Question 60
A remote desktop change record says Azure NetApp Files volume quota monitoring now enables the team to avoid a profile-volume capacity overrun as more users join the environment. Which result verifies this?
Explanation
Correct Answer
This is the direct functional outcome for Azure NetApp Files volume quota monitoring: monitoring indicates actual consumption below approved quota and projects exhaustion risk. NetApp volume quota constrains the profile data that can be stored. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.
Incorrect Answers
That evidence concerns Azure NetApp Files capacity pool provisioning, used to provide managed performance capacity before adding a new enterprise profile SMB volume. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files volume quota monitoring satisfies the current requirement to avoid a profile-volume capacity overrun as more users join the environment.
That evidence concerns Azure NetApp Files SMB volume deployment, used to present a managed SMB path to domain-joined AVD session hosts for shared profiles. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files volume quota monitoring satisfies the current requirement to avoid a profile-volume capacity overrun as more users join the environment.
That evidence concerns Cloud Cache provider failover validation, used to test use of a second Cloud Cache profile backend while the first is intentionally unavailable. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files volume quota monitoring satisfies the current requirement to avoid a profile-volume capacity overrun as more users join the environment.






Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests