Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 12

Question 110

The test plan requires administrators to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions. Which configuration should they implement?

  1. Scaling plan identity permissions
  2. Autoscale session-aware deallocation test
  3. Pooled hostpool autoscale scaling plan
  4. Ramp-up minimum active hosts setting

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Autoscale requires permission to operate assigned VMs. This addresses the stated need to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Session-aware controls protect users during deallocation. This is relevant when the task is to ensure scaling doesn't shut down a host with active users contrary to the approved schedule settings; it does not directly meet the requirement to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions.

C:

Scaling plans automate pooled host capacity scheduling. This is relevant when the task is to control VM availability throughout ramp-up, peak and off-peak phases according to a defined weekly schedule; it does not directly meet the requirement to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions.

D:

Ramp-up phase brings compute online before peak demand. This is relevant when the task is to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge; it does not directly meet the requirement to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions.

Question 111

A post-deployment audit tests GPU-supported session-host Windows image for the requirement to satisfy a design requiring validated remote graphics acceleration for a visualization application. Which evidence is decisive?

  1. User licensing inventory shows a qualifying Microsoft 365 or Windows entitlement
  2. A compatible guest driver and VM GPU capability are present under the approved host image
  3. Different licensed users log in simultaneously using supported multi-session capabilities
  4. The license inventory covers required RDS access for server session hosts

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for GPU-supported session-host Windows image: a compatible guest driver and VM GPU capability are present under the approved host image. GPU workloads require compatible VM size, driver and OS configuration. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Eligible Microsoft 365 user license for Windows client AVD, used to authorize an entitled employee to access an AVD Windows client session with an eligible subscription. It does not establish whether GPU-supported session-host Windows image satisfies the current requirement to satisfy a design requiring validated remote graphics acceleration for a visualization application.

C:

That evidence concerns Windows 11 Enterprise multi-session host, used to consolidate several interactive users on one supported Windows client VM in an AVD pooled deployment. It does not establish whether GPU-supported session-host Windows image satisfies the current requirement to satisfy a design requiring validated remote graphics acceleration for a visualization application.

D:

That evidence concerns Windows Server session host with RDS CAL planning, used to serve supported remote sessions using Windows Server while satisfying applicable RDS CAL licensing requirements. It does not establish whether GPU-supported session-host Windows image satisfies the current requirement to satisfy a design requiring validated remote graphics acceleration for a visualization application.

Question 112

A peer reviewer inspects GPU VM size for graphics-intensive RemoteApp after it was introduced to provide accelerated rendering to design applications that require graphics APIs unavailable on a general-purpose host. Which result should be documented?

  1. Committed memory and available RAM remain within measured headroom at the agreed concurrent user count
  2. Peak CPU utilization and response-time tests remain within accepted limits at target user concurrency
  3. Guest disk latency and queue length meet baseline during logon and launch tests
  4. Graphics tests detect usable GPU acceleration with acceptable frame delivery

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for GPU VM size for graphics-intensive RemoteApp: graphics tests detect usable GPU acceleration with acceptable frame delivery. GPU-backed VM SKUs support specialized graphical workloads. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Memory sizing for concurrent sessions, used to prevent a shared host from paging during simultaneous office application use. It does not establish whether GPU VM size for graphics-intensive RemoteApp satisfies the current requirement to provide accelerated rendering to design applications that require graphics APIs unavailable on a general-purpose host.

B:

That evidence concerns CPU-to-session density load test, used to choose a host VM CPU class after measuring the processor demand of the real workload. It does not establish whether GPU VM size for graphics-intensive RemoteApp satisfies the current requirement to provide accelerated rendering to design applications that require graphics APIs unavailable on a general-purpose host.

C:

That evidence concerns Premium OS disk selection for logon-intensive hosts, used to reduce local operating-system and application I/O bottlenecks unrelated to FSLogix remote SMB profiles. It does not establish whether GPU VM size for graphics-intensive RemoteApp satisfies the current requirement to provide accelerated rendering to design applications that require graphics APIs unavailable on a general-purpose host.

Question 113

A regulated AVD environment must connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy. Which configuration achieves that goal most directly?

  1. AD DS domain join for session hosts
  2. Microsoft Entra join for session hosts
  3. Host registration token lifecycle
  4. Microsoft Entra hybrid join workflow

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Hybrid join combines AD DS membership with Entra device registration. This addresses the stated need to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

AD DS join binds a Windows host to the directory domain. This is relevant when the task is to join a new Windows VM to an existing corporate AD domain for hybrid authenticated desktop access; it does not directly meet the requirement to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy.

B:

Microsoft Entra join enables a cloud identity host model. This is relevant when the task is to deploy approved modern cloud identity session hosts without a traditional domain join; it does not directly meet the requirement to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy.

C:

Registration tokens authorize AVD agent association with a pool. This is relevant when the task is to register newly provisioned session hosts to the intended AVD host pool using a time-scoped registration token; it does not directly meet the requirement to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy.

Question 114

A remote desktop change record says FSLogix DeleteLocalProfileWhenVHDShouldApply now enables the team to prevent an old local profile from shadowing the intended roaming container for a returning user. Which result verifies this?

  1. The attachment log shows the expected share UNC and creates or mounts the user's VHDX
  2. A user receives the same personal settings after switching between healthy session hosts
  3. Share-level and NTFS tests allow the user's folder while denying others
  4. Sign-in selects the correct remote container rather than loading a pre-existing local profile

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for FSLogix DeleteLocalProfileWhenVHDShouldApply: sign-in selects the correct remote container rather than loading a pre-existing local profile. This setting can remove the conflicting local profile when a container should apply. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns FSLogix VHDLocations registry value, used to point profile attachment to the intended SMB UNC file share rather than a local user folder. It does not establish whether FSLogix DeleteLocalProfileWhenVHDShouldApply satisfies the current requirement to prevent an old local profile from shadowing the intended roaming container for a returning user.

B:

That evidence concerns FSLogix Profile Container VHDX format, used to retain a portable Windows user profile on a share to follow a user among pooled VMs. It does not establish whether FSLogix DeleteLocalProfileWhenVHDShouldApply satisfies the current requirement to prevent an old local profile from shadowing the intended roaming container for a returning user.

C:

That evidence concerns FSLogix container storage share permission validation, used to ensure the signed-in user can create and reopen only their own profile container on Azure Files. It does not establish whether FSLogix DeleteLocalProfileWhenVHDShouldApply satisfies the current requirement to prevent an old local profile from shadowing the intended roaming container for a returning user.

Question 115

The runbook says Windows security event log for guest logon was enabled to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Report-only evaluation results identify predicted grant failures without actual denial
  2. Guest authentication events show denied logon rights or credential validation results
  3. Effective permissions include inherited role assignments from ancestor scopes
  4. Effective group membership includes the authorized app-group access group

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Windows security event log for guest logon: guest authentication events show denied logon rights or credential validation results. Guest logs distinguish local/session OS failures from cloud token failures. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Conditional Access report-only result review, used to inspect which users a proposed desktop access rule would reject before activating enforcement. It does not establish whether Windows security event log for guest logon satisfies the current requirement to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user.

C:

That evidence concerns Effective role assignment at hostpool scope, used to diagnose access granted by a parent resource group that isn't obvious from a direct resource assignment list. It does not establish whether Windows security event log for guest logon satisfies the current requirement to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user.

D:

That evidence concerns Microsoft Entra group membership check, used to verify that a user has the security group used to entitle a RemoteApp application group. It does not establish whether Windows security event log for guest logon satisfies the current requirement to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user.

Question 116

A support analyst validates Depth-first autoscale load balancing coordination following the change to pack active user sessions onto fewer pooled hosts when scaling down under a cost optimization objective. Which measured result is expected?

  1. At ramp-up the expected minimum number or percentage of VMs is running and accepting connections
  2. Test with active sessions avoids prohibited shutdown and logs the reason
  3. Eligible disconnected sessions meet policy before corresponding VMs are deallocated
  4. Session density rises on active hosts without exceeding maximum limit before idle hosts are stopped

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Depth-first autoscale load balancing coordination: session density rises on active hosts without exceeding maximum limit before idle hosts are stopped. Depth-first aids consolidation under autoscale. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Ramp-up minimum active hosts setting, used to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge. It does not establish whether Depth-first autoscale load balancing coordination satisfies the current requirement to pack active user sessions onto fewer pooled hosts when scaling down under a cost optimization objective.

B:

That evidence concerns Autoscale session-aware deallocation test, used to ensure scaling doesn't shut down a host with active users contrary to the approved schedule settings. It does not establish whether Depth-first autoscale load balancing coordination satisfies the current requirement to pack active user sessions onto fewer pooled hosts when scaling down under a cost optimization objective.

C:

That evidence concerns Ramp-down phase disconnect settings, used to reduce active capacity after users have been disconnected for the configured safe interval. It does not establish whether Depth-first autoscale load balancing coordination satisfies the current requirement to pack active user sessions onto fewer pooled hosts when scaling down under a cost optimization objective.

Question 117

Following approval of Windows App on macOS to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Client resource feed contains only the intended workspace's assigned resources
  2. Managed device inventory shows the approved client version installed by deployment policy
  3. Support bundle contains error details, timestamp and session correlation ID
  4. Mac client successfully subscribes to and opens the approved AVD workspace

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Windows App on macOS: Mac client successfully subscribes to and opens the approved AVD workspace. Windows App is available on supported macOS clients. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Workspace URL subscription in client, used to connect a supported endpoint to the correct published workspace feed rather than a different tenant. It does not establish whether Windows App on macOS satisfies the current requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices.

B:

That evidence concerns Corporate client deployment via endpoint management, used to distribute the supported AVD client to a large managed-device fleet without individual user installs. It does not establish whether Windows App on macOS satisfies the current requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices.

C:

That evidence concerns Client connection diagnostics export, used to collect evidence for a specific failed AVD client connection before modifying the hostpool. It does not establish whether Windows App on macOS satisfies the current requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices.

Question 118

An enterprise remote desktop change ticket requires the team to ensure a package can be assigned to session hosts in the supported Azure region required by that package and pool. What should the change include?

  1. App Attach package version upgrade
  2. App Attach storage-access test as SYSTEM
  3. App Attach Azure Files UNC storage path
  4. App Attach same-region package planning

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

App Attach delivery observes supported regional requirements. This addresses the stated need to ensure a package can be assigned to session hosts in the supported Azure region required by that package and pool without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Package version replacement is independent from host image lifecycle. This is relevant when the task is to release a new version of one app without rebuilding golden images across the pool; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure a package can be assigned to session hosts in the supported Azure region required by that package and pool.

B:

App Attach staging may require machine/system access to package files. This is relevant when the task is to diagnose staging failure when a user can browse the file share but the session-host system context cannot mount its package image; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure a package can be assigned to session hosts in the supported Azure region required by that package and pool.

C:

Package-image access requires reachable shared storage. This is relevant when the task is to make a package image reachable to every session host in the allowed pool through shared file storage; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure a package can be assigned to session hosts in the supported Azure region required by that package and pool.

Question 119

The administrator configured Deployment what-if review for the business need to identify proposed destructive hostpool resource changes before deploying an updated infrastructure template. Which observation supports sign-off?

  1. An Azure CLI readback reports the requested algorithm and session limit
  2. The created host pool shows the selected name, type and load-balancing properties
  3. Deployment order resolves the app group dependency without a manual sleep
  4. What-if output lists intended creates, changes and deletes without applying them

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Deployment what-if review: what-if output lists intended creates, changes and deletes without applying them. Deployment what-if previews resource configuration differences. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure CLI desktopvirtualization extension, used to set a pooled host pool's load-balancing properties from a shell automation job. It does not establish whether Deployment what-if review satisfies the current requirement to identify proposed destructive hostpool resource changes before deploying an updated infrastructure template.

B:

That evidence concerns Azure portal host pool wizard, used to deploy a straightforward pooled host pool with initial settings through the graphical Azure management interface. It does not establish whether Deployment what-if review satisfies the current requirement to identify proposed destructive hostpool resource changes before deploying an updated infrastructure template.

C:

That evidence concerns Resource dependency ordering in Bicep, used to ensure an app group is deployed only after the host pool it references exists. It does not establish whether Deployment what-if review satisfies the current requirement to identify proposed destructive hostpool resource changes before deploying an updated infrastructure template.

Question 120

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to remove an interfering traffic-inspection hop from latency-sensitive remote desktop flow. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Separate user multimedia and bulk-transfer classes
  2. Avoidance of TLS/UDP proxy inspection
  3. RDP packet-loss observation
  4. DSCP markings checked at network boundary

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Extra proxy and packet-inspection devices can add delay to desktop traffic. This addresses the stated need to remove an interfering traffic-inspection hop from latency-sensitive remote desktop flow without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Differential traffic classes protect delay-sensitive interactive packets. This is relevant when the task is to give interactive audio and video flows higher priority than noncritical file transfers; it does not directly meet the requirement to remove an interfering traffic-inspection hop from latency-sensitive remote desktop flow.

C:

Packet-loss measurements isolate transport unreliability from compute load. This is relevant when the task is to identify dropped packets rather than VM CPU saturation as the principal media quality problem; it does not directly meet the requirement to remove an interfering traffic-inspection hop from latency-sensitive remote desktop flow.

D:

End-to-end QoS depends on intermediate infrastructure honoring the markings. This is relevant when the task is to find a switch or gateway that strips desktop media priority tags downstream; it does not directly meet the requirement to remove an interfering traffic-inspection hop from latency-sensitive remote desktop flow.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.