Pass Your CompTIA N10-009 Exam Easy!

CompTIA N10-009 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

N10-009 Premium Bundle

$79.99

CompTIA N10-009 Premium Bundle

N10-009 Premium File: 768 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Nov 14, 2026

N10-009 Training Course: 240 Video Lectures

N10-009 PDF Study Guide: 128 Pages

N10-009 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "N10-009" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
CompTIA N10-009 Premium Bundle
CompTIA N10-009 Premium Bundle

N10-009 Premium File: 768 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Nov 14, 2026

N10-009 Training Course: 240 Video Lectures

N10-009 PDF Study Guide: 128 Pages

$79.99

N10-009 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "N10-009" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

CompTIA N10-009 Practice Test 80

Question 790

A network team addresses this situation: A patch panel is undocumented and engineers need to identify which adjacent managed switch connects to a core port. After the corrective action, which test or result BEST verifies that the problem is resolved?

  1. Correlate SYN/SYN-ACK captures from both endpoints.
  2. Compare peer-reported port ID with physical cable tracing.
  3. Observe permitted leakage at the damaged point and retest the repaired fiber.
  4. Watch gateway MAC mapping and check authorized switch-port source.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Neighbor and physical map consistency validate adjacency.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Directional packet evidence isolates the failing leg. It does not compare peer-reported port ID with physical cable tracing.

C:

Physical break identification validates the tool choice. It does not compare peer-reported port ID with physical cable tracing.

D:

Communication between different IP subnets requires a routed interface or gateway rather than Layer 2 bridging alone. Verification of this result involves comparing peer-reported port ID with physical cable tracing.

Question 791

A network specialist investigates this evidence: A patch panel is undocumented and engineers need to identify which adjacent managed switch connects to a core port. Which underlying condition BEST explains the observed failure or requirement?

  1. A local optical continuity break is suspected.
  2. Packet-level timing is not visible in basic connection logs.
  3. Link-layer neighbor identity is unknown.
  4. Local interface IP configuration is not documented.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Link-layer neighbor identity is unknown. Discovery advertisements reveal directly adjacent device and port identifiers.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Optical transceiver compatibility and receive-light measurements diagnose the physical signal path before higher-layer work. That does not establish link-layer neighbor identity is unknown.

B:

Packet-level timing is not visible in basic connection logs. That does not establish link-layer neighbor identity is unknown.

D:

Local interface IP configuration is not documented. That does not establish link-layer neighbor identity is unknown.

Question 792

A network team observes: A new Ethernet run powers a device but fails gigabit link negotiation and the technician suspects split pairs. What is the MOST appropriate corrective action or technical decision?

  1. Use a visual fault locator within its supported safety limits to trace or identify the break.
  2. Use ping with expected ICMP filtering caveats to test echo reachability.
  3. Use tcpdump or equivalent packet capture on the relevant interface.
  4. Use a proper cable certifier to inspect wiremap, pair integrity and NEXT.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Continuity alone misses some pair construction defects. Copper wiring arrangement is not certified.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Using a visual fault locator within its supported safety limits to trace or identify the break would not meet the need for a proper cable certifier to inspect wiremap, pair integrity and NEXT.

B:

Using ping with expected ICMP filtering caveats to test echo reachability would not meet the need for a proper cable certifier to inspect wiremap, pair integrity and NEXT.

C:

Using tcpdump or equivalent packet capture on the relevant interface would not meet the need for a proper cable certifier to inspect wiremap, pair integrity and NEXT.

Question 793

A network team addresses this situation: A new Ethernet run powers a device but fails gigabit link negotiation and the technician suspects split pairs. After the corrective action, which test or result BEST verifies that the problem is resolved?

  1. Compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits.
  2. Observe permitted leakage at the damaged point and retest the repaired fiber.
  3. Run ip route get for a remote address after correction.
  4. Correlate SYN/SYN-ACK captures from both endpoints.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Physical break identification validates the tool choice. It does not compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits.

C:

Run ip route get for a remote address after correction. It does not compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits.

D:

Directional packet evidence isolates the failing leg. It does not compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits.

Question 794

A network specialist investigates this evidence: A new Ethernet run powers a device but fails gigabit link negotiation and the technician suspects split pairs. Which underlying condition BEST explains the observed failure or requirement?

  1. A local optical continuity break is suspected.
  2. Copper wiring arrangement is not certified.
  3. The Linux kernel route table prefers the wrong default.
  4. The issue is likely DNS resolution rather than raw IP connectivity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Copper wiring arrangement is not certified. Continuity alone misses some pair construction defects.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Optical transceiver compatibility and receive-light measurements diagnose the physical signal path before higher-layer work. That does not establish copper wiring arrangement is not certified.

C:

IP routing depends on a route to the destination prefix and a reachable next hop. That does not establish copper wiring arrangement is not certified.

D:

DNS resolution maps hostnames to records and can fail independently of packet forwarding. That does not establish copper wiring arrangement is not certified.

Question 795

A network team observes: A fiber run is dark and the technician needs to locate a visible break near a patch panel. What is the MOST appropriate corrective action or technical decision?

