Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 57

Question 560

Following approval of Trusted Launch virtual TPM to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Guest firewall drops unapproved inbound RDP while service reverse connect remains operational
  2. Guest OS detects the virtual TPM and health attestation has expected state
  3. The operator activates the eligible role for the bounded window and access expires afterward
  4. VM security profile shows Secure Boot enabled and supported boot-integrity signals

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Trusted Launch virtual TPM: guest OS detects the virtual TPM and health attestation has expected state. Trusted Launch supports vTPM-backed security functionality. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Windows Defender Firewall inbound restriction, used to ensure ordinary RDP TCP 3389 isn't exposed to arbitrary endpoints on a pooled session host. It does not establish whether Trusted Launch virtual TPM satisfies the current requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

C:

That evidence concerns Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles, used to require time-limited just-in-time elevation before an operator changes AVD hostpool settings. It does not establish whether Trusted Launch virtual TPM satisfies the current requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

D:

That evidence concerns Trusted Launch with Secure Boot, used to enforce a supported VM boot chain that checks digitally trusted boot components on AVD session hosts. It does not establish whether Trusted Launch virtual TPM satisfies the current requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

Question 561

After implementing Browser update ring validation, reviewers must ensure the environment can avoid breaking a line-of-business browser extension in all AVD hosts with an untested upgrade. Which evidence is most relevant?

  1. Test call presents the selected camera and user sees expected video
  2. Teams call health indicates optimized VDI state on a compatible client
  3. Pilot browser version passes the extension's acceptance test before fleet-wide rollout
  4. Video redirection extension status reports active offload on a supported endpoint

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Browser update ring validation: pilot browser version passes the extension's acceptance test before fleet-wide rollout. Staged browser testing guards application compatibility. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Teams webcam redirection policy, used to allow supported remote video meetings to access an approved client camera in a session. It does not establish whether Browser update ring validation satisfies the current requirement to avoid breaking a line-of-business browser extension in all AVD hosts with an untested upgrade.

B:

That evidence concerns New Teams VDI optimization support check, used to confirm Teams in AVD uses its supported optimized media path for voice and video instead of unoptimized host rendering. It does not establish whether Browser update ring validation satisfies the current requirement to avoid breaking a line-of-business browser extension in all AVD hosts with an untested upgrade.

D:

That evidence concerns Web app site-specific multimedia redirection, used to improve playback for supported browser video content without forcing general desktop sessions to process the bitstream. It does not establish whether Browser update ring validation satisfies the current requirement to avoid breaking a line-of-business browser extension in all AVD hosts with an untested upgrade.

Question 562

The administrator configured AVD Agent Boot Loader installation for the business need to ensure the session host can initialize and maintain the AVD agent during guest startup. Which observation supports sign-off?

  1. Boot loader components initialize successfully and agent health reports expected status
  2. Extension status reports successful domain join and the computer object exists in the target OU
  3. The VM reports domain membership and successfully contacts domain controllers
  4. New hosts appear registered to the correct pool and the token is valid only for its approved period

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for AVD Agent Boot Loader installation: boot loader components initialize successfully and agent health reports expected status. The boot loader participates in the AVD agent startup lifecycle. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Azure VM extension deployment for directory join, used to automate a Windows VM's supported domain join as part of its infrastructure deployment. It does not establish whether AVD Agent Boot Loader installation satisfies the current requirement to ensure the session host can initialize and maintain the AVD agent during guest startup.

C:

That evidence concerns AD DS domain join for session hosts, used to join a new Windows VM to an existing corporate AD domain for hybrid authenticated desktop access. It does not establish whether AVD Agent Boot Loader installation satisfies the current requirement to ensure the session host can initialize and maintain the AVD agent during guest startup.

D:

That evidence concerns Host registration token lifecycle, used to register newly provisioned session hosts to the intended AVD host pool using a time-scoped registration token. It does not establish whether AVD Agent Boot Loader installation satisfies the current requirement to ensure the session host can initialize and maintain the AVD agent during guest startup.

Question 563

In a controlled lab, the team applied Workspace Feed diagnostics so it could troubleshoot a missing application feed after an app group is published to a workspace. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Diagnostic table contains new error events with correlation identifiers
  2. Log Analytics contains host pool Connection records for new attempted sessions
  3. Resource diagnostic settings send data to the intended Log Analytics workspace
  4. Workspace Feed records show subscription and feed processing events

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Workspace Feed diagnostics: workspace Feed records show subscription and feed processing events. Feed diagnostics cover workspace feed operations. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Hostpool Error diagnostic category, used to retain AVD service error events associated with failed host registration or user connections. It does not establish whether Workspace Feed diagnostics satisfies the current requirement to troubleshoot a missing application feed after an app group is published to a workspace.

B:

That evidence concerns Hostpool Connection diagnostics to Log Analytics, used to collect service-side user connection events to investigate failed desktop launches. It does not establish whether Workspace Feed diagnostics satisfies the current requirement to troubleshoot a missing application feed after an app group is published to a workspace.

C:

That evidence concerns Log Analytics workspace selection, used to centralize AVD diagnostic events from approved workspaces, hostpools and app groups for one query workflow. It does not establish whether Workspace Feed diagnostics satisfies the current requirement to troubleshoot a missing application feed after an app group is published to a workspace.

Question 564

A virtual desktop administrator receives a requirement to publish a packaged app to selected AVD users without installing it on every session-host image. What should they select?

  1. App Attach logon-blocking registration
  2. App Attach app registration on demand
  3. App Attach same-region package planning
  4. App Attach dynamic application assignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

App Attach dynamically mounts packaged application content. This addresses the stated need to publish a packaged app to selected AVD users without installing it on every session-host image without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Logon-blocking registration prioritizes app readiness over login latency. This is relevant when the task is to ensure a critical assigned app completes full package registration before the user's desktop sign-in finishes; it does not directly meet the requirement to publish a packaged app to selected AVD users without installing it on every session-host image.

B:

On-demand registration defers work until needed. This is relevant when the task is to limit application registration overhead during AVD logon by deferring full registration until first application launch; it does not directly meet the requirement to publish a packaged app to selected AVD users without installing it on every session-host image.

C:

App Attach delivery observes supported regional requirements. This is relevant when the task is to ensure a package can be assigned to session hosts in the supported Azure region required by that package and pool; it does not directly meet the requirement to publish a packaged app to selected AVD users without installing it on every session-host image.

Question 565

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Cloud Cache profile performance test
  2. Cloud Cache storage location failover architecture
  3. Cloud Cache write synchronization monitor
  4. Cloud Cache provider failover drill

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Multiple storage backends can change the profile I/O performance characteristics. This addresses the stated need to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Distinct failure domains reduce correlated provider loss. This is relevant when the task is to choose provider locations in distinct failure domains to support a genuine continuity objective; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group.

C:

Local write buffering requires successful later provider synchronization. This is relevant when the task is to verify changes made during temporary network isolation eventually reach approved remote storage providers; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group.

D:

Multi-provider Cloud Cache improves profile resilience. This is relevant when the task is to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group.

Question 566

The team implemented FSLogix CCDLocations multiple provider strings to specify two named profile storage backends for Cloud Cache rather than a single fixed VHDLocations path. Which test result demonstrates that the requirement is satisfied?

  1. Effective configuration lists both provider connection strings and Cloud Cache writes to the providers
  2. Cloud Cache logs identify the affected provider while remaining providers show healthy state
  3. Measured attach, sign-out and provider sync timing meet the expected session SLA
  4. Test user remains usable and updates synchronize when provider connectivity returns

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for FSLogix CCDLocations multiple provider strings: effective configuration lists both provider connection strings and Cloud Cache writes to the providers. CCDLocations defines Cloud Cache remote storage providers. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache per-provider connectivity diagnostic, used to determine which configured remote profile provider is disconnected when a user sees intermittent performance. It does not establish whether FSLogix CCDLocations multiple provider strings satisfies the current requirement to specify two named profile storage backends for Cloud Cache rather than a single fixed VHDLocations path.

C:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache profile performance test, used to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group. It does not establish whether FSLogix CCDLocations multiple provider strings satisfies the current requirement to specify two named profile storage backends for Cloud Cache rather than a single fixed VHDLocations path.

D:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache provider failover drill, used to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault. It does not establish whether FSLogix CCDLocations multiple provider strings satisfies the current requirement to specify two named profile storage backends for Cloud Cache rather than a single fixed VHDLocations path.

Question 567

An Azure Virtual Desktop engineering team needs to let the build service write its finished image to a private gallery without broad Owner permissions. Which specific configuration is the most direct fit?

  1. Image Builder managed identity permission
  2. Image Builder customizer script
  3. Image version promotion ring
  4. Image-version release notes and change log

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Build pipelines require scoped permissions for output artifacts. This addresses the stated need to let the build service write its finished image to a private gallery without broad Owner permissions without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Image Builder customizers modify the base guest before capture. This is relevant when the task is to install a required security agent into the image as an audited build stage; it does not directly meet the requirement to let the build service write its finished image to a private gallery without broad Owner permissions.

C:

Staged promotion reduces deployment blast radius. This is relevant when the task is to test a new desktop image with a small pilot host pool before production-wide rollout; it does not directly meet the requirement to let the build service write its finished image to a private gallery without broad Owner permissions.

D:

Version metadata supports repeatability and rollback. This is relevant when the task is to trace which app and OS patches were introduced between two host image versions; it does not directly meet the requirement to let the build service write its finished image to a private gallery without broad Owner permissions.

Question 568

A peer reviewer inspects Read-only resource lock on critical image gallery after it was introduced to block accidental removal or mutation of a production image repository during a maintenance freeze. Which result should be documented?

  1. Subscription quota headroom exceeds the requested additional VM cores
  2. Effective role assignments permit approved version operations but deny unrelated resources
  3. Attempted locked mutation is rejected while allowed viewing continues
  4. Remaining eligible hosts support the expected user concurrency during the patch window

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Read-only resource lock on critical image gallery: attempted locked mutation is rejected while allowed viewing continues. Azure resource locks can protect critical deployment artifacts. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Azure quota inspection before scaling hosts, used to avoid failures caused by inadequate regional vCPU limits when expanding the pooled fleet. It does not establish whether Read-only resource lock on critical image gallery satisfies the current requirement to block accidental removal or mutation of a production image repository during a maintenance freeze.

B:

That evidence concerns Granular RBAC for image publishers, used to allow only approved engineers to create new gallery image versions without broad subscription Owner privileges. It does not establish whether Read-only resource lock on critical image gallery satisfies the current requirement to block accidental removal or mutation of a production image repository during a maintenance freeze.

D:

That evidence concerns Availability-capacity buffer for planned maintenance, used to retain enough live pooled host capacity while a maintenance ring is drained. It does not establish whether Read-only resource lock on critical image gallery satisfies the current requirement to block accidental removal or mutation of a production image repository during a maintenance freeze.

Question 569

Following approval of App Control for Business audit mode to measure which line-of-business binaries would be blocked before enforcing a new policy fleet-wide, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Code Integrity events show enforcement blocking the test binary
  2. Guest Security logs include the privileged logon events with user identity and status
  3. Code Integrity event logs record predicted blocks while test programs still run
  4. Controlled access blocks a simulated untrusted write to a designated protected folder

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for App Control for Business audit mode: Code Integrity event logs record predicted blocks while test programs still run. Audit mode tests application policy impact safely. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns App Control for Business enforced policy, used to prevent users from running a prohibited unsigned executable in pooled desktops. It does not establish whether App Control for Business audit mode satisfies the current requirement to measure which line-of-business binaries would be blocked before enforcing a new policy fleet-wide.

B:

That evidence concerns Windows audit policy for privileged sign-ins, used to record administrator authentication attempts on session-host Windows rather than relying only on AVD service sign-in logs. It does not establish whether App Control for Business audit mode satisfies the current requirement to measure which line-of-business binaries would be blocked before enforcing a new policy fleet-wide.

D:

That evidence concerns Controlled Folder Access enabled policy, used to prevent untrusted processes from modifying protected user folders on a session host. It does not establish whether App Control for Business audit mode satisfies the current requirement to measure which line-of-business binaries would be blocked before enforcing a new policy fleet-wide.

Question 570

A desktop service owner wants to pin host deployment to a tested build number rather than an unpredictable latest image. Which change provides the requested capability?

  1. Regional image replication
  2. Azure VM Image Builder template
  3. Image version read access via Azure RBAC
  4. Azure Compute Gallery image version

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Gallery versions identify explicit immutable VM image revisions. This addresses the stated need to pin host deployment to a tested build number rather than an unpredictable latest image without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Compute Gallery distributes image versions to chosen regions. This is relevant when the task is to make an approved desktop image deployable in a separate Azure region before a recovery exercise; it does not directly meet the requirement to pin host deployment to a tested build number rather than an unpredictable latest image.

B:

Image Builder automates repeatable VM image creation. This is relevant when the task is to automate repeatable OS image creation with provisioners and output distribution rather than relying on manual console changes; it does not directly meet the requirement to pin host deployment to a tested build number rather than an unpredictable latest image.

C:

Scoped RBAC controls private gallery image consumption. This is relevant when the task is to let approved host-deployment automation read a private gallery image without making the gallery publicly accessible; it does not directly meet the requirement to pin host deployment to a tested build number rather than an unpredictable latest image.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.