Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 62

Question 610

The administrator configured Azure Bastion administrative access for the business need to let authorized engineers open secure VM management sessions through the Azure portal without exposing public RDP on the VM. Which observation supports sign-off?

  1. Portal-managed Bastion connection succeeds and the VM retains no public inbound RDP exposure
  2. Session-host NICs have no unneeded public IP and remote sessions continue through supported AVD transport
  3. Access request approval yields a temporary rule that expires according to JIT settings
  4. Effective NSG rules admit only the configured source and destination port

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure Bastion administrative access: portal-managed Bastion connection succeeds and the VM retains no public inbound RDP exposure. Bastion provides secure admin connectivity to private VMs. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts, used to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect. It does not establish whether Azure Bastion administrative access satisfies the current requirement to let authorized engineers open secure VM management sessions through the Azure portal without exposing public RDP on the VM.

C:

That evidence concerns Just-in-time VM access via Defender for Cloud, used to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows. It does not establish whether Azure Bastion administrative access satisfies the current requirement to let authorized engineers open secure VM management sessions through the Azure portal without exposing public RDP on the VM.

D:

That evidence concerns NSG source and port restriction, used to permit approved administration traffic only from a defined management subnet while denying broader lateral access. It does not establish whether Azure Bastion administrative access satisfies the current requirement to let authorized engineers open secure VM management sessions through the Azure portal without exposing public RDP on the VM.

Question 611

A remote desktop change record says NTFS folder ACLs on FSLogix containers now enables the team to prevent one AVD user from opening another user's roaming profile files inside the share. Which result verifies this?

  1. SMB logons use a supported AES-compatible Kerberos service ticket instead of failed legacy RC4 negotiation
  2. SMB access succeeds from allowed hosts and is denied from disallowed source networks
  3. Signed-in users receive valid Kerberos tickets and mount authorized SMB folders using the approved identity
  4. ACL checks allow user-owned profile folders and deny unrelated users

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for NTFS folder ACLs on FSLogix containers: ACL checks allow user-owned profile folders and deny unrelated users. NTFS permissions restrict file and directory access beyond share-level roles. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure Files Kerberos encryption modernization, used to avoid profile authentication failures after the Windows Kerberos RC4-to-AES hardening change. It does not establish whether NTFS folder ACLs on FSLogix containers satisfies the current requirement to prevent one AVD user from opening another user's roaming profile files inside the share.

B:

That evidence concerns Azure Files storage-account firewall rules, used to restrict SMB share endpoints to approved networks even when users have identity permissions. It does not establish whether NTFS folder ACLs on FSLogix containers satisfies the current requirement to prevent one AVD user from opening another user's roaming profile files inside the share.

C:

That evidence concerns Microsoft Entra Kerberos for Azure Files, used to authenticate supported Microsoft Entra joined AVD hosts to a profile SMB share without routine domain-controller line-of-sight. It does not establish whether NTFS folder ACLs on FSLogix containers satisfies the current requirement to prevent one AVD user from opening another user's roaming profile files inside the share.

Question 612

After implementing Group Policy Object security baseline, reviewers must ensure the environment can apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU. Which evidence is most relevant?

  1. An approved signed program starts while an unauthorized test binary is blocked by policy
  2. Resultant Set of Policy reflects the linked GPO and intended security configuration
  3. Code Integrity event logs record predicted blocks while test programs still run
  4. Audit results record would-be blocked writes without interrupting the current production workflow

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Group Policy Object security baseline: Resultant Set of Policy reflects the linked GPO and intended security configuration. GPOs apply scoped policy to AD joined desktop devices. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns App Control for Business allow policy, used to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers. It does not establish whether Group Policy Object security baseline satisfies the current requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU.

C:

That evidence concerns App Control for Business audit mode, used to measure which line-of-business binaries would be blocked before enforcing a new policy fleet-wide. It does not establish whether Group Policy Object security baseline satisfies the current requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU.

D:

That evidence concerns Controlled Folder Access audit mode, used to identify planned app compatibility problems before a protected folder policy is enforced. It does not establish whether Group Policy Object security baseline satisfies the current requirement to apply Windows security rules to all domain-joined session hosts in a designated OU.

Question 613

A remote desktop change record says SMB 3 encryption in transit now enables the team to require encrypted file share data in flight between session host and Azure Files. Which result verifies this?

  1. Negotiated SMB session details show encryption for approved clients
  2. Storage encryption reports the authorized Key Vault key and rotation/permission state
  3. A compliance evaluation flags nonconforming storage accounts or blocks creation under enforced policy
  4. The snapshot lists an earlier file version that can be selected for recovery

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for SMB 3 encryption in transit: negotiated SMB session details show encryption for approved clients. SMB encryption protects profile traffic during transfer. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Customer-managed key for storage account, used to meet a policy requiring an organization-controlled key lifecycle for encrypted profile data. It does not establish whether SMB 3 encryption in transit satisfies the current requirement to require encrypted file share data in flight between session host and Azure Files.

C:

That evidence concerns Storage account Azure Policy compliance, used to detect a profile-storage account created with prohibited public access settings. It does not establish whether SMB 3 encryption in transit satisfies the current requirement to require encrypted file share data in flight between session host and Azure Files.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure Files snapshots, used to retain point-in-time versions of a share for an operational file-level rollback. It does not establish whether SMB 3 encryption in transit satisfies the current requirement to require encrypted file share data in flight between session host and Azure Files.

Question 614

A support analyst validates App Attach host-pool assignment following the change to keep a GPU-intensive application visible only on the pool whose session hosts have appropriate graphics resources. Which measured result is expected?

  1. App package is assigned to the intended GPU host pool and only its eligible sessions can launch
  2. SYSTEM-context share mount works after storage permissions are corrected
  3. Test user launches the newly assigned app package while VM image build stays unchanged
  4. Assigned members see the app and unassigned users sharing the VM do not

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for App Attach host-pool assignment: app package is assigned to the intended GPU host pool and only its eligible sessions can launch. App Attach package assignments scope delivery to pools. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns App Attach storage-access test as SYSTEM, used to diagnose staging failure when a user can browse the file share but the session-host system context cannot mount its package image. It does not establish whether App Attach host-pool assignment satisfies the current requirement to keep a GPU-intensive application visible only on the pool whose session hosts have appropriate graphics resources.

C:

That evidence concerns App Attach package version upgrade, used to release a new version of one app without rebuilding golden images across the pool. It does not establish whether App Attach host-pool assignment satisfies the current requirement to keep a GPU-intensive application visible only on the pool whose session hosts have appropriate graphics resources.

D:

That evidence concerns App Attach app user/group assignment, used to deliver a licensed application only to an approved Entra security group in the same pooled desktop fleet. It does not establish whether App Attach host-pool assignment satisfies the current requirement to keep a GPU-intensive application visible only on the pool whose session hosts have appropriate graphics resources.

Question 615

A regulated AVD environment must demonstrate a deleted profile share can be restored during the supported recovery interval. Which configuration achieves that goal most directly?

  1. Azure Files soft-delete recovery drill
  2. Encrypted backup recovery test
  3. Cloud Cache versus backup distinction
  4. Backup vault retention policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Soft delete protects against inadvertent share deletion. This addresses the stated need to demonstrate a deleted profile share can be restored during the supported recovery interval without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Key permissions must be preserved for encrypted backup restoration. This is relevant when the task is to ensure restored profile data remains accessible when an approved storage encryption key is rotated; it does not directly meet the requirement to demonstrate a deleted profile share can be restored during the supported recovery interval.

C:

Live cache replication is not equivalent to point-in-time backup. This is relevant when the task is to explain why two synchronized live FSLogix providers cannot replace a versioned historical backup after accidental data deletion; it does not directly meet the requirement to demonstrate a deleted profile share can be restored during the supported recovery interval.

D:

Retention policy determines which restore points persist. This is relevant when the task is to retain backup recovery points for the formally approved retention period instead of relying on default ad hoc snapshots; it does not directly meet the requirement to demonstrate a deleted profile share can be restored during the supported recovery interval.

Question 616

After implementing Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis, reviewers must ensure the environment can identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one. Which evidence is most relevant?

  1. AVD session-host inventory lists the VM under the wrong hostpool resource ID
  2. The host reports a supported agent version and required health checks succeed
  3. Session host status details identify the failed AVD-specific health check
  4. Session state changes to Disconnected and user can resume it later

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis: AVD session-host inventory lists the VM under the wrong hostpool resource ID. Registration associates a session host with one host pool. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Session host agent update policy, used to bring a stale AVD agent into a supported healthy state following a service upgrade. It does not establish whether Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis satisfies the current requirement to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one.

C:

That evidence concerns AVD health-check status inspection, used to distinguish failed agent health from a generic Windows guest boot problem. It does not establish whether Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis satisfies the current requirement to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one.

