Question 980
An incident report calls a phishing attachment a ransomware infection although no file encrypted. What is the MOST appropriate analyst action based on the evidence?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Incident labels should not outrun forensic proof. Avoid unsupported ransomware impact claim.
Incorrect Answers
Pseudoprecise confidence numbers are misleading without calibration. It could help report calibrated attribution uncertainty, but it would not avoid unsupported ransomware impact claim.
Impact evidence and attribution confidence are separate questions. That is relevant to confidence and threat actor communication, not to avoid unsupported ransomware impact claim.
Shared cloud infrastructure does not uniquely link intrusions. It would communicate cloud shared-IP attribution limits, but it would not avoid unsupported ransomware impact claim.






CompTIA CySA+ (CS0-003) (CS0-003) Practice Tests