Question 420
During a branch management project, the primary requirement is to remove multiple inconsistent mappings for one FortiGate target. What is the most appropriate FortiManager control?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Dynamic object mapping conflict cleanup fits this operational requirement: remove multiple inconsistent mappings for one FortiGate target. The implementation begins by ensuring that administrators review mappings and keep a single authorized value for the target scope; success is confirmed when the target's compiled policy resolves to the approved value consistently.
Incorrect Answers
Device-specific object values in policy preview is suited to a different task: verify object resolution before a multi-device deployment. It does not directly meet the specified goal to remove multiple inconsistent mappings for one FortiGate target; selecting it would address a different management function.
Dynamic object versus static address distinction is suited to a different task: decide when different branch sites require different address values under one rule. It does not directly meet the specified goal to remove multiple inconsistent mappings for one FortiGate target; selecting it would address a different management function.
Dynamic address object by installation target is suited to a different task: use a common server object name with different local IP addresses for each managed site. It does not directly meet the specified goal to remove multiple inconsistent mappings for one FortiGate target; selecting it would address a different management function.



Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiManager 7.6 Administrator (FCP_FMG_AD-7.6) Practice Tests