Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 56

Question 550

The runbook says Endpoint security agent health after patch was enabled to ensure defender service and endpoint telemetry remain functional following an in-guest OS update. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Security portal reports onboarded healthy device and fresh protection signatures
  2. Replacement hosts built from prior image pass required tests and broken version is not promoted
  3. Assessment results list required updates and affected VM IDs
  4. Representative user completes an app launch and transactional smoke test on the updated ring

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Endpoint security agent health after patch: security portal reports onboarded healthy device and fresh protection signatures. Patch acceptance needs security software validation. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Image rollback after failed quality gate, used to restore new host provision to a previously approved gallery image when the latest baseline breaks logon. It does not establish whether Endpoint security agent health after patch satisfies the current requirement to ensure defender service and endpoint telemetry remain functional following an in-guest OS update.

C:

That evidence concerns Azure Update Manager patch assessment, used to identify which session-host VMs are missing approved OS updates before scheduling installation. It does not establish whether Endpoint security agent health after patch satisfies the current requirement to ensure defender service and endpoint telemetry remain functional following an in-guest OS update.

D:

That evidence concerns RemoteApp regression test after update, used to verify a critical packaged program still starts from a patched desktop host. It does not establish whether Endpoint security agent health after patch satisfies the current requirement to ensure defender service and endpoint telemetry remain functional following an in-guest OS update.

Question 551

A desktop service owner wants to troubleshoot a new member who cannot see a permitted application immediately after joining a security group. Which change provides the requested capability?

  1. Group membership propagation verification
  2. Application group user group assignment
  3. User-to-workspace entitlement acceptance test
  4. Application group host pool reference validation

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Effective authorization depends on directory group membership. This addresses the stated need to troubleshoot a new member who cannot see a permitted application immediately after joining a security group without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Application group assignment controls who is entitled to the resource. This is relevant when the task is to entitle a department's security group to a previously created desktop or RemoteApp group; it does not directly meet the requirement to troubleshoot a new member who cannot see a permitted application immediately after joining a security group.

C:

Successful publication requires entitlement, workspace association and healthy hosts. This is relevant when the task is to verify both feed discovery and session launch before announcing that the app deployment is complete; it does not directly meet the requirement to troubleshoot a new member who cannot see a permitted application immediately after joining a security group.

D:

App-group host pool reference determines where the application runs. This is relevant when the task is to fix a RemoteApp published against the wrong host pool despite correct user assignment; it does not directly meet the requirement to troubleshoot a new member who cannot see a permitted application immediately after joining a security group.

Question 552

A peer reviewer inspects Conditional Access MFA for Azure Virtual Desktop app after it was introduced to require strong second-factor authentication at AVD service login for eligible employees. Which result should be documented?

  1. Authorized compliant client connects and a noncompliant tested client is denied
  2. Entra sign-in log shows the MFA grant control satisfied for the AVD app
  3. Affected users complete a single expected MFA path without the known legacy method error
  4. Both app sign-in logs show aligned frequency policy and expected prompt cadence

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Conditional Access MFA for Azure Virtual Desktop app: Entra sign-in log shows the MFA grant control satisfied for the AVD app. Conditional Access applies MFA at AVD service authentication. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Compliant-device requirement in Conditional Access, used to restrict AVD access to organization-approved compliant endpoints where device identity permits evaluation. It does not establish whether Conditional Access MFA for Azure Virtual Desktop app satisfies the current requirement to require strong second-factor authentication at AVD service login for eligible employees.

C:

That evidence concerns Disable legacy per-user MFA with Entra SSO, used to prevent conflicting legacy MFA behavior after moving AVD sign-ins under dedicated Conditional Access policies. It does not establish whether Conditional Access MFA for Azure Virtual Desktop app satisfies the current requirement to require strong second-factor authentication at AVD service login for eligible employees.

D:

That evidence concerns Align sign-in frequency between AVD and Cloud Login apps, used to stop repeated MFA prompts when an AVD resource feed and its session-host SSO app use inconsistent session policies. It does not establish whether Conditional Access MFA for Azure Virtual Desktop app satisfies the current requirement to require strong second-factor authentication at AVD service login for eligible employees.

Question 553

A regulated AVD environment must identify a failed provisioner rather than silently promoting an incomplete golden image. Which configuration achieves that goal most directly?

  1. Image Builder failure log inspection
  2. Image Builder validation stage
  3. Image Builder customizer script
  4. Image Builder managed identity permission

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Build logs give actionable evidence for image pipeline defects. This addresses the stated need to identify a failed provisioner rather than silently promoting an incomplete golden image without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Image validation gates avoid deploying broken templates. This is relevant when the task is to reject an image whose installed application baseline fails required tests; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify a failed provisioner rather than silently promoting an incomplete golden image.

