Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 99

Question 980

A remote desktop change record says Transport status review after enabling UDP now enables the team to detect a case where clients still connect over TCP because a UDP rule was omitted. Which result verifies this?

  1. Effective routes show the unexpected next hop for the affected service prefix
  2. Direct DNS lookup fails even though approved IP connectivity to the server succeeds
  3. Session connection information still reports TCP and network traces show blocked UDP attempts
  4. The effective security rule set shows the deny precedence on the destination and port

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Transport status review after enabling UDP: session connection information still reports TCP and network traces show blocked UDP attempts. Transport verification reveals fallback instead of Shortpath operation. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Effective route table inspection, used to find a forced tunneling rule that sends AVD egress to a nonfunctional next hop. It does not establish whether Transport status review after enabling UDP satisfies the current requirement to detect a case where clients still connect over TCP because a UDP rule was omitted.

B:

That evidence concerns Network path test to DNS servers, used to separate name-resolution failure from inaccessible directory servers after a host image update. It does not establish whether Transport status review after enabling UDP satisfies the current requirement to detect a case where clients still connect over TCP because a UDP rule was omitted.

D:

That evidence concerns NSG effective security rules check, used to identify a higher priority deny rule overriding a proposed allow rule for storage access. It does not establish whether Transport status review after enabling UDP satisfies the current requirement to detect a case where clients still connect over TCP because a UDP rule was omitted.

Question 981

A platform engineering group is evaluating the best supported way to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings. Which option addresses that need?

  1. Key Vault-backed secret handling for deployment
  2. Secure host image software supply-chain control
  3. Azure confidential VM protection
  4. Azure Policy audit for insecure host configuration

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Policy assignments evaluate resource configurations. This addresses the stated need to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Secret stores isolate sensitive values from source definitions. This is relevant when the task is to avoid embedding a domain-join credential directly in a shared infrastructure template; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings.

B:

Build-time controls reduce trusted image compromise. This is relevant when the task is to reject unsigned or unapproved desktop image components before they reach a production image version; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings.

C:

Confidential VMs strengthen isolation of guest memory. This is relevant when the task is to choose a supported protected-compute VM architecture for a workload requiring hardware-backed guest-memory confidentiality; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings.

Question 982

An enterprise remote desktop change ticket requires the team to decide whether a connection incident is caused by a stopped VM or an unhealthy agent in a running guest. What should the change include?

  1. Power-on fault versus AVD agent fault distinction
  2. AVD app-group launch health test
  3. User notification before administrative logoff
  4. Azure Virtual Desktop session list inspection

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Compute power and agent registration are different readiness conditions. This addresses the stated need to decide whether a connection incident is caused by a stopped VM or an unhealthy agent in a running guest without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

App group existence alone does not prove functional delivery. This is relevant when the task is to verify assigned users can actually start published applications rather than relying solely on resource existence; it does not directly meet the requirement to decide whether a connection incident is caused by a stopped VM or an unhealthy agent in a running guest.

C:

Notice reduces disruption during session administration. This is relevant when the task is to communicate a maintenance window to connected workers before ending sessions on the affected host; it does not directly meet the requirement to decide whether a connection incident is caused by a stopped VM or an unhealthy agent in a running guest.

D:

AVD session inventory provides operational occupancy state. This is relevant when the task is to identify which user sessions remain active on a host before taking it out for maintenance; it does not directly meet the requirement to decide whether a connection incident is caused by a stopped VM or an unhealthy agent in a running guest.

Question 983

For a managed Azure Virtual Desktop service, administrators must resolve a conflict when a stale session or open handle prevents a user's profile disk from mounting on a second host. Which setting or service fits?

  1. FSLogix sign-in trace before login script
  2. FSLogix profile folder ACL audit
  3. FSLogix redirections.xml exclusions
  4. FSLogix VHDX lock examination

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Container attachment requires an available disk handle. This addresses the stated need to resolve a conflict when a stale session or open handle prevents a user's profile disk from mounting on a second host without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Profile attach events can be timed separately from later shell configuration. This is relevant when the task is to separate a slow network profile mount from a slow application login script after Windows authentication; it does not directly meet the requirement to resolve a conflict when a stale session or open handle prevents a user's profile disk from mounting on a second host.

B:

Filesystem ACLs protect user profile confidentiality. This is relevant when the task is to discover a share where users can read other employees' VHDX containers due to overly broad NTFS permissions; it does not directly meet the requirement to resolve a conflict when a stale session or open handle prevents a user's profile disk from mounting on a second host.

C:

Redirections XML controls selected profile exclusions. This is relevant when the task is to reduce roaming profile bloat from disposable local cache folders while retaining critical user state; it does not directly meet the requirement to resolve a conflict when a stale session or open handle prevents a user's profile disk from mounting on a second host.

