Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 32

Question 310

A published intranet app is reachable through Application Proxy, but the organization expects Microsoft Entra Conditional Access checks before it loads. Select THREE distinct actions: implement the required change, obtain direct evidence it works, and maintain a continuing protection against drift. Actions that solve a different identity-management problem do not meet those responsibilities.

From outside the corporate network, verify an assigned user reaches the internal app through a Microsoft Entra authenticated proxy flow.
Attempt access with a blocked test identity and verify Conditional Access is evaluated before the app responds.
Run multiple supported connectors and monitor internal DNS, proxy connectivity and capacity.
Review preauthentication settings and avoid bypassing policy checks during backend SSO migrations.
Create a new Application Proxy connector group but leave the existing published application on passthrough preauthentication and with no applicable Conditional Access policy.
Enable Microsoft Entra preauthentication for the Application Proxy application and scope the relevant access policy.

Explanation

Correct Answers

Attempt access with a blocked test identity and verify Conditional Access is evaluated before the app responds. This directly tests the effective outcome, not merely that a configuration exists. It establishes whether the intended change works: enable Microsoft Entra preauthentication for the Application Proxy application and scope the relevant access policy. Failure would be evident in this case: an unauthenticated Internet visitor reaches the backend sign-in page directly through the proxy without an Entra prompt.

Review preauthentication settings and avoid bypassing policy checks during backend SSO migrations. This reduces future drift after the initial control is deployed: enable Microsoft Entra preauthentication for the Application Proxy application and scope the relevant access policy. Recheck the actual behavior with: attempt access with a blocked test identity and verify Conditional Access is evaluated before the app responds.

Enable Microsoft Entra preauthentication for the Application Proxy application and scope the relevant access policy. The solution acts at the intended identity, policy or application scope. A successful result is testable: attempt access with a blocked test identity and verify Conditional Access is evaluated before the app responds. The competing configuration error is: the published application is set to passthrough preauthentication instead of Microsoft Entra preauthentication.

Incorrect Answers

The proposed observation checks the different application proxy on-premises app scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: attempt access with a blocked test identity and verify Conditional Access is evaluated before the app responds.

This control manages future application proxy on-premises app drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described application proxy preauthentication case. The correct safeguard is: review preauthentication settings and avoid bypassing policy checks during backend SSO migrations.

Connector topology alone does not impose Microsoft Entra preauthentication. The existing passthrough setting would continue to bypass the expected sign-in policy gate.

Question 311

An employee needs a useful third-party app that requests higher privileges than users may self-consent, and IT wants a review path. Which proposed configuration or implementation directly meets the stated requirement?

Have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal.
Restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests.
Configure the enterprise application's supported SAML single sign-on with the correct identifier, reply URL and certificate exchange.
Assign the user's approved group to the Reader app role on the enterprise application.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests. The solution acts at the intended identity, policy or application scope. A successful result is testable: submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely. The competing configuration error is: the admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured.

Incorrect Answers

That action implements the separate application tenant-wide admin consent decision. It is appropriate when a multitenant enterprise app requests Microsoft Graph application permissions and the tenant must grant them only after an authorized security review. The present case instead requires the specific admin consent request workflow change: restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests.

That action implements the separate saml enterprise app setup decision. It is appropriate when a company onboards a SAML 2.0 HR SaaS app and wants employees to use Microsoft Entra for single sign-on. The present case instead requires the specific admin consent request workflow change: restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests.

That action implements the separate application app role assignment decision. It is appropriate when a custom enterprise app exposes Reader and Approver roles, and a user must receive only Reader privileges. The present case instead requires the specific admin consent request workflow change: restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests.

Question 312

An employee needs a useful third-party app that requests higher privileges than users may self-consent, and IT wants a review path. The proposed change is: Restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests. After applying the intended configuration, which observation most directly proves that the required behavior works?

Inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.
Check the resulting token's role claim or app-side effective permissions for the test user.
Verify an unassigned test employee is denied while an assigned employee can sign in.
Submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely. This directly tests the effective outcome, not merely that a configuration exists. It establishes whether the intended change works: restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests. Failure would be evident in this case: users see an admin-approval requirement but there is no request submission or reviewer notification flow.

Incorrect Answers

The proposed observation checks the different application tenant-wide admin consent scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

The proposed observation checks the different application app role assignment scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

The proposed observation checks the different enterprise app user assignment requirement scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

Question 313

Users see an admin-approval requirement but there is no request submission or reviewer notification flow. Which root cause best explains the described result rather than merely treating its symptoms?

The group was associated with the wrong application role instead of Reader.
The admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured.
Delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant.
The SAML issuer/relying-party identifier configuration is inconsistent across the service provider and Entra.

