Question 870
A centralized security team is assigned to resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition. Which FortiManager approach should be selected?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Import object collision handling fits this operational requirement: resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition. The implementation begins by ensuring that administrators compare object values and choose an approved conflict-resolution mapping; success is confirmed when imported rules refer to intended approved object semantics.
Incorrect Answers
Import summary and report is suited to a different task: distinguish successful policy import from silent partial failure. It does not directly meet the specified goal to resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition; selecting it would address a different management function.
Import wizard interface mapping review is suited to a different task: prevent device-specific interfaces from being lost during policy import. It does not directly meet the specified goal to resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition; selecting it would address a different management function.
Policy import after local FortiGate change is suited to a different task: reconcile out-of-band local firewall rule changes into central management. It does not directly meet the specified goal to resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition; selecting it would address a different management function.



Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiManager 7.6 Administrator (FCP_FMG_AD-7.6) Practice Tests