Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 8

Question 70

A virtual desktop administrator receives a requirement to permit approved administrators to sign in as administrators on a supported Entra-joined host. What should they select?

  1. Desktop Virtualization User role assignment
  2. Custom least-privilege RBAC role
  3. Contributor role on AVD resource group
  4. Virtual Machine Administrator Login role

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

VM Administrator Login grants privileged guest login rights. This addresses the stated need to permit approved administrators to sign in as administrators on a supported Entra-joined host without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user role enables authorized application group consumption. This is relevant when the task is to grant an entitled user access to a published Azure Virtual Desktop application group; it does not directly meet the requirement to permit approved administrators to sign in as administrators on a supported Entra-joined host.

B:

Custom roles narrow operations beyond broad built-in roles. This is relevant when the task is to grant a specialized automation only the precise hostpool actions it needs; it does not directly meet the requirement to permit approved administrators to sign in as administrators on a supported Entra-joined host.

C:

Contributor manages resources while excluding role assignment authority. This is relevant when the task is to permit AVD operations personnel to create and update resources without managing RBAC assignments; it does not directly meet the requirement to permit approved administrators to sign in as administrators on a supported Entra-joined host.

Question 71

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to ensure a published paid application permits each entitled AVD user to access it under its own vendor licensing terms. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Application version compatibility validation
  2. App-V style application isolation planning
  3. RemoteApp working-directory configuration
  4. Application license entitlement check

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Application licensing is separate from AVD infrastructure entitlement. This addresses the stated need to ensure a published paid application permits each entitled AVD user to access it under its own vendor licensing terms without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

App compatibility needs real multiuser testing. This is relevant when the task is to stop a problematic app update from spreading to all multi-session users without a tested rollback option; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure a published paid application permits each entitled AVD user to access it under its own vendor licensing terms.

B:

App virtualization separates packaged application contents from guest image. This is relevant when the task is to evaluate whether a supported virtualized application package can be delivered without installing its binaries into the base Windows image; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure a published paid application permits each entitled AVD user to access it under its own vendor licensing terms.

C:

Launched programs can depend on their working directory. This is relevant when the task is to fix a published app that loads but cannot locate its relative resource files when started from a different default directory; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure a published paid application permits each entitled AVD user to access it under its own vendor licensing terms.

Question 72

A virtual desktop administrator receives a requirement to confirm guest FSLogix build is supported and compatible with the current Windows image before troubleshooting advanced settings. What should they select?

  1. FSLogix profile folder ACL audit
  2. Profile container corruption recovery choice
  3. FSLogix current-version compatibility review
  4. FSLogix Apps service health check

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Consistent supported agent versions reduce profile troubleshooting noise. This addresses the stated need to confirm guest FSLogix build is supported and compatible with the current Windows image before troubleshooting advanced settings without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Filesystem ACLs protect user profile confidentiality. This is relevant when the task is to discover a share where users can read other employees' VHDX containers due to overly broad NTFS permissions; it does not directly meet the requirement to confirm guest FSLogix build is supported and compatible with the current Windows image before troubleshooting advanced settings.

B:

A broken container requires validated backup or recovery, not silent data deletion. This is relevant when the task is to replace a confirmed damaged VHDX using a valid recovery point rather than delete a user's only profile copy; it does not directly meet the requirement to confirm guest FSLogix build is supported and compatible with the current Windows image before troubleshooting advanced settings.

D:

FSLogix Apps service handles container attach, detach and filesystem redirection. This is relevant when the task is to find an inactive core FSLogix service preventing profile container redirection even though the SMB share is reachable; it does not directly meet the requirement to confirm guest FSLogix build is supported and compatible with the current Windows image before troubleshooting advanced settings.

Question 73

In a controlled lab, the team applied Controlled pooled session draining so it could reduce impact of a rolling maintenance operation by removing one host at a time from new session placement. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Test hosts report the new build and pass application/regression checks before expansion
  2. The host reports a supported agent version and required health checks succeed
  3. Remaining hosts keep enough available session capacity throughout maintenance
  4. AVD session-host inventory lists the VM under the wrong hostpool resource ID

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Controlled pooled session draining: remaining hosts keep enough available session capacity throughout maintenance. Draining enables incremental maintenance without denying normal login. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Guest OS security-patch rollout, used to install an approved cumulative update to a maintenance ring before the whole desktop fleet. It does not establish whether Controlled pooled session draining satisfies the current requirement to reduce impact of a rolling maintenance operation by removing one host at a time from new session placement.