Explanation

Correct Answer

The admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured. This is the causal explanation of the observed behavior: users see an admin-approval requirement but there is no request submission or reviewer notification flow. Address the underlying mechanism with: restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests. Then confirm: submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

Incorrect Answers

This diagnosis fits a separate application app role assignment incident: A user appears assigned to the application but receives Approver permissions after group reassignment. It does not explain this case's observed failure; the admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured.

This diagnosis fits a separate application tenant-wide admin consent incident: A developer's individual user consent succeeds for delegated access but an unattended daemon still lacks application permissions. It does not explain this case's observed failure; the admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured.

This diagnosis fits a separate saml enterprise app setup incident: The SaaS reports an invalid audience because the Entra application's identifier does not match its expected entity ID. It does not explain this case's observed failure; the admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured.

Question 314

An employee needs a useful third-party app that requests higher privileges than users may self-consent, and IT wants a review path. The initial implementation works. Which continuing control most directly prevents the same failure or drift from recurring?

Review app consent requests for least privilege and verified publisher context before tenant-wide grants.
Regularly review tenant-wide grants and remove stale application permissions.
Audit role-value changes and app assignments at each privileged application release.
Review preauthentication settings and avoid bypassing policy checks during backend SSO migrations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Review app consent requests for least privilege and verified publisher context before tenant-wide grants. This reduces future drift after the initial control is deployed: restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests. Recheck the actual behavior with: submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

Incorrect Answers

This control manages future application tenant-wide admin consent drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described admin consent request workflow case. The correct safeguard is: review app consent requests for least privilege and verified publisher context before tenant-wide grants.

This control manages future application app role assignment drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described admin consent request workflow case. The correct safeguard is: review app consent requests for least privilege and verified publisher context before tenant-wide grants.

This control manages future application proxy preauthentication drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described admin consent request workflow case. The correct safeguard is: review app consent requests for least privilege and verified publisher context before tenant-wide grants.

Question 315

A multitenant enterprise app requests Microsoft Graph application permissions and the tenant must grant them only after an authorized security review. Which proposed configuration or implementation directly meets the stated requirement?

Have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal.
Create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users.
Restrict self-consent per policy and configure an admin consent workflow with authorized reviewers for elevated requests.
Set assignment required for the enterprise application and assign authorized users/groups to available app roles.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal. The solution acts at the intended identity, policy or application scope. A successful result is testable: inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role. The competing configuration error is: delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant.

Incorrect Answers

That action implements the separate enterprise app collections decision. It is appropriate when employees see a cluttered My Apps portal and want related finance applications grouped for easier discovery without changing who is authorized. The present case instead requires the specific application tenant-wide admin consent change: have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal.

That action implements the separate admin consent request workflow decision. It is appropriate when an employee needs a useful third-party app that requests higher privileges than users may self-consent, and IT wants a review path. The present case instead requires the specific application tenant-wide admin consent change: have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal.

That action implements the separate enterprise app user assignment requirement decision. It is appropriate when a sensitive enterprise app should be accessible only to staff explicitly assigned to it, not every authenticated tenant user. The present case instead requires the specific application tenant-wide admin consent change: have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal.

Question 316

A multitenant enterprise app requests Microsoft Graph application permissions and the tenant must grant them only after an authorized security review. The proposed change is: Have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal. After applying the intended configuration, which observation most directly proves that the required behavior works?

Submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.
Check the resulting token's role claim or app-side effective permissions for the test user.
Inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.
Inspect provisioning logs for create, update and deprovision operations for a controlled test user.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role. This directly tests the effective outcome, not merely that a configuration exists. It establishes whether the intended change works: have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal. Failure would be evident in this case: a developer's individual user consent succeeds for delegated access but an unattended daemon still lacks application permissions.

Incorrect Answers

The proposed observation checks the different admin consent request workflow scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.

The proposed observation checks the different application app role assignment scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.

The proposed observation checks the different scim application provisioning scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.

Question 317

A developer's individual user consent succeeds for delegated access but an unattended daemon still lacks application permissions. Which root cause best explains the described result rather than merely treating its symptoms?

The group was associated with the wrong application role instead of Reader.
The enterprise application has no user assignment requirement, allowing broader sign-in than intended.
The admin consent workflow has not been enabled or its reviewers are not configured.
Delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant. This is the causal explanation of the observed behavior: a developer's individual user consent succeeds for delegated access but an unattended daemon still lacks application permissions. Address the underlying mechanism with: have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal. Then confirm: inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.

Incorrect Answers

This diagnosis fits a separate application app role assignment incident: A user appears assigned to the application but receives Approver permissions after group reassignment. It does not explain this case's observed failure; delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant.

