Pass Your Microsoft AZ-700 Exam Easy!

A DNS traffic manager does not terminate HTTP/TLS connections or inspect request payloads.

Traffic Manager makes DNS-level routing decisions and is not an inline application proxy.

This plan leaves out a required action: Configure Azure Traffic Manager with an appropriate traffic-routing method and endpoint monitoring. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

This plan leaves out a required action: Configure Front Door origin groups and routes with appropriate priority and latency-based traffic distribution. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

Front Door can apply supported request-routing transformations at the global entry point.

Front Door's global edge and origin selection differ from Azure's regional Application Gateway footprint.

For this finding, a regional public IP does not automatically span independent regions or become a global frontend address.

Here, a regional public IP does not automatically span independent regions or become a global frontend address.

For this question, a regional public IP does not automatically span independent regions or become a global frontend address.

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 3 misses this need: physical provider and peering diversity address failures that redundant gateway instances on one circuit cannot.

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 1 misses this need: global Reach joins supported on-premises sites through ExpressRoute circuits subject to geographic and SKU constraints.

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 2 misses this need: fastPath can bypass parts of a supported gateway data path but is not automatically available for all circuit configurations.

A delegated subnet grants a compatible platform service authority over subnet operations and may limit colocated services.

Peering and VPN routing cannot disambiguate overlapping private destinations without a deliberate addressing or translation plan.

This plan leaves out a required action: Redesign the Azure address plan using nonoverlapping prefixes and coordinate any required network translation before connecting the environments. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

Validating Application Gateway subnet and routing restrictions and repairing the effective required control-plane and backend paths would not configure supported cookie-based affinity where suitable and redesign session state for failover resilience.

Here, sticky routing can reduce session churn but cannot protect application sessions when a single backend permanently fails.

Using supported multi-site HTTPS listeners and server name indication with valid certificates for each authorized hostname would not configure supported cookie-based affinity where suitable and redesign session state for failover resilience.

For this question, frontend TLS termination alone does not guarantee that the gateway-to-origin hop is encrypted.

For this finding, frontend TLS termination alone does not guarantee that the gateway-to-origin hop is encrypted.

Here, frontend TLS termination alone does not guarantee that the gateway-to-origin hop is encrypted.

For this finding, expressRoute uses private connectivity arrangements distinct from encrypted internet VPN tunnels.

For this question, expressRoute uses private connectivity arrangements distinct from encrypted internet VPN tunnels.

Here, expressRoute uses private connectivity arrangements distinct from encrypted internet VPN tunnels.

Using Azure Firewall Policy hierarchy and appropriately scoped child policies with validation of rule collection priorities would not deploy a supported Azure Firewall secured virtual hub configuration and verify Virtual WAN routing intent and connections.

Updating and associate approved route tables or secured hub routing intent and confirming packets traverse the firewall would not deploy a supported Azure Firewall secured virtual hub configuration and verify Virtual WAN routing intent and connections.

Here, a secured virtual hub has supported managed integration steps distinct from placing any VM in a peered subnet.

Lower numerical priority values are processed first, so an earlier matching allow can shadow a later deny.

This plan leaves out a required action: Reorder or narrow the higher-priority matching NSG rule and validate the effective security evaluation. The remaining action alone does not satisfy the situation.

ASGs allow logically grouped network interfaces to be controlled without manually tracking each private address.

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 2 misses this need: frontend and backend ports are independent settings in an application-layer proxy.

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 3 misses this need: hTTP virtual hosting can return different health responses depending on the Host header sent by the probe.

Two actions meet their requirements, but action 1 misses this need: application Gateway focuses on HTTP(S) services and does not expose generic TCP connections like an L4 balancer.