Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 96

Question 950

During an architecture review, a platform engineer must avoid a failed AD DS join caused by using a DNS resolver that lacks corporate service records. Which option meets that requirement most directly?

  1. Session-host registration expiration investigation
  2. Domain DNS server assignment on host NIC
  3. Host registration token lifecycle
  4. AD DS domain join for session hosts

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

AD join depends on resolving domain services. This addresses the stated need to avoid a failed AD DS join caused by using a DNS resolver that lacks corporate service records without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Expired tokens cannot be used to enroll new hosts. This is relevant when the task is to restore failed fleet enrollment after a registration token expired during provisioning; it does not directly meet the requirement to avoid a failed AD DS join caused by using a DNS resolver that lacks corporate service records.

C:

Registration tokens authorize AVD agent association with a pool. This is relevant when the task is to register newly provisioned session hosts to the intended AVD host pool using a time-scoped registration token; it does not directly meet the requirement to avoid a failed AD DS join caused by using a DNS resolver that lacks corporate service records.

D:

AD DS join binds a Windows host to the directory domain. This is relevant when the task is to join a new Windows VM to an existing corporate AD domain for hybrid authenticated desktop access; it does not directly meet the requirement to avoid a failed AD DS join caused by using a DNS resolver that lacks corporate service records.

Question 951

A desktop operator is asked to restore failed fleet enrollment after a registration token expired during provisioning. Which implementation is appropriate?

  1. Azure VM extension deployment for directory join
  2. Microsoft Entra hybrid join workflow
  3. AVD Agent Boot Loader installation
  4. Session-host registration expiration investigation

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Expired tokens cannot be used to enroll new hosts. This addresses the stated need to restore failed fleet enrollment after a registration token expired during provisioning without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The VM domain-join extension automates Windows directory membership. This is relevant when the task is to automate a Windows VM's supported domain join as part of its infrastructure deployment; it does not directly meet the requirement to restore failed fleet enrollment after a registration token expired during provisioning.

B:

Hybrid join combines AD DS membership with Entra device registration. This is relevant when the task is to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy; it does not directly meet the requirement to restore failed fleet enrollment after a registration token expired during provisioning.

C:

The boot loader participates in the AVD agent startup lifecycle. This is relevant when the task is to ensure the session host can initialize and maintain the AVD agent during guest startup; it does not directly meet the requirement to restore failed fleet enrollment after a registration token expired during provisioning.

Question 952

In a controlled lab, the team applied Azure Policy audit for insecure host configuration so it could identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Configured disk encryption references the approved managed key and permissions permit access
  2. Policy compliance assessment flags the nonconforming desktop VM
  3. Guest OS detects the virtual TPM and health attestation has expected state
  4. Guest firewall drops unapproved inbound RDP while service reverse connect remains operational

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure Policy audit for insecure host configuration: policy compliance assessment flags the nonconforming desktop VM. Policy assignments evaluate resource configurations. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Customer-managed disk encryption key, used to meet a policy demanding organizational control over encryption key lifecycle for sensitive desktop disks. It does not establish whether Azure Policy audit for insecure host configuration satisfies the current requirement to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings.

C:

That evidence concerns Trusted Launch virtual TPM, used to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection. It does not establish whether Azure Policy audit for insecure host configuration satisfies the current requirement to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings.

D:

That evidence concerns Windows Defender Firewall inbound restriction, used to ensure ordinary RDP TCP 3389 isn't exposed to arbitrary endpoints on a pooled session host. It does not establish whether Azure Policy audit for insecure host configuration satisfies the current requirement to identify session-host VMs deployed without approved security flags or encryption settings.

Question 953

A desktop operator is asked to recover a mistakenly deleted entire SMB file share within its configured retention interval. Which implementation is appropriate?

  1. Customer-managed key for storage account
  2. Azure Files share soft delete
  3. SMB 3 encryption in transit
  4. Storage availability-zone redundancy planning

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Soft delete protects against accidental share deletion. This addresses the stated need to recover a mistakenly deleted entire SMB file share within its configured retention interval without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

CMK configuration ties storage encryption to a managed customer key. This is relevant when the task is to meet a policy requiring an organization-controlled key lifecycle for encrypted profile data; it does not directly meet the requirement to recover a mistakenly deleted entire SMB file share within its configured retention interval.

C:

SMB encryption protects profile traffic during transfer. This is relevant when the task is to require encrypted file share data in flight between session host and Azure Files; it does not directly meet the requirement to recover a mistakenly deleted entire SMB file share within its configured retention interval.

D:

Zone redundancy replicates data across datacenter zones within a region. This is relevant when the task is to avoid a single datacenter outage interrupting a supported zone-redundant share workload; it does not directly meet the requirement to recover a mistakenly deleted entire SMB file share within its configured retention interval.

Question 954

A support analyst validates Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles following the change to require time-limited just-in-time elevation before an operator changes AVD hostpool settings. Which measured result is expected?

  1. VM SKU and security configuration report supported confidential compute capability
  2. The operator activates the eligible role for the bounded window and access expires afterward
  3. Guest OS detects the virtual TPM and health attestation has expected state
  4. VM security profile shows Secure Boot enabled and supported boot-integrity signals

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles: the operator activates the eligible role for the bounded window and access expires afterward. Privileged access activation limits standing admin authority. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure confidential VM protection, used to choose a supported protected-compute VM architecture for a workload requiring hardware-backed guest-memory confidentiality. It does not establish whether Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles satisfies the current requirement to require time-limited just-in-time elevation before an operator changes AVD hostpool settings.

C:

That evidence concerns Trusted Launch virtual TPM, used to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection. It does not establish whether Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles satisfies the current requirement to require time-limited just-in-time elevation before an operator changes AVD hostpool settings.

D:

That evidence concerns Trusted Launch with Secure Boot, used to enforce a supported VM boot chain that checks digitally trusted boot components on AVD session hosts. It does not establish whether Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles satisfies the current requirement to require time-limited just-in-time elevation before an operator changes AVD hostpool settings.

Question 955

To meet an audited operations objective, the desktop team must isolate preview updates and AVD service changes from regular production sessions. Which choice is appropriate?

  1. Validation host pool for pre-release tests
  2. Dedicated production resource group for AVD assets
  3. Host pool application-group association
  4. Azure RBAC role scope at resource group

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Validation pools support testing without using the production feed. This addresses the stated need to isolate preview updates and AVD service changes from regular production sessions without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Resource groups provide Azure resource lifecycle and access scope. This is relevant when the task is to isolate lifecycle and delegated management of production host pool resources from test infrastructure; it does not directly meet the requirement to isolate preview updates and AVD service changes from regular production sessions.

C:

Application groups are bound to a host pool for delivery. This is relevant when the task is to keep several desktop/application entitlements linked to the intended collection of session hosts; it does not directly meet the requirement to isolate preview updates and AVD service changes from regular production sessions.

D:

Azure RBAC supports least-privilege delegation by scope. This is relevant when the task is to delegate VM operations on the AVD production resource group without granting subscription-wide Owner; it does not directly meet the requirement to isolate preview updates and AVD service changes from regular production sessions.

Question 956

In a controlled lab, the team applied Pooled session-limit update after load testing so it could reduce a host's placement ceiling for new sessions without abruptly terminating its current user sessions. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Reconnect resumes the earlier session and no new unrelated user is placed
  2. Existing sessions persist while later placements respect the revised limit
  3. Inventory lists the intended user assigned to multiple enabled personal session hosts
  4. Hostpool assignment inventory shows the user mapped to that exact session host

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Pooled session-limit update after load testing: existing sessions persist while later placements respect the revised limit. Load balancer limits affect new placement rather than killing live sessions. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Existing-session reconnection on drain host, used to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one. It does not establish whether Pooled session-limit update after load testing satisfies the current requirement to reduce a host's placement ceiling for new sessions without abruptly terminating its current user sessions.

C:

That evidence concerns Personal desktop multiple assignments feature, used to provide one approved worker with several separately assigned personal desktops when supported by the host pool configuration. It does not establish whether Pooled session-limit update after load testing satisfies the current requirement to reduce a host's placement ceiling for new sessions without abruptly terminating its current user sessions.

D:

That evidence concerns Personal desktop direct user assignment, used to assign a named user to a selected persistent Windows VM within the personal host pool. It does not establish whether Pooled session-limit update after load testing satisfies the current requirement to reduce a host's placement ceiling for new sessions without abruptly terminating its current user sessions.

Question 957

A peer reviewer inspects Custom image software installation for all hosts after it was introduced to ensure a required line-of-business application exists on every newly provisioned pooled VM. Which result should be documented?

  1. An image-based test host contains the approved application version and launches successfully
  2. Replacement host's app is healthy and its image version matches approved baseline
  3. The package launches in its supported isolated environment under the tested delivery method
  4. Pilot host sessions open business workflows on the new app version before fleet rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Custom image software installation for all hosts: an image-based test host contains the approved application version and launches successfully. Installing in the reference image standardizes shared app availability. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Application repair via controlled host rebuild, used to recover a broken shared app installation by replacing the host with a tested image rather than modifying dozens of VMs ad hoc. It does not establish whether Custom image software installation for all hosts satisfies the current requirement to ensure a required line-of-business application exists on every newly provisioned pooled VM.

C:

That evidence concerns App-V style application isolation planning, used to evaluate whether a supported virtualized application package can be delivered without installing its binaries into the base Windows image. It does not establish whether Custom image software installation for all hosts satisfies the current requirement to ensure a required line-of-business application exists on every newly provisioned pooled VM.

D:

That evidence concerns Application version compatibility validation, used to stop a problematic app update from spreading to all multi-session users without a tested rollback option. It does not establish whether Custom image software installation for all hosts satisfies the current requirement to ensure a required line-of-business application exists on every newly provisioned pooled VM.

Question 958

A peer reviewer inspects Azure NetApp Files SMB volume after it was introduced to use managed high-performance enterprise file storage for FSLogix profile shares with strict service requirements. Which result should be documented?

  1. Session hosts mount the supported SMB volume and measured profile I/O meets the agreed target
  2. Archive output appears as blob objects while profile containers stay on SMB-capable storage
  3. Session hosts can be deployed from approved replicated image versions
  4. Share metrics sustain the provisioned throughput and storage latency target under concurrent logon load

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure NetApp Files SMB volume: session hosts mount the supported SMB volume and measured profile I/O meets the agreed target. Azure NetApp Files supports managed SMB volumes for profile storage. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Azure Blob container for diagnostic export, used to retain exported diagnostic log objects rather than attempting to mount an SMB VHDX profile directly. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files SMB volume satisfies the current requirement to use managed high-performance enterprise file storage for FSLogix profile shares with strict service requirements.

C:

That evidence concerns Azure Compute Gallery image versions, used to distribute immutable session-host image versions across approved target regions rather than storing live profiles in an image. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files SMB volume satisfies the current requirement to use managed high-performance enterprise file storage for FSLogix profile shares with strict service requirements.

D:

That evidence concerns SSD provisioned Azure Files share, used to provide predictable high IOPS and low latency for large logon bursts with heavy profile traffic. It does not establish whether Azure NetApp Files SMB volume satisfies the current requirement to use managed high-performance enterprise file storage for FSLogix profile shares with strict service requirements.

Question 959

The runbook says RDP display and monitor configuration was enabled to make a remote desktop use the authorized multi-monitor arrangement rather than forcing every user onto one screen. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. The remote app sees a valid redirected smart card and completes certificate login
  2. Test text clipboard flows in the permitted direction under the configured policy
  3. Client session reports the intended display configuration on supported hardware
  4. Local device restriction is found and disabling it under approval restores permitted clipboard flow

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for RDP display and monitor configuration: client session reports the intended display configuration on supported hardware. RDP properties control remote display behavior. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Smart-card redirection configuration, used to support an authorized user presenting a local hardware smart card during remote application authentication. It does not establish whether RDP display and monitor configuration satisfies the current requirement to make a remote desktop use the authorized multi-monitor arrangement rather than forcing every user onto one screen.

B:

That evidence concerns Clipboard redirection hostpool RDP property, used to allow permitted copy-paste operations between an end-user device and an approved remote desktop. It does not establish whether RDP display and monitor configuration satisfies the current requirement to make a remote desktop use the authorized multi-monitor arrangement rather than forcing every user onto one screen.

D:

That evidence concerns Restricted client-side redirection precedence, used to diagnose why a user cannot paste even though the hostpool allows clipboard redirection. It does not establish whether RDP display and monitor configuration satisfies the current requirement to make a remote desktop use the authorized multi-monitor arrangement rather than forcing every user onto one screen.

Question 960

The runbook says Scaling plan identity permissions was enabled to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Scaling activity changes available hosts in the approved phase without exceeding minimum capacity
  2. Actual VM actions align with local office operating hours under the configured schedule timezone
  3. Hostpool appears in scaling plan assignments and autoscale actions affect that pool
  4. Diagnostic authorization errors cease and controlled start/stop actions succeed

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Scaling plan identity permissions: diagnostic authorization errors cease and controlled start/stop actions succeed. Autoscale requires permission to operate assigned VMs. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Pooled hostpool autoscale scaling plan, used to control VM availability throughout ramp-up, peak and off-peak phases according to a defined weekly schedule. It does not establish whether Scaling plan identity permissions satisfies the current requirement to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions.

B:

That evidence concerns Autoscale phase timezone verification, used to prevent pooled capacity being started an hour late after a schedule's wrong timezone was selected. It does not establish whether Scaling plan identity permissions satisfies the current requirement to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions.

C:

That evidence concerns Scaling plan hostpool assignment, used to make an approved scaling plan actually govern a specified target pooled hostpool rather than remain unassigned. It does not establish whether Scaling plan identity permissions satisfies the current requirement to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.