Question 350
An auditor wants to confirm who changed Insider Risk Management privacy settings. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Auditing helps establish accountability for privacy-sensitive configuration changes. It directly meets the case's requirement to trace an IRM privacy setting change.
Incorrect Answers
Identity exposure is governed by the configured privacy mode and authorization model. That would reveal user identity under controls; the question instead requires a way to trace an IRM privacy setting change.
The solution is designed to pseudonymize user identity by default where configured. That would protect identity during initial triage; the question instead requires a way to trace an IRM privacy setting change.
IRM role separation helps preserve least privilege and participant privacy. That would permit investigation without IRM policy editing; the question instead requires a way to trace an IRM privacy setting change.





Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests