Question 770
Before applying Import wizard completion versus per-object failures for the goal to identify why a completed import dialog still leaves missing rules in the central package, which explicitly described setup step belongs to this control?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The specific preparation for Import wizard completion versus per-object failures is to examine the detailed import report and reconcile per-object failures. This addresses the stated need to identify why a completed import dialog still leaves missing rules in the central package, and later acceptance is demonstrated when every required approved rule is accounted for before final signoff.
Incorrect Answers
That step belongs to Unsupported feature during import, used to avoid losing source-device policy behavior when the target ADOM does not support its feature. It is not the mechanism-specific setup for Import wizard completion versus per-object failures required to identify why a completed import dialog still leaves missing rules in the central package.
That step belongs to Name collision between device and ADOM object, used to preserve correct match semantics when a FortiGate object name already exists centrally with different value. It is not the mechanism-specific setup for Import wizard completion versus per-object failures required to identify why a completed import dialog still leaves missing rules in the central package.
That step belongs to Missing source object on policy import, used to recover an import stopped by a reference to an undefined address or service. It is not the mechanism-specific setup for Import wizard completion versus per-object failures required to identify why a completed import dialog still leaves missing rules in the central package.



Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiManager 7.6 Administrator (FCP_FMG_AD-7.6) Practice Tests