Pass Your Microsoft AZ-700 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-700 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-700 Premium Bundle

AZ-700 Premium File: 406 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 08, 2026

AZ-700 Training Course: 64 Video Lectures

AZ-700 PDF Study Guide: 762 Pages

AZ-700 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-700" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-700 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-700 Premium Bundle

AZ-700 Premium File: 406 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 08, 2026

AZ-700 Training Course: 64 Video Lectures

AZ-700 PDF Study Guide: 762 Pages

$79.99

AZ-700 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-700" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-700 Practice Test 65

Question 640

A spoke peered to a hub needs to reach on-premises through the hub VPN gateway, but gateway transit options are not configured. A network team peers two VNets that use overlapping 10.0.0.0/16 prefixes and is surprised by the creation failure. What is the most appropriate plan for this situation?

  1. Enable gateway transit on the hub peering and use remote gateways on eligible spokes subject to gateway design rules; use VNet peering with verified permissions and nonoverlapping ranges when private Microsoft backbone connectivity meets the requirement.
  2. Enable gateway transit on the hub peering and use remote gateways on eligible spokes subject to gateway design rules; Renumber or redesign the conflicting address spaces before creating peering between the two VNets.
  3. Renumber or redesign the conflicting address spaces before creating peering between the two VNets; do not enable gateway transit on the hub peering and use remote gateways on eligible spokes subject to gateway design rules.
  4. Design explicit connectivity or approved transit routing because VNet peering does not inherently provide A-to-C transitivity; Renumber or redesign the conflicting address spaces before creating peering between the two VNets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Ordinary peering does not automatically permit a spoke to consume a hub's virtual network gateway. Overlapping address ranges are incompatible with reliable direct peering across the endpoints. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Overlapping address ranges are incompatible with reliable direct peering across the endpoints.

C:

This plan leaves out a required action: Enable gateway transit on the hub peering and use remote gateways on eligible spokes subject to gateway design rules. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

D:

Ordinary peering does not automatically permit a spoke to consume a hub's virtual network gateway.

Question 641

A security policy change blocks new inbound sessions, but existing established connections continue transferring for a period. A project uses Virtual Network Manager security admin rules and local NSGs but assumes their precedence is a simple concatenated NSG list. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Use supported Azure service tags and narrowly scoped protocols where applicable instead of manually pinning transient platform prefixes; validate supported security admin rule precedence, Allow or Always Allow semantics, and effective policy before rollout.
  2. Review NSG stateful flow behavior and verify active session handling before claiming the rule instantly terminates all traffic; validate supported security admin rule precedence, Allow or Always Allow semantics, and effective policy before rollout.
  3. Validate supported security admin rule precedence, Allow or Always Allow semantics, and effective policy before rollout; do not review NSG stateful flow behavior and verify active session handling before claiming the rule instantly terminates all traffic.
  4. Review NSG stateful flow behavior and verify active session handling before claiming the rule instantly terminates all traffic; inspect both connection initiation direction and the relevant inbound/outbound NSG rules and stateful semantics.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Stateful security evaluation can allow established flows to persist independently of how new flows are classified. Central security administration rules are evaluated differently from standard workload NSG rules. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Stateful security evaluation can allow established flows to persist independently of how new flows are classified.

C:

This plan leaves out a required action: Review NSG stateful flow behavior and verify active session handling before claiming the rule instantly terminates all traffic. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

D:

Central security administration rules are evaluated differently from standard workload NSG rules.

Question 642

A private endpoint connection is approved for production, but administrators forget that its data plane still uses an overprivileged service identity. Which response best addresses this Azure networking scenario?

  1. Validate the supported private endpoint routing policy, prefix specificity, and effective path through the intended appliance.
  2. Check private endpoint network policies and supported NSG behavior for the target subnet before asserting enforcement.
  3. Continue using the service's valid hostname and certificate validation over the private endpoint connection.
  4. Apply least-privilege service authorization and identity controls in addition to the private network connection.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Private connectivity protects the transport path but does not grant or restrict data-plane permissions by itself.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Here, private connectivity protects the transport path but does not grant or restrict data-plane permissions by itself.

