Pass Your Microsoft SC-900 Exam Easy!

Microsoft SC-900 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft SC-900 Premium Bundle

SC-900 Premium File: 259 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Sep 27, 2026

SC-900 Training Course: 147 Video Lectures

SC-900 PDF Study Guide: 413 Pages

SC-900 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-900" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft SC-900 Premium Bundle
Microsoft SC-900 Premium Bundle

SC-900 Premium File: 259 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Sep 27, 2026

SC-900 Training Course: 147 Video Lectures

SC-900 PDF Study Guide: 413 Pages

$79.99

SC-900 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-900" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 21

Question 200

Following a control design challenge at a manufacturer with remote factories, the risk manager has to defend a design against oversimplified assumptions. The requirement is: Remote access to a finance app should require MFA for the targeted user group. The review is limited to the control and concept described by this requirement. Which unsupported assumption would MOST directly undermine this requirement?

  1. Assuming a policy in report-only mode is already enforcing its grant requirements.
  2. Assuming access approved once during onboarding never needs re-evaluation.
  3. Assuming group membership bypasses all resource-level access checks.
  4. Assuming a local Windows PIN is sent directly to every remote service as the account password.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Assuming a policy in report-only mode is already enforcing its grant requirements. This belief conflicts with this control principle: Conditional Access grant controls can require additional authentication before protected app access. The appropriate response instead is: Target the app and user group with a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Assuming access approved once during onboarding never needs re-evaluation. That caution concerns access reviews; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a policy in report-only mode is already enforcing its grant requirements.

C:

Assuming group membership bypasses all resource-level access checks. That caution concerns groups for access; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a policy in report-only mode is already enforcing its grant requirements.

D:

Assuming a local Windows PIN is sent directly to every remote service as the account password. That caution concerns windows hello for business; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a policy in report-only mode is already enforcing its grant requirements.

Question 201

During an application integration project at a cloud migration consultancy, the service owner records this concrete requirement: An enterprise app must be accessible only from devices marked compliant under policy. The solution must address this requirement directly, without replacing unrelated controls. Which primary response BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Use an Azure managed identity and assign the minimum required permissions to the target service.
  2. Configure PIM activation settings with approval and appropriate duration for the target role.
  3. Require a compliant device in an appropriately scoped Conditional Access grant control.
  4. Review sign-in risk for the specific authentication event and user risk for the overall identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Require a compliant device in an appropriately scoped Conditional Access grant control. Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured. To verify, check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use an Azure managed identity and assign the minimum required permissions to the target service. That addresses a different task: an Azure workload needs to call a supported Azure service without storing a long-lived secret in code. The present requirement concerns conditional access device compliance.

B:

Configure PIM activation settings with approval and appropriate duration for the target role. That addresses a different task: a high-impact role must require business approval before a user can elevate privilege. The present requirement concerns conditional access device compliance.

D:

Review sign-in risk for the specific authentication event and user risk for the overall identity. That addresses a different task: analysts must distinguish suspicious individual authentication events from a potentially compromised identity. The present requirement concerns conditional access device compliance.

Question 202

During an application integration project at a cloud migration consultancy, the service owner records this concrete requirement: An enterprise app must be accessible only from devices marked compliant under policy. The solution must address this requirement directly, without replacing unrelated controls. The team implements the following response: Require a compliant device in an appropriately scoped Conditional Access grant control. Which evidence BEST verifies that the action met its stated purpose?

  1. Review risk detections and affected identities, then confirm the chosen remediation action.
  2. Find the sign-in event and correlate time, user, application, conditions, and policy result.
  3. Review the access-package request, approval decision, assignment, and expiration event.
  4. Check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins. Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review risk detections and affected identities, then confirm the chosen remediation action. This would test microsoft entra id protection, whereas the required evidence is: Check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins.

B:

Find the sign-in event and correlate time, user, application, conditions, and policy result. This would test sign-in logs, whereas the required evidence is: Check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins.

C:

Review the access-package request, approval decision, assignment, and expiration event. This would test entitlement management, whereas the required evidence is: Check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins.

Question 203

Following a privileged access audit at a nonprofit association, the application administrator has to defend a design against oversimplified assumptions. The requirement is: An enterprise app must be accessible only from devices marked compliant under policy. The review is limited to the control and concept described by this requirement. Which security, identity, or compliance principle MOST directly explains the appropriate approach?

  1. Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured.
  2. Older authentication protocols can bypass or limit modern conditional identity protections.
  3. Authenticator is an authentication method; it is not an authorization role assignment.
  4. Member identities typically represent internal tenant users with organizational lifecycle governance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured. It explains why the selected measure—Require a compliant device in an appropriately scoped Conditional Access grant control—fits the specific requirement. It should be verified by checking: Check policy results and device compliance state for allowed and denied test sign-ins.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Older authentication protocols can bypass or limit modern conditional identity protections. This describes legacy authentication; the governing concept here is: Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured.

C:

Authenticator is an authentication method; it is not an authorization role assignment. This describes microsoft authenticator; the governing concept here is: Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured.

D:

Member identities typically represent internal tenant users with organizational lifecycle governance. This describes member user identity; the governing concept here is: Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured.

Question 204

Following a privileged access audit at a nonprofit association, the application administrator has to defend a design against oversimplified assumptions. The requirement is: An enterprise app must be accessible only from devices marked compliant under policy. The review is limited to the control and concept described by this requirement. Which unsupported assumption would MOST directly undermine this requirement?

  1. Assuming a directory user profile alone explains each failed sign-in and applied policy decision.
  2. Assuming a device merely being enrolled automatically makes it compliant with every policy.
  3. Assuming an application should authenticate by sharing an administrator's human password.
  4. Assuming a shared spreadsheet of permissions provides the same enforceable request and expiration workflow.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Assuming a device merely being enrolled automatically makes it compliant with every policy. This belief conflicts with this control principle: Device compliance can be an access condition when supported and configured. The appropriate response instead is: Require a compliant device in an appropriately scoped Conditional Access grant control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Assuming a directory user profile alone explains each failed sign-in and applied policy decision. That caution concerns sign-in logs; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a device merely being enrolled automatically makes it compliant with every policy.

C:

Assuming an application should authenticate by sharing an administrator's human password. That caution concerns service principal; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a device merely being enrolled automatically makes it compliant with every policy.

D:

Assuming a shared spreadsheet of permissions provides the same enforceable request and expiration workflow. That caution concerns entitlement management; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a device merely being enrolled automatically makes it compliant with every policy.

Question 205

During a baseline configuration review at a regional bank, the enterprise architect records this concrete requirement: Administrators must deny access attempts matching a prohibited location rule. The solution must address this requirement directly, without replacing unrelated controls. Which primary response BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows where appropriate to automate defined identity lifecycle actions.
  2. Use supported risk signals with Conditional Access to require remediation or block appropriate attempts.
  3. Use a service principal representing the application in the tenant and grant only required permissions.
  4. Configure a scoped Conditional Access block-access policy for matching sign-ins.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure a scoped Conditional Access block-access policy for matching sign-ins. A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match. To verify, test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows where appropriate to automate defined identity lifecycle actions. That addresses a different task: joiner, mover, and leaver events need predictable identity-management tasks. The present requirement concerns conditional access block.

B:

Use supported risk signals with Conditional Access to require remediation or block appropriate attempts. That addresses a different task: the organization wants extra protection for sign-ins that the identity risk system marks suspicious. The present requirement concerns conditional access block.

C:

Use a service principal representing the application in the tenant and grant only required permissions. That addresses a different task: an application needs a security identity to request tokens and access a protected API. The present requirement concerns conditional access block.

Question 206

During a baseline configuration review at a regional bank, the enterprise architect records this concrete requirement: Administrators must deny access attempts matching a prohibited location rule. The solution must address this requirement directly, without replacing unrelated controls. The team implements the following response: Configure a scoped Conditional Access block-access policy for matching sign-ins. Which evidence BEST verifies that the action met its stated purpose?

  1. Test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs.
  2. Test password-change outcomes against permitted and blocked patterns without exposing user secrets.
  3. Verify the resource's managed identity is enabled and successfully obtains a token without embedded credentials.
  4. Check user and application objects and successful identity-provider sign-ins in the Entra tenant.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs. A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Test password-change outcomes against permitted and blocked patterns without exposing user secrets. This would test password protection, whereas the required evidence is: Test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs.

C:

Verify the resource's managed identity is enabled and successfully obtains a token without embedded credentials. This would test managed identity, whereas the required evidence is: Test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs.

D:

Check user and application objects and successful identity-provider sign-ins in the Entra tenant. This would test microsoft entra id cloud identity, whereas the required evidence is: Test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs.

Question 207

Following a tabletop exercise at a construction engineering group, the incident responder has to defend a design against oversimplified assumptions. The requirement is: Administrators must deny access attempts matching a prohibited location rule. The review is limited to the control and concept described by this requirement. Which security, identity, or compliance principle MOST directly explains the appropriate approach?

  1. Lifecycle automation reduces manual drift when employment or role status changes.
  2. A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match.
  3. Self-service password reset permits qualified users to reset their own passwords under defined verification controls.
  4. Risk-aware access decisions adapt protections to current identity threat indicators.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match. It explains why the selected measure—Configure a scoped Conditional Access block-access policy for matching sign-ins—fits the specific requirement. It should be verified by checking: Test allowed and disallowed location conditions and inspect actual enforcement logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Lifecycle automation reduces manual drift when employment or role status changes. This describes lifecycle workflows; the governing concept here is: A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match.

C:

Self-service password reset permits qualified users to reset their own passwords under defined verification controls. This describes self-service password reset; the governing concept here is: A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match.

D:

Risk-aware access decisions adapt protections to current identity threat indicators. This describes risk-based access control; the governing concept here is: A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match.

Question 208

Following a tabletop exercise at a construction engineering group, the incident responder has to defend a design against oversimplified assumptions. The requirement is: Administrators must deny access attempts matching a prohibited location rule. The review is limited to the control and concept described by this requirement. Which unsupported assumption would MOST directly undermine this requirement?

  1. Assuming authentication success alone demonstrates proper identity governance.
  2. Assuming Entra ID itself inspects all virtual-network packets like a network security appliance.
  3. Assuming a report-only block policy will prevent production access.
  4. Assuming an SSPR rollout removes the need to register verification methods or scope eligible users.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Assuming a report-only block policy will prevent production access. This belief conflicts with this control principle: A Conditional Access block decision denies an access request when policy conditions match. The appropriate response instead is: Configure a scoped Conditional Access block-access policy for matching sign-ins.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Assuming authentication success alone demonstrates proper identity governance. That caution concerns identity governance oversight; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a report-only block policy will prevent production access.

B:

Assuming Entra ID itself inspects all virtual-network packets like a network security appliance. That caution concerns microsoft entra id cloud identity; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a report-only block policy will prevent production access.

D:

Assuming an SSPR rollout removes the need to register verification methods or scope eligible users. That caution concerns self-service password reset; the specific misconception here is: Assuming a report-only block policy will prevent production access.

Question 209

During a third-party integration at a global consulting firm, the training coordinator records this concrete requirement: A junior admin needs to manage users but should not receive global tenant administration. The solution must address this requirement directly, without replacing unrelated controls. Which primary response BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Assign an appropriate narrower Microsoft Entra administrative role at the justified scope.
  2. Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with policies, approval, and expiration rules.
  3. Identify and block unwanted legacy authentication flows, migrating clients to modern authentication.
  4. Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management eligible assignments and just-in-time activation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Assign an appropriate narrower Microsoft Entra administrative role at the justified scope. Directory roles define delegated administrative capabilities and should follow least privilege. To verify, inspect role assignments and test which administrative tasks the assignee can perform.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with policies, approval, and expiration rules. That addresses a different task: a project team must package multiple group and application entitlements for controlled requests and expiry. The present requirement concerns entra directory roles.

C:

Identify and block unwanted legacy authentication flows, migrating clients to modern authentication. That addresses a different task: a tenant sees old basic-authentication clients that cannot satisfy modern controls reliably. The present requirement concerns entra directory roles.

D:

Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management eligible assignments and just-in-time activation. That addresses a different task: administrators need privileged roles occasionally but should not hold permanent active elevation. The present requirement concerns entra directory roles.

Question 210

During a third-party integration at a global consulting firm, the training coordinator records this concrete requirement: A junior admin needs to manage users but should not receive global tenant administration. The solution must address this requirement directly, without replacing unrelated controls. The team implements the following response: Assign an appropriate narrower Microsoft Entra administrative role at the justified scope. Which evidence BEST verifies that the action met its stated purpose?

  1. Inspect policy scope and user method-registration outcomes for included and excluded groups.
  2. Inspect role assignments and test which administrative tasks the assignee can perform.
  3. Check activation attempts for required approvals and confirm access expires after the configured interval.
  4. Validate registration and Windows sign-in using the configured Hello credential.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect role assignments and test which administrative tasks the assignee can perform. Directory roles define delegated administrative capabilities and should follow least privilege.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect policy scope and user method-registration outcomes for included and excluded groups. This would test authentication methods policy, whereas the required evidence is: Inspect role assignments and test which administrative tasks the assignee can perform.

C:

Check activation attempts for required approvals and confirm access expires after the configured interval. This would test pim approval and activation, whereas the required evidence is: Inspect role assignments and test which administrative tasks the assignee can perform.

D:

Validate registration and Windows sign-in using the configured Hello credential. This would test windows hello for business, whereas the required evidence is: Inspect role assignments and test which administrative tasks the assignee can perform.


Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

SC-900 Premium File

Premium File
SC-900 Premium File
259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

SC-900 Training Video Course

Training Course
SC-900 Training Video Course
147 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

SC-900 Study Guide

Study Guide
SC-900 Study Guide
413 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.