B:

That evidence concerns Session host agent update policy, used to bring a stale AVD agent into a supported healthy state following a service upgrade. It does not establish whether Controlled pooled session draining satisfies the current requirement to reduce impact of a rolling maintenance operation by removing one host at a time from new session placement.

D:

That evidence concerns Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis, used to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one. It does not establish whether Controlled pooled session draining satisfies the current requirement to reduce impact of a rolling maintenance operation by removing one host at a time from new session placement.

Question 74

In a controlled lab, the team applied Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts so it could reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Access request approval yields a temporary rule that expires according to JIT settings
  2. Tested user subnet flows are denied and approved admin subnet flows are permitted
  3. Session-host NICs have no unneeded public IP and remote sessions continue through supported AVD transport
  4. Host can resolve the target and the firewall permits intended DNS or service flows

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts: session-host NICs have no unneeded public IP and remote sessions continue through supported AVD transport. AVD connection architecture does not require public inbound RDP. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Just-in-time VM access via Defender for Cloud, used to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows. It does not establish whether Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts satisfies the current requirement to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect.

B:

That evidence concerns Least-privilege admin subnet isolation, used to prevent regular end-user sessions from initiating management connections to desktop control servers. It does not establish whether Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts satisfies the current requirement to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect.

D:

That evidence concerns Firewall DNS rule review, used to prevent a new firewall rule from allowing a service IP while blocking required name resolution to that service. It does not establish whether Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts satisfies the current requirement to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect.

Question 75

An AVD service owner asks for validation that AVD session correlation ID tracing enables staff to link a client error report to the corresponding hostpool diagnostic entries instead of guessing which user session failed. Which test should pass?

  1. Matching correlation IDs connect client and service-side events for the attempt
  2. Host health events show the affected session host and reported health state
  3. Resource diagnostic settings send data to the intended Log Analytics workspace
  4. Checkpoint log entries identify the relevant app group stage and time

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for AVD session correlation ID tracing: matching correlation IDs connect client and service-side events for the attempt. Correlation IDs enable cross-component troubleshooting. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Hostpool AgentHealthStatus diagnostics, used to monitor AVD agent health changes on registered session hosts. It does not establish whether AVD session correlation ID tracing satisfies the current requirement to link a client error report to the corresponding hostpool diagnostic entries instead of guessing which user session failed.

C:

That evidence concerns Log Analytics workspace selection, used to centralize AVD diagnostic events from approved workspaces, hostpools and app groups for one query workflow. It does not establish whether AVD session correlation ID tracing satisfies the current requirement to link a client error report to the corresponding hostpool diagnostic entries instead of guessing which user session failed.

D:

That evidence concerns Application group Checkpoint diagnostics, used to review AVD application-group milestone events before a user-reported launch issue. It does not establish whether AVD session correlation ID tracing satisfies the current requirement to link a client error report to the corresponding hostpool diagnostic entries instead of guessing which user session failed.

Question 76

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to automate repeatable creation and updates to host pools in a scripted administrative workflow. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Az.DesktopVirtualization PowerShell module
  2. Bicep module deployment
  3. ARM deployment outputs
  4. Azure Resource Manager template deployment

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

DesktopVirtualization cmdlets manage AVD ARM resources. This addresses the stated need to automate repeatable creation and updates to host pools in a scripted administrative workflow without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Bicep compiles declarative infrastructure definitions for ARM. This is relevant when the task is to manage reusable AVD host pool resource definitions with typed declarative modules; it does not directly meet the requirement to automate repeatable creation and updates to host pools in a scripted administrative workflow.

C:

ARM outputs expose selected values from deployed resources. This is relevant when the task is to pass a newly created host pool resource ID to a downstream automation stage; it does not directly meet the requirement to automate repeatable creation and updates to host pools in a scripted administrative workflow.

D:

ARM templates declaratively describe Azure resource deployments. This is relevant when the task is to define repeatable AVD resource dependencies declaratively for audited environments; it does not directly meet the requirement to automate repeatable creation and updates to host pools in a scripted administrative workflow.

Question 77

Following approval of Azure Firewall outbound allow rule to let AVD session hosts reach required service endpoints through a controlled egress firewall policy, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Flow diagnostics expose the denied source/destination/port aligned with failed SMB connections
  2. Host can resolve the target and the firewall permits intended DNS or service flows
  3. Firewall logs show allowed service FQDN traffic and denied unapproved destinations
  4. Effective routes point to the inspection next hop for targeted prefixes

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure Firewall outbound allow rule: firewall logs show allowed service FQDN traffic and denied unapproved destinations. Azure Firewall enforces centrally managed network filtering. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Network security diagnostic log capture, used to investigate dropped connectivity to profile SMB storage after an NSG ruleset update. It does not establish whether Azure Firewall outbound allow rule satisfies the current requirement to let AVD session hosts reach required service endpoints through a controlled egress firewall policy.

B:

That evidence concerns Firewall DNS rule review, used to prevent a new firewall rule from allowing a service IP while blocking required name resolution to that service. It does not establish whether Azure Firewall outbound allow rule satisfies the current requirement to let AVD session hosts reach required service endpoints through a controlled egress firewall policy.

D:

That evidence concerns User-defined route to inspection firewall, used to steer sensitive session-host subnet egress through a mandated central firewall rather than direct internet routing. It does not establish whether Azure Firewall outbound allow rule satisfies the current requirement to let AVD session hosts reach required service endpoints through a controlled egress firewall policy.

Question 78

A peer reviewer inspects Azure NetApp Files Active Directory connection after it was introduced to bind SMB file services to the intended directory domain for domain user authentication. Which result should be documented?

  1. Capacity pool and volume allocation reflect the planned service level and size
  2. Selected storage redundancy meets the target recovery requirement and is visible in resource configuration
  3. Domain-joined hosts access the created SMB volume using its published path
  4. Connection settings identify the approved directory and Kerberos-based access works

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure NetApp Files Active Directory connection: connection settings identify the approved directory and Kerberos-based access works. SMB volume identity needs compatible Active Directory integration. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure NetApp Files capacity pool provisioning, used to provide managed performance capacity before adding a new enterprise profile SMB volume. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files Active Directory connection satisfies the current requirement to bind SMB file services to the intended directory domain for domain user authentication.

B:

That evidence concerns FSLogix container storage redundancy selection, used to match a storage platform's documented zone/region resilience to the profile availability objective. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files Active Directory connection satisfies the current requirement to bind SMB file services to the intended directory domain for domain user authentication.

C:

That evidence concerns Azure NetApp Files SMB volume deployment, used to present a managed SMB path to domain-joined AVD session hosts for shared profiles. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files Active Directory connection satisfies the current requirement to bind SMB file services to the intended directory domain for domain user authentication.

Question 79

In a controlled lab, the team applied Application version compatibility validation so it could stop a problematic app update from spreading to all multi-session users without a tested rollback option. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Pilot host sessions open business workflows on the new app version before fleet rollout
  2. Dedicated RemoteApp launch shows only the app window and has valid session diagnostics
  3. Target hosts report successful installation of the approved app release
  4. Replacement host's app is healthy and its image version matches approved baseline

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Application version compatibility validation: pilot host sessions open business workflows on the new app version before fleet rollout. App compatibility needs real multiuser testing. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns RemoteApp session window test, used to distinguish a RemoteApp launch failure from a full desktop rendering issue for the same user. It does not establish whether Application version compatibility validation satisfies the current requirement to stop a problematic app update from spreading to all multi-session users without a tested rollback option.

C:

That evidence concerns Application installation with device management, used to deploy an updated app package to selected session-host maintenance rings using enterprise endpoint policy. It does not establish whether Application version compatibility validation satisfies the current requirement to stop a problematic app update from spreading to all multi-session users without a tested rollback option.

D:

That evidence concerns Application repair via controlled host rebuild, used to recover a broken shared app installation by replacing the host with a tested image rather than modifying dozens of VMs ad hoc. It does not establish whether Application version compatibility validation satisfies the current requirement to stop a problematic app update from spreading to all multi-session users without a tested rollback option.

Question 80

An Azure Virtual Desktop engineering team needs to steer sensitive session-host subnet egress through a mandated central firewall rather than direct internet routing. Which specific configuration is the most direct fit?

  1. Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts
  2. User-defined route to inspection firewall
  3. Just-in-time VM access via Defender for Cloud
  4. NSG source and port restriction

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

UDR rules influence subnet packet forwarding. This addresses the stated need to steer sensitive session-host subnet egress through a mandated central firewall rather than direct internet routing without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

AVD connection architecture does not require public inbound RDP. This is relevant when the task is to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect; it does not directly meet the requirement to steer sensitive session-host subnet egress through a mandated central firewall rather than direct internet routing.

C:

JIT limits standing management-port exposure. This is relevant when the task is to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows; it does not directly meet the requirement to steer sensitive session-host subnet egress through a mandated central firewall rather than direct internet routing.

D:

NSGs apply stateful network traffic filtering. This is relevant when the task is to permit approved administration traffic only from a defined management subnet while denying broader lateral access; it does not directly meet the requirement to steer sensitive session-host subnet egress through a mandated central firewall rather than direct internet routing.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.