Pass Your Microsoft SC-401 Exam Easy!

Microsoft SC-401 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

SC-401 Premium Bundle

$74.99

Microsoft SC-401 Premium Bundle

SC-401 Premium File: 291 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 23, 2026

SC-401 Training Course: 101 Video Lectures

SC-401 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-401" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft SC-401 Premium Bundle
Microsoft SC-401 Premium Bundle

SC-401 Premium File: 291 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 23, 2026

SC-401 Training Course: 101 Video Lectures

$74.99

SC-401 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-401" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft SC-401 Practice Test 10

Question 90

An auditor must review which users applied labels without being allowed to edit protection policy. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

  1. Grant suitable label policy management permissions and target a scoped publication policy.
  2. Assign scoped audit or investigation read permissions instead of label policy management.
  3. Separate information protection management roles from content explorer viewer permissions.
  4. Assign an appropriate least-privilege information protection administration role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Investigation and policy-authoring permissions are separately delegated capabilities. It directly meets the case's requirement to permit label investigation without policy editing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Label publishing is separately controlled and can be targeted to selected users. That would delegate audience-scoped label publication; the question instead requires a way to permit label investigation without policy editing.

C:

Content investigation does not require the authority to create or change protection policies. That would maintain role separation for labels; the question instead requires a way to permit label investigation without policy editing.

D:

Purview role groups can delegate label configuration without global administrator privileges. That would delegate label creation safely; the question instead requires a way to permit label investigation without policy editing.

Question 91

A delegated administrator needs to distribute an approved label only to a business unit. Which configuration BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Separate information protection management roles from content explorer viewer permissions.
  2. Assign an appropriate least-privilege information protection administration role.
  3. Grant suitable label policy management permissions and target a scoped publication policy.
  4. Assign scoped audit or investigation read permissions instead of label policy management.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Label publishing is separately controlled and can be targeted to selected users. It directly meets the case's requirement to delegate audience-scoped label publication.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Content investigation does not require the authority to create or change protection policies. That would maintain role separation for labels; the question instead requires a way to delegate audience-scoped label publication.

B:

Purview role groups can delegate label configuration without global administrator privileges. That would delegate label creation safely; the question instead requires a way to delegate audience-scoped label publication.

D:

Investigation and policy-authoring permissions are separately delegated capabilities. That would permit label investigation without policy editing; the question instead requires a way to delegate audience-scoped label publication.

Question 92

The governance team wants to prevent label configuration changes by users who only inspect classified content. Which Microsoft Purview approach should the administrator choose?

  1. Assign an appropriate least-privilege information protection administration role.
  2. Grant suitable label policy management permissions and target a scoped publication policy.
  3. Assign scoped audit or investigation read permissions instead of label policy management.
  4. Separate information protection management roles from content explorer viewer permissions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Content investigation does not require the authority to create or change protection policies. It directly meets the case's requirement to maintain role separation for labels.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Purview role groups can delegate label configuration without global administrator privileges. That would delegate label creation safely; the question instead requires a way to maintain role separation for labels.

B:

Label publishing is separately controlled and can be targeted to selected users. That would delegate audience-scoped label publication; the question instead requires a way to maintain role separation for labels.

C:

Investigation and policy-authoring permissions are separately delegated capabilities. That would permit label investigation without policy editing; the question instead requires a way to maintain role separation for labels.

Question 93

The security team wants supported uploaded cloud files to be classified through a Defender for Cloud Apps file policy. Which action most directly satisfies this requirement?

  1. Configure the supported Defender for Cloud Apps file-policy labeling action.
  2. Inspect the cloud file’s applied label and corresponding governance status in the connected app.
  3. Verify that the label and connected app are eligible for the Defender for Cloud Apps labeling integration.
  4. Review the relevant file-policy alerts in Defender for Cloud Apps.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Cloud Apps file policies can inspect files and perform supported governance actions, including applying labels in eligible integrations. It directly meets the case's requirement to label discovered cloud files.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Verifying resultant file classification checks an action’s outcome, rather than changing a browser session policy. That would confirm the resulting label on a governed file; the question instead requires a way to label discovered cloud files.

