Pass Your Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Easy!

Microsoft AZ-140 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AZ-140 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle
Microsoft AZ-140 Premium Bundle

AZ-140 Premium File: 372 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 02, 2026

AZ-140 Training Course: 79 Video Lectures

AZ-140 PDF Study Guide: 430 Pages

$79.99

AZ-140 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AZ-140" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Microsoft AZ-140 Practice Test 66

Question 650

To meet an audited operations objective, the desktop team must let domain-joined AVD hosts use an existing Active Directory identity for profile-share access. Which choice is appropriate?

  1. Microsoft Entra Kerberos for Azure Files
  2. Azure Files Kerberos encryption modernization
  3. AD DS integrated Azure Files SMB authentication
  4. LoadCredKeyFromProfile registry policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Azure Files can use AD DS identity-based SMB authentication. This addresses the stated need to let domain-joined AVD hosts use an existing Active Directory identity for profile-share access without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Entra Kerberos provides identity-based SMB authentication for supported host/user combinations. This is relevant when the task is to authenticate supported Microsoft Entra joined AVD hosts to a profile SMB share without routine domain-controller line-of-sight; it does not directly meet the requirement to let domain-joined AVD hosts use an existing Active Directory identity for profile-share access.

B:

Modern AES service-ticket support is required under updated Windows defaults. This is relevant when the task is to avoid profile authentication failures after the Windows Kerberos RC4-to-AES hardening change; it does not directly meet the requirement to let domain-joined AVD hosts use an existing Active Directory identity for profile-share access.

D:

The Azure AD account policy allows credential keys to roam with a profile. This is relevant when the task is to keep a roaming user's credential manager keys linked to the profile currently being loaded; it does not directly meet the requirement to let domain-joined AVD hosts use an existing Active Directory identity for profile-share access.

Question 651

A support analyst validates ODFC shared storage access check following the change to diagnose Office cache disappearance when the separate ODFC share is inaccessible although base profile login succeeded. Which measured result is expected?

  1. Two approved container storage locations and sizes behave independently on sign-in
  2. ODFC attach succeeds after the specific office-share permission or connectivity issue is fixed
  3. Office data follows the session through the dedicated ODFC disk without duplicate user-profile redirection
  4. Licensed test user retains expected activation behavior after moving hosts

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for ODFC shared storage access check: ODFC attach succeeds after the specific office-share permission or connectivity issue is fixed. Separate ODFC storage can fail independently of base profile storage. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Split ODFC and base profile storage planning, used to allocate a larger capacity tier for Office cache while keeping normal profile data in a smaller separate container. It does not establish whether ODFC shared storage access check satisfies the current requirement to diagnose Office cache disappearance when the separate ODFC share is inaccessible although base profile login succeeded.

C:

That evidence concerns ODFC targeted application-data validation, used to confirm OneDrive and Outlook state follow a user while other local machine settings remain controlled by another roaming system. It does not establish whether ODFC shared storage access check satisfies the current requirement to diagnose Office cache disappearance when the separate ODFC share is inaccessible although base profile login succeeded.

D:

That evidence concerns Office activation data redirection in ODFC, used to persist Office activation-related user state as part of an approved separate Office-data profile solution. It does not establish whether ODFC shared storage access check satisfies the current requirement to diagnose Office cache disappearance when the separate ODFC share is inaccessible although base profile login succeeded.

Question 652

The team implemented RDP Shortpath for managed networks to prioritize direct UDP transport across routed corporate connectivity to a session host. Which test result demonstrates that the requirement is satisfied?

  1. Connection details indicate direct STUN-discovered UDP transport without TURN relay
  2. Connection details show a relayed UDP path through the TURN service
  3. Connection information reports a direct UDP Shortpath transport between client and host
  4. Connection details identify the selected transport and current network characteristics

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This is the direct functional outcome for RDP Shortpath for managed networks: connection information reports a direct UDP Shortpath transport between client and host. Managed Shortpath uses a reachable private-network UDP path. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns RDP Shortpath with STUN discovery, used to use direct public-network UDP where NAT traversal succeeds. It does not establish whether RDP Shortpath for managed networks satisfies the current requirement to prioritize direct UDP transport across routed corporate connectivity to a session host.

B:

That evidence concerns RDP Shortpath TURN relay, used to preserve UDP media transport when NAT or firewalls prevent a direct Shortpath route. It does not establish whether RDP Shortpath for managed networks satisfies the current requirement to prioritize direct UDP transport across routed corporate connectivity to a session host.

D:

That evidence concerns RDP transport connection information, used to distinguish whether a user's live connection uses TCP, direct UDP or relayed UDP. It does not establish whether RDP Shortpath for managed networks satisfies the current requirement to prioritize direct UDP transport across routed corporate connectivity to a session host.

Question 653

The test plan requires administrators to enforce a supported occupancy ceiling before the pooled load balancer places sessions on another host. Which configuration should they implement?

  1. Personal host pool for dedicated desktop assignment
  2. Breadth-first pooled load balancing
  3. Preferred application group type on host pool
  4. Maximum session limit for depth-first

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Max-session-limit constrains session placement for depth-first balancing. This addresses the stated need to enforce a supported occupancy ceiling before the pooled load balancer places sessions on another host without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Personal host pools maintain persistent user-to-VM association. This is relevant when the task is to keep one designated virtual desktop linked to an individual user across reconnects; it does not directly meet the requirement to enforce a supported occupancy ceiling before the pooled load balancer places sessions on another host.

B:

Breadth-first balances session placement among hosts. This is relevant when the task is to spread incoming sessions across the least-loaded eligible hosts to favor capacity distribution; it does not directly meet the requirement to enforce a supported occupancy ceiling before the pooled load balancer places sessions on another host.

C:

Host pool defaults influence app group creation and user experience. This is relevant when the task is to specify the intended Desktop or RemoteApp default experience when creating the hostpool; it does not directly meet the requirement to enforce a supported occupancy ceiling before the pooled load balancer places sessions on another host.

Question 654

A remote desktop change record says App Attach Azure Files UNC storage path now enables the team to make a package image reachable to every session host in the allowed pool through shared file storage. Which result verifies this?

  1. Supported hosts can mount the exact UNC package image path under the required identity
  2. Package disk image can be mounted and the application manifest is discoverable
  3. Test user launches the newly assigned app package while VM image build stays unchanged
  4. Session-host trust store validates the full signing chain and package staging succeeds

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This is the direct functional outcome for App Attach Azure Files UNC storage path: supported hosts can mount the exact UNC package image path under the required identity. Package-image access requires reachable shared storage. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That evidence concerns MSIX package image preparation, used to create a supported disk-image form of an existing signed MSIX package for App Attach use. It does not establish whether App Attach Azure Files UNC storage path satisfies the current requirement to make a package image reachable to every session host in the allowed pool through shared file storage.

C:

That evidence concerns App Attach package version upgrade, used to release a new version of one app without rebuilding golden images across the pool. It does not establish whether App Attach Azure Files UNC storage path satisfies the current requirement to make a package image reachable to every session host in the allowed pool through shared file storage.

D:

That evidence concerns App Attach package certificate trust, used to correct a packaged application that fails to stage because its code-signing certificate chain isn't trusted. It does not establish whether App Attach Azure Files UNC storage path satisfies the current requirement to make a package image reachable to every session host in the allowed pool through shared file storage.

Question 655

A post-deployment audit tests Windows Sysprep generalization step for the requirement to prepare a Windows reference VM for generalized re-use without duplicating its machine-specific identity. Which evidence is decisive?

  1. Target region reports the gallery version replicated and its deployment is possible
  2. Session hosts use the official Marketplace Windows client multi-session publisher/image baseline
  3. Provisioning source points to the current approved image and old version is no longer used for new rollout
  4. The source VM is generalized and deployment creates hosts with unique instance identity

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the direct functional outcome for Windows Sysprep generalization step: the source VM is generalized and deployment creates hosts with unique instance identity. Sysprep removes host-specific Windows provisioning state. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Regional image replication, used to make an approved desktop image deployable in a separate Azure region before a recovery exercise. It does not establish whether Windows Sysprep generalization step satisfies the current requirement to prepare a Windows reference VM for generalized re-use without duplicating its machine-specific identity.

B:

That evidence concerns Marketplace Windows 11 multi-session image selection, used to provision a supported pooled desktop without creating a custom image before the first deployment. It does not establish whether Windows Sysprep generalization step satisfies the current requirement to prepare a Windows reference VM for generalized re-use without duplicating its machine-specific identity.

C:

That evidence concerns Image retirement after replacement validation, used to stop new hosts from launching an obsolete desktop image while preserving required historical recovery evidence. It does not establish whether Windows Sysprep generalization step satisfies the current requirement to prepare a Windows reference VM for generalized re-use without duplicating its machine-specific identity.

Question 656

A production desktop deployment has the requirement to limit application registration overhead during AVD logon by deferring full registration until first application launch. Which action should the administrator choose?

  1. MSIX package image preparation
  2. App Attach application telemetry analysis
  3. App Attach app registration on demand
  4. App Attach host-pool assignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

On-demand registration defers work until needed. This addresses the stated need to limit application registration overhead during AVD logon by deferring full registration until first application launch without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

App Attach mounts supported packaged application images. This is relevant when the task is to create a supported disk-image form of an existing signed MSIX package for App Attach use; it does not directly meet the requirement to limit application registration overhead during AVD logon by deferring full registration until first application launch.

B:

App Attach operational telemetry exposes package health. This is relevant when the task is to monitor which package failed on one session host after assignment and investigate its health check; it does not directly meet the requirement to limit application registration overhead during AVD logon by deferring full registration until first application launch.

