Pass Your Cisco 350-401 Exam Easy!

That control reduces a separate risk: It has no functioning TLOC extension path to the peer transport. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: transport color classification or policy match does not reflect the physical circuit role. The specific required safeguard is: review transport color, encapsulation and allowed colors at every edge refresh.

That control reduces a separate risk: NAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: transport color classification or policy match does not reflect the physical circuit role. The specific required safeguard is: review transport color, encapsulation and allowed colors at every edge refresh.

That control reduces a separate risk: The policy was distributed centrally instead of scoped to the single local branch. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: transport color classification or policy match does not reflect the physical circuit role. The specific required safeguard is: review transport color, encapsulation and allowed colors at every edge refresh.

Creating and activating a supported centralized control policy with correct site/VPN scope and Controller distribution would not check SD-WAN NAT traversal behavior and reachable TLOC public/private address mappings.

Mapping transport interfaces to intended supported SD-WAN colors and selecting TLOCs in policy would not check SD-WAN NAT traversal behavior and reachable TLOC public/private address mappings.

Implementing a supported local TLOC extension between the two edges with required transport and routing settings would not check SD-WAN NAT traversal behavior and reachable TLOC public/private address mappings.

This test measures a different behavior: Check that the second edge advertises and can use the peer circuit's extended transport location. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: correlate control-connection information with BFD/IPsec tunnel health across the translated transport.

This test measures a different behavior: Verify the intended sites receive the policy and resulting OMP/TLOC choices change only for eligible prefixes. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: correlate control-connection information with BFD/IPsec tunnel health across the translated transport.

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect live local/remote TLOC color attributes and confirm the intended transport is selected. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: correlate control-connection information with BFD/IPsec tunnel health across the translated transport.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: The backup router loses all transport connectivity when its directly attached ISP circuit fails. Here the recorded observation is: oMP peers are healthy while the remote branch has no established data tunnel through translated endpoints. The applicable cause is: nAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: An Internet-only traffic policy chooses an MPLS TLOC after a template update. Here the recorded observation is: oMP peers are healthy while the remote branch has no established data tunnel through translated endpoints. The applicable cause is: nAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: Routes stay unchanged because a drafted policy was never activated or applied to a site list. Here the recorded observation is: oMP peers are healthy while the remote branch has no established data tunnel through translated endpoints. The applicable cause is: nAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded.

That control reduces a separate risk: The control policy exists but is not active for the relevant control-plane sites. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: nAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded. The specific required safeguard is: test inbound/outbound NAT behavior for the intended SD-WAN transport and maintain compatible firewall rules.

That control reduces a separate risk: It has no functioning TLOC extension path to the peer transport. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: nAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded. The specific required safeguard is: test inbound/outbound NAT behavior for the intended SD-WAN transport and maintain compatible firewall rules.

That control reduces a separate risk: Transport color classification or policy match does not reflect the physical circuit role. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: nAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded. The specific required safeguard is: test inbound/outbound NAT behavior for the intended SD-WAN transport and maintain compatible firewall rules.

Checking SD-WAN NAT traversal behavior and reachable TLOC public/private address mappings would not create and activate a supported centralized control policy with correct site/VPN scope and Controller distribution.

Using supported localized policy on the target edge or site template for the required behavior would not create and activate a supported centralized control policy with correct site/VPN scope and Controller distribution.

Mapping transport interfaces to intended supported SD-WAN colors and selecting TLOCs in policy would not create and activate a supported centralized control policy with correct site/VPN scope and Controller distribution.

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect live local/remote TLOC color attributes and confirm the intended transport is selected. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify the intended sites receive the policy and resulting OMP/TLOC choices change only for eligible prefixes.

This test measures a different behavior: Confirm local feature-policy match counters change at only the intended branch. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify the intended sites receive the policy and resulting OMP/TLOC choices change only for eligible prefixes.

This test measures a different behavior: Correlate control-connection information with BFD/IPsec tunnel health across the translated transport. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: verify the intended sites receive the policy and resulting OMP/TLOC choices change only for eligible prefixes.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: OMP peers are healthy while the remote branch has no established data tunnel through translated endpoints. Here the recorded observation is: routes stay unchanged because a drafted policy was never activated or applied to a site list. The applicable cause is: the control policy exists but is not active for the relevant control-plane sites.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: All branch routers unexpectedly change behavior after a supposed site-only QoS update. Here the recorded observation is: routes stay unchanged because a drafted policy was never activated or applied to a site list. The applicable cause is: the control policy exists but is not active for the relevant control-plane sites.

That diagnosis is supported by a different symptom: An Internet-only traffic policy chooses an MPLS TLOC after a template update. Here the recorded observation is: routes stay unchanged because a drafted policy was never activated or applied to a site list. The applicable cause is: the control policy exists but is not active for the relevant control-plane sites.

Transport colors and TLOC selection describe path endpoints, not a centralized policy distributed consistently to every branch region.

That control reduces a separate risk: NAT mappings and data-plane tunnel reachability fail even though control connections succeeded. For the described design, the recurring risk arises from: the control policy exists but is not active for the relevant control-plane sites. The specific required safeguard is: keep site-list membership and policy activation in formal review with route-level tests.

A localized edge policy cannot enforce the requested routing behavior uniformly across all regions.

Creating and activating a supported centralized control policy with correct site/VPN scope and Controller distribution would not meet the need for supported localized policy on the target edge or site template for the required behavior.

Mapping transport interfaces to intended supported SD-WAN colors and selecting TLOCs in policy would not meet the need for supported localized policy on the target edge or site template for the required behavior.

Implementing a supported local TLOC extension between the two edges with required transport and routing settings would not meet the need for supported localized policy on the target edge or site template for the required behavior.

This test measures a different behavior: Inspect live local/remote TLOC color attributes and confirm the intended transport is selected. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: confirm local feature-policy match counters change at only the intended branch.

This test measures a different behavior: Verify the intended sites receive the policy and resulting OMP/TLOC choices change only for eligible prefixes. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: confirm local feature-policy match counters change at only the intended branch.

This test measures a different behavior: Check that the second edge advertises and can use the peer circuit's extended transport location. It does not establish the target outcome. For the documented fault, the direct acceptance test is: confirm local feature-policy match counters change at only the intended branch.