Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 89

Question 880

A peer reviewer inspects Outlook cache inclusion in ODFC after it was introduced to retain an approved Outlook cached data state across AVD hosts without reconstructing it every sign-in. Which result should be documented?

  1. The ODFC disk mounts and Outlook cached content is available after host switch
  2. Two approved container storage locations and sizes behave independently on sign-in
  3. ODFC attach succeeds after the specific office-share permission or connectivity issue is fixed
  4. One profile container mounts and carries the needed Microsoft 365 state

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Outlook cache inclusion in ODFC: the ODFC disk mounts and Outlook cached content is available after host switch. ODFC includes supported Office and Outlook data. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Split ODFC and base profile storage planning, used to allocate a larger capacity tier for Office cache while keeping normal profile data in a smaller separate container. It does not establish whether Outlook cache inclusion in ODFC satisfies the current requirement to retain an approved Outlook cached data state across AVD hosts without reconstructing it every sign-in.

C:

That evidence concerns ODFC shared storage access check, used to diagnose Office cache disappearance when the separate ODFC share is inaccessible although base profile login succeeded. It does not establish whether Outlook cache inclusion in ODFC satisfies the current requirement to retain an approved Outlook cached data state across AVD hosts without reconstructing it every sign-in.

D:

That evidence concerns ODFC optional configuration decision, used to avoid maintaining a separate Office container when a single full FSLogix profile design meets all requirements. It does not establish whether Outlook cache inclusion in ODFC satisfies the current requirement to retain an approved Outlook cached data state across AVD hosts without reconstructing it every sign-in.

Question 881

The runbook says Cloud Cache versus backup distinction was enabled to explain why two synchronized live FSLogix providers cannot replace a versioned historical backup after accidental data deletion. Which reported behavior proves that step worked?

  1. Deletion may propagate to live providers while backup restores prior content
  2. Validated restore decrypts data under the required key access policy
  3. A restored copy attaches cleanly during a controlled nonproduction sign-in
  4. Recovery service inventory shows valid VM restore points for the assigned personal desktop

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Cloud Cache versus backup distinction: deletion may propagate to live providers while backup restores prior content. Live cache replication is not equivalent to point-in-time backup. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Encrypted backup recovery test, used to ensure restored profile data remains accessible when an approved storage encryption key is rotated. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache versus backup distinction satisfies the current requirement to explain why two synchronized live FSLogix providers cannot replace a versioned historical backup after accidental data deletion.

C:

That evidence concerns Profile VHDX backup consistency validation, used to confirm a backup strategy captures a recoverable user profile container without corrupting its file contents. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache versus backup distinction satisfies the current requirement to explain why two synchronized live FSLogix providers cannot replace a versioned historical backup after accidental data deletion.

D:

That evidence concerns Personal desktop VM backup policy, used to protect a persistent user's VM OS and data disks according to the desktop RPO/RTO plan. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache versus backup distinction satisfies the current requirement to explain why two synchronized live FSLogix providers cannot replace a versioned historical backup after accidental data deletion.

Question 882

A virtual desktop administrator receives a requirement to apply a newly linked host-side RDP QoS policy without waiting for the periodic policy refresh. What should they select?

  1. RDP Shortpath network readiness test
  2. Host-side New-NetQosPolicy configuration
  3. DSCP-based QoS policy for managed RDP Shortpath
  4. QoS policy refresh with gpupdate

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Refreshed Group Policy makes newly deployed QoS settings effective. This addresses the stated need to apply a newly linked host-side RDP QoS policy without waiting for the periodic policy refresh without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

QoS for managed Shortpath is not a substitute for UDP reachability. This is relevant when the task is to verify the required UDP network route exists before enabling QoS for media; it does not directly meet the requirement to apply a newly linked host-side RDP QoS policy without waiting for the periodic policy refresh.

B:

New-NetQosPolicy creates packet classification rules on Windows hosts. This is relevant when the task is to apply RDP UDP traffic classifications through a supported PowerShell network QoS policy; it does not directly meet the requirement to apply a newly linked host-side RDP QoS policy without waiting for the periodic policy refresh.

C:

QoS policies mark the intended UDP traffic for network prioritization. This is relevant when the task is to prioritize real-time RDP UDP packets over background transfer traffic on a congested managed network; it does not directly meet the requirement to apply a newly linked host-side RDP QoS policy without waiting for the periodic policy refresh.

Question 883

An Azure Virtual Desktop engineering team needs to turn a supported Windows VM into a session host managed by AVD control plane. Which specific configuration is the most direct fit?

  1. Azure Virtual Desktop Agent installation
  2. AD DS domain join for session hosts
  3. Microsoft Entra hybrid join workflow
  4. Host registration token lifecycle

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The AVD agent registers and manages session-host connectivity. This addresses the stated need to turn a supported Windows VM into a session host managed by AVD control plane without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

AD DS join binds a Windows host to the directory domain. This is relevant when the task is to join a new Windows VM to an existing corporate AD domain for hybrid authenticated desktop access; it does not directly meet the requirement to turn a supported Windows VM into a session host managed by AVD control plane.

