Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 39

Question 380

An investigated employee should receive an approved policy reminder through a controlled insider risk workflow. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

Manage the alert through an IRM case and documented case workflow.
Keep notice actions subject to the case review and authorization process.
Evaluate supported IRM case automation with controlled approval.
Configure and use an eligible IRM notice template.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Notice templates standardize permitted communication during policy-response workflows. It directly meets the case's requirement to send a governed policy notice.

Incorrect Answers

Cases support accountable investigation ownership and decision tracking. That would coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation; the question instead requires a way to send a governed policy notice.

Alert scores are investigation signals, not automatic proof of misconduct. That would prevent premature insider accusations; the question instead requires a way to send a governed policy notice.

Supported workflow integration can standardize authorized case actions. That would automate an approved insider response; the question instead requires a way to send a governed policy notice.

Question 381

The team needs to assign analyst responsibilities and record next investigative steps after an alert escalation. Which configuration BEST meets the requirement?

Manage the alert through an IRM case and documented case workflow.
Keep notice actions subject to the case review and authorization process.
Configure and use an eligible IRM notice template.
Evaluate supported IRM case automation with controlled approval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Cases support accountable investigation ownership and decision tracking. It directly meets the case's requirement to coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation.

Incorrect Answers

Alert scores are investigation signals, not automatic proof of misconduct. That would prevent premature insider accusations; the question instead requires a way to coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation.

Notice templates standardize permitted communication during policy-response workflows. That would send a governed policy notice; the question instead requires a way to coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation.

Supported workflow integration can standardize authorized case actions. That would automate an approved insider response; the question instead requires a way to coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation.

Question 382

An IRM administrator wants to automate an approved response after case decisions rather than use unreviewed manual emails. Which Microsoft Purview approach should the administrator choose?

Configure and use an eligible IRM notice template.
Evaluate supported IRM case automation with controlled approval.
Keep notice actions subject to the case review and authorization process.
Manage the alert through an IRM case and documented case workflow.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Supported workflow integration can standardize authorized case actions. It directly meets the case's requirement to automate an approved insider response.

Incorrect Answers

Notice templates standardize permitted communication during policy-response workflows. That would send a governed policy notice; the question instead requires a way to automate an approved insider response.

Alert scores are investigation signals, not automatic proof of misconduct. That would prevent premature insider accusations; the question instead requires a way to automate an approved insider response.

Cases support accountable investigation ownership and decision tracking. That would coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation; the question instead requires a way to automate an approved insider response.

Question 383

A privacy reviewer must ensure notices are not sent prematurely during initial unverified alert triage. Which action most directly satisfies this requirement?

Evaluate supported IRM case automation with controlled approval.
Manage the alert through an IRM case and documented case workflow.
Keep notice actions subject to the case review and authorization process.
Configure and use an eligible IRM notice template.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Alert scores are investigation signals, not automatic proof of misconduct. It directly meets the case's requirement to prevent premature insider accusations.

Incorrect Answers

Supported workflow integration can standardize authorized case actions. That would automate an approved insider response; the question instead requires a way to prevent premature insider accusations.

Cases support accountable investigation ownership and decision tracking. That would coordinate a multi-step IRM investigation; the question instead requires a way to prevent premature insider accusations.

Notice templates standardize permitted communication during policy-response workflows. That would send a governed policy notice; the question instead requires a way to prevent premature insider accusations.

Question 384

An organization wants to start with a guided policy for staff departing and downloading corporate data. What is the most appropriate next action?

Configure supported priority content targeting for that site.
Enable the required insider policy indicators and their prerequisites.
Configure the policy's supported user or group scope.
Select the appropriate departing-user quick policy or template.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Preconfigured policies and templates accelerate a known exit-related risk use case. It directly meets the case's requirement to initialize departing-user detection.

Incorrect Answers

Priority assets let IRM place greater analytical weight on valuable content. That would focus insider analysis on key intellectual property; the question instead requires a way to initialize departing-user detection.

Without relevant indicator selection the policy lacks the specified monitored activities. That would give an IRM policy usable signals; the question instead requires a way to initialize departing-user detection.

Insider risk policies determine which users are in scope for scoring. That would limit policy population to a department; the question instead requires a way to initialize departing-user detection.

Question 385

A new policy has no configured exfiltration indicators and generates no meaningful risk signal. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

Enable the required insider policy indicators and their prerequisites.
Configure supported priority content targeting for that site.
Select the appropriate departing-user quick policy or template.
Configure the policy's supported user or group scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Without relevant indicator selection the policy lacks the specified monitored activities. It directly meets the case's requirement to give an IRM policy usable signals.

Incorrect Answers

Preconfigured policies and templates accelerate a known exit-related risk use case. That would initialize departing-user detection; the question instead requires a way to give an IRM policy usable signals.

Insider risk policies determine which users are in scope for scoring. That would limit policy population to a department; the question instead requires a way to give an IRM policy usable signals.

Question 386

A policy should focus on a particular SharePoint site with intellectual property rather than score every site equally. Which configuration BEST meets the requirement?

Select the appropriate departing-user quick policy or template.
Configure supported priority content targeting for that site.
Configure the policy's supported user or group scope.
Enable the required insider policy indicators and their prerequisites.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Priority assets let IRM place greater analytical weight on valuable content. It directly meets the case's requirement to focus insider analysis on key intellectual property.

Incorrect Answers

Preconfigured policies and templates accelerate a known exit-related risk use case. That would initialize departing-user detection; the question instead requires a way to focus insider analysis on key intellectual property.

Insider risk policies determine which users are in scope for scoring. That would limit policy population to a department; the question instead requires a way to focus insider analysis on key intellectual property.

Without relevant indicator selection the policy lacks the specified monitored activities. That would give an IRM policy usable signals; the question instead requires a way to focus insider analysis on key intellectual property.

Question 387

A new department wants an IRM policy limited to approved employees, not everyone in the tenant. Which Microsoft Purview approach should the administrator choose?

Configure supported priority content targeting for that site.
Enable the required insider policy indicators and their prerequisites.
Configure the policy's supported user or group scope.
Select the appropriate departing-user quick policy or template.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Insider risk policies determine which users are in scope for scoring. It directly meets the case's requirement to limit policy population to a department.

Incorrect Answers

Without relevant indicator selection the policy lacks the specified monitored activities. That would give an IRM policy usable signals; the question instead requires a way to limit policy population to a department.

Preconfigured policies and templates accelerate a known exit-related risk use case. That would initialize departing-user detection; the question instead requires a way to limit policy population to a department.

Question 388

A review board asks whether Insider Risk Management exposes real usernames by default to every alert triager. Which action most directly satisfies this requirement?

Assign a suitable IRM investigation role with minimal configuration rights.
Inspect relevant administrative audit activities.
Complete the documented dual authorization and scoped setup process.
Review and maintain the default pseudonymous-username privacy setting.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Default IRM pseudonymization reduces unnecessary identity exposure. It directly meets the case's requirement to protect identity in ordinary alert review.

Incorrect Answers

Distinct IRM roles restrict policy management separately from case review. That would separate investigation from administration; the question instead requires a way to protect identity in ordinary alert review.

Supported IRM administration changes can be reviewed through audit records. That would audit insider policy modifications; the question instead requires a way to protect identity in ordinary alert review.

Opt-in forensic evidence demands additional permission safeguards. That would authorize sensitive evidence capture; the question instead requires a way to protect identity in ordinary alert review.

Question 389

An administrator changes insider risk policy indicators and compliance wants evidence of the change. What is the most appropriate next action?

Inspect relevant administrative audit activities.
Assign a suitable IRM investigation role with minimal configuration rights.
Complete the documented dual authorization and scoped setup process.
Review and maintain the default pseudonymous-username privacy setting.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Supported IRM administration changes can be reviewed through audit records. It directly meets the case's requirement to audit insider policy modifications.

Incorrect Answers

Distinct IRM roles restrict policy management separately from case review. That would separate investigation from administration; the question instead requires a way to audit insider policy modifications.

Opt-in forensic evidence demands additional permission safeguards. That would authorize sensitive evidence capture; the question instead requires a way to audit insider policy modifications.

Default IRM pseudonymization reduces unnecessary identity exposure. That would protect identity in ordinary alert review; the question instead requires a way to audit insider policy modifications.

Question 390

A new analyst should view case details but not change risk scoring settings. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

Complete the documented dual authorization and scoped setup process.
Assign a suitable IRM investigation role with minimal configuration rights.
Inspect relevant administrative audit activities.
Review and maintain the default pseudonymous-username privacy setting.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Distinct IRM roles restrict policy management separately from case review. It directly meets the case's requirement to separate investigation from administration.

Incorrect Answers

Opt-in forensic evidence demands additional permission safeguards. That would authorize sensitive evidence capture; the question instead requires a way to separate investigation from administration.

Supported IRM administration changes can be reviewed through audit records. That would audit insider policy modifications; the question instead requires a way to separate investigation from administration.

Default IRM pseudonymization reduces unnecessary identity exposure. That would protect identity in ordinary alert review; the question instead requires a way to separate investigation from administration.

Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests

Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 37 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 28-Sep-2026)
Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 38 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 27-Sep-2026)
Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 39 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 26-Sep-2026)
Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 40 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 25-Sep-2026)
Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 41 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 24-Sep-2026)

Pass Your Microsoft SC-401 Exam Easy!

Question 380

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 381

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 382

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 383

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 384

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 385

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 386

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 387

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 388

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 389

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 390

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests