Pass Your Cisco 350-401 Exam Easy!

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect controller OMP peer status and accepted route advertisements from representative edge devices. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify a device template push and health telemetry in Manager while branch edges continue forwarding locally.

This test measures a different behavior: Verify the edge reaches Validator and discovers permitted Controller and Manager addresses with authenticated sessions. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify a device template push and health telemetry in Manager while branch edges continue forwarding locally.

This test measures a different behavior: Capture TLOC/BFD and data-plane tunnel counters between edges while observing no user-data transit at Controller. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify a device template push and health telemetry in Manager while branch edges continue forwarding locally.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: Application flows stop when an edge has no valid remote TLOC despite an OMP route being present. Here the recorded observation is: a change engineer expects Manager to carry application packets and concludes the WAN is down when its UI is unavailable. The applicable cause is: management-plane availability was confused with distributed edge data-plane forwarding.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: Tunnels may be up but remote VPN prefixes are not distributed to edge routes. Here the recorded observation is: a change engineer expects Manager to carry application packets and concludes the WAN is down when its UI is unavailable. The applicable cause is: management-plane availability was confused with distributed edge data-plane forwarding.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: The edge remains in onboarding and cannot discover controller endpoints even though WAN internet access works. Here the recorded observation is: a change engineer expects Manager to carry application packets and concludes the WAN is down when its UI is unavailable. The applicable cause is: management-plane availability was confused with distributed edge data-plane forwarding.

That control reduces a separate risk: Orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: management-plane availability was confused with distributed edge data-plane forwarding. The specific required safeguard is: separate Manager resiliency testing from edge tunnel and forwarding validation.

The needed correction is to use Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager as the centralized management-plane system, not as the per-packet data forwarder.

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect controller OMP peer status and accepted route advertisements from representative edge devices. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify a device template push and health telemetry in Manager while branch edges continue forwarding locally.

Providing reachability and valid onboarding information to the Catalyst SD-WAN Validator orchestration service would not meet the need for the Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as the control-plane peer that distributes routing and policy state to edge routers.

Forward encrypted user traffic between authorized SD-WAN edge routers across data-plane tunnels would not meet the need for the Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as the control-plane peer that distributes routing and policy state to edge routers.

Checking local VPN route redistribution and OMP advertisement toward the SD-WAN Controller would not meet the need for the Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as the control-plane peer that distributes routing and policy state to edge routers.

This test measures a different behavior: Verify the edge reaches Validator and discovers permitted Controller and Manager addresses with authenticated sessions. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: inspect controller OMP peer status and accepted route advertisements from representative edge devices.

This test measures a different behavior: Verify the prefix in local VPN routing, OMP advertised routes and remote edge accepted routes in that sequence. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: inspect controller OMP peer status and accepted route advertisements from representative edge devices.

This test measures a different behavior: Capture TLOC/BFD and data-plane tunnel counters between edges while observing no user-data transit at Controller. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: inspect controller OMP peer status and accepted route advertisements from representative edge devices.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: The edge remains in onboarding and cannot discover controller endpoints even though WAN internet access works. Here the recorded observation is: tunnels may be up but remote VPN prefixes are not distributed to edge routes. The applicable cause is: the edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: Application flows stop when an edge has no valid remote TLOC despite an OMP route being present. Here the recorded observation is: tunnels may be up but remote VPN prefixes are not distributed to edge routes. The applicable cause is: the edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: The branch VPN prefix exists in its local RIB yet is absent from remote OMP routes. Here the recorded observation is: tunnels may be up but remote VPN prefixes are not distributed to edge routes. The applicable cause is: the edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login.

That control reduces a separate risk: A control-plane route existed but no eligible secure edge data-plane transport path was operational. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: the edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login. The specific required safeguard is: monitor OMP adjacency, route filters and controller certificate validity separately.

That control reduces a separate risk: The prefix was not injected into OMP or was rejected by control policy. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: the edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login. The specific required safeguard is: monitor OMP adjacency, route filters and controller certificate validity separately.

That control reduces a separate risk: Orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: the edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login. The specific required safeguard is: monitor OMP adjacency, route filters and controller certificate validity separately.

Mapping transport interfaces to intended supported SD-WAN colors and selecting TLOCs in policy would not provide reachability and valid onboarding information to the Catalyst SD-WAN Validator orchestration service.

Forward encrypted user traffic between authorized SD-WAN edge routers across data-plane tunnels would not provide reachability and valid onboarding information to the Catalyst SD-WAN Validator orchestration service.

Using the Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as the control-plane peer that distributes routing and policy state to edge routers would not provide reachability and valid onboarding information to the Catalyst SD-WAN Validator orchestration service.

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect controller OMP peer status and accepted route advertisements from representative edge devices. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify the edge reaches Validator and discovers permitted Controller and Manager addresses with authenticated sessions.

This test measures a different behavior: Capture TLOC/BFD and data-plane tunnel counters between edges while observing no user-data transit at Controller. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify the edge reaches Validator and discovers permitted Controller and Manager addresses with authenticated sessions.

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect live local/remote TLOC color attributes and confirm the intended transport is selected. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify the edge reaches Validator and discovers permitted Controller and Manager addresses with authenticated sessions.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: Application flows stop when an edge has no valid remote TLOC despite an OMP route being present. Here the recorded observation is: the edge remains in onboarding and cannot discover controller endpoints even though WAN internet access works. The applicable cause is: orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: Tunnels may be up but remote VPN prefixes are not distributed to edge routes. Here the recorded observation is: the edge remains in onboarding and cannot discover controller endpoints even though WAN internet access works. The applicable cause is: orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: An Internet-only traffic policy chooses an MPLS TLOC after a template update. Here the recorded observation is: the edge remains in onboarding and cannot discover controller endpoints even though WAN internet access works. The applicable cause is: orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery.

That control reduces a separate risk: A control-plane route existed but no eligible secure edge data-plane transport path was operational. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery. The specific required safeguard is: test NAT, certificate, and control-connection bootstrap for each new transport/provider.

That control reduces a separate risk: Management-plane availability was confused with distributed edge data-plane forwarding. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery. The specific required safeguard is: test NAT, certificate, and control-connection bootstrap for each new transport/provider.

That control reduces a separate risk: The edge lacks the expected OMP control-plane routes or policy, not a management dashboard login. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: orchestration/validator reachability or device authorization is missing during initial discovery. The specific required safeguard is: test NAT, certificate, and control-connection bootstrap for each new transport/provider.