Pass Your Microsoft AZ-700 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-700 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-700 Premium Bundle

AZ-700 Premium File: 406 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 08, 2026

AZ-700 Training Course: 64 Video Lectures

AZ-700 PDF Study Guide: 762 Pages

AZ-700 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-700" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-700 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-700 Premium Bundle

AZ-700 Premium File: 406 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 08, 2026

AZ-700 Training Course: 64 Video Lectures

AZ-700 PDF Study Guide: 762 Pages

$79.99

AZ-700 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-700" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-700 Practice Test 63

Question 620

A company deploys dozens of public ingress endpoints and wants contiguous provider-owned addresses that simplify upstream firewall allowlists. A web application must maintain one stable inbound IP through a VM restart, but it currently receives a dynamic public address. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Reserve a Standard public IP prefix of appropriate size and allocate individual public IP resources from that prefix; create a suitable static Standard public IP and associate it with the supported load balancer or network interface.
  2. Reserve a Standard public IP prefix of appropriate size and allocate individual public IP resources from that prefix; evaluate Azure custom IP prefix bring-your-own-IP onboarding, validation, and supported regional advertisement requirements.
  3. Create and explicitly assign appropriate public IP resources from the prefix to the intended frontend endpoints; create a suitable static Standard public IP and associate it with the supported load balancer or network interface.
  4. Create a suitable static Standard public IP and associate it with the supported load balancer or network interface; do not Reserve a Standard public IP prefix of appropriate size and allocate individual public IP resources from that prefix.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An Azure public IP prefix provides a predictable block for related public addresses without requiring independent random allocations. A static public IP resource maintains a known endpoint instead of relying on a temporary automatically assigned address. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A static public IP resource maintains a known endpoint instead of relying on a temporary automatically assigned address.

C:

An Azure public IP prefix provides a predictable block for related public addresses without requiring independent random allocations.

D:

This plan leaves out a required action: Reserve a Standard public IP prefix of appropriate size and allocate individual public IP resources from that prefix. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

Question 621

A business uses an external RADIUS server for remote user authentication and wants Azure P2S to validate against it. Which response best addresses this Azure networking scenario?

  1. Implement certificate revocation and replacement for affected P2S clients, then verify rejected connections.
  2. Redesign the client address pool to avoid overlapping private networks and validate the return routes.
  3. Choose a supported P2S gateway and tunnel combination with RADIUS authentication and test server reachability.
  4. Use a supported Microsoft Entra ID authentication design with appropriate client and conditional access prerequisites.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

RADIUS requires a compatible VPN configuration and live authentication path beyond a portal checkbox.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For this finding, rADIUS requires a compatible VPN configuration and live authentication path beyond a portal checkbox.

B:

Redesigning the client address pool to avoid overlapping private networks and validating the return routes would not meet the need for a supported P2S gateway and tunnel combination with RADIUS authentication and test server reachability.

D:

For this question, rADIUS requires a compatible VPN configuration and live authentication path beyond a portal checkbox.

Question 622

A fleet of managed Windows devices must use a supported VPN protocol with modern identity integration, but the proposed basic tunnel option lacks the feature. Which response most directly resolves the issue?

  1. Match the selected tunnel protocol and authentication approach to actual supported client operating systems.
  2. Select an eligible OpenVPN-based point-to-site profile and validate the required Microsoft Entra authentication support.
  3. Configure a supported Azure point-to-site VPN gateway and distribute approved client profiles.
  4. Regenerate and redistribute the current VPN client configuration and verify the client's installed route list.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Protocol selection affects supported authentication methods; not every tunnel type provides identical identity integrations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Matching the selected tunnel protocol and authentication approach to actual supported client operating systems would not meet the need for an eligible OpenVPN-based point-to-site profile and validate the required Microsoft Entra authentication support.

C:

Configuring a supported Azure point-to-site VPN gateway and distributing approved client profiles would not meet the need for an eligible OpenVPN-based point-to-site profile and validate the required Microsoft Entra authentication support.

D:

For this finding, protocol selection affects supported authentication methods; not every tunnel type provides identical identity integrations.

Question 623

An enterprise must preserve one backend VM for each client source across multiple TCP connections, and uniform load distribution breaks session behavior. An app needs to expose one private service on port 443 and a separate TCP management service on 8443 behind the same frontend. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Create appropriately scoped load-balancing or inbound NAT rules with distinct ports and authorized access controls; do not evaluate supported Load Balancer session persistence settings and the application's actual state handling.
  2. Evaluate supported Load Balancer session persistence settings and the application's actual state handling; create appropriately scoped load-balancing or inbound NAT rules with distinct ports and authorized access controls.
  3. Evaluate supported Load Balancer session persistence settings and the application's actual state handling; deploy a suitable Azure Load Balancer UDP rule and health-check strategy for the supported backend service.
  4. Associate the intended instances with the backend pool and verify probe health and effective frontend rules; create appropriately scoped load-balancing or inbound NAT rules with distinct ports and authorized access controls.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Layer-4 distribution can use session-affinity modes, but application state still requires a compatible design. Each listener and port mapping must be explicit; one HTTPS rule does not cover every transport service. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This plan leaves out a required action: Evaluate supported Load Balancer session persistence settings and the application's actual state handling. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

C:

Each listener and port mapping must be explicit; one HTTPS rule does not cover every transport service.

D:

Layer-4 distribution can use session-affinity modes, but application state still requires a compatible design.

Question 624

A legacy network appliance supports only fixed traffic selectors and no route-based tunnel configuration. Which response most directly resolves the issue?

  1. Evaluate policy-based compatibility and supported VPN gateway connection settings before attempting to force a route-based design.
  2. Select a supported gateway SKU based on throughput, tunnel limits, feature support, and availability needs.
  3. Deploy a supported route-based Azure VPN gateway and configure compatible IPsec peer settings and routes.
  4. Select an eligible active-active VPN gateway configuration and design both on-premises tunnels and BGP peers where supported.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Tunnel types and selector capabilities must match both peers, not only the Azure side.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Selecting a supported gateway SKU based on throughput, tunnel limits, feature support, and availability needs would not meet the need for policy-based compatibility and supported VPN gateway connection settings.

C:

Deploying a supported route-based Azure VPN gateway and configuring compatible IPsec peer settings and routes would not meet the need for policy-based compatibility and supported VPN gateway connection settings.

D:

For this finding, tunnel types and selector capabilities must match both peers, not only the Azure side.

Question 625

A public zone was created in Azure DNS, but users still query the prior provider because the domain registrar nameservers were not updated. A retail domain changes its application endpoint during cutover but some recursive resolvers keep returning the old address. A private DNS zone contains an A record for an endpoint that was deleted and recreated with a different address; clients hit the obsolete IP. What is the most appropriate plan for this situation?

  1. Delegate the public domain to the Azure DNS authoritative nameservers at the registrar and verify propagation; plan record TTLs and allow cached responses to age out while validating the authoritative record and cutover window; and inspect endpoint-linked DNS zone groups and reconcile stale private A records to the current endpoint IP.
  2. Delegate the public domain to the Azure DNS authoritative nameservers at the registrar and verify propagation; configure delegation in the appropriate public parent zone and verify authoritative NS records for the child zone; and inspect endpoint-linked DNS zone groups and reconcile stale private A records to the current endpoint IP.
  3. Configure delegation in the appropriate public parent zone and verify authoritative NS records for the child zone; plan record TTLs and allow cached responses to age out while validating the authoritative record and cutover window; and inspect endpoint-linked DNS zone groups and reconcile stale private A records to the current endpoint IP.
  4. Delegate the public domain to the Azure DNS authoritative nameservers at the registrar and verify propagation; plan record TTLs and allow cached responses to age out while validating the authoritative record and cutover window; and configure delegation in the appropriate public parent zone and verify authoritative NS records for the child zone.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Public zone creation must be paired with parent delegation before internet clients consistently use Azure records. DNS caching follows TTL semantics and can delay an otherwise correct record change. Private endpoint resolution must track endpoint lifecycle; an old A record can break an otherwise healthy service. Each decision addresses a separate requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 2 misses this need: DNS caching follows TTL semantics and can delay an otherwise correct record change.

C:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 1 misses this need: public zone creation must be paired with parent delegation before internet clients consistently use Azure records.

D:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 3 misses this need: private endpoint resolution must track endpoint lifecycle; an old A record can break an otherwise healthy service.

Question 626

A retailer needs to limit aggressive automated checkout requests from a small set of source addresses without blocking all legitimate shopping. A security engineer creates one custom WAF allow rule ahead of managed rules and unintentionally lets selected traffic bypass later inspections. A team deploys a new Front Door WAF policy and checks only that HTTP status is 200 instead of validating known harmless attack-test fixtures. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Map supported managed rule sets and custom-rule options to the new WAF platform before migration; review custom-rule priority and termination behavior before permitting exceptions to the managed rule set; and run authorized representative request tests and correlate WAF logs with policy mode and expected decisions.
  2. Evaluate supported WAF rate-limiting rules with appropriate thresholds, exceptions, and telemetry; map supported managed rule sets and custom-rule options to the new WAF platform before migration; and run authorized representative request tests and correlate WAF logs with policy mode and expected decisions.
  3. Evaluate supported WAF rate-limiting rules with appropriate thresholds, exceptions, and telemetry; review custom-rule priority and termination behavior before permitting exceptions to the managed rule set; and map supported managed rule sets and custom-rule options to the new WAF platform before migration.
  4. Evaluate supported WAF rate-limiting rules with appropriate thresholds, exceptions, and telemetry; review custom-rule priority and termination behavior before permitting exceptions to the managed rule set; and run authorized representative request tests and correlate WAF logs with policy mode and expected decisions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Rate limiting can mitigate request floods while preserving legitimate client patterns when thresholds are tested. WAF custom rule evaluation can change whether subsequent protections are applied to a request. Functional and security behavior should be confirmed through actual matched requests, not service readiness alone. Each decision addresses a separate requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 1 misses this need: rate limiting can mitigate request floods while preserving legitimate client patterns when thresholds are tested.

B:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 2 misses this need: wAF custom rule evaluation can change whether subsequent protections are applied to a request.

C:

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 3 misses this need: functional and security behavior should be confirmed through actual matched requests, not service readiness alone.

Question 627

A firewall appliance service must be inserted transparently ahead of a workload and preserve the relevant traffic path. Which response best addresses this Azure networking scenario?

  1. Evaluate Azure Gateway Load Balancer chaining and the compatible NVA appliance integration.
  2. Design explicit outbound SNAT rules or approved NAT Gateway capacity and verify connection reuse.
  3. Configure an appropriate health probe for the actual service protocol and port and validate backend readiness.
  4. Define approved inbound NAT rules with distinct frontend port mappings to the intended backend instances.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Gateway Load Balancer enables supported transparent third-party appliance insertion rather than HTTP-path routing.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For this finding, gateway Load Balancer enables supported transparent third-party appliance insertion rather than HTTP-path routing.

C:

For this question, gateway Load Balancer enables supported transparent third-party appliance insertion rather than HTTP-path routing.

D:

Here, gateway Load Balancer enables supported transparent third-party appliance insertion rather than HTTP-path routing.

Question 628

A site-to-site route seems incorrect, but engineers inspect only BGP configuration and not the selected VM next hop. What should the Azure network engineer do?

  1. Use Network Watcher next hop and effective-route diagnostics for the affected VM source and destination.
  2. Run IP flow verify with representative five-tuple details and inspect the resulting allow or deny rule.
  3. Use Network Watcher connection troubleshoot and appropriate IP flow verification to isolate the failed connection stage.
  4. Configure a bounded Network Watcher packet capture for the target VM with authorized storage and filters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Next-hop testing shows which route Azure would use for a specific destination at a given interface.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Running IP flow verify with representative five-tuple details and inspecting the resulting allow or deny rule would not meet the need for network Watcher next hop and effective-route diagnostics for the affected VM source and destination.

C:

Using Network Watcher connection troubleshoot and appropriate IP flow verification to isolate the failed connection stage would not meet the need for network Watcher next hop and effective-route diagnostics for the affected VM source and destination.

D:

For this finding, next-hop testing shows which route Azure would use for a specific destination at a given interface.

Question 629

During an Azure networking rollout, the team must resolve both of these conditions. An operations team schedules an Azure virtual network gateway maintenance operation without planning how branch traffic will survive an instance loss. A route-based VPN advertises 0.0.0.0/0 from a branch and unexpectedly attracts Azure workloads that should use direct internet egress. Which course of action addresses the stated issues?

  1. Expand GatewaySubnet through a supported change plan before allocating the new gateway instances; review BGP default-route acceptance and forced-tunneling intent before allowing the branch's advertised default.
  2. Evaluate zone-redundant or active-active options and validate operational failover against branch peer capabilities; correct overlapping on-premises address ranges and verify learned prefixes before adjusting tunnel encryption profiles.
  3. Review BGP default-route acceptance and forced-tunneling intent before allowing the branch's advertised default; do not evaluate zone-redundant or active-active options and validate operational failover against branch peer capabilities.
  4. Evaluate zone-redundant or active-active options and validate operational failover against branch peer capabilities; review BGP default-route acceptance and forced-tunneling intent before allowing the branch's advertised default.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Gateway high availability and on-premises configuration together determine whether encrypted sessions can recover. An accepted default route can change all internet egress traffic paths, not just the intended private branch prefixes. Both actions are needed.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Gateway high availability and on-premises configuration together determine whether encrypted sessions can recover.

B:

An accepted default route can change all internet egress traffic paths, not just the intended private branch prefixes.

C:

This plan leaves out a required action: Evaluate zone-redundant or active-active options and validate operational failover against branch peer capabilities. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

Question 630

A team wants to allow multiple consumer VNets to use one SQL private endpoint without peering or routing between those VNets. What should the Azure network engineer do?

  1. Review and restrict the SQL service's public network access independently from the private endpoint connection.
  2. Create an Azure private endpoint for the required storage subresource and configure private name resolution.
  3. Fix the application's DNS resolution path so the service hostname resolves to the correct private endpoint address.
  4. Provide private endpoint instances or supported network connectivity for each consumer VNet, with matching DNS resolution.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Private endpoint reachability is a private networking concern; another VNet cannot use an unreachable endpoint by permission alone.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Here, private endpoint reachability is a private networking concern; another VNet cannot use an unreachable endpoint by permission alone.

B:

For this question, private endpoint reachability is a private networking concern; another VNet cannot use an unreachable endpoint by permission alone.

C:

For this finding, private endpoint reachability is a private networking concern; another VNet cannot use an unreachable endpoint by permission alone.


Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions (AZ-700) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-700 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-700 Premium File
406 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-700 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-700 Training Video Course
64 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-700 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-700 Study Guide
762 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.