Pass Your Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Exam Easy!

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File: 306 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 12, 2026

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Course: 223 Video Lectures

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 PDF Study Guide: 411 Pages

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle
Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File: 306 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 12, 2026

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Course: 223 Video Lectures

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 PDF Study Guide: 411 Pages

$79.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Test 22

Question 210

In an AWS networking assessment, a global design requires connecting two regional transit gateways, but the operator tries to propagate VPC routes automatically through the peering attachment. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. VPC peering requires routes for the remote CIDR in the participating VPC subnet tables.
  2. Inter-region Transit Gateway peering requires supported explicit route entries to the peer attachment.
  3. AWS RAM resource sharing must grant the principal access before cross-account attachment creation.
  4. A matching Transit Gateway blackhole route drops packets rather than forwarding to an alternate less-specific route.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that selected regional workloads reach the remote Region through matching static peer routes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unidirectional route configuration can lead to failed return traffic even when peering is active. The decisive technical distinction is inter-region Transit Gateway peering requires supported explicit route entries to the peer attachment; local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering.

C:

Organization membership alone does not necessarily authorize use of every privately owned network resource. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering.

D:

The most specific matching blackhole takes precedence over a broader valid route. The decisive technical distinction is inter-region Transit Gateway peering requires supported explicit route entries to the peer attachment; local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering.

Question 211

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A Transit Gateway attachment is created but data traffic fails because the attached VPC subnets have no routes back to other spokes. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Configure the required associations, propagations and explicit routes in the relevant TGW route tables.
  2. Add approved VPC routes toward the Transit Gateway and appropriate TGW return routes.
  3. Add an approved blackhole route for the prohibited destination in the affected route table.
  4. Enable authorized propagation to the correct associated TGW table or add a supported static route.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

An attached gateway cannot redirect VPC packets that lack a subnet route targeting the attachment. Confirm the change by checking that forward and return traffic traverse the desired VPC and TGW route entries.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Connecting attachments to the same Transit Gateway does not by itself permit every attachment to reach every other. In this situation, an attached gateway cannot redirect VPC packets that lack a subnet route targeting the attachment. The proposed change does not ensure forward and return traffic traverse the desired VPC and TGW route entries.

C:

A targeted blackhole route prevents forwarding to otherwise reachable next hops for its matching destination. The needed control instead targets VPC subnet route tables and Transit Gateway route tables are separate forwarding decisions; it succeeds when forward and return traffic traverse the desired VPC and TGW route entries.

D:

A route propagated into one TGW table may be invisible to another attachment using a different table. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: an attached gateway cannot redirect VPC packets that lack a subnet route targeting the attachment. Verify forward and return traffic traverse the desired VPC and TGW route entries.

Question 212

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A VPN connection was reconfigured to use different pre-shared keys and one of its two tunnels remains down. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Replace the blackhole NAT route with a supported healthy egress path.
  2. Restore the remote prefix route on each affected regional TGW table.
  3. Associate the attachment to the approved table or add only required DNS transit routes.
  4. Verify and rotate only the affected tunnel's agreed pre-shared key without disturbing the healthy tunnel.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A mismatch on one tunnel's credentials can break it while the paired tunnel continues. Confirm the change by checking that both tunnels negotiate after correcting the mismatched key.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A route marked blackhole cannot carry IPv4 outbound traffic regardless of instance state. It does not directly achieve the required result: both tunnels negotiate after correcting the mismatched key. The constraint is that a mismatch on one tunnel's credentials can break it while the paired tunnel continues.

B:

Peer connection state does not automatically propagate remote VPC CIDR changes. It does not directly achieve the required result: both tunnels negotiate after correcting the mismatched key. The constraint is that a mismatch on one tunnel's credentials can break it while the paired tunnel continues.

C:

A TGW attachment can be connected yet lack a path under its new routing-domain membership. It does not directly achieve the required result: both tunnels negotiate after correcting the mismatched key. The constraint is that a mismatch on one tunnel's credentials can break it while the paired tunnel continues.

Question 213

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A global design requires connecting two regional transit gateways, but the operator tries to propagate VPC routes automatically through the peering attachment. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Share the Transit Gateway with the approved account or organization through RAM.
  2. Provide direct internet egress or a supported centralized network architecture instead of relying on transit peering.
  3. Add the missing remote-CIDR route to the peering connection on the responding VPC.
  4. Create the appropriate static routes for remote regional prefixes on both TGWs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering. Confirm the change by checking that selected regional workloads reach the remote Region through matching static peer routes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Organization membership alone does not necessarily authorize use of every privately owned network resource. The needed control instead targets inter-region Transit Gateway peering requires supported explicit route entries to the peer attachment; it succeeds when selected regional workloads reach the remote Region through matching static peer routes.

B:

Peering routes do not permit arbitrary traversal through another VPC's internet or VPN gateway. It does not directly achieve the required result: selected regional workloads reach the remote Region through matching static peer routes. The constraint is that local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering.

C:

Unidirectional route configuration can lead to failed return traffic even when peering is active. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: local VPC propagation into a TGW does not automatically propagate onward over inter-region peering. Verify selected regional workloads reach the remote Region through matching static peer routes.

Question 214

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A financial service needs TCP traffic inspection at a Network Load Balancer endpoint but no HTTP path features. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Deploy the shared GWLB service and gateway load balancer endpoints with appropriate VPC routes.
  2. Add a priority-scoped fixed-response listener rule for the maintenance path.
  3. Select an NLB TCP listener and register healthy targets for the required service port.
  4. Use Gateway Load Balancer and supported gateway load balancer endpoints for the appliance service.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

TCP flow routing and HTTP path matching are separate service capabilities. Confirm the change by checking that connections reach eligible TCP targets and path contents are not used to select targets.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An endpoint alone does not alter routing; both forward and return paths must traverse the inspection architecture. It does not directly achieve the required result: connections reach eligible TCP targets and path contents are not used to select targets. The constraint is that tCP flow routing and HTTP path matching are separate service capabilities.

B:

A fixed response is produced by the load balancer and does not depend on backend target availability. The needed control instead targets an NLB supports layer-four load balancing on TCP listener ports without interpreting HTTP routes; it succeeds when connections reach eligible TCP targets and path contents are not used to select targets.

D:

GWLB is designed for appliance insertion rather than content-based ALB routing or general TCP endpoints alone. It does not directly achieve the required result: connections reach eligible TCP targets and path contents are not used to select targets. The constraint is that tCP flow routing and HTTP path matching are separate service capabilities.

Question 215

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A compliance investigator needs metadata about allowed and rejected packets crossing a sensitive subnet at night. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Enable scoped VPC or subnet Flow Logs and preserve required audit fields.
  2. Collect and correlate CloudTrail NACL change events alongside traffic-flow records.
  3. Apply approved WAF log redaction and filtering policies before long-term storage.
  4. Enable ALB access logs with controlled retention and restricted access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Packet-flow metadata is separate from CloudTrail API configuration activity. Confirm the change by checking that the investigator filters traffic by subnet, ports and ACCEPT or REJECT status.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Traffic logs cannot identify the API principal responsible for a policy change by themselves. The needed control instead targets VPC Flow Logs record flow dispositions and traffic tuple fields for supported VPC observation points; it succeeds when the investigator filters traffic by subnet, ports and ACCEPT or REJECT status.

C:

Comprehensive request logging can expose sensitive headers or query strings beyond the audit's legitimate need. It does not directly achieve the required result: the investigator filters traffic by subnet, ports and ACCEPT or REJECT status. The constraint is that packet-flow metadata is separate from CloudTrail API configuration activity.

D:

Application load-balancer logging carries different context from subnet-level network-flow telemetry. In this situation, packet-flow metadata is separate from CloudTrail API configuration activity. The proposed change does not ensure the investigator filters traffic by subnet, ports and ACCEPT or REJECT status.

Question 216

In an AWS networking assessment, an availability strategy requires DNS to answer with several healthy application endpoint IPs and evaluate endpoint health. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Route 53 multivalue answer routing returns multiple eligible records with optional health evaluations.
  2. Resolver forwarding rules can be associated with multiple VPCs, including cross-account sharing mechanisms.
  3. Route 53 calculated health checks can combine monitored child checks through a configured threshold.
  4. Route 53 health-aware failover requires a routing policy and health checks that participate in record selection.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Multivalue answers are not a full load balancer but can reduce returning unhealthy addresses. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that queries return only eligible healthy addresses from the configured endpoint set.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Shared rule associations centralize hybrid name forwarding while endpoint capacity and connectivity remain separate concerns. For the stated conditions, multivalue answers are not a full load balancer but can reduce returning unhealthy addresses. The more specific mechanism is Route 53 multivalue answer routing returns multiple eligible records with optional health evaluations.

C:

A parent calculated check can represent health criteria spanning several dependencies instead of testing a single IP alone. For the stated conditions, multivalue answers are not a full load balancer but can reduce returning unhealthy addresses. The more specific mechanism is Route 53 multivalue answer routing returns multiple eligible records with optional health evaluations.

D:

Simple routing alone does not make Route 53 suppress failed records based on application health. The reported evidence instead concerns Route 53 multivalue answer routing returns multiple eligible records with optional health evaluations: multivalue answers are not a full load balancer but can reduce returning unhealthy addresses.

Question 217

In an AWS networking assessment, network deployment requires updates only after a request is peer-reviewed and the target account is verified. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. CDK deployments rely on explicit AWS account and Region environment context for targeted resources.
  2. A controlled CI/CD release pipeline can gate IaC changes through approvals and account identity validation.
  3. AWS RAM share creation and principal association can be managed as repeatable infrastructure.
  4. CDK synthesis output must be reviewed for changed CloudFormation resource identities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Version-controlled infrastructure prevents accidental drift only when deployment permissions and approvals are enforced. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that unapproved branch commits cannot alter network resources in production.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A reusable CDK app can deploy to different accounts unless the target is controlled. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; version-controlled infrastructure prevents accidental drift only when deployment permissions and approvals are enforced.