B:

Checking private endpoint network policies and supported NSG behavior for the target subnet would not apply least-privilege service authorization and identity controls in addition to the private network connection.

C:

Continuing using the service's valid hostname and certificate validation over the private endpoint connection would not apply least-privilege service authorization and identity controls in addition to the private network connection.

Question 643

An application gateway deployment fails because the team put backend VMs and its gateway instances in the same subnet. A new Azure Bastion host cannot deploy because the security team reused a general server subnet for the service. What is the most appropriate plan for this situation?

  1. Place Application Gateway in a supported dedicated subnet and keep application backend resources in their own subnets; create the required AzureBastionSubnet with a supported address size before deploying Azure Bastion.
  2. Create the required AzureBastionSubnet with a supported address size before deploying Azure Bastion; do not Place Application Gateway in a supported dedicated subnet and keep application backend resources in their own subnets.
  3. Place Application Gateway in a supported dedicated subnet and keep application backend resources in their own subnets; Allocate a suitable private endpoint address within an appropriate VNet subnet and check network policy compatibility.
  4. Select a supported public ingress service or public IP association target instead of inventing direct attachment capability; create the required AzureBastionSubnet with a supported address size before deploying Azure Bastion.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Application Gateway has subnet placement requirements that are distinct from the workloads it proxies. Azure Bastion requires its designated subnet; a network security rule alone cannot replace service prerequisites. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This plan leaves out a required action: Place Application Gateway in a supported dedicated subnet and keep application backend resources in their own subnets. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

C:

Azure Bastion requires its designated subnet; a network security rule alone cannot replace service prerequisites.

D:

Application Gateway has subnet placement requirements that are distinct from the workloads it proxies.

Question 644

During an Azure networking rollout, the team must resolve both of these conditions. A globally cached API returns private personalized responses to other users because its routes cache content with an overly broad policy. A retailer plans to cut traffic from one region but simply disables its origin without validating what happens to long-lived client connections. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Stage changes to Front Door origin routing and test failover and application session behavior under maintenance; do not Disable caching for personalized responses and correct origin cache headers before enabling edge delivery.
  2. Disable caching for personalized responses and correct origin cache headers before enabling edge delivery; Stage changes to Front Door origin routing and test failover and application session behavior under maintenance.
  3. Inspect Front Door diagnostics and WAF event logs separately from origin request logs to trace enforcement; Stage changes to Front Door origin routing and test failover and application session behavior under maintenance.
  4. Disable caching for personalized responses and correct origin cache headers before enabling edge delivery; Complete the supported custom-domain validation and certificate workflow and confirm public DNS records.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Shared edge caching of user-specific content can cause cross-user disclosure unless cache keys and policies are safe. Origin routing health changes affect new or retried requests and must be tested with real application continuity needs. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This plan leaves out a required action: Disable caching for personalized responses and correct origin cache headers before enabling edge delivery. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

C:

Shared edge caching of user-specific content can cause cross-user disclosure unless cache keys and policies are safe.

D:

Origin routing health changes affect new or retried requests and must be tested with real application continuity needs.

Question 645

A shopping site must send /payments to a protected API pool and /catalog to a different pool under one HTTPS host. A team deploys one manually sized Application Gateway instance for traffic that varies tenfold during seasonal campaigns. Which response best addresses these needs?

  1. Create a custom health probe for the correct host and health path and review backend HTTP settings; evaluate autoscaling Application Gateway capacity with monitored minimums and service limits.
  2. Use Azure Application Gateway path-based routing with listeners, backend pools, and HTTP settings; configure multi-site listener hostnames and appropriate routing rules with the required certificates.
  3. Evaluate autoscaling Application Gateway capacity with monitored minimums and service limits; do not use Azure Application Gateway path-based routing with listeners, backend pools, and HTTP settings.
  4. Use Azure Application Gateway path-based routing with listeners, backend pools, and HTTP settings; evaluate autoscaling Application Gateway capacity with monitored minimums and service limits.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Application Gateway supports layer-7 path decisions that a layer-4 load balancer cannot provide. Dynamic autoscaling can handle changing load more reliably than a permanently undersized fixed instance. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Application Gateway supports layer-7 path decisions that a layer-4 load balancer cannot provide.