C:

A connected application and eligible published label are prerequisites to supported file-label governance actions. That would troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility; the question instead requires a way to label discovered cloud files.

D:

File-policy alert records show matches and related governance events for investigation. That would investigate cloud-file policy detection; the question instead requires a way to label discovered cloud files.

Question 94

A classification admin cannot select an approved sensitivity label for a supported cloud-app file policy action. What is the most appropriate next action?

  1. Inspect the cloud file’s applied label and corresponding governance status in the connected app.
  2. Verify that the label and connected app are eligible for the Defender for Cloud Apps labeling integration.
  3. Configure the supported Defender for Cloud Apps file-policy labeling action.
  4. Review the relevant file-policy alerts in Defender for Cloud Apps.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A connected application and eligible published label are prerequisites to supported file-label governance actions. It directly meets the case's requirement to troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Verifying resultant file classification checks an action’s outcome, rather than changing a browser session policy. That would confirm the resulting label on a governed file; the question instead requires a way to troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility.

C:

Cloud Apps file policies can inspect files and perform supported governance actions, including applying labels in eligible integrations. That would label discovered cloud files; the question instead requires a way to troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility.

D:

File-policy alert records show matches and related governance events for investigation. That would investigate cloud-file policy detection; the question instead requires a way to troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility.

Question 95

The team must verify which sensitivity label was actually assigned to an eligible cloud file after a policy action. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

  1. Verify that the label and connected app are eligible for the Defender for Cloud Apps labeling integration.
  2. Configure the supported Defender for Cloud Apps file-policy labeling action.
  3. Inspect the cloud file’s applied label and corresponding governance status in the connected app.
  4. Review the relevant file-policy alerts in Defender for Cloud Apps.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Verifying resultant file classification checks an action’s outcome, rather than changing a browser session policy. It directly meets the case's requirement to confirm the resulting label on a governed file.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A connected application and eligible published label are prerequisites to supported file-label governance actions. That would troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility; the question instead requires a way to confirm the resulting label on a governed file.

B:

Cloud Apps file policies can inspect files and perform supported governance actions, including applying labels in eligible integrations. That would label discovered cloud files; the question instead requires a way to confirm the resulting label on a governed file.

D:

File-policy alert records show matches and related governance events for investigation. That would investigate cloud-file policy detection; the question instead requires a way to confirm the resulting label on a governed file.

Question 96

The security team wants to investigate existing Cloud Apps file-policy alerts rather than modify sensitivity labels. Which configuration BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Inspect the cloud file’s applied label and corresponding governance status in the connected app.
  2. Configure the supported Defender for Cloud Apps file-policy labeling action.
  3. Verify that the label and connected app are eligible for the Defender for Cloud Apps labeling integration.
  4. Review the relevant file-policy alerts in Defender for Cloud Apps.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

File-policy alert records show matches and related governance events for investigation. It directly meets the case's requirement to investigate cloud-file policy detection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Verifying resultant file classification checks an action’s outcome, rather than changing a browser session policy. That would confirm the resulting label on a governed file; the question instead requires a way to investigate cloud-file policy detection.

B:

Cloud Apps file policies can inspect files and perform supported governance actions, including applying labels in eligible integrations. That would label discovered cloud files; the question instead requires a way to investigate cloud-file policy detection.

C:

A connected application and eligible published label are prerequisites to supported file-label governance actions. That would troubleshoot cloud-app labeling eligibility; the question instead requires a way to investigate cloud-file policy detection.

Question 97

An administrator needs user-driven sensitivity labeling in Windows Explorer for supported local files. Which Microsoft Purview approach should the administrator choose?

  1. Deploy the current Microsoft Purview Information Protection client and its file-labeling capability.
  2. Check Office licensing and client support before enabling built-in label expectations.
  3. Remove or disable the retired add-in and use supported built-in Office labeling.
  4. Verify Purview Information Protection client file-type support and deploy the client.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The current Purview Information Protection client extends labeling to supported Windows file workflows. It directly meets the case's requirement to enable Explorer-based file labeling.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Sensitivity labeling requires supported Microsoft 365 Office editions and eligible workloads. That would validate Office labeling prerequisites; the question instead requires a way to enable Explorer-based file labeling.

C:

Microsoft 365 Apps include modern sensitivity labeling; the legacy Office add-in is retired. That would restore supported native Office labels; the question instead requires a way to enable Explorer-based file labeling.

D:

Client support governs which local file types can be labeled using Windows integration. That would extend labeling to eligible Windows files; the question instead requires a way to enable Explorer-based file labeling.

Question 98

A user has an old retired Azure Information Protection Office add-in blocking native Office label experiences. Which action most directly satisfies this requirement?

  1. Verify Purview Information Protection client file-type support and deploy the client.
  2. Remove or disable the retired add-in and use supported built-in Office labeling.
  3. Check Office licensing and client support before enabling built-in label expectations.
  4. Deploy the current Microsoft Purview Information Protection client and its file-labeling capability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Microsoft 365 Apps include modern sensitivity labeling; the legacy Office add-in is retired. It directly meets the case's requirement to restore supported native Office labels.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Client support governs which local file types can be labeled using Windows integration. That would extend labeling to eligible Windows files; the question instead requires a way to restore supported native Office labels.

C:

Sensitivity labeling requires supported Microsoft 365 Office editions and eligible workloads. That would validate Office labeling prerequisites; the question instead requires a way to restore supported native Office labels.

D:

The current Purview Information Protection client extends labeling to supported Windows file workflows. That would enable Explorer-based file labeling; the question instead requires a way to restore supported native Office labels.

Question 99

A rollout needs supported local non-Office file types to receive organization labels in Windows. What is the most appropriate next action?

  1. Deploy the current Microsoft Purview Information Protection client and its file-labeling capability.
  2. Check Office licensing and client support before enabling built-in label expectations.
  3. Verify Purview Information Protection client file-type support and deploy the client.
  4. Remove or disable the retired add-in and use supported built-in Office labeling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Client support governs which local file types can be labeled using Windows integration. It directly meets the case's requirement to extend labeling to eligible Windows files.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The current Purview Information Protection client extends labeling to supported Windows file workflows. That would enable Explorer-based file labeling; the question instead requires a way to extend labeling to eligible Windows files.

B:

Sensitivity labeling requires supported Microsoft 365 Office editions and eligible workloads. That would validate Office labeling prerequisites; the question instead requires a way to extend labeling to eligible Windows files.

D:

Microsoft 365 Apps include modern sensitivity labeling; the legacy Office add-in is retired. That would restore supported native Office labels; the question instead requires a way to extend labeling to eligible Windows files.

Question 100

An administrator must prevent an unsupported Office perpetual edition from being treated as a supported labeling client. Which response most directly addresses the stated need?

  1. Remove or disable the retired add-in and use supported built-in Office labeling.
  2. Verify Purview Information Protection client file-type support and deploy the client.
  3. Deploy the current Microsoft Purview Information Protection client and its file-labeling capability.
  4. Check Office licensing and client support before enabling built-in label expectations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Sensitivity labeling requires supported Microsoft 365 Office editions and eligible workloads. It directly meets the case's requirement to validate Office labeling prerequisites.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Microsoft 365 Apps include modern sensitivity labeling; the legacy Office add-in is retired. That would restore supported native Office labels; the question instead requires a way to validate Office labeling prerequisites.

B:

Client support governs which local file types can be labeled using Windows integration. That would extend labeling to eligible Windows files; the question instead requires a way to validate Office labeling prerequisites.

C:

The current Purview Information Protection client extends labeling to supported Windows file workflows. That would enable Explorer-based file labeling; the question instead requires a way to validate Office labeling prerequisites.


Administering Information Security in Microsoft 365 (SC-401) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

SC-401 Premium File

Premium File
SC-401 Premium File
291 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

SC-401 Training Video Course

Training Course
SC-401 Training Video Course
101 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.