Question 580
After configuring Policy change comment field to preserve a human-readable reason for a security rule alteration, an administrator observes an unexpected outcome. Which check should be prioritized?
Explanation
Correct Answer
This is the focused troubleshooting check for Policy change comment field: inspect copied comments if policy history does not explain an exception. It tests the failure most relevant to the goal to preserve a human-readable reason for a security rule alteration before unrelated settings are changed.
Incorrect Answers
That check is relevant to a fault in Feature visibility at administrator scope used to limit optional policy controls shown to an authorized operator. It does not directly isolate the described Policy change comment field failure to preserve a human-readable reason for a security rule alteration.
That check is relevant to a fault in ADOM object tagging for inventory used to group shared address objects by asset or business purpose for review. It does not directly isolate the described Policy change comment field failure to preserve a human-readable reason for a security rule alteration.
That check is relevant to a fault in ADOM-level metadata variable used to store a reusable site-specific metadata field for several managed policy objects. It does not directly isolate the described Policy change comment field failure to preserve a human-readable reason for a security rule alteration.



Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiManager 7.6 Administrator (FCP_FMG_AD-7.6) Practice Tests