Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 106

Question 1050

The team implemented Shared computer activation for Microsoft 365 Apps to allow multiple entitled users to activate Microsoft 365 Apps on the same AVD Windows multi-session VM. Which test result demonstrates that the requirement is satisfied?

  1. Separate eligible users open Office successfully with shared computer activation status
  2. Supported per-machine client is installed and different users start their own sync sessions
  3. Office settings and supported cache contents follow the user via the mounted profile VHDX
  4. Files appear as placeholders and download when required by access

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Shared computer activation for Microsoft 365 Apps: separate eligible users open Office successfully with shared computer activation status. Shared activation supports pooled Office clients. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns OneDrive per-machine installation, used to ensure OneDrive is available to each user of a pooled Windows session host without relying on per-user manual installs. It does not establish whether Shared computer activation for Microsoft 365 Apps satisfies the current requirement to allow multiple entitled users to activate Microsoft 365 Apps on the same AVD Windows multi-session VM.

C:

That evidence concerns FSLogix Profile Container for Office user data, used to preserve Outlook and Teams-related user application state between pooled desktop VM sessions. It does not establish whether Shared computer activation for Microsoft 365 Apps satisfies the current requirement to allow multiple entitled users to activate Microsoft 365 Apps on the same AVD Windows multi-session VM.

D:

That evidence concerns OneDrive Files On-Demand, used to reduce local VHDX capacity pressure by hydrating files only when a user opens cloud-backed content. It does not establish whether Shared computer activation for Microsoft 365 Apps satisfies the current requirement to allow multiple entitled users to activate Microsoft 365 Apps on the same AVD Windows multi-session VM.

Question 1051

The test plan requires administrators to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers. Which configuration should they implement?

  1. Controlled Folder Access enabled policy
  2. Controlled Folder Access allowed-app list
  3. App Control for Business allow policy
  4. App Control for Business audit mode

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Application control applies allowlisting decisions to code execution. This addresses the stated need to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

CFA restricts unauthorized changes to guarded folders. This is relevant when the task is to prevent untrusted processes from modifying protected user folders on a session host; it does not directly meet the requirement to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers.

B:

Allowed apps make narrow CFA exceptions. This is relevant when the task is to permit a vetted line-of-business application to write to a protected folder without globally disabling protection; it does not directly meet the requirement to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers.

D:

Audit mode tests application policy impact safely. This is relevant when the task is to measure which line-of-business binaries would be blocked before enforcing a new policy fleet-wide; it does not directly meet the requirement to restrict execution on session hosts to approved applications and trusted publishers.

Question 1052

A post-deployment audit tests Multi-region image version replication check for the requirement to prepare an alternative region for a desktop failover plan by copying the approved image artifact in advance. Which evidence is decisive?

  1. Targeted hosts run the scheduled maintenance and report patch status
  2. Recovery region reports an accessible and fully replicated approved image version
  3. Representative pilot users pass app, profile and connection checks against the new image
  4. Each ring follows its approved image version and post-change acceptance results

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Multi-region image version replication check: recovery region reports an accessible and fully replicated approved image version. A DR region needs ready session-host image artifacts. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure Update Manager maintenance configuration, used to schedule supported operating system patch assessment and installation for targeted session hosts. It does not establish whether Multi-region image version replication check satisfies the current requirement to prepare an alternative region for a desktop failover plan by copying the approved image artifact in advance.

C:

That evidence concerns Validation hostpool image rollout, used to trial an updated image on a nonproduction host pool before replacing business-critical session hosts. It does not establish whether Multi-region image version replication check satisfies the current requirement to prepare an alternative region for a desktop failover plan by copying the approved image artifact in advance.

D:

That evidence concerns Image refresh schedule for feature updates, used to roll out major Windows feature releases by piloting new images and controlling host replacement waves. It does not establish whether Multi-region image version replication check satisfies the current requirement to prepare an alternative region for a desktop failover plan by copying the approved image artifact in advance.

Question 1053

A desktop service owner wants to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user. Which change provides the requested capability?

  1. FSLogix profile access audit versus login denial
  2. Windows security event log for guest logon
  3. Conditional Access report-only result review
  4. AVD app sign-in success event

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Guest logs distinguish local/session OS failures from cloud token failures. This addresses the stated need to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Profile file authorization is separate from initial identity authentication. This is relevant when the task is to show that a user passed Windows sign-in but profile attachment subsequently failed due to SMB permissions; it does not directly meet the requirement to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user.

C:

Report-only data supports safer policy rollout. This is relevant when the task is to inspect which users a proposed desktop access rule would reject before activating enforcement; it does not directly meet the requirement to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user.

