement to provide an alternative region with preprovisioned session capacity for a regional desktop outage.

C:

Failback needs data and access reconciliation. This is relevant when the task is to safely return staff to primary-region desktops after services recover without losing recent profile changes; it does not directly meet the requirement to provide an alternative region with preprovisioned session capacity for a regional desktop outage.

Question 96

For a managed Azure Virtual Desktop service, administrators must verify the end-to-end desktop experience once both broker and session-host authentication rules are changed. Which setting or service fits?

  1. Security-group-based application entitlement
  2. Microsoft Entra MFA method registration
  3. Session-host remote desktop user-right assignment
  4. SSO authentication replay test after policy change

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Testing all auth phases catches split-policy failures. This addresses the stated need to verify the end-to-end desktop experience once both broker and session-host authentication rules are changed without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Group entitlements simplify and constrain access to published resources. This is relevant when the task is to assign a department access through a directory group rather than individual app-group role grants; it does not directly meet the requirement to verify the end-to-end desktop experience once both broker and session-host authentication rules are changed.

B:

MFA enforcement requires an eligible method for the user. This is relevant when the task is to make sure a user has a registered approved factor before enforcing a new MFA policy on AVD; it does not directly meet the requirement to verify the end-to-end desktop experience once both broker and session-host authentication rules are changed.

C:

Guest logon rights are separate from AVD app-group assignment. This is relevant when the task is to permit a nonadmin identity to sign into the Windows session-host OS after gaining app-group entitlement; it does not directly meet the requirement to verify the end-to-end desktop experience once both broker and session-host authentication rules are changed.

Question 97

A support analyst validates Client-version compatibility verification following the change to resolve a new client feature not working on an older installed release. Which measured result is expected?

  1. Workspace refresh retrieves the expected newly authorized RemoteApp item
  2. Windows App connects and lists the employee's assigned desktop and RemoteApp feed
  3. Support bundle contains error details, timestamp and session correlation ID
  4. Test connection succeeds after upgrading to the documented supported client version

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Client-version compatibility verification: test connection succeeds after upgrading to the documented supported client version. Advanced connection features depend on supported client versions. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns User entitlement feed refresh in client, used to display newly assigned AVD application groups without re-creating the user's Windows profile. It does not establish whether Client-version compatibility verification satisfies the current requirement to resolve a new client feature not working on an older installed release.

B:

That evidence concerns Windows App for managed Windows endpoints, used to give corporate Windows staff the current supported desktop client for subscribed AVD resources. It does not establish whether Client-version compatibility verification satisfies the current requirement to resolve a new client feature not working on an older installed release.

C:

That evidence concerns Client connection diagnostics export, used to collect evidence for a specific failed AVD client connection before modifying the hostpool. It does not establish whether Client-version compatibility verification satisfies the current requirement to resolve a new client feature not working on an older installed release.

Question 98

An Azure Virtual Desktop deployment is being redesigned to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff. Which approach should be prioritized?

  1. Idle-session timeout policy
  2. Personal desktop assignment before sign-in
  3. Session host maintenance drain and user notification
  4. Session logoff versus disconnect policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Disconnect and logoff have different Windows session semantics. This addresses the stated need to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Idle limits constrain unattended session activity. This is relevant when the task is to enforce a maximum period of user inactivity before a desktop session is disconnected or ended; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff.

B:

Personal assignment binds user and VM. This is relevant when the task is to direct an employee to a particular personal VM instead of allocating an arbitrary pooled desktop; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff.

C:

Maintenance combines communication and controlled session placement. This is relevant when the task is to clear active sessions responsibly before rebooting a pooled host without surprising users; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff.

Question 99

A post-deployment audit tests CloudKerberosTicketRetrievalEnabled on hosts for the requirement to permit supported Microsoft Entra joined Windows devices to retrieve a cloud Kerberos ticket at logon. Which evidence is decisive?

  1. SMB access succeeds from allowed hosts and is denied from disallowed source networks
  2. ACL checks allow user-owned profile folders and deny unrelated users
  3. Cloud ticket retrieval works and mounted profile shares authenticate without manual storage keys
  4. Credentials associated with the roaming profile remain accessible when the user changes hosts

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for CloudKerberosTicketRetrievalEnabled on hosts: cloud ticket retrieval works and mounted profile shares authenticate without manual storage keys. The Windows Kerberos cloud-ticket setting enables supported AVD profile access. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure Files storage-account firewall rules, used to restrict SMB share endpoints to approved networks even when users have identity permissions. It does not establish whether CloudKerberosTicketRetrievalEnabled on hosts satisfies the current requirement to permit supported Microsoft Entra joined Windows devices to retrieve a cloud Kerberos ticket at logon.

B:

That evidence concerns NTFS folder ACLs on FSLogix containers, used to prevent one AVD user from opening another user's roaming profile files inside the share. It does not establish whether CloudKerberosTicketRetrievalEnabled on hosts satisfies the current requirement to permit supported Microsoft Entra joined Windows devices to retrieve a cloud Kerberos ticket at logon.

D:

That evidence concerns LoadCredKeyFromProfile registry policy, used to keep a roaming user's credential manager keys linked to the profile currently being loaded. It does not establish whether CloudKerberosTicketRetrievalEnabled on hosts satisfies the current requirement to permit supported Microsoft Entra joined Windows devices to retrieve a cloud Kerberos ticket at logon.

Question 100

An Azure Virtual Desktop deployment is being redesigned to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain. Which approach should be prioritized?

  1. Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication
  2. Azure Files Kerberos encryption modernization
  3. Microsoft Entra Kerberos for Azure Files
  4. FSLogix VHDLocations UNC path configuration

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Azure Files supports SMB authentication with Entra Domain Services. This addresses the stated need to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Modern AES service-ticket support is required under updated Windows defaults. This is relevant when the task is to avoid profile authentication failures after the Windows Kerberos RC4-to-AES hardening change; it does not directly meet the requirement to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain.

C:

Entra Kerberos provides identity-based SMB authentication for supported host/user combinations. This is relevant when the task is to authenticate supported Microsoft Entra joined AVD hosts to a profile SMB share without routine domain-controller line-of-sight; it does not directly meet the requirement to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain.

D:

VHDLocations determines where profile containers are found or created. This is relevant when the task is to direct a user's container to the approved SMB share rather than a local system drive; it does not directly meet the requirement to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.