Pass Your Microsoft SC-401 Exam Easy!

Microsoft SC-401 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

SC-401 Premium Bundle

$74.99

Microsoft SC-401 Premium Bundle

SC-401 Premium File: 291 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 23, 2026

SC-401 Training Course: 101 Video Lectures

SC-401 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-401" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft SC-401 Premium Bundle
Microsoft SC-401 Premium Bundle

SC-401 Premium File: 291 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 23, 2026

SC-401 Training Course: 101 Video Lectures

$74.99

SC-401 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-401" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 36

Question 350

An auditor wants to confirm who changed Insider Risk Management privacy settings. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

  1. Use the approved IRM privacy setting and roles to reveal identities when justified.
  2. Review supported administrative audit records for the settings change.
  3. Keep Insider Risk Management anonymized usernames enabled.
  4. Assign an appropriate IRM analyst or investigator role rather than full administration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Auditing helps establish accountability for privacy-sensitive configuration changes. It directly meets the case's requirement to trace an IRM privacy setting change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Identity exposure is governed by the configured privacy mode and authorization model. That would reveal user identity under controls; the question instead requires a way to trace an IRM privacy setting change.

C:

The solution is designed to pseudonymize user identity by default where configured. That would protect identity during initial triage; the question instead requires a way to trace an IRM privacy setting change.

D:

IRM role separation helps preserve least privilege and participant privacy. That would permit investigation without IRM policy editing; the question instead requires a way to trace an IRM privacy setting change.

Question 351

A responder needs alert evidence but has no business requirement to change IRM policy templates. Which configuration BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Keep Insider Risk Management anonymized usernames enabled.
  2. Review supported administrative audit records for the settings change.
  3. Assign an appropriate IRM analyst or investigator role rather than full administration.
  4. Use the approved IRM privacy setting and roles to reveal identities when justified.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

IRM role separation helps preserve least privilege and participant privacy. It directly meets the case's requirement to permit investigation without IRM policy editing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The solution is designed to pseudonymize user identity by default where configured. That would protect identity during initial triage; the question instead requires a way to permit investigation without IRM policy editing.

B:

Auditing helps establish accountability for privacy-sensitive configuration changes. That would trace an IRM privacy setting change; the question instead requires a way to permit investigation without IRM policy editing.

D:

Identity exposure is governed by the configured privacy mode and authorization model. That would reveal user identity under controls; the question instead requires a way to permit investigation without IRM policy editing.

Question 352

A security policy violation template needs Defender for Endpoint risk alerts as part of insider scoring. Which Microsoft Purview approach should the administrator choose?

  1. Use an appropriate data leaks policy with available exfiltration indicators.
  2. Complete the supported device onboarding prerequisite.
  3. Correlate the supported Defender for Endpoint alert with IRM user activity.
  4. Enable the supported Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alert-sharing integration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Shared endpoint security alerts provide signals to eligible IRM violation templates. It directly meets the case's requirement to ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Data leaks templates can score sharing activities independently of security-alert templates. That would monitor exfiltration without malware signals; the question instead requires a way to ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM.

B:

Device-based risk indicators require devices to send the necessary activity telemetry. That would make endpoint insider indicators available; the question instead requires a way to ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM.

C:

Combining endpoint security context and insider activity strengthens investigation of suspected violations. That would correlate endpoint and insider incidents; the question instead requires a way to ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM.

Question 353

An IRM policy needs device activity but the devices were never onboarded into the supported telemetry service. Which action most directly satisfies this requirement?

  1. Complete the supported device onboarding prerequisite.
  2. Correlate the supported Defender for Endpoint alert with IRM user activity.
  3. Use an appropriate data leaks policy with available exfiltration indicators.
  4. Enable the supported Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alert-sharing integration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Device-based risk indicators require devices to send the necessary activity telemetry. It directly meets the case's requirement to make endpoint insider indicators available.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Combining endpoint security context and insider activity strengthens investigation of suspected violations. That would correlate endpoint and insider incidents; the question instead requires a way to make endpoint insider indicators available.

C:

Data leaks templates can score sharing activities independently of security-alert templates. That would monitor exfiltration without malware signals; the question instead requires a way to make endpoint insider indicators available.

D:

Shared endpoint security alerts provide signals to eligible IRM violation templates. That would ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM; the question instead requires a way to make endpoint insider indicators available.

Question 354

An investigator wants to understand whether a suspicious malware alert correlates with insider exfiltration. What is the most appropriate next action?

  1. Complete the supported device onboarding prerequisite.
  2. Correlate the supported Defender for Endpoint alert with IRM user activity.
  3. Enable the supported Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alert-sharing integration.
  4. Use an appropriate data leaks policy with available exfiltration indicators.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Combining endpoint security context and insider activity strengthens investigation of suspected violations. It directly meets the case's requirement to correlate endpoint and insider incidents.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Device-based risk indicators require devices to send the necessary activity telemetry. That would make endpoint insider indicators available; the question instead requires a way to correlate endpoint and insider incidents.

C:

Shared endpoint security alerts provide signals to eligible IRM violation templates. That would ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM; the question instead requires a way to correlate endpoint and insider incidents.

D:

Data leaks templates can score sharing activities independently of security-alert templates. That would monitor exfiltration without malware signals; the question instead requires a way to correlate endpoint and insider incidents.

Question 355

The organization wants to detect ordinary file-sharing violations without depending on Defender malware alerts. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

  1. Correlate the supported Defender for Endpoint alert with IRM user activity.
  2. Enable the supported Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alert-sharing integration.
  3. Use an appropriate data leaks policy with available exfiltration indicators.
  4. Complete the supported device onboarding prerequisite.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Data leaks templates can score sharing activities independently of security-alert templates. It directly meets the case's requirement to monitor exfiltration without malware signals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Combining endpoint security context and insider activity strengthens investigation of suspected violations. That would correlate endpoint and insider incidents; the question instead requires a way to monitor exfiltration without malware signals.

