Question 370
A device relies on an outdated CPU security extension vulnerable to known side channels. Which action is MOST defensible given these facts?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Hardware security boundaries are subject to implementation flaws. The controlling fact is: A device relies on an outdated CPU security extension vulnerable to known side channels.
Incorrect Answers
Requiring remote attestation would not apply mitigations and reassess whether isolation remains sufficient.
Trusted execution can reduce host exposure but not eliminate all risks. The scenario does not present the alternate condition: a confidential analytics service wants to protect selected computations from the host OS. The proper immediate action is to apply mitigations and reassess whether isolation remains sufficient.
Using approved hardware acceleration while retaining authenticated encryption would not apply mitigations and reassess whether isolation remains sufficient.






CompTIA SecurityX (CAS-005) Practice Tests