Pass Your Microsoft SC-200 Exam Easy!

Microsoft SC-200 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

SC-200 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft SC-200 Premium Bundle

SC-200 Premium File: 499 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 30, 2026

SC-200 Training Course: 47 Video Lectures

SC-200 PDF Study Guide: 441 Pages

SC-200 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-200" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft SC-200 Premium Bundle
Microsoft SC-200 Premium Bundle

SC-200 Premium File: 499 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 30, 2026

SC-200 Training Course: 47 Video Lectures

SC-200 PDF Study Guide: 441 Pages

$79.99

SC-200 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "SC-200" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft SC-200 Practice Test 73

Question 720

An analyst uses leftanti but reverses the two tables and receives the approved accounts that never signed in. Which response best meets the security operations requirement?

  1. Use a leftanti or appropriate set difference to find accounts missing from one side.
  2. Use a leftanti join against the approved account set.
  3. Use narrow approved exceptions while keeping other VPN activity in the hunt.
  4. Put the observed events on the left and approved identities on the right.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Leftanti direction determines which unmatched records survive. This directly addresses the requirement to correct a reversed exclusion join.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Set differences expose unmatched identities between reference and observed records. This addresses detect mismatches between observed and expected accounts; it does not directly satisfy correct a reversed exclusion join.

B:

Leftanti returns left-side records that have no matching key on the right. Its intended use is to identify unauthorized account activity, whereas this case requires the analyst to correct a reversed exclusion join.

C:

Large exclusion lists can conceal real attacker sessions using the same egress. That action focuses on avoid broad VPN-based hunting blind spots rather than the specified need to correct a reversed exclusion join.

Question 721

A newly deployed product has not populated the expected advanced hunting table, yet the SOC reports zero threats. Which approach is best supported by the evidence?

  1. Validate product deployment and telemetry coverage before interpreting an empty query result.
  2. Use the advanced hunting schema reference to inspect table columns and action types.
  3. Return supported timestamp and relevant device/report identifier fields in the detection query.
  4. Filter time and high-selectivity conditions early in the KQL pipeline.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Unsupported or absent integrations produce no data independent of attack activity. This directly addresses the requirement to distinguish unavailable hunting telemetry from no threats.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Schema reference documents supported fields and available event types. Its intended use is to ground a hunt in the correct schema, whereas this case requires the analyst to distinguish unavailable hunting telemetry from no threats.

C:

Detection output schema supports event correlation and alert entity mapping. That action focuses on make a hunting query detection-ready rather than the specified need to distinguish unavailable hunting telemetry from no threats.

D:

Early filtering reduces processing cost and query execution time. This addresses optimize slow advanced hunting queries; it does not directly satisfy distinguish unavailable hunting telemetry from no threats.

Question 722

The hunt asks which executable spawned a suspicious encoded PowerShell command on managed Windows devices. Which action most directly addresses the observed condition?

  1. Query DeviceNetworkEvents for remote address and initiating process.
  2. Query DeviceProcessEvents and inspect parent process fields.
  3. Query DeviceFileEvents for file creation and path evidence.
  4. Query DeviceRegistryEvents for the relevant key path and action type.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

DeviceProcessEvents records process creation context and initiating process relationships. This directly addresses the requirement to hunt for suspicious process ancestry.

Incorrect Answers

A:

DeviceNetworkEvents describes endpoint network connections and their process context. This addresses identify outbound endpoint network connections; it does not directly satisfy hunt for suspicious process ancestry.

C:

DeviceFileEvents captures supported file creation and modification activity. That action focuses on detect suspicious endpoint file placement rather than the specified need to hunt for suspicious process ancestry.

D:

DeviceRegistryEvents exposes supported registry changes and initiating activity. This addresses find registry persistence changes; it does not directly satisfy hunt for suspicious process ancestry.

Question 723

A phishing account logged into a second endpoint before a suspicious process spawned there. What is the most appropriate next action for the analyst?

