Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

A partial Private Link pattern can use public discovery and private remaining phases. This is relevant when the task is to leave initial discovery public but keep feed and session connections private to meet a scoped requirement; it does not directly meet the requirement to prevent disallowed public connections after private session access has been validated.

Feed routing requires endpoint coverage for each relevant workspace. This is relevant when the task is to ensure a new workspace's feeds remain private after workspace expansion; it does not directly meet the requirement to prevent disallowed public connections after private session access has been validated.

Private-only acceptance requires all three distinct connection stages. This is relevant when the task is to demonstrate that feed discovery, feed subscription and session launch remain functional without an approved public path; it does not directly meet the requirement to prevent disallowed public connections after private session access has been validated.

That evidence concerns Transport status review after enabling UDP, used to detect a case where clients still connect over TCP because a UDP rule was omitted. It does not establish whether Azure Firewall diagnostic deny logs satisfies the current requirement to locate a firewall policy that silently blocks an AVD control-plane destination.

That evidence concerns Session-host domain join DNS health check, used to resolve a host-registration failure caused by unavailable AD DS SRV records. It does not establish whether Azure Firewall diagnostic deny logs satisfies the current requirement to locate a firewall policy that silently blocks an AVD control-plane destination.

That evidence concerns Azure Virtual Desktop Insights network RTT chart, used to compare user session latency before and after relocating a host pool. It does not establish whether Azure Firewall diagnostic deny logs satisfies the current requirement to locate a firewall policy that silently blocks an AVD control-plane destination.

Successful publication requires entitlement, workspace association and healthy hosts. This is relevant when the task is to verify both feed discovery and session launch before announcing that the app deployment is complete; it does not directly meet the requirement to publish a program from its installed application path for a targeted hostpool.

Preferred app-group type records the default delivery mode. This is relevant when the task is to let a newly created AVD host pool default to full-desktop delivery rather than RemoteApp; it does not directly meet the requirement to publish a program from its installed application path for a targeted hostpool.

Effective authorization depends on directory group membership. This is relevant when the task is to troubleshoot a new member who cannot see a permitted application immediately after joining a security group; it does not directly meet the requirement to publish a program from its installed application path for a targeted hostpool.

That evidence concerns CA report-only deployment phase, used to measure the effect of a proposed user access rule without first blocking production employees. It does not establish whether Compliant-device requirement in Conditional Access satisfies the current requirement to restrict AVD access to organization-approved compliant endpoints where device identity permits evaluation.

That evidence concerns Disable legacy per-user MFA with Entra SSO, used to prevent conflicting legacy MFA behavior after moving AVD sign-ins under dedicated Conditional Access policies. It does not establish whether Compliant-device requirement in Conditional Access satisfies the current requirement to restrict AVD access to organization-approved compliant endpoints where device identity permits evaluation.

That evidence concerns Named-location Conditional Access targeting, used to apply a stronger access rule to sessions initiated from untrusted networks rather than all sign-ins. It does not establish whether Compliant-device requirement in Conditional Access satisfies the current requirement to restrict AVD access to organization-approved compliant endpoints where device identity permits evaluation.

Domain join depends on reachable domain services and correct DNS. This is relevant when the task is to resolve corporate AD domain services before trying to join hosts to the domain; it does not directly meet the requirement to resolve the SMB storage hostname to the private endpoint address instead of a public service address.

Firewall can enforce network-level egress policy for a subnet. This is relevant when the task is to permit necessary broker and service endpoints while keeping a default-deny egress posture; it does not directly meet the requirement to resolve the SMB storage hostname to the private endpoint address instead of a public service address.

AD DS joined hosts must contact domain controllers for join and authentication. This is relevant when the task is to restore a routed path from AVD session hosts to private AD DS domain controllers; it does not directly meet the requirement to resolve the SMB storage hostname to the private endpoint address instead of a public service address.

That evidence concerns Peak user population forecast, used to determine enough pooled session hosts for the highest expected concurrent morning login surge. It does not establish whether Premium OS disk selection for logon-intensive hosts satisfies the current requirement to reduce local operating-system and application I/O bottlenecks unrelated to FSLogix remote SMB profiles.

That evidence concerns VM availability-zone distribution, used to reduce the risk that one Azure datacenter-zone failure removes all hosts from a critical pool. It does not establish whether Premium OS disk selection for logon-intensive hosts satisfies the current requirement to reduce local operating-system and application I/O bottlenecks unrelated to FSLogix remote SMB profiles.