D:

That evidence concerns Remote user-session disconnect operation, used to pause a session's client connection without immediately closing its running applications. It does not establish whether Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis satisfies the current requirement to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one.

Question 617

A peer reviewer inspects Drive redirection policy restriction after it was introduced to prevent a confidential desktop from accessing arbitrary client-side storage drives. Which result should be documented?

  1. The remote app sees a valid redirected smart card and completes certificate login
  2. Remote app audio input test receives microphone capture from the local device
  3. Mapped client drives are absent in the secure session while other approved devices still work
  4. Remote sound plays on the authorized local output device

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Drive redirection policy restriction: mapped client drives are absent in the secure session while other approved devices still work. Drive redirection controls access to client filesystem volumes. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Smart-card redirection configuration, used to support an authorized user presenting a local hardware smart card during remote application authentication. It does not establish whether Drive redirection policy restriction satisfies the current requirement to prevent a confidential desktop from accessing arbitrary client-side storage drives.

B:

That evidence concerns Microphone audio capture redirection, used to permit a remote communications app to use the local client's microphone when security policy allows it. It does not establish whether Drive redirection policy restriction satisfies the current requirement to prevent a confidential desktop from accessing arbitrary client-side storage drives.

D:

That evidence concerns Audio output redirection policy, used to let an end user hear remote application audio on the local client device instead of the session host speaker. It does not establish whether Drive redirection policy restriction satisfies the current requirement to prevent a confidential desktop from accessing arbitrary client-side storage drives.

Question 618

At an operational readiness review, a team is required to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed. Which technical choice is most suitable?

  1. Universal Print cloud print deployment
  2. High-DPI display scaling test
  3. Audio microphone privacy restriction
  4. Browser policy management on session host

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Input and output redirection are independently configurable. This addresses the stated need to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Universal Print provides centralized cloud-managed printing. This is relevant when the task is to publish managed printers to supported AVD users without depending exclusively on per-client redirected printer drivers; it does not directly meet the requirement to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed.

B:

Client display settings and RDP behavior affect screen scaling. This is relevant when the task is to ensure remote applications remain usable on mixed-resolution client monitors; it does not directly meet the requirement to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed.

D:

Windows browser enterprise policy can be applied across hosts. This is relevant when the task is to enforce approved enterprise browser extension and home page settings in a pooled desktop; it does not directly meet the requirement to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed.

Question 619

An Azure Virtual Desktop deployment is being redesigned to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one. Which approach should be prioritized?

  1. Host pool registration mismatch diagnosis
  2. Controlled pooled session draining
  3. Guest OS security-patch rollout
  4. Remote user-session logoff operation

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Registration associates a session host with one host pool. This addresses the stated need to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Draining enables incremental maintenance without denying normal login. This is relevant when the task is to reduce impact of a rolling maintenance operation by removing one host at a time from new session placement; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one.

C:

Phased updates detect failures before broad production rollout. This is relevant when the task is to install an approved cumulative update to a maintenance ring before the whole desktop fleet; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one.

D:

Administrative logoff ends an actual Windows user session. This is relevant when the task is to release a stuck session and its resources after notifying the affected user; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify a VM that was accidentally enrolled into a test host pool rather than the production one.

Question 620

A peer reviewer inspects Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication after it was introduced to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain. Which result should be documented?

  1. Credentials associated with the roaming profile remain accessible when the user changes hosts
  2. Eligible managed-domain users access the SMB share through the chosen identity method
  3. Signed-in users receive valid Kerberos tickets and mount authorized SMB folders using the approved identity
  4. The eligible group has the appropriate SMB Share Contributor access and can reach the share

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication: eligible managed-domain users access the SMB share through the chosen identity method. Azure Files supports SMB authentication with Entra Domain Services. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns LoadCredKeyFromProfile registry policy, used to keep a roaming user's credential manager keys linked to the profile currently being loaded. It does not establish whether Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication satisfies the current requirement to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain.

C:

That evidence concerns Microsoft Entra Kerberos for Azure Files, used to authenticate supported Microsoft Entra joined AVD hosts to a profile SMB share without routine domain-controller line-of-sight. It does not establish whether Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication satisfies the current requirement to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure Files SMB share-level Azure RBAC assignment, used to grant a user group permission to reach a profile SMB share while retaining identity-based authorization. It does not establish whether Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication satisfies the current requirement to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.