  1. Corroborate remote execution, anomaly and authorization context before concluding movement.
  2. Aggregate or select the earliest matching timestamp by device with event evidence.
  3. Join or correlate identity logon and device process events by account, device and time.
  4. Search DeviceNetworkEvents for the remote IP across the incident interval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Cross-source correlation connects session establishment to process execution. This directly addresses the requirement to investigate account-driven endpoint compromise.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Multiple logons may be normal and need additional malicious indicators. This addresses avoid weak multi-device login attribution; it does not directly satisfy investigate account-driven endpoint compromise.

B:

First-seen network observations help reconstruct infection chronology. Its intended use is to find earliest compromised infrastructure contact, whereas this case requires the analyst to investigate account-driven endpoint compromise.

D:

Network destination correlation scopes potential shared communication. This addresses find other endpoints contacting suspicious infrastructure; it does not directly satisfy investigate account-driven endpoint compromise.

Question 724

An analyst finds a strongly corroborated new behavior not covered by existing alerts. Which response best meets the security operations requirement?

  1. Verify data coverage and query conditions before declaring the hypothesis disproved.
  2. Define expected attacker behavior and necessary evidence before escalating a rarity alert.
  3. Form a testable hypothesis using remote-tool process, installation and network evidence.
  4. Document the tested inference and propose a validated custom detection.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Hunting outcomes can mature into repeatable preventive monitoring. This directly addresses the requirement to operationalize a successful proactive hunt.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Missing telemetry makes a negative result inconclusive. This addresses interpret negative hunts under coverage gaps; it does not directly satisfy operationalize a successful proactive hunt.

B:

Rarity by itself is not malicious intent and benefits from behavioral context. Its intended use is to avoid rarity-only malicious classification, whereas this case requires the analyst to operationalize a successful proactive hunt.

C:

A hypothesis defines observable behaviors that a hunt can confirm or refute. That action focuses on design a falsifiable remote-management hunt rather than the specified need to operationalize a successful proactive hunt.

Question 725

The investigator wants newest events displayed first after narrowing by the affected account. Which approach is best supported by the evidence?

  1. Use sort by Timestamp descending after the account filter.
  2. Use a KQL where predicate on ActionType before further processing.
  3. Use the KQL take operator with an explicit row count.
  4. Use project to return the specified columns.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Sort orders matching rows by their timestamps. This directly addresses the requirement to rank filtered events by recency.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Where filters input records based on a boolean condition. Its intended use is to select events matching one exact action, whereas this case requires the analyst to rank filtered events by recency.

C:

Take returns a bounded sample without providing exhaustive event analysis. That action focuses on inspect a small event sample rather than the specified need to rank filtered events by recency.

D:

Project restricts output fields while preserving rows. This addresses select only required hunting result columns; it does not directly satisfy rank filtered events by recency.

Question 726

A manager expects a daily count but sees many output rows because the query also groups by minute. Which action most directly addresses the observed condition?

  1. Preserve Timestamp and order events without binning away chronology.
  2. Remove unintended fine-grained grouping keys from summarize.
  3. Use summarize count() by bin(TimeGenerated, 5m) with the relevant entity.
  4. Use bin(TimeGenerated, 1d) after consistent timezone handling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Extra grouping columns subdivide counts into separate buckets. This directly addresses the requirement to correct oversegmented time aggregation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Time aggregation trades fine event order for summaries. This addresses retain detailed process chronology; it does not directly satisfy correct oversegmented time aggregation.

C:

Bin groups datetime values into fixed-size buckets suitable for trends. That action focuses on build five-minute failure intervals rather than the specified need to correct oversegmented time aggregation.

D:

Daily bins reduce events to comparable time intervals. This addresses aggregate daily incident volumes; it does not directly satisfy correct oversegmented time aggregation.

Question 727

A suspicious process connects to an external IP and the analyst wants to identify other devices with the same destination. What is the most appropriate next action for the analyst?