That evidence concerns Autoscaling cost model for idle capacity, used to reduce idle VM runtime expense while keeping minimum hosts available for login bursts. It does not establish whether Premium OS disk selection for logon-intensive hosts satisfies the current requirement to reduce local operating-system and application I/O bottlenecks unrelated to FSLogix remote SMB profiles.

That evidence concerns Manual customized image from reference VM, used to capture an organization-approved guest OS and installed baseline applications after hardening. It does not establish whether Marketplace Windows 11 multi-session image selection satisfies the current requirement to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment.

That evidence concerns Image version read access via Azure RBAC, used to let approved host-deployment automation read a private gallery image without making the gallery publicly accessible. It does not establish whether Marketplace Windows 11 multi-session image selection satisfies the current requirement to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment.

That evidence concerns Image definition specialized state, used to preserve machine-specific image characteristics when the chosen supported deployment scenario requires a specialized image. It does not establish whether Marketplace Windows 11 multi-session image selection satisfies the current requirement to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment.

That evidence concerns Profile VHDX backup consistency validation, used to confirm a backup strategy captures a recoverable user profile container without corrupting its file contents. It does not establish whether Encrypted backup recovery test satisfies the current requirement to ensure restored profile data remains accessible when an approved storage encryption key is rotated.

That evidence concerns Backup recovery access RBAC review, used to prevent ordinary desktop users from deleting recovery points while allowing delegated restoration to approved operators. It does not establish whether Encrypted backup recovery test satisfies the current requirement to ensure restored profile data remains accessible when an approved storage encryption key is rotated.

That evidence concerns Azure Backup protection of Azure Files share, used to create scheduled recovery points for an eligible file share storing FSLogix profiles. It does not establish whether Encrypted backup recovery test satisfies the current requirement to ensure restored profile data remains accessible when an approved storage encryption key is rotated.

That evidence concerns CA report-only deployment phase, used to measure the effect of a proposed user access rule without first blocking production employees. It does not establish whether Sign-in frequency Conditional Access control satisfies the current requirement to require a new authentication after an approved session-age interval on a new connection.

That evidence concerns Align sign-in frequency between AVD and Cloud Login apps, used to stop repeated MFA prompts when an AVD resource feed and its session-host SSO app use inconsistent session policies. It does not establish whether Sign-in frequency Conditional Access control satisfies the current requirement to require a new authentication after an approved session-age interval on a new connection.

That evidence concerns Conditional Access MFA for Azure Virtual Desktop app, used to require strong second-factor authentication at AVD service login for eligible employees. It does not establish whether Sign-in frequency Conditional Access control satisfies the current requirement to require a new authentication after an approved session-age interval on a new connection.

That evidence concerns FSLogix VHDX lock examination, used to resolve a conflict when a stale session or open handle prevents a user's profile disk from mounting on a second host. It does not establish whether FSLogix rules assignment group testing satisfies the current requirement to diagnose a masking rule that doesn't apply because an employee isn't in the expected identity group.

That evidence concerns FSLogix sign-in trace before login script, used to separate a slow network profile mount from a slow application login script after Windows authentication. It does not establish whether FSLogix rules assignment group testing satisfies the current requirement to diagnose a masking rule that doesn't apply because an employee isn't in the expected identity group.

That evidence concerns FSLogix profile log collection, used to identify why one user sees a temporary profile after moving to a new pooled session host. It does not establish whether FSLogix rules assignment group testing satisfies the current requirement to diagnose a masking rule that doesn't apply because an employee isn't in the expected identity group.

That evidence concerns Personal desktop direct user assignment, used to assign a named user to a selected persistent Windows VM within the personal host pool. It does not establish whether Depth-first configuration via Azure CLI satisfies the current requirement to switch a pooled host pool to density-first placement with an explicitly tested maximum session limit.

That evidence concerns Pooled host drain mode before patching, used to protect existing sessions while stopping new session assignments to a host scheduled for reboot. It does not establish whether Depth-first configuration via Azure CLI satisfies the current requirement to switch a pooled host pool to density-first placement with an explicitly tested maximum session limit.

That evidence concerns Remove personal desktop assignment, used to return an assigned VM to an unassigned pool after the prior user leaves, while meeting data-retention procedures. It does not establish whether Depth-first configuration via Azure CLI satisfies the current requirement to switch a pooled host pool to density-first placement with an explicitly tested maximum session limit.