  1. Inspect LLDP or CDP neighbor information on the managed interface.
  2. Use a proper cable certifier to inspect wiremap, pair integrity and NEXT.
  3. Use a visual fault locator within its supported safety limits to trace or identify the break.
  4. Use ping with expected ICMP filtering caveats to test echo reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Visible fault light can reveal near-end bends or breaks. A local optical continuity break is suspected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspecting LLDP or CDP neighbor information on the managed interface would not meet the need for a visual fault locator within its supported safety limits to trace or identify the break.

B:

Using a proper cable certifier to inspect wiremap, pair integrity and NEXT would not meet the need for a visual fault locator within its supported safety limits to trace or identify the break.

D:

Using ping with expected ICMP filtering caveats to test echo reachability would not meet the need for a visual fault locator within its supported safety limits to trace or identify the break.

Question 796

A network team addresses this situation: A fiber run is dark and the technician needs to locate a visible break near a patch panel. After the corrective action, which test or result BEST verifies that the problem is resolved?

  1. Compare peer-reported port ID with physical cable tracing.
  2. Compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits.
  3. Compare echo results from local and remote VLAN clients.
  4. Observe permitted leakage at the damaged point and retest the repaired fiber.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Physical break identification validates the tool choice.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Neighbor and physical map consistency validate adjacency. That check cannot demonstrate restoration and verification of received optical light.

B:

Compare wiremap and crosstalk readings with cable category limits. That check cannot demonstrate restoration and verification of received optical light.

C:

VLAN membership and 802.1Q tagging determine which Layer 2 broadcast domain carries each frame. That check cannot demonstrate restoration and verification of received optical light.

Question 797

A network specialist investigates this evidence: A fiber run is dark and the technician needs to locate a visible break near a patch panel. Which underlying condition BEST explains the observed failure or requirement?

  1. A local optical continuity break is suspected.
  2. Link-layer neighbor identity is unknown.
  3. Copper wiring arrangement is not certified.
  4. Basic IP connectivity has not been tested.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A local optical continuity break is suspected. Visible fault light can reveal near-end bends or breaks.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Discovery advertisements reveal directly adjacent device and port identifiers. That does not establish restoration and verification of received optical light.

C:

Continuity alone misses some pair construction defects. That does not establish restoration and verification of received optical light.

D:

Basic IP connectivity has not been tested. That does not establish restoration and verification of received optical light.

Question 798

A network team observes: An office WLAN has poor throughput despite strong signal and the team needs channel occupancy and neighboring AP visibility. What is the MOST appropriate corrective action or technical decision?

  1. Run traceroute or tracert and interpret TTL-expiry responses.
  2. Use a Wi-Fi analyzer and, for non-Wi-Fi emitters, a spectrum analyzer.
  3. Query affected names using nslookup against specific recursive and authoritative servers.
  4. Inspect LLDP or CDP neighbor information on the managed interface.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Wi-Fi tools reveal networks and channels; spectrum analysis finds broader RF energy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Running traceroute or tracert and interpreting TTL-expiry responses would not meet the need for a Wi-Fi analyzer and, for non-Wi-Fi emitters, a spectrum analyzer.

C:

Querying affected names using nslookup against specific recursive and authoritative servers would not meet the need for a Wi-Fi analyzer and, for non-Wi-Fi emitters, a spectrum analyzer.

D:

Inspecting LLDP or CDP neighbor information on the managed interface would not meet the need for a Wi-Fi analyzer and, for non-Wi-Fi emitters, a spectrum analyzer.

Question 799

A network team addresses this situation: An office WLAN has poor throughput despite strong signal and the team needs channel occupancy and neighboring AP visibility. After the corrective action, which test or result BEST verifies that the problem is resolved?

  1. Compare outbound hop progression before and after route repair.
  2. Watch gateway MAC mapping and check authorized switch-port source.
  3. Compare channel utilization and spectrum before and after RF changes.
  4. Run ip route get for a remote address after correction.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Compare channel utilization and spectrum before and after RF changes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Compare outbound hop progression before and after route repair. It does not compare channel utilization and spectrum before and after RF changes.

B:

Communication between different IP subnets requires a routed interface or gateway rather than Layer 2 bridging alone. Verification of this result involves comparing channel utilization and spectrum before and after RF changes.

D:

Run ip route get for a remote address after correction. It does not compare channel utilization and spectrum before and after RF changes.

Question 800

An office WLAN reports strong received signal (about -52 dBm), but users see retries and low throughput during lunchtime. Channel utilization exceeds 85% and nearby access points are using overlapping channels. Which condition best explains the performance issue?

  1. The WAN router has no default route for internet traffic.
  2. An HTTPS session timer has been shortened on the application server.
  3. The access points are unable to assign DHCP leases to wireless clients.
  4. Co-channel or adjacent-channel interference is consuming available WLAN airtime.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Strong signal alone does not guarantee usable airtime. High channel utilization, retries, and overlapping nearby AP channels point to contention and interference; a channel plan and RF survey should validate the remedy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A missing WAN default route would interrupt reachability, not selectively raise wireless retries and airtime utilization when nearby APs are active.

B:

An HTTPS session timer can interrupt application sessions but does not explain radio-layer channel occupancy and retransmissions.

C:

DHCP exhaustion causes address-assignment failures; the observed retries and heavy channel usage indicate an RF medium problem.


CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

N10-009 Premium File

Premium File
N10-009 Premium File
768 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

N10-009 Training Video Course

Training Course
N10-009 Training Video Course
240 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

N10-009 Study Guide

Study Guide
N10-009 Study Guide
128 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.