Question 610
In an AWS networking assessment, instances in private subnets need S3 access without public NAT egress but the S3 route-table endpoint is not associated with their subnets. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?
Explanation
Correct Answer
A gateway endpoint's route works only for route tables explicitly associated with it. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that s3 requests take the gateway endpoint path without a NAT or Internet Gateway.
Incorrect Answers
An attachment can have a different associated routing view from where its CIDR propagates. The decisive technical distinction is S3 gateway VPC endpoints provide private service routing through selected VPC route tables; a gateway endpoint's route works only for route tables explicitly associated with it.
An attached TGW does not automatically redirect packets that a VPC subnet table sends elsewhere. The decisive technical distinction is S3 gateway VPC endpoints provide private service routing through selected VPC route tables; a gateway endpoint's route works only for route tables explicitly associated with it.
Private endpoint DNS behavior is separate from merely establishing the private network interface. The reported evidence instead concerns S3 gateway VPC endpoints provide private service routing through selected VPC route tables: a gateway endpoint's route works only for route tables explicitly associated with it.






AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Tests