  1. Corroborate remote execution, anomaly and authorization context before concluding movement.
  2. Join or correlate identity logon and device process events by account, device and time.
  3. Search DeviceNetworkEvents for the remote IP across the incident interval.
  4. Aggregate or select the earliest matching timestamp by device with event evidence.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Network destination correlation scopes potential shared communication. This directly addresses the requirement to find other endpoints contacting suspicious infrastructure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Multiple logons may be normal and need additional malicious indicators. This addresses avoid weak multi-device login attribution; it does not directly satisfy find other endpoints contacting suspicious infrastructure.

B:

Cross-source correlation connects session establishment to process execution. Its intended use is to investigate account-driven endpoint compromise, whereas this case requires the analyst to find other endpoints contacting suspicious infrastructure.

D:

First-seen network observations help reconstruct infection chronology. This addresses find earliest compromised infrastructure contact; it does not directly satisfy find other endpoints contacting suspicious infrastructure.

Question 728

An analyst compares a dynamic numeric field to a number but gets wrong results due to type mismatch. Which response best meets the security operations requirement?

  1. Use a supported dynamic property access or parse_json expression.
  2. Validate the raw payload and repair parsing assumptions before extracting fields.
  3. Use mv-expand on the relevant dynamic array.
  4. Cast the extracted dynamic value to a suitable numeric type.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Explicit conversion preserves numeric comparison semantics. This directly addresses the requirement to type nested JSON numeric values correctly.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Dynamic parsing exposes nested structured attributes for filtering. This addresses extract a nested JSON permission; it does not directly satisfy type nested JSON numeric values correctly.

B:

Invalid serialized JSON cannot reliably yield nested properties. Its intended use is to diagnose malformed JSON event payload, whereas this case requires the analyst to type nested JSON numeric values correctly.

C:

Mv-expand converts dynamic collection elements into independent rows. That action focuses on expand role membership arrays rather than the specified need to type nested JSON numeric values correctly.

Question 729

An analyst needs to search old archived records from before Sentinel data lake onboarding using one source table. Which approach is best supported by the evidence?

  1. Use an eligible Sentinel search job for that historical archive.
  2. Use appropriate analytics or near-real-time detections for active event monitoring.
  3. Use a KQL job rather than a single-table search job.
  4. Create a supported search job that materializes the selected records.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Search jobs can query applicable historical archived records outside later lake onboarding coverage. This directly addresses the requirement to access pre-onboarding archived events.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Search jobs target historical asynchronous investigations, not routine low-latency alerts. Its intended use is to distinguish search jobs from active analytic rules, whereas this case requires the analyst to access pre-onboarding archived events.

C:

KQL jobs support multi-table joins and unions for eligible lake data. That action focuses on execute complex multi-table historical correlation rather than the specified need to access pre-onboarding archived events.

D:

Search jobs can return large single-table result sets into a queryable investigation table. This addresses materialize one-table forensic search results; it does not directly satisfy access pre-onboarding archived events.

Question 730

A KQL job performs a large multi-table join without filtering either input by the suspected indicator. Which action most directly addresses the observed condition?

  1. Scope the query to that firewall table and the intended historical period.
  2. Prefilter both relevant tables before joining on stable keys.
  3. Reuse the governed precomputed summary data where the required dimensions are retained.
  4. Check data retention and available historical access mechanisms before altering predicates.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Selective inputs reduce join expansion and execution cost. This directly addresses the requirement to optimize expensive lake joins.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Narrow source and time boundaries reduce unnecessary scans. This addresses reduce hunting query resource use; it does not directly satisfy optimize expensive lake joins.

C:

Materialized aggregates prevent repeated heavy computation. That action focuses on prefer available summary signals to repeated scans rather than the specified need to optimize expensive lake joins.

D:

Expired or moved source data cannot be recovered by query syntax alone. This addresses assess retention before blaming KQL logic; it does not directly satisfy optimize expensive lake joins.


Microsoft Security Operations Analyst (SC-200) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

SC-200 Premium File

Premium File
SC-200 Premium File
499 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

SC-200 Training Video Course

Training Course
SC-200 Training Video Course
47 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

SC-200 Study Guide

Study Guide
SC-200 Study Guide
441 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.