C:

Image Builder customizers modify the base guest before capture. This is relevant when the task is to install a required security agent into the image as an audited build stage; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify a failed provisioner rather than silently promoting an incomplete golden image.

D:

Build pipelines require scoped permissions for output artifacts. This is relevant when the task is to let the build service write its finished image to a private gallery without broad Owner permissions; it does not directly meet the requirement to identify a failed provisioner rather than silently promoting an incomplete golden image.

Question 554

An Azure Virtual Desktop deployment is being redesigned to make an approved scaling plan actually govern a specified target pooled hostpool rather than remain unassigned. Which approach should be prioritized?

  1. Ramp-down phase disconnect settings
  2. Ramp-up minimum active hosts setting
  3. Scaling plan identity permissions
  4. Scaling plan hostpool assignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A scaling plan must be associated with its host pool. This addresses the stated need to make an approved scaling plan actually govern a specified target pooled hostpool rather than remain unassigned without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Ramp-down settings control safe reduction of host capacity. This is relevant when the task is to reduce active capacity after users have been disconnected for the configured safe interval; it does not directly meet the requirement to make an approved scaling plan actually govern a specified target pooled hostpool rather than remain unassigned.

B:

Ramp-up phase brings compute online before peak demand. This is relevant when the task is to ensure enough session host capacity is started before the morning sign-in surge; it does not directly meet the requirement to make an approved scaling plan actually govern a specified target pooled hostpool rather than remain unassigned.

C:

Autoscale requires permission to operate assigned VMs. This is relevant when the task is to fix a schedule that cannot start or stop session hosts because the service identity lacks required VM permissions; it does not directly meet the requirement to make an approved scaling plan actually govern a specified target pooled hostpool rather than remain unassigned.

Question 555

A post-deployment audit tests Azure Blob container for diagnostic export for the requirement to retain exported diagnostic log objects rather than attempting to mount an SMB VHDX profile directly. Which evidence is decisive?

  1. Share metrics sustain the provisioned throughput and storage latency target under concurrent logon load
  2. A VHDX attaches at sign-in and user settings persist when accessing a different pooled host
  3. Session hosts mount the supported SMB volume and measured profile I/O meets the agreed target
  4. Archive output appears as blob objects while profile containers stay on SMB-capable storage

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Azure Blob container for diagnostic export: archive output appears as blob objects while profile containers stay on SMB-capable storage. Blob object storage fits log retention rather than ordinary FSLogix SMB attachment. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns SSD provisioned Azure Files share, used to provide predictable high IOPS and low latency for large logon bursts with heavy profile traffic. It does not establish whether Azure Blob container for diagnostic export satisfies the current requirement to retain exported diagnostic log objects rather than attempting to mount an SMB VHDX profile directly.

B:

That evidence concerns FSLogix Profile Container VHDX on SMB, used to roam the whole Windows user profile instead of rebuilding a local profile each login. It does not establish whether Azure Blob container for diagnostic export satisfies the current requirement to retain exported diagnostic log objects rather than attempting to mount an SMB VHDX profile directly.

C:

That evidence concerns Azure NetApp Files SMB volume, used to use managed high-performance enterprise file storage for FSLogix profile shares with strict service requirements. It does not establish whether Azure Blob container for diagnostic export satisfies the current requirement to retain exported diagnostic log objects rather than attempting to mount an SMB VHDX profile directly.

Question 556

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Corporate client deployment via endpoint management
  2. Windows App on macOS
  3. User entitlement feed refresh in client
  4. Windows App for Android

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Windows App is available on supported macOS clients. This addresses the stated need to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Device management can distribute a standard client. This is relevant when the task is to distribute the supported AVD client to a large managed-device fleet without individual user installs; it does not directly meet the requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices.

C:

Client feed refresh updates resource entitlements. This is relevant when the task is to display newly assigned AVD application groups without re-creating the user's Windows profile; it does not directly meet the requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices.

D:

Azure Virtual Desktop clients include supported Android platforms. This is relevant when the task is to allow a managed Android device to access supported remote Windows applications; it does not directly meet the requirement to enable supported Apple laptop users to reach a Windows desktop without replacing their devices.

Question 557

A remote desktop change record says Image recovery gallery version retention now enables the team to retain the last known good image version in protected storage for rollback if the newest build fails. Which result verifies this?

  1. Rollback deployment can select the retained previous version and pass sign-in checks
  2. Compliance inventory shows affected session-host IDs and missing updates
  3. Replacement host is reproducibly deployed from the recorded image version
  4. Deployment catalog and build signature match the recorded trusted publisher and version

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Image recovery gallery version retention: rollback deployment can select the retained previous version and pass sign-in checks. Retained versions are essential for image recovery. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Guest patch compliance report, used to identify hosts that missed a scheduled Windows cumulative update without incorrectly treating all hosts as current. It does not establish whether Image recovery gallery version retention satisfies the current requirement to retain the last known good image version in protected storage for rollback if the newest build fails.

C:

That evidence concerns Rebuild-not-in-place policy for pooled hosts, used to replace a drifted pooled VM with an approved current image rather than apply undocumented custom patches. It does not establish whether Image recovery gallery version retention satisfies the current requirement to retain the last known good image version in protected storage for rollback if the newest build fails.

D:

That evidence concerns Image signing/publisher provenance review, used to reject an image artifact whose version or publishing provenance differs from the approved pipeline. It does not establish whether Image recovery gallery version retention satisfies the current requirement to retain the last known good image version in protected storage for rollback if the newest build fails.

Question 558

The runbook says Image refresh schedule for feature updates was enabled to roll out major Windows feature releases by piloting new images and controlling host replacement waves. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Rollback deployment can select the retained previous version and pass sign-in checks
  2. Deployment catalog and build signature match the recorded trusted publisher and version
  3. Replacement host is reproducibly deployed from the recorded image version
  4. Each ring follows its approved image version and post-change acceptance results

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Image refresh schedule for feature updates: each ring follows its approved image version and post-change acceptance results. Feature updates can require host image lifecycle planning. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Image recovery gallery version retention, used to retain the last known good image version in protected storage for rollback if the newest build fails. It does not establish whether Image refresh schedule for feature updates satisfies the current requirement to roll out major Windows feature releases by piloting new images and controlling host replacement waves.

B:

That evidence concerns Image signing/publisher provenance review, used to reject an image artifact whose version or publishing provenance differs from the approved pipeline. It does not establish whether Image refresh schedule for feature updates satisfies the current requirement to roll out major Windows feature releases by piloting new images and controlling host replacement waves.

C:

That evidence concerns Rebuild-not-in-place policy for pooled hosts, used to replace a drifted pooled VM with an approved current image rather than apply undocumented custom patches. It does not establish whether Image refresh schedule for feature updates satisfies the current requirement to roll out major Windows feature releases by piloting new images and controlling host replacement waves.

Question 559

A peer reviewer inspects Storage encryption at rest with service-managed keys after it was introduced to ensure filesystem data on a managed storage service is encrypted while avoiding customer key management. Which result should be documented?

  1. Storage encryption reports the authorized Key Vault key and rotation/permission state
  2. The snapshot lists an earlier file version that can be selected for recovery
  3. Storage configuration reports encryption-at-rest enabled using the service-managed key
  4. Recovery Services vault jobs and recovery points match the schedule and retention policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for Storage encryption at rest with service-managed keys: storage configuration reports encryption-at-rest enabled using the service-managed key. Storage services encrypt persisted data at rest. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Customer-managed key for storage account, used to meet a policy requiring an organization-controlled key lifecycle for encrypted profile data. It does not establish whether Storage encryption at rest with service-managed keys satisfies the current requirement to ensure filesystem data on a managed storage service is encrypted while avoiding customer key management.

B:

That evidence concerns Azure Files snapshots, used to retain point-in-time versions of a share for an operational file-level rollback. It does not establish whether Storage encryption at rest with service-managed keys satisfies the current requirement to ensure filesystem data on a managed storage service is encrypted while avoiding customer key management.

D:

That evidence concerns Azure Files backup protection policy, used to ensure share recovery points are created on an audited schedule with approved retention. It does not establish whether Storage encryption at rest with service-managed keys satisfies the current requirement to ensure filesystem data on a managed storage service is encrypted while avoiding customer key management.

Question 560

Following approval of Trusted Launch virtual TPM to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Guest firewall drops unapproved inbound RDP while service reverse connect remains operational
  2. Guest OS detects the virtual TPM and health attestation has expected state
  3. The operator activates the eligible role for the bounded window and access expires afterward
  4. VM security profile shows Secure Boot enabled and supported boot-integrity signals

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Trusted Launch virtual TPM: guest OS detects the virtual TPM and health attestation has expected state. Trusted Launch supports vTPM-backed security functionality. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Windows Defender Firewall inbound restriction, used to ensure ordinary RDP TCP 3389 isn't exposed to arbitrary endpoints on a pooled session host. It does not establish whether Trusted Launch virtual TPM satisfies the current requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

C:

That evidence concerns Privileged Identity Management activation for admin roles, used to require time-limited just-in-time elevation before an operator changes AVD hostpool settings. It does not establish whether Trusted Launch virtual TPM satisfies the current requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.

D:

That evidence concerns Trusted Launch with Secure Boot, used to enforce a supported VM boot chain that checks digitally trusted boot components on AVD session hosts. It does not establish whether Trusted Launch virtual TPM satisfies the current requirement to give supported Windows session host VMs a virtual trusted platform module for measured boot and key protection.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.