C:

Resource creation and cross-account permission grants are separate lifecycle operations. For the stated conditions, version-controlled infrastructure prevents accidental drift only when deployment permissions and approvals are enforced. The more specific mechanism is a controlled CI/CD release pipeline can gate IaC changes through approvals and account identity validation.

D:

Logical-ID changes can cause CloudFormation to replace networking resources unexpectedly. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; version-controlled infrastructure prevents accidental drift only when deployment permissions and approvals are enforced.

Question 218

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A VPN customer gateway supports only outdated IKE encryption ciphers prohibited by enterprise policy. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Use an HTTPS target group and configure suitable backend TLS endpoints.
  2. Upgrade the customer gateway or configure approved modern IKE and IPsec proposals on both ends.
  3. Configure approved SSE-KMS encryption for the log bucket and appropriate delivery/key permissions.
  4. Select an approved modern ALB TLS policy and test required client compatibility.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Compatible but obsolete cryptography may violate security policy despite forming a technically valid tunnel. Confirm the change by checking that VPN negotiation uses only the reviewed allowed cipher and integrity configurations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

End-to-end confidentiality requires securing both client-to-ALB and ALB-to-target legs when policy demands. It does not directly achieve the required result: VPN negotiation uses only the reviewed allowed cipher and integrity configurations. The constraint is that compatible but obsolete cryptography may violate security policy despite forming a technically valid tunnel.

C:

Network logging transport security and encryption of retained audit records address different data lifecycle stages. It does not directly achieve the required result: VPN negotiation uses only the reviewed allowed cipher and integrity configurations. The constraint is that compatible but obsolete cryptography may violate security policy despite forming a technically valid tunnel.

D:

Certificate validity does not itself prevent negotiation of legacy TLS versions or cipher suites. In this situation, compatible but obsolete cryptography may violate security policy despite forming a technically valid tunnel. The proposed change does not ensure VPN negotiation uses only the reviewed allowed cipher and integrity configurations.

Question 219

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: An ALB terminates client HTTPS but forwards plaintext HTTP to targets in an environment that requires encryption on every hop. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Use an HTTPS target group and configure suitable backend TLS endpoints.
  2. Require HTTPS for viewer requests and test both HTTP and HTTPS behavior.
  3. Use an NLB TCP listener forwarding TLS bytes to the application-controlled TLS endpoint.
  4. Configure an NLB TLS listener with ACM certificate and appropriate target protocol.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

End-to-end confidentiality requires securing both client-to-ALB and ALB-to-target legs when policy demands. Confirm the change by checking that traffic from the ALB reaches targets using the reviewed encrypted target protocol.

Incorrect Answers

B:

DNS name resolution is not a transport security control and cannot guarantee TLS use. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: end-to-end confidentiality requires securing both client-to-ALB and ALB-to-target legs when policy demands. Verify traffic from the ALB reaches targets using the reviewed encrypted target protocol.

C:

Load-balancer TLS termination could change where mutual authentication occurs. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: end-to-end confidentiality requires securing both client-to-ALB and ALB-to-target legs when policy demands. Verify traffic from the ALB reaches targets using the reviewed encrypted target protocol.

D:

NLB TLS termination is different from a TCP listener passing encrypted data through to targets. It does not directly achieve the required result: traffic from the ALB reaches targets using the reviewed encrypted target protocol. The constraint is that end-to-end confidentiality requires securing both client-to-ALB and ALB-to-target legs when policy demands.

Question 220

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: An EC2 private instance has two ENIs in different subnets and reply traffic leaves via the wrong source path. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Configure appropriate policy routing and security controls for the selected source ENI.
  2. Configure the on-premises resolver forwarding path and private routing to the endpoint.
  3. Add approved peering routes and security rules for the additional nonoverlapping CIDR.
  4. Review BGP local preference and route advertisements on the customer's WAN routing policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Multiple interfaces do not automatically guarantee symmetric operating-system return paths. Confirm the change by checking that replies exit through the intended interface and permitted sessions persist.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Endpoint availability in one VPC does not automatically change corporate DNS resolution for the service. In this situation, multiple interfaces do not automatically guarantee symmetric operating-system return paths. The proposed change does not ensure replies exit through the intended interface and permitted sessions persist.

C:

The new prefix needs explicit route visibility even when the existing original VPC addresses work. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: multiple interfaces do not automatically guarantee symmetric operating-system return paths. Verify replies exit through the intended interface and permitted sessions persist.

D:

Failback requires explicit routing preference rather than assuming an active link automatically dominates. The needed control instead targets multihomed EC2 routing requires operating-system source routing consistent with VPC interface paths; it succeeds when replies exit through the intended interface and permitted sessions persist.


AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File

Premium File
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File
306 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Video Course

Training Course
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Video Course
223 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Study Guide

Study Guide
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Study Guide
411 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.