C:

Hybrid join combines AD DS membership with Entra device registration. This is relevant when the task is to connect existing AD DS domain-joined VMs to Entra device identity as part of a hybrid session strategy; it does not directly meet the requirement to turn a supported Windows VM into a session host managed by AVD control plane.

D:

Registration tokens authorize AVD agent association with a pool. This is relevant when the task is to register newly provisioned session hosts to the intended AVD host pool using a time-scoped registration token; it does not directly meet the requirement to turn a supported Windows VM into a session host managed by AVD control plane.

Question 884

A regulated AVD environment must retain local AD DS join while registering devices in Microsoft Entra for hybrid policies. Which configuration achieves that goal most directly?

  1. AD DS joined AVD host architecture
  2. Microsoft Entra hybrid joined hosts
  3. Microsoft Entra Domain Services managed domain
  4. Microsoft Entra device registration status audit

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Hybrid join preserves both device identities. This addresses the stated need to retain local AD DS join while registering devices in Microsoft Entra for hybrid policies without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

AD DS membership enables domain-backed Windows sign-in. This is relevant when the task is to keep Windows desktop hosts authenticating with an existing corporate Active Directory domain; it does not directly meet the requirement to retain local AD DS join while registering devices in Microsoft Entra for hybrid policies.

C:

Entra Domain Services supplies managed domain functionality. This is relevant when the task is to use a managed AD-compatible domain for a supported legacy LDAP/Kerberos application requirement; it does not directly meet the requirement to retain local AD DS join while registering devices in Microsoft Entra for hybrid policies.

D:

Registered and joined device states are distinct. This is relevant when the task is to identify a host registered in Entra but not actually joined as required by the deployment design; it does not directly meet the requirement to retain local AD DS join while registering devices in Microsoft Entra for hybrid policies.

Question 885

A support analyst validates Session-host domain join DNS health check following the change to resolve a host-registration failure caused by unavailable AD DS SRV records. Which measured result is expected?

  1. Diagnostics show matching connection errors and correlation details for the attempted session
  2. Domain controller discovery succeeds after correcting the host DNS server assignment
  3. Session connection information still reports TCP and network traces show blocked UDP attempts
  4. Connection reliability telemetry correlates path loss with disconnect time while profile storage remains healthy

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Session-host domain join DNS health check: domain controller discovery succeeds after correcting the host DNS server assignment. AD DS discovery requires appropriate domain DNS records. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns AVD connection diagnostics for handshake errors, used to find the failed service-side connection stage when a user never reaches a session host. It does not establish whether Session-host domain join DNS health check satisfies the current requirement to resolve a host-registration failure caused by unavailable AD DS SRV records.

C:

That evidence concerns Transport status review after enabling UDP, used to detect a case where clients still connect over TCP because a UDP rule was omitted. It does not establish whether Session-host domain join DNS health check satisfies the current requirement to resolve a host-registration failure caused by unavailable AD DS SRV records.

D:

That evidence concerns RDP client connection reliability test, used to prove intermittent wireless network drops rather than FSLogix storage faults are causing disconnects. It does not establish whether Session-host domain join DNS health check satisfies the current requirement to resolve a host-registration failure caused by unavailable AD DS SRV records.

Question 886

A peer reviewer inspects Management-group policy assignment after it was introduced to enforce shared desktop governance across several subscriptions without copying each policy manually. Which result should be documented?

  1. Evaluated child subscriptions receive inherited policy assignments
  2. Subnet and VM location configuration meet the deployment region constraint
  3. Tags appear on resource inventory and corresponding cost reporting dimensions
  4. Assigned end users see eligible desktop or RemoteApp resources from the subscribed workspace

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for Management-group policy assignment: evaluated child subscriptions receive inherited policy assignments. Management groups organize governance across subscriptions. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns Region alignment for VM compute and subnet, used to place session hosts on a virtual network subnet in the VM's supported Azure region. It does not establish whether Management-group policy assignment satisfies the current requirement to enforce shared desktop governance across several subscriptions without copying each policy manually.

C:

That evidence concerns Azure resource tags on host pools and VMs, used to allow cost reporting to distinguish departmental AVD session hosts from unrelated compute. It does not establish whether Management-group policy assignment satisfies the current requirement to enforce shared desktop governance across several subscriptions without copying each policy manually.

D:

That evidence concerns Workspace to publish app groups, used to provide a discoverable user feed containing the app groups associated with a desktop deployment. It does not establish whether Management-group policy assignment satisfies the current requirement to enforce shared desktop governance across several subscriptions without copying each policy manually.

Question 887

A support analyst validates Existing-session reconnection on drain host following the change to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one. Which measured result is expected?

  1. Inventory lists the intended user assigned to multiple enabled personal session hosts
  2. Drain-mode host receives no first-time session while existing sessions can reconnect
  3. A hostpool show command reports DepthFirst and its target maxSessionLimit
  4. Reconnect resumes the earlier session and no new unrelated user is placed

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Existing-session reconnection on drain host: reconnect resumes the earlier session and no new unrelated user is placed. Drain hosts retain existing session affinity. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Personal desktop multiple assignments feature, used to provide one approved worker with several separately assigned personal desktops when supported by the host pool configuration. It does not establish whether Existing-session reconnection on drain host satisfies the current requirement to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one.

B:

That evidence concerns Pooled host drain mode before patching, used to protect existing sessions while stopping new session assignments to a host scheduled for reboot. It does not establish whether Existing-session reconnection on drain host satisfies the current requirement to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one.

C:

That evidence concerns Depth-first configuration via Azure CLI, used to switch a pooled host pool to density-first placement with an explicitly tested maximum session limit. It does not establish whether Existing-session reconnection on drain host satisfies the current requirement to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one.

Question 888

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to diagnose sign-in errors when the VM cache volume fills with profile container data. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. Cloud Cache local cache disk-capacity check
  2. Azure NetApp Files SMB volume deployment
  3. Cloud Cache provider failover validation
  4. FSLogix container storage redundancy selection

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Local Cloud Cache consumption affects session host disk requirements. This addresses the stated need to diagnose sign-in errors when the VM cache volume fills with profile container data without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

SMB volumes support Windows profile workloads on Azure NetApp Files. This is relevant when the task is to present a managed SMB path to domain-joined AVD session hosts for shared profiles; it does not directly meet the requirement to diagnose sign-in errors when the VM cache volume fills with profile container data.

C:

Cloud Cache supports multiple storage providers for resilience. This is relevant when the task is to test use of a second Cloud Cache profile backend while the first is intentionally unavailable; it does not directly meet the requirement to diagnose sign-in errors when the VM cache volume fills with profile container data.

D:

Storage redundancy options are design controls distinct from profile software. This is relevant when the task is to match a storage platform's documented zone/region resilience to the profile availability objective; it does not directly meet the requirement to diagnose sign-in errors when the VM cache volume fills with profile container data.

Question 889

In a controlled lab, the team applied RDP packet-loss observation so it could identify dropped packets rather than VM CPU saturation as the principal media quality problem. Which outcome verifies its behavior?

  1. Azure Virtual Desktop connection telemetry reports the network round-trip time for selected sessions
  2. The session host lists the configured app/protocol/port match with the chosen DSCP action
  3. Connection traces stop traversing the interfering proxy and media jitter is reduced
  4. Network telemetry shows packet loss aligned with video freezes and sound gaps

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for RDP packet-loss observation: network telemetry shows packet loss aligned with video freezes and sound gaps. Packet-loss measurements isolate transport unreliability from compute load. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns RDP round-trip-time baseline, used to quantify user-perceived interaction latency before changing transport settings. It does not establish whether RDP packet-loss observation satisfies the current requirement to identify dropped packets rather than VM CPU saturation as the principal media quality problem.

B:

That evidence concerns Host-side New-NetQosPolicy configuration, used to apply RDP UDP traffic classifications through a supported PowerShell network QoS policy. It does not establish whether RDP packet-loss observation satisfies the current requirement to identify dropped packets rather than VM CPU saturation as the principal media quality problem.

C:

That evidence concerns Avoidance of TLS/UDP proxy inspection, used to remove an interfering traffic-inspection hop from latency-sensitive remote desktop flow. It does not establish whether RDP packet-loss observation satisfies the current requirement to identify dropped packets rather than VM CPU saturation as the principal media quality problem.

Question 890

An Azure Virtual Desktop engineering team needs to direct a user's container to the approved SMB share rather than a local system drive. Which specific configuration is the most direct fit?

  1. FSLogix VHDLocations UNC path configuration
  2. Azure Files SMB share-level Azure RBAC assignment
  3. Azure Files storage-account firewall rules
  4. Microsoft Entra Domain Services SMB authentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

VHDLocations determines where profile containers are found or created. This addresses the stated need to direct a user's container to the approved SMB share rather than a local system drive without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Share-level RBAC is an independent authorization layer. This is relevant when the task is to grant a user group permission to reach a profile SMB share while retaining identity-based authorization; it does not directly meet the requirement to direct a user's container to the approved SMB share rather than a local system drive.

C:

Storage network controls constrain service reachability. This is relevant when the task is to restrict SMB share endpoints to approved networks even when users have identity permissions; it does not directly meet the requirement to direct a user's container to the approved SMB share rather than a local system drive.

D:

Azure Files supports SMB authentication with Entra Domain Services. This is relevant when the task is to let a managed domain joined deployment authenticate to profile storage using the managed domain; it does not directly meet the requirement to direct a user's container to the approved SMB share rather than a local system drive.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.