Question 984

An Azure Virtual Desktop deployment is being redesigned to return an assigned VM to an unassigned pool after the prior user leaves, while meeting data-retention procedures. Which approach should be prioritized?

  1. Remove personal desktop assignment
  2. Enable Start VM on Connect for a pool
  3. Depth-first configuration via Azure CLI
  4. Pooled session-limit update after load testing

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Unassignment removes the user-to-desktop relationship. This addresses the stated need to return an assigned VM to an unassigned pool after the prior user leaves, while meeting data-retention procedures without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Start VM on Connect allows conditional compute startup. This is relevant when the task is to bring a stopped but otherwise eligible host online when an authorized connection requests capacity; it does not directly meet the requirement to return an assigned VM to an unassigned pool after the prior user leaves, while meeting data-retention procedures.

C:

CLI can configure the pooled load balancing and session limit. This is relevant when the task is to switch a pooled host pool to density-first placement with an explicitly tested maximum session limit; it does not directly meet the requirement to return an assigned VM to an unassigned pool after the prior user leaves, while meeting data-retention procedures.

D:

Load balancer limits affect new placement rather than killing live sessions. This is relevant when the task is to reduce a host's placement ceiling for new sessions without abruptly terminating its current user sessions; it does not directly meet the requirement to return an assigned VM to an unassigned pool after the prior user leaves, while meeting data-retention procedures.

Question 985

After implementing Azure RBAC role scope at resource group, reviewers must ensure the environment can delegate VM operations on the AVD production resource group without granting subscription-wide Owner. Which evidence is most relevant?

  1. Application group metadata references the target host pool rather than a different fleet
  2. Tags appear on resource inventory and corresponding cost reporting dimensions
  3. Effective role assignment grants only required actions at the resource group boundary
  4. Deployed host resources are billed and governed under the intended subscription

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure RBAC role scope at resource group: effective role assignment grants only required actions at the resource group boundary. Azure RBAC supports least-privilege delegation by scope. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Host pool application-group association, used to keep several desktop/application entitlements linked to the intended collection of session hosts. It does not establish whether Azure RBAC role scope at resource group satisfies the current requirement to delegate VM operations on the AVD production resource group without granting subscription-wide Owner.

B:

That evidence concerns Azure resource tags on host pools and VMs, used to allow cost reporting to distinguish departmental AVD session hosts from unrelated compute. It does not establish whether Azure RBAC role scope at resource group satisfies the current requirement to delegate VM operations on the AVD production resource group without granting subscription-wide Owner.

D:

That evidence concerns Separate subscription for regulated desktops, used to isolate finance chargeback and policy boundaries for a regulated virtual desktop environment. It does not establish whether Azure RBAC role scope at resource group satisfies the current requirement to delegate VM operations on the AVD production resource group without granting subscription-wide Owner.

Question 986

The runbook says DR runbook with ordered dependency recovery was enabled to bring back identity, profile storage, session hosts and AVD application delivery in a tested order. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Exercise evidence shows each prerequisite passes before dependent desktop launch
  2. Successful failback test preserves user data and restores normal feed routing
  3. Time from simulated failure to a successful recovery desktop session is below target RTO
  4. DR subnet tests resolve and reach all needed identity and SMB endpoints

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for DR runbook with ordered dependency recovery: exercise evidence shows each prerequisite passes before dependent desktop launch. Documented recovery dependency sequencing reduces failover errors. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Disaster recovery failback procedure, used to safely return staff to primary-region desktops after services recover without losing recent profile changes. It does not establish whether DR runbook with ordered dependency recovery satisfies the current requirement to bring back identity, profile storage, session hosts and AVD application delivery in a tested order.

C:

That evidence concerns Recovery-time-objective rehearsal for desktop access, used to prove the team can restore user session access within its contractual recovery time objective. It does not establish whether DR runbook with ordered dependency recovery satisfies the current requirement to bring back identity, profile storage, session hosts and AVD application delivery in a tested order.

D:

That evidence concerns Secondary region network and DNS preconfiguration, used to prevent failover hosts from starting without access to required directory, storage and name-resolution services. It does not establish whether DR runbook with ordered dependency recovery satisfies the current requirement to bring back identity, profile storage, session hosts and AVD application delivery in a tested order.

Question 987

The test plan requires administrators to replace a confirmed damaged VHDX using a valid recovery point rather than delete a user's only profile copy. Which configuration should they implement?

  1. FSLogix Apps service health check
  2. FSLogix profile log collection
  3. Profile container corruption recovery choice
  4. FSLogix redirections.xml exclusions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A broken container requires validated backup or recovery, not silent data deletion. This addresses the stated need to replace a confirmed damaged VHDX using a valid recovery point rather than delete a user's only profile copy without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

FSLogix Apps service handles container attach, detach and filesystem redirection. This is relevant when the task is to find an inactive core FSLogix service preventing profile container redirection even though the SMB share is reachable; it does not directly meet the requirement to replace a confirmed damaged VHDX using a valid recovery point rather than delete a user's only profile copy.

B:

Profile logs expose the attachment process and failure conditions. This is relevant when the task is to identify why one user sees a temporary profile after moving to a new pooled session host; it does not directly meet the requirement to replace a confirmed damaged VHDX using a valid recovery point rather than delete a user's only profile copy.

D:

Redirections XML controls selected profile exclusions. This is relevant when the task is to reduce roaming profile bloat from disposable local cache folders while retaining critical user state; it does not directly meet the requirement to replace a confirmed damaged VHDX using a valid recovery point rather than delete a user's only profile copy.

Question 988

A new user experience rule requires the support team to prevent regular end-user sessions from initiating management connections to desktop control servers. Which control matches the rule?

  1. Firewall DNS rule review
  2. Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts
  3. Least-privilege admin subnet isolation
  4. NSG source and port restriction

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Segmentation limits lateral movement between user and management networks. This addresses the stated need to prevent regular end-user sessions from initiating management connections to desktop control servers without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Both name resolution and egress policy are needed for successful access. This is relevant when the task is to prevent a new firewall rule from allowing a service IP while blocking required name resolution to that service; it does not directly meet the requirement to prevent regular end-user sessions from initiating management connections to desktop control servers.

B:

AVD connection architecture does not require public inbound RDP. This is relevant when the task is to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect; it does not directly meet the requirement to prevent regular end-user sessions from initiating management connections to desktop control servers.

D:

NSGs apply stateful network traffic filtering. This is relevant when the task is to permit approved administration traffic only from a defined management subnet while denying broader lateral access; it does not directly meet the requirement to prevent regular end-user sessions from initiating management connections to desktop control servers.

Question 989

In a controlled lab, the team applied Session-host CPU utilization alert so it could notify desktop support when a pooled VM stays CPU-saturated during an assigned work shift. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Azure Monitor alert fires after the defined sustained CPU breach is measured
  2. Collected CPU and memory series match the DCR settings for the selected hosts
  3. Insights configuration checks identify hosts not sending required telemetry to the workspace
  4. Aggregated user/profile attach times show measurable change by host image version

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Session-host CPU utilization alert: Azure Monitor alert fires after the defined sustained CPU breach is measured. Metric alerts can detect persistent compute saturation. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Data collection rule for Windows performance counters, used to select the guest counter set and sampling interval sent from pooled Windows session hosts to Azure Monitor. It does not establish whether Session-host CPU utilization alert satisfies the current requirement to notify desktop support when a pooled VM stays CPU-saturated during an assigned work shift.

C:

That evidence concerns AVD Insights data health checks, used to diagnose a blank workbook caused by missing agent data rather than nonexistent user sessions. It does not establish whether Session-host CPU utilization alert satisfies the current requirement to notify desktop support when a pooled VM stays CPU-saturated during an assigned work shift.

D:

That evidence concerns FSLogix attach-time trend dashboard, used to compare roaming profile sign-in duration across different host images after an agent update. It does not establish whether Session-host CPU utilization alert satisfies the current requirement to notify desktop support when a pooled VM stays CPU-saturated during an assigned work shift.

Question 990

A peer reviewer inspects Network path test to DNS servers after it was introduced to separate name-resolution failure from inaccessible directory servers after a host image update. Which result should be documented?

  1. The effective security rule set shows the deny precedence on the destination and port
  2. Direct DNS lookup fails even though approved IP connectivity to the server succeeds
  3. Diagnostics show matching connection errors and correlation details for the attempted session
  4. Logged flows match the denied FQDN or IP and the relevant host source

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Network path test to DNS servers: direct DNS lookup fails even though approved IP connectivity to the server succeeds. DNS tests distinguish resolution failures from transport reachability. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns NSG effective security rules check, used to identify a higher priority deny rule overriding a proposed allow rule for storage access. It does not establish whether Network path test to DNS servers satisfies the current requirement to separate name-resolution failure from inaccessible directory servers after a host image update.

C:

That evidence concerns AVD connection diagnostics for handshake errors, used to find the failed service-side connection stage when a user never reaches a session host. It does not establish whether Network path test to DNS servers satisfies the current requirement to separate name-resolution failure from inaccessible directory servers after a host image update.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure Firewall diagnostic deny logs, used to locate a firewall policy that silently blocks an AVD control-plane destination. It does not establish whether Network path test to DNS servers satisfies the current requirement to separate name-resolution failure from inaccessible directory servers after a host image update.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.