Question 470
In an AWS networking assessment, a TGW VPC attachment is present only in one AZ, and applications in a second AZ show asymmetric or missing forwarding paths. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?
Explanation
Correct Answer
AZ placement of attachment subnets affects how traffic from workloads can use the transit hub. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that test traffic from the relevant AZs follows the expected TGW attachment path.
Incorrect Answers
An attachment can have a different associated routing view from where its CIDR propagates. The reported evidence instead concerns Transit Gateway VPC attachments require subnets in supported Availability Zones for local TGW attachment connectivity: aZ placement of attachment subnets affects how traffic from workloads can use the transit hub.
The most specific matching blackhole takes precedence over a broader valid route. For the stated conditions, aZ placement of attachment subnets affects how traffic from workloads can use the transit hub. The more specific mechanism is Transit Gateway VPC attachments require subnets in supported Availability Zones for local TGW attachment connectivity.
Organization membership alone does not necessarily authorize use of every privately owned network resource. The decisive technical distinction is Transit Gateway VPC attachments require subnets in supported Availability Zones for local TGW attachment connectivity; aZ placement of attachment subnets affects how traffic from workloads can use the transit hub.






AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Tests