Question 100
An administrator reports success using Import object collision handling to resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition. Which control-specific limitation still applies?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The stated scope boundary specifically qualifies Import object collision handling: same names across repositories do not guarantee same object meaning. The control is appropriate for the operational need to resolve an existing ADOM object name with a different on-device definition, but should not be credited with unrelated behavior.
Incorrect Answers
That caveat describes Policy import after local FortiGate change in a different management scenario, which addresses reconcile out-of-band local firewall rule changes into central management. It is not the specific limitation of Import object collision handling requested in this design review.
That caveat describes Import summary and report in a different management scenario, which addresses distinguish successful policy import from silent partial failure. It is not the specific limitation of Import object collision handling requested in this design review.
That caveat describes Import wizard interface mapping review in a different management scenario, which addresses prevent device-specific interfaces from being lost during policy import. It is not the specific limitation of Import object collision handling requested in this design review.



Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiManager 7.6 Administrator (FCP_FMG_AD-7.6) Practice Tests