D:

App Attach package assignments scope delivery to pools. This is relevant when the task is to keep a GPU-intensive application visible only on the pool whose session hosts have appropriate graphics resources; it does not directly meet the requirement to limit application registration overhead during AVD logon by deferring full registration until first application launch.

Question 657

At an operational readiness review, a team is required to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one. Which technical choice is most suitable?

  1. Existing-session reconnection on drain host
  2. Personal desktop multiple assignments feature
  3. Depth-first configuration via Azure CLI
  4. Pooled session-limit update after load testing

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Drain hosts retain existing session affinity. This addresses the stated need to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Multi-personal assignment supports several dedicated VMs per entitled user. This is relevant when the task is to provide one approved worker with several separately assigned personal desktops when supported by the host pool configuration; it does not directly meet the requirement to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one.

C:

CLI can configure the pooled load balancing and session limit. This is relevant when the task is to switch a pooled host pool to density-first placement with an explicitly tested maximum session limit; it does not directly meet the requirement to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one.

D:

Load balancer limits affect new placement rather than killing live sessions. This is relevant when the task is to reduce a host's placement ceiling for new sessions without abruptly terminating its current user sessions; it does not directly meet the requirement to allow a temporarily disconnected user's session to resume on a draining host rather than creating a fresh one.

Question 658

Following approval of Cloud Cache provider failover drill to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault, which finding is the most relevant functional validation?

  1. Measured attach, sign-out and provider sync timing meet the expected session SLA
  2. Test user remains usable and updates synchronize when provider connectivity returns
  3. Host disk metrics show adequate headroom under peak concurrent cached profiles
  4. Completed logout cleans approved local cache artifacts while remote provider retains the profile

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the direct functional outcome for Cloud Cache provider failover drill: test user remains usable and updates synchronize when provider connectivity returns. Multi-provider Cloud Cache improves profile resilience. The observed behavior supports the specified acceptance requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache profile performance test, used to identify whether extra remote write replication creates unacceptable logoff latency for a demanding group. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache provider failover drill satisfies the current requirement to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault.

C:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache local disk free-space monitoring, used to prevent profiles from failing to attach because local Cache directory grew beyond planned VM disk capacity. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache provider failover drill satisfies the current requirement to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault.

D:

That evidence concerns Cloud Cache ClearCacheOnLogoff policy, used to reduce stale cache accumulation after clean profile sessions without unnecessarily deleting remote profile storage. It does not establish whether Cloud Cache provider failover drill satisfies the current requirement to demonstrate that an alternate profile provider can support continuation after a planned primary storage fault.

Question 659

During an architecture review, a platform engineer must open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows. Which option meets that requirement most directly?

  1. Azure Bastion administrative access
  2. Just-in-time VM access via Defender for Cloud
  3. Remove unused public IP addresses from session hosts
  4. Firewall DNS rule review

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

JIT limits standing management-port exposure. This addresses the stated need to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Bastion provides secure admin connectivity to private VMs. This is relevant when the task is to let authorized engineers open secure VM management sessions through the Azure portal without exposing public RDP on the VM; it does not directly meet the requirement to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows.

C:

AVD connection architecture does not require public inbound RDP. This is relevant when the task is to reduce direct external attack surface when AVD clients use service reverse connect; it does not directly meet the requirement to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows.

D:

Both name resolution and egress policy are needed for successful access. This is relevant when the task is to prevent a new firewall rule from allowing a service IP while blocking required name resolution to that service; it does not directly meet the requirement to open restricted management ports only for approved identities and limited time windows.

Question 660

An Azure Virtual Desktop deployment is being redesigned to determine which principal or policy rejected a resource deployment during an approved change window. Which approach should be prioritized?

  1. Azure deployment activity log inspection
  2. Bicep module deployment
  3. Resource dependency ordering in Bicep
  4. Az.DesktopVirtualization PowerShell module

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Azure activity records control-plane deployment events. This addresses the stated need to determine which principal or policy rejected a resource deployment during an approved change window without substituting a different control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Bicep compiles declarative infrastructure definitions for ARM. This is relevant when the task is to manage reusable AVD host pool resource definitions with typed declarative modules; it does not directly meet the requirement to determine which principal or policy rejected a resource deployment during an approved change window.

C:

Bicep dependencies express resource creation ordering. This is relevant when the task is to ensure an app group is deployed only after the host pool it references exists; it does not directly meet the requirement to determine which principal or policy rejected a resource deployment during an approved change window.

D:

DesktopVirtualization cmdlets manage AVD ARM resources. This is relevant when the task is to automate repeatable creation and updates to host pools in a scripted administrative workflow; it does not directly meet the requirement to determine which principal or policy rejected a resource deployment during an approved change window.


Configuring and Operating Microsoft Azure Virtual Desktop (AZ-140) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AZ-140 Premium File

Premium File
AZ-140 Premium File
372 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AZ-140 Training Video Course

Training Course
AZ-140 Training Video Course
79 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AZ-140 Study Guide

Study Guide
AZ-140 Study Guide
430 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.