B:

Shared endpoint security alerts provide signals to eligible IRM violation templates. That would ingest endpoint security alerts into IRM; the question instead requires a way to monitor exfiltration without malware signals.

D:

Device-based risk indicators require devices to send the necessary activity telemetry. That would make endpoint insider indicators available; the question instead requires a way to monitor exfiltration without malware signals.

Question 356

The business wants heightened DLP restrictions only when a user receives an Elevated insider risk classification. Which configuration BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Validate eligible insider risk policies, indicators, and Adaptive Protection activation.
  2. Implement an ordinary DLP policy with static content conditions.
  3. Configure the Adaptive Protection insider risk level thresholds.
  4. Enable Adaptive Protection risk levels and connect them to DLP policy conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Adaptive Protection feeds supported IRM risk levels into risk-based DLP enforcement. It directly meets the case's requirement to strengthen DLP for elevated users.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Risk-based DLP requires usable IRM risk signals before its conditions can match. That would diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals; the question instead requires a way to strengthen DLP for elevated users.

B:

Traditional DLP does not require dynamic insider risk-level inputs. That would enforce a uniform data protection standard; the question instead requires a way to strengthen DLP for elevated users.

C:

Risk-level settings control how eligible insider scoring maps to named levels. That would tune insider risk-level assignment; the question instead requires a way to strengthen DLP for elevated users.

Question 357

The SOC wants to change how Moderate and Elevated levels are assigned from observed insider activities. Which Microsoft Purview approach should the administrator choose?

  1. Configure the Adaptive Protection insider risk level thresholds.
  2. Enable Adaptive Protection risk levels and connect them to DLP policy conditions.
  3. Validate eligible insider risk policies, indicators, and Adaptive Protection activation.
  4. Implement an ordinary DLP policy with static content conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Risk-level settings control how eligible insider scoring maps to named levels. It directly meets the case's requirement to tune insider risk-level assignment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Adaptive Protection feeds supported IRM risk levels into risk-based DLP enforcement. That would strengthen DLP for elevated users; the question instead requires a way to tune insider risk-level assignment.

C:

Risk-based DLP requires usable IRM risk signals before its conditions can match. That would diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals; the question instead requires a way to tune insider risk-level assignment.

D:

Traditional DLP does not require dynamic insider risk-level inputs. That would enforce a uniform data protection standard; the question instead requires a way to tune insider risk-level assignment.

Question 358

An IRM administrator sees no users qualifying for adaptive DLP because the necessary insider policy and indicators are inactive. Which action most directly satisfies this requirement?

  1. Enable Adaptive Protection risk levels and connect them to DLP policy conditions.
  2. Validate eligible insider risk policies, indicators, and Adaptive Protection activation.
  3. Configure the Adaptive Protection insider risk level thresholds.
  4. Implement an ordinary DLP policy with static content conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Risk-based DLP requires usable IRM risk signals before its conditions can match. It directly meets the case's requirement to diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Adaptive Protection feeds supported IRM risk levels into risk-based DLP enforcement. That would strengthen DLP for elevated users; the question instead requires a way to diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals.

C:

Risk-level settings control how eligible insider scoring maps to named levels. That would tune insider risk-level assignment; the question instead requires a way to diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals.

D:

Traditional DLP does not require dynamic insider risk-level inputs. That would enforce a uniform data protection standard; the question instead requires a way to diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals.

Question 359

A compliance team wants stable blocking for all staff regardless of individual insider risk assessments. What is the most appropriate next action?

  1. Validate eligible insider risk policies, indicators, and Adaptive Protection activation.
  2. Enable Adaptive Protection risk levels and connect them to DLP policy conditions.
  3. Implement an ordinary DLP policy with static content conditions.
  4. Configure the Adaptive Protection insider risk level thresholds.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Traditional DLP does not require dynamic insider risk-level inputs. It directly meets the case's requirement to enforce a uniform data protection standard.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Risk-based DLP requires usable IRM risk signals before its conditions can match. That would diagnose absent Adaptive Protection signals; the question instead requires a way to enforce a uniform data protection standard.

B:

Adaptive Protection feeds supported IRM risk levels into risk-based DLP enforcement. That would strengthen DLP for elevated users; the question instead requires a way to enforce a uniform data protection standard.

D:

Risk-level settings control how eligible insider scoring maps to named levels. That would tune insider risk-level assignment; the question instead requires a way to enforce a uniform data protection standard.

Question 360

An analyst finds a potentially serious insider risk alert but has not established enough facts for formal case management. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

  1. Resolve or dismiss the alert with documented rationale.
  2. Use documented case workflow and role-controlled collaboration.
  3. Escalate the IRM alert to a managed insider risk case.
  4. Triage the IRM alert and inspect supporting activities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Alert triage helps distinguish credible patterns from routine behavior before escalation. It directly meets the case's requirement to assess an insider alert before escalation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Triage records can close false positive or legitimate events while retaining an audit trail. That would document a benign insider alert outcome; the question instead requires a way to assess an insider alert before escalation.

B:

Case roles and workflow maintain evidentiary access boundaries. That would collaborate within a controlled case; the question instead requires a way to assess an insider alert before escalation.

C:

Cases organize investigation activities, review, and potential response actions. That would open a formal insider risk investigation; the question instead requires a way to assess an insider alert before escalation.


Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

SC-401 Premium File

Premium File
SC-401 Premium File
291 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

SC-401 Training Video Course

Training Course
SC-401 Training Video Course
101 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.