This diagnosis fits a separate enterprise app user assignment requirement incident: An employee can authenticate to the app even though they are not in the approved access roster. It does not explain this case's observed failure; delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant.

This diagnosis fits a separate admin consent request workflow incident: Users see an admin-approval requirement but there is no request submission or reviewer notification flow. It does not explain this case's observed failure; delegated user consent did not authorize the requested application-only roles in the customer tenant.

Question 318

A multitenant enterprise app requests Microsoft Graph application permissions and the tenant must grant them only after an authorized security review. The initial implementation works. Which continuing control most directly prevents the same failure or drift from recurring?

Reconcile application group assignments with HR departures and access reviews.
Regularly review tenant-wide grants and remove stale application permissions.
Audit role-value changes and app assignments at each privileged application release.
Review app consent requests for least privilege and verified publisher context before tenant-wide grants.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Regularly review tenant-wide grants and remove stale application permissions. This reduces future drift after the initial control is deployed: have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal. Recheck the actual behavior with: inspect the service principal's permission grants and run a controlled API operation with the approved app role.

Incorrect Answers

This control manages future enterprise app user assignment requirement drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described application tenant-wide admin consent case. The correct safeguard is: regularly review tenant-wide grants and remove stale application permissions.

This control manages future application app role assignment drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described application tenant-wide admin consent case. The correct safeguard is: regularly review tenant-wide grants and remove stale application permissions.

This control manages future admin consent request workflow drift, but it does not reduce the continuing exposure in the described application tenant-wide admin consent case. The correct safeguard is: regularly review tenant-wide grants and remove stale application permissions.

Question 319

Employees see a cluttered My Apps portal and want related finance applications grouped for easier discovery without changing who is authorized. Which proposed configuration or implementation directly meets the stated requirement?

Create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users.
Set assignment required for the enterprise application and assign authorized users/groups to available app roles.
Have an authorized administrator evaluate and grant the precise tenant-wide permissions for the application service principal.
Configure the enterprise application's supported SAML single sign-on with the correct identifier, reply URL and certificate exchange.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users. The solution acts at the intended identity, policy or application scope. A successful result is testable: open My Apps as a pilot employee and verify the collection appears while existing app access remains unchanged. The competing configuration error is: application collection organization does not create enterprise application authorization or assignments.

Incorrect Answers

That action implements the separate enterprise app user assignment requirement decision. It is appropriate when a sensitive enterprise app should be accessible only to staff explicitly assigned to it, not every authenticated tenant user. The present case instead requires the specific enterprise app collections change: create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users.

That action implements the separate application tenant-wide admin consent decision. It is appropriate when a multitenant enterprise app requests Microsoft Graph application permissions and the tenant must grant them only after an authorized security review. The present case instead requires the specific enterprise app collections change: create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users.

That action implements the separate saml enterprise app setup decision. It is appropriate when a company onboards a SAML 2.0 HR SaaS app and wants employees to use Microsoft Entra for single sign-on. The present case instead requires the specific enterprise app collections change: create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users.

Question 320

Employees see a cluttered My Apps portal and want related finance applications grouped for easier discovery without changing who is authorized. The proposed change is: Create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users. After applying the intended configuration, which observation most directly proves that the required behavior works?

Attempt access with a blocked test identity and verify Conditional Access is evaluated before the app responds.
Open My Apps as a pilot employee and verify the collection appears while existing app access remains unchanged.
Verify an unassigned test employee is denied while an assigned employee can sign in.
Submit an app consent request and verify it enters the reviewer queue without granting permissions prematurely.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Open My Apps as a pilot employee and verify the collection appears while existing app access remains unchanged. This directly tests the effective outcome, not merely that a configuration exists. It establishes whether the intended change works: create appropriate enterprise application collections and include the relevant finance apps for targeted users. Failure would be evident in this case: an app collection is visible but a user still receives AccessDenied when launching an unassigned finance app.

Incorrect Answers

The proposed observation checks the different application proxy preauthentication scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: open My Apps as a pilot employee and verify the collection appears while existing app access remains unchanged.

The proposed observation checks the different enterprise app user assignment requirement scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: open My Apps as a pilot employee and verify the collection appears while existing app access remains unchanged.

The proposed observation checks the different admin consent request workflow scenario. Even a successful test would not establish the requested outcome here: open My Apps as a pilot employee and verify the collection appears while existing app access remains unchanged.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 30 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 08-Oct-2026)
Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 31 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 07-Oct-2026)
Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 32 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 06-Oct-2026)
Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 33 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 05-Oct-2026)
Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 34 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 04-Oct-2026)

Pass Your Microsoft SC-300 Exam Easy!

Question 310

Explanation

Correct Answers

Incorrect Answers

Question 311

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 312

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 313

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 314

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 315

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 316

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 317

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 318

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 319

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 320

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests