Question 120
An AWS planning meeting highlights two independent requirements. Finding 1: An engineer needs an authoritative explanation of a cloud service's documented limits and cannot rely on an old forum answer. Finding 2: A company wants published architectural guidance for common migration and modernization decisions, not a service interruption ticket. Which two-part response addresses both findings in order?
Explanation
Correct Answer
For finding 1: Official documentation is the proper starting point for supported features and constraints. For finding 2: Prescriptive Guidance provides reusable architecture and migration practices rather than live incident triage. Both actions are required.
Incorrect Answers
For finding 1: Official documentation is the proper starting point for supported features and constraints. That action addresses a different situation: A small team encounters an unexpected AWS service issue and needs to know which available Support plan offers the required response scope.
For finding 2: Prescriptive Guidance provides reusable architecture and migration practices rather than live incident triage. That action addresses a different situation: A developer wants to exchange AWS implementation experiences with other practitioners without opening a formal account support case.
The actions are reversed. The correct order is (1) Consult current AWS service documentation and applicable service quotas or best-practice guidance. (2) Consult AWS Prescriptive Guidance and applicable AWS architecture materials for documented patterns.






AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner CLF-C02 Practice Tests