B:

Dynamic autoscaling can handle changing load more reliably than a permanently undersized fixed instance.

C:

This plan leaves out a required action: Use Azure Application Gateway path-based routing with listeners, backend pools, and HTTP settings. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

Question 646

A regional outage affects multiple network resources, but monitoring checks only one VM's CPU graph. An internet-facing app is targeted by a volumetric attack, and the team mistakes a simple NSG deny rule for a full DDoS mitigation plan. What is the most appropriate plan for this situation?

  1. Use Azure Monitor for Networks and resource-specific diagnostics to correlate network health and dependency symptoms; plan supported virtual network flow logs with appropriate storage, traffic analytics, retention, and privacy restrictions.
  2. Evaluate Azure DDoS Network Protection for supported public endpoints and design network-level mitigation and monitoring; do not use Azure Monitor for Networks and resource-specific diagnostics to correlate network health and dependency symptoms.
  3. Use Azure Monitor for Networks and resource-specific diagnostics to correlate network health and dependency symptoms; evaluate Azure DDoS Network Protection for supported public endpoints and design network-level mitigation and monitoring.
  4. Review Secure Score recommendations and attack path analysis with the affected resource's reachability and exposure evidence; evaluate Azure DDoS Network Protection for supported public endpoints and design network-level mitigation and monitoring.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Network observability requires path and service signals beyond guest VM compute utilization. NSG packet filtering alone does not provide the adaptive volumetric attack protections of DDoS services. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

NSG packet filtering alone does not provide the adaptive volumetric attack protections of DDoS services.

B:

This plan leaves out a required action: Use Azure Monitor for Networks and resource-specific diagnostics to correlate network health and dependency symptoms. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

D:

Network observability requires path and service signals beyond guest VM compute utilization.

Question 647

A payroll API must be reachable only from private VNets and must not expose any public frontend address. An internet-facing application needs region-independent failover across two regional backend deployments using transport-level balancing. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Evaluate cross-region Azure Load Balancer with supported regional load balancers and global frontend requirements; do not deploy an internal Azure Load Balancer with a private frontend IP and approved backend subnet routing.
  2. Use an application-layer gateway or reverse proxy when routing requires HTTP path inspection; evaluate cross-region Azure Load Balancer with supported regional load balancers and global frontend requirements.
  3. Deploy an internal Azure Load Balancer with a private frontend IP and approved backend subnet routing; evaluate cross-region Azure Load Balancer with supported regional load balancers and global frontend requirements.
  4. Deploy an internal Azure Load Balancer with a private frontend IP and approved backend subnet routing; use an appropriate Azure Load Balancer frontend, backend pool, health probe, and transport-level rule.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Internal load balancing provides VNet-private service entry rather than an internet-facing public address. Cross-region load balancing uses a global entry point across eligible regional deployments rather than a private regional listener. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This plan leaves out a required action: Deploy an internal Azure Load Balancer with a private frontend IP and approved backend subnet routing. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

B:

Internal load balancing provides VNet-private service entry rather than an internet-facing public address.

D:

Cross-region load balancing uses a global entry point across eligible regional deployments rather than a private regional listener.

Question 648

A private endpoint appears in the portal as Pending and clients cannot reach the provider service despite correct subnet DNS. A resource team deletes a storage private endpoint but assumes all linked private DNS records and stale application caches disappear immediately. Which response best addresses these needs?

  1. Review zone group lifecycle, remove stale records if needed, and validate resolver cache expiration; do not approve the endpoint request through the service provider's supported connection workflow and confirm the connection state.
  2. Use an approved Private Link service and consumer private endpoint rather than broad VNet peering; review zone group lifecycle, remove stale records if needed, and validate resolver cache expiration.
  3. Approve the endpoint request through the service provider's supported connection workflow and confirm the connection state; review zone group lifecycle, remove stale records if needed, and validate resolver cache expiration.
  4. Approve the endpoint request through the service provider's supported connection workflow and confirm the connection state; create and manage private endpoints for the intended consumers with corresponding DNS zone links and approvals.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A pending private connection cannot be treated as an established provider-approved data path. Resource deletion and DNS/cache cleanup are distinct lifecycle steps that can affect clients after teardown. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This plan leaves out a required action: Approve the endpoint request through the service provider's supported connection workflow and confirm the connection state. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

B:

A pending private connection cannot be treated as an established provider-approved data path.

D:

Resource deletion and DNS/cache cleanup are distinct lifecycle steps that can affect clients after teardown.

Question 649

A WAF is left in Detection mode while executives expect it to block confirmed malicious payloads. A false-positive rule excludes all request bodies to fix one JSON property, creating a large inspection gap. An enterprise enables a WAF policy on one Front Door domain and assumes all domains on a separate profile inherit it automatically. What is the most appropriate plan for this situation?

  1. Restrict the origin's network access so protected traffic must traverse the WAF-enabled ingress; use the narrowest supported WAF match-variable exclusion with controlled testing and monitoring; and validate policy associations and the exact domains or endpoints protected in each relevant Front Door profile.
  2. After testing exclusions and rule behavior, enable Prevention mode on the appropriate policy and verify blocked outcomes; use the narrowest supported WAF match-variable exclusion with controlled testing and monitoring; and restrict the origin's network access so protected traffic must traverse the WAF-enabled ingress.
  3. After testing exclusions and rule behavior, enable Prevention mode on the appropriate policy and verify blocked outcomes; use the narrowest supported WAF match-variable exclusion with controlled testing and monitoring; and validate policy associations and the exact domains or endpoints protected in each relevant Front Door profile.
  4. After testing exclusions and rule behavior, enable Prevention mode on the appropriate policy and verify blocked outcomes; restrict the origin's network access so protected traffic must traverse the WAF-enabled ingress; and validate policy associations and the exact domains or endpoints protected in each relevant Front Door profile.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Detection mode records matching requests but does not enforce the same blocking actions as Prevention mode. Broad exemptions can silently remove inspection coverage for unrelated malicious payloads. WAF protection must be explicitly associated with the intended application ingress scope. Each decision addresses a separate requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 1 misses this need: detection mode records matching requests but does not enforce the same blocking actions as Prevention mode.

B:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 3 misses this need: wAF protection must be explicitly associated with the intended application ingress scope.

D:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 2 misses this need: broad exemptions can silently remove inspection coverage for unrelated malicious payloads.

Question 650

A dual-tunnel deployment sends traffic to Azure but replies prefer one failed peer because on-premises routing did not converge. What should the Azure network engineer do?

  1. Check peer credentials and IKE negotiation diagnostics before modifying unrelated subnet UDRs.
  2. Verify BGP advertisements, health, and route selection for both active paths across the VPN peers.
  3. Verify the gateway SKU, VPN type, and BGP compatibility before enabling route exchange.
  4. Compare measured throughput and tunnel use with gateway SKU limits and scale to a supported capacity tier.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Resilient tunnel provisioning also requires correctly converging bidirectional routes after a failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For this question, resilient tunnel provisioning also requires correctly converging bidirectional routes after a failure.

C:

Verifying the gateway SKU, VPN type, and BGP compatibility would not verify BGP advertisements, health, and route selection for both active paths across the VPN peers.

D:

Here, resilient tunnel provisioning also requires correctly converging bidirectional routes after a failure.


Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions (AZ-700) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-700 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-700 Premium File
406 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-700 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-700 Training Video Course
64 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-700 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-700 Study Guide
762 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.