Question 1060
A peer reviewer inspects WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app after it was introduced to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally. Which result should be documented?
Explanation
Correct Answer
This is the direct functional outcome for WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app: connection diagnostics show compatible call redirection rather than all media being processed on the VM. WebRTC call redirection optimizes supported remote calls. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.
Incorrect Answers
That evidence concerns Remote Desktop WebRTC redirector component, used to ensure compatible Teams/media redirection features have required host-side runtime components. It does not establish whether WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app satisfies the current requirement to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally.
That evidence concerns Audio microphone privacy restriction, used to disable mic redirection in sensitive AVD sessions while leaving playback allowed. It does not establish whether WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app satisfies the current requirement to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally.
That evidence concerns High-DPI display scaling test, used to ensure remote applications remain usable on mixed-resolution client monitors. It does not establish whether WebRTC call redirection for supported browser app satisfies the current requirement to reduce latency of an approved browser-based call by processing supported media locally.






Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests