Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 82

Question 810

The administrator configured FSLogix SizeInMBs setting for the business need to set a planned maximum profile VHDX capacity for a user with heavy but bounded local profile needs. Which observation supports sign-off?

  1. Profile container maximum-size configuration matches the approved capacity policy
  2. Profile logs identify the specific attach stage and any share or disk error
  3. New user containers use the specified supported virtual disk format
  4. Logs show a clean detach and the container is available for a later login

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for FSLogix SizeInMBs setting: profile container maximum-size configuration matches the approved capacity policy. FSLogix supports configured maximum profile disk size. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns FSLogix profile attach event log, used to troubleshoot a sign-in that reaches Windows but fails during VHDX profile mounting. It does not establish whether FSLogix SizeInMBs setting satisfies the current requirement to set a planned maximum profile VHDX capacity for a user with heavy but bounded local profile needs.

C:

That evidence concerns FSLogix VolumeType setting, used to select the supported VHDX disk type for new profile containers instead of a legacy VHD format. It does not establish whether FSLogix SizeInMBs setting satisfies the current requirement to set a planned maximum profile VHDX capacity for a user with heavy but bounded local profile needs.

D:

That evidence concerns User sign-out profile-detach verification, used to verify a completed sign-out flushes and releases the user's roaming VHDX for another pooled host. It does not establish whether FSLogix SizeInMBs setting satisfies the current requirement to set a planned maximum profile VHDX capacity for a user with heavy but bounded local profile needs.

Question 811

Following approval of Session logoff versus disconnect policy to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Existing application state resumes on the original host
  2. Disconnect preserves processes while logoff removes the user session
  3. Service authorization permits the required VM start action and the user can connect to a stopped VM
  4. Users receive notification and no new sessions land during the planned drain

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Session logoff versus disconnect policy: disconnect preserves processes while logoff removes the user session. Disconnect and logoff have different Windows session semantics. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Pooled session reconnection behavior, used to return a user to their disconnected session even though breadth-first placement would choose another less-used VM. It does not establish whether Session logoff versus disconnect policy satisfies the current requirement to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff.

C:

That evidence concerns Start VM on Connect VM start RBAC permission, used to fix a start-on-connect failure after the pool property was enabled but its service identity lacks VM start rights. It does not establish whether Session logoff versus disconnect policy satisfies the current requirement to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff.

D:

That evidence concerns Session host maintenance drain and user notification, used to clear active sessions responsibly before rebooting a pooled host without surprising users. It does not establish whether Session logoff versus disconnect policy satisfies the current requirement to ensure an application continues running during a temporary network disconnect but is closed after explicit logoff.

Question 812

In a controlled lab, the team applied Image definition specialized state so it could preserve machine-specific image characteristics when the chosen supported deployment scenario requires a specialized image. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Image definition indicates specialized state and deployment follows its constraints
  2. Provisioning source points to the current approved image and old version is no longer used for new rollout
  3. Target region reports the gallery version replicated and its deployment is possible
  4. Image build reports success with tested output artifacts and the specified distribution

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Image definition specialized state: image definition indicates specialized state and deployment follows its constraints. Generalized and specialized image artifacts have different provisioning semantics. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Image retirement after replacement validation, used to stop new hosts from launching an obsolete desktop image while preserving required historical recovery evidence. It does not establish whether Image definition specialized state satisfies the current requirement to preserve machine-specific image characteristics when the chosen supported deployment scenario requires a specialized image.

C:

That evidence concerns Regional image replication, used to make an approved desktop image deployable in a separate Azure region before a recovery exercise. It does not establish whether Image definition specialized state satisfies the current requirement to preserve machine-specific image characteristics when the chosen supported deployment scenario requires a specialized image.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure VM Image Builder template, used to automate repeatable OS image creation with provisioners and output distribution rather than relying on manual console changes. It does not establish whether Image definition specialized state satisfies the current requirement to preserve machine-specific image characteristics when the chosen supported deployment scenario requires a specialized image.

Question 813

The runbook says Azure Monitor alert action group was enabled to route a severe AVD connection failure alert to an on-call notification channel. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Memory and paging counters spike while external SMB latency stays normal
  2. Workbook visualizes the expected connection latency trends for selected users and hosts
  3. Saved workbook applies resource or host filters to show the intended scope
  4. Action group history records a notification when alert state changes

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure Monitor alert action group: action group history records a notification when alert state changes. Action groups deliver configured alert notifications. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Session-host memory pressure investigation, used to distinguish a login slowdown caused by guest paging from one caused by the profile SMB share. It does not establish whether Azure Monitor alert action group satisfies the current requirement to route a severe AVD connection failure alert to an on-call notification channel.

B:

That evidence concerns AVD Insights connection performance view, used to compare network RTT and session reliability across desktop host pools and regions. It does not establish whether Azure Monitor alert action group satisfies the current requirement to route a severe AVD connection failure alert to an on-call notification channel.

C:

That evidence concerns AVD Insights workbook customization, used to create an operator view limited to a specific department's host pool and session-host performance. It does not establish whether Azure Monitor alert action group satisfies the current requirement to route a severe AVD connection failure alert to an on-call notification channel.

Question 814

A post-deployment audit tests Application group host pool reference validation for the requirement to fix a RemoteApp published against the wrong host pool despite correct user assignment. Which evidence is decisive?

  1. App-group configuration references the executable available on all target session hosts
  2. An assigned test user can subscribe, see and actually launch the intended desktop or app
  3. App-group metadata points to the intended pool and launches connect to its hosts
  4. Users assigned to the desktop application group see the full desktop in the subscribed workspace

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Application group host pool reference validation: app-group metadata points to the intended pool and launches connect to its hosts. App-group host pool reference determines where the application runs. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns RemoteApp executable alias mapping, used to publish a program from its installed application path for a targeted hostpool. It does not establish whether Application group host pool reference validation satisfies the current requirement to fix a RemoteApp published against the wrong host pool despite correct user assignment.

B:

That evidence concerns User-to-workspace entitlement acceptance test, used to verify both feed discovery and session launch before announcing that the app deployment is complete. It does not establish whether Application group host pool reference validation satisfies the current requirement to fix a RemoteApp published against the wrong host pool despite correct user assignment.

D:

That evidence concerns Host pool desktop application group, used to publish a full Windows desktop from a specific AVD host pool to entitled users. It does not establish whether Application group host pool reference validation satisfies the current requirement to fix a RemoteApp published against the wrong host pool despite correct user assignment.

Question 815

A support analyst validates Microsoft Entra device registration status audit following the change to identify a host registered in Entra but not actually joined as required by the deployment design. Which measured result is expected?

  1. Session-host membership and Kerberos authentication work against the managed domain
  2. Domain controller discovery returns valid AD DS service records once correct DNS is configured
  3. Device status reports the actual expected join type after remediation
  4. Kerberos/DC reachability tests pass from the session-host subnet

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Microsoft Entra device registration status audit: device status reports the actual expected join type after remediation. Registered and joined device states are distinct. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Microsoft Entra Domain Services managed domain, used to use a managed AD-compatible domain for a supported legacy LDAP/Kerberos application requirement. It does not establish whether Microsoft Entra device registration status audit satisfies the current requirement to identify a host registered in Entra but not actually joined as required by the deployment design.

B:

That evidence concerns Active Directory DNS SRV record resolution, used to find the root cause of Windows domain join failures after an incorrect VM DNS configuration. It does not establish whether Microsoft Entra device registration status audit satisfies the current requirement to identify a host registered in Entra but not actually joined as required by the deployment design.

D:

That evidence concerns Domain controller reachability for AD hosts, used to prevent Windows login failures when domain-joined session hosts cannot reach a required private controller. It does not establish whether Microsoft Entra device registration status audit satisfies the current requirement to identify a host registered in Entra but not actually joined as required by the deployment design.

Question 816

A desktop operator is asked to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge. Which implementation is appropriate?

  1. Ramp-up minimum active hosts setting
  2. Autoscale session-aware deallocation test
  3. Peak-phase capacity schedule
  4. Depth-first autoscale load balancing coordination

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Ramp-up phase brings compute online before peak demand. This addresses the stated need to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Session-aware controls protect users during deallocation. This is relevant when the task is to ensure scaling doesn't shut down a host with active users contrary to the approved schedule settings; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge.

C:

Peak phase controls planned host availability. This is relevant when the task is to sustain sufficient available VM capacity during expected working-hour utilization peaks; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge.

D:

Depth-first aids consolidation under autoscale. This is relevant when the task is to pack active user sessions onto fewer pooled hosts when scaling down under a cost optimization objective; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge.

Question 817

A platform engineering group is evaluating the best supported way to ensure new desktop session hosts inherit enforced Windows security controls. Which option addresses that need?

  1. Configure multi-session Office shared computer activation
  2. Separate App Attach packages from OS image
  3. Apply recommended system hardening baseline
  4. Bake enterprise security agent into image baseline

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Hardening in image creation reduces host-by-host drift. This addresses the stated need to ensure new desktop session hosts inherit enforced Windows security controls without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Shared computer activation supports multi-user environments. This is relevant when the task is to avoid user activation errors when several licensed workers share one Windows session host; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure new desktop session hosts inherit enforced Windows security controls.

B:

Dynamic app delivery decouples applications from host images. This is relevant when the task is to deliver frequently changing applications without rebuilding the entire session-host image for each release; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure new desktop session hosts inherit enforced Windows security controls.

D:

Immutable image provisioning standardizes security software. This is relevant when the task is to ensure each new host has the approved endpoint protection client from its first boot; it does not directly meet the requirement to ensure new desktop session hosts inherit enforced Windows security controls.

Question 818

The team implemented Azure Policy deny for disallowed VM regions to prevent creation of new session hosts outside the organization's approved geographies. Which test result demonstrates that the requirement is satisfied?

  1. Subscription quota headroom exceeds the requested additional VM cores
  2. Policy compliance reports identify noncompliant VM and related rule assignments
  3. Attempted unsupported-region VM creation is denied by the assigned policy
  4. Budget report shows actual and forecast spend with configured notification thresholds

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure Policy deny for disallowed VM regions: attempted unsupported-region VM creation is denied by the assigned policy. Azure Policy can enforce allowed-location restrictions. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure quota inspection before scaling hosts, used to avoid failures caused by inadequate regional vCPU limits when expanding the pooled fleet. It does not establish whether Azure Policy deny for disallowed VM regions satisfies the current requirement to prevent creation of new session hosts outside the organization's approved geographies.

B:

That evidence concerns Azure Policy compliance dashboard for session hosts, used to audit whether existing desktop VMs adhere to the approved configuration baseline. It does not establish whether Azure Policy deny for disallowed VM regions satisfies the current requirement to prevent creation of new session hosts outside the organization's approved geographies.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure budget alert scoped to AVD subscription, used to notify platform owners before virtual desktop spending crosses an agreed monthly threshold. It does not establish whether Azure Policy deny for disallowed VM regions satisfies the current requirement to prevent creation of new session hosts outside the organization's approved geographies.

Question 819

A new user experience rule requires the support team to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection. Which control matches the rule?

  1. Secure host image software supply-chain control
  2. Trusted Launch with Secure Boot
  3. Key Vault-backed secret handling for deployment
  4. Trusted Launch virtual TPM

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Trusted Launch supports vTPM-backed security functionality. This addresses the stated need to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Build-time controls reduce trusted image compromise. This is relevant when the task is to reject unsigned or unapproved desktop image components before they reach a production image version; it does not directly meet the requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

B:

Secure Boot is a Trusted Launch capability. This is relevant when the task is to enforce a supported VM boot chain that checks digitally trusted boot components on AVD session hosts; it does not directly meet the requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

C:

Secret stores isolate sensitive values from source definitions. This is relevant when the task is to avoid embedding a domain-join credential directly in a shared infrastructure template; it does not directly meet the requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

Question 820

The runbook says Cloud Cache profile performance test was enabled to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Effective configuration lists both provider connection strings and Cloud Cache writes to the providers
  2. Sync backlog returns to normal and recovered provider contains the post-outage profile update
  3. Measured attach, sign-out and provider sync timing meet the expected session SLA
  4. Test user remains usable and updates synchronize when provider connectivity returns

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Cloud Cache profile performance test: measured attach, sign-out and provider sync timing meet the expected session SLA. Multiple storage backends can change the profile I/O performance characteristics. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns FSLogix CCDLocations multiple provider strings, used to specify two named profile storage backends for Cloud Cache rather than a single fixed VHDLocations path. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache profile performance test satisfies the current requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group.

B:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor, used to verify changes made during temporary network isolation eventually reach approved remote storage providers. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache profile performance test satisfies the current requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group.

D:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache provider failover drill, used to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache profile performance test satisfies the current requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.