D:

The broker-side sign-in precedes remote Windows login. This is relevant when the task is to verify that initial desktop resource-service authentication succeeded before diagnosing guest logon; it does not directly meet the requirement to isolate Windows account-right failure after the Entra service stages have already accepted a user.

Question 1054

After implementing Post-incident recovery audit checkpoint, reviewers must ensure the environment can capture the restored desktop region, profile recovery timestamp, user validation and outstanding issues after an outage. Which evidence is most relevant?

  1. Recovery host mounts the profile with correct per-user share and NTFS permissions
  2. Recorded sign-off ties test results to RTO, RPO and actual user application availability
  3. The recovered VHDX mounts and selected previous user settings are present
  4. Restored VM contains the expected user state and assignment access is valid

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Post-incident recovery audit checkpoint: recorded sign-off ties test results to RTO, RPO and actual user application availability. A DR closeout must document measured recovery outcomes. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Verify DR storage identity and ACLs, used to prevent successful VM failover from ending in temporary profiles because SMB security was not reproduced. It does not establish whether Post-incident recovery audit checkpoint satisfies the current requirement to capture the restored desktop region, profile recovery timestamp, user validation and outstanding issues after an outage.

C:

That evidence concerns Restore FSLogix user profile from backup, used to recover the user's profile container after a confirmed accidental deletion rather than create an empty replacement profile. It does not establish whether Post-incident recovery audit checkpoint satisfies the current requirement to capture the restored desktop region, profile recovery timestamp, user validation and outstanding issues after an outage.

D:

That evidence concerns Restore personal desktop disk from recovery point, used to recover an assigned user's persistent VM after destructive disk corruption. It does not establish whether Post-incident recovery audit checkpoint satisfies the current requirement to capture the restored desktop region, profile recovery timestamp, user validation and outstanding issues after an outage.

Question 1055

For a managed Azure Virtual Desktop service, administrators must restore a routed path from AVD session hosts to private AD DS domain controllers. Which setting or service fits?

  1. Network security group outbound service rule
  2. Subnet region alignment for session-host VMs
  3. Domain-controller routing verification
  4. VPN gateway hybrid connection

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

AD DS joined hosts must contact domain controllers for join and authentication. This addresses the stated need to restore a routed path from AVD session hosts to private AD DS domain controllers without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

NSGs filter traffic before guest workloads reach required services. This is relevant when the task is to correct an NSG rule that blocks approved session-host communication with identity or AVD services; it does not directly meet the requirement to restore a routed path from AVD session hosts to private AD DS domain controllers.

B:

A VM network interface must attach to a supported same-region VNet subnet. This is relevant when the task is to ensure a new AVD session host VM joins a virtual network in the VM's Azure region; it does not directly meet the requirement to restore a routed path from AVD session hosts to private AD DS domain controllers.

D:

A site-to-site VPN establishes an encrypted hybrid connection. This is relevant when the task is to reach an on-premises directory from Azure session-host networks through an encrypted internet-based tunnel; it does not directly meet the requirement to restore a routed path from AVD session hosts to private AD DS domain controllers.

Question 1056

A desktop service owner wants to avoid exhausting profile storage when users download very large Outlook cached mailboxes on shared hosts. Which change provides the requested capability?

  1. OneDrive enterprise sign-in restriction
  2. Microsoft 365 Apps deployment tool configuration
  3. Outlook offline cache/profile size planning
  4. OneDrive per-machine installation

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Outlook cache behavior influences roaming profile storage demand. This addresses the stated need to avoid exhausting profile storage when users download very large Outlook cached mailboxes on shared hosts without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Sync client policies can constrain permitted identity types. This is relevant when the task is to block personal consumer OneDrive accounts on regulated pooled desktops while allowing organizational accounts; it does not directly meet the requirement to avoid exhausting profile storage when users download very large Outlook cached mailboxes on shared hosts.

B:

The deployment tool configures Office installation parameters. This is relevant when the task is to install a specified Office channel and selected apps to an AVD image through controlled deployment XML; it does not directly meet the requirement to avoid exhausting profile storage when users download very large Outlook cached mailboxes on shared hosts.

D:

Per-machine setup is a common multi-user deployment model. This is relevant when the task is to ensure OneDrive is available to each user of a pooled Windows session host without relying on per-user manual installs; it does not directly meet the requirement to avoid exhausting profile storage when users download very large Outlook cached mailboxes on shared hosts.

Question 1057

A platform engineering group is evaluating the best supported way to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment. Which option addresses that need?

  1. Marketplace Windows 11 multi-session image selection
  2. Manual customized image from reference VM
  3. Azure VM Image Builder template
  4. Windows Sysprep generalization step

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Marketplace images provide maintained starting points for supported session hosts. This addresses the stated need to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Capturing a prepared reference VM produces a reusable custom image. This is relevant when the task is to capture an organization-approved guest OS and installed baseline applications after hardening; it does not directly meet the requirement to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment.

C:

Image Builder automates repeatable VM image creation. This is relevant when the task is to automate repeatable OS image creation with provisioners and output distribution rather than relying on manual console changes; it does not directly meet the requirement to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment.

D:

Sysprep removes host-specific Windows provisioning state. This is relevant when the task is to prepare a Windows reference VM for generalized re-use without duplicating its machine-specific identity; it does not directly meet the requirement to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment.

Question 1058

An AVD service owner asks for validation that Supported Windows App client version for SSO enables staff to restore single sign-on when a legacy client lacks a supported Entra remote authentication feature. Which test should pass?

  1. The hostpool has Entra SSO enabled and a supported client opens the session without an extra password prompt
  2. An updated supported client signs in once and opens the session successfully
  3. Hostpool RDP properties indicate enablerdsaadauth enabled and sign-in succeeds
  4. Both app sign-in logs report successful matching policy evaluations without unexpected repeated prompts

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Supported Windows App client version for SSO: an updated supported client signs in once and opens the session successfully. Client support is a prerequisite for new token-based SSO. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Microsoft Entra SSO RDP hostpool property, used to provide token-based Windows sign-in without asking the user for a second password after authenticating the AVD feed. It does not establish whether Supported Windows App client version for SSO satisfies the current requirement to restore single sign-on when a legacy client lacks a supported Entra remote authentication feature.

C:

That evidence concerns Hostpool enablerdsaadauth setting, used to enable the RDP property needed for Entra-based single sign-on on eligible session hosts. It does not establish whether Supported Windows App client version for SSO satisfies the current requirement to restore single sign-on when a legacy client lacks a supported Entra remote authentication feature.

D:

That evidence concerns SSO Conditional Access alignment, used to avoid MFA loops when the AVD broker app and Windows Cloud Login app have inconsistent access rules. It does not establish whether Supported Windows App client version for SSO satisfies the current requirement to restore single sign-on when a legacy client lacks a supported Entra remote authentication feature.

Question 1059

A support analyst validates Azure VM extension deployment for directory join following the change to automate a Windows VM's supported domain join as part of its infrastructure deployment. Which measured result is expected?

  1. VM power state is healthy AND AVD host registration/health are valid
  2. Device state reports hybrid join and Entra registration completes
  3. New hosts appear registered to the correct pool and the token is valid only for its approved period
  4. Extension status reports successful domain join and the computer object exists in the target OU

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure VM extension deployment for directory join: extension status reports successful domain join and the computer object exists in the target OU. The VM domain-join extension automates Windows directory membership. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Session-host VM resource health verification, used to distinguish a running but unregistered guest from a complete usable AVD session host. It does not establish whether Azure VM extension deployment for directory join satisfies the current requirement to automate a Windows VM's supported domain join as part of its infrastructure deployment.

B:

That evidence concerns Microsoft Entra hybrid join workflow, used to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy. It does not establish whether Azure VM extension deployment for directory join satisfies the current requirement to automate a Windows VM's supported domain join as part of its infrastructure deployment.

C:

That evidence concerns Host registration token lifecycle, used to register newly provisioned session hosts to the intended AVD host pool using a time-scoped registration token. It does not establish whether Azure VM extension deployment for directory join satisfies the current requirement to automate a Windows VM's supported domain join as part of its infrastructure deployment.

Question 1060

A peer reviewer inspects WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app after it was introduced to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally. Which result should be documented?

  1. Supported media test detects the expected redirector readiness and optimized connection
  2. A remote app cannot capture local mic input but remote sound still plays when allowed
  3. Remote text/UI scales correctly on representative high-DPI endpoints
  4. Connection diagnostics show compatible call redirection rather than all media being processed on the VM

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app: connection diagnostics show compatible call redirection rather than all media being processed on the VM. WebRTC call redirection optimizes supported remote calls. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Remote Desktop WebRTC redirector component, used to ensure compatible Teams/media redirection features have required host-side runtime components. It does not establish whether WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app satisfies the current requirement to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally.

B:

That evidence concerns Audio microphone privacy restriction, used to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed. It does not establish whether WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app satisfies the current requirement to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally.

C:

That evidence concerns High-DPI display scaling test, used to ensure remote applications remain usable on mixed-resolution client monitors. It does not establish whether WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app satisfies the current requirement to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.