Pass Your Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Exam Easy!

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File: 306 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 12, 2026

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Course: 223 Video Lectures

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 PDF Study Guide: 411 Pages

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle
Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File: 306 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 12, 2026

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Course: 223 Video Lectures

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 PDF Study Guide: 411 Pages

$79.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Test 36

Question 350

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A central Transit Gateway attachment is present, but the route back to an on-premises prefix points to a wrong VPC instead of the VPN. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Update the approved datacenter prefix filters and security policies for the specific VPC ranges.
  2. Enable approved VPN route propagation into the correct Transit Gateway route table.
  3. Advertise the correct permitted private CIDRs and verify their visibility on AWS gateway route tables.
  4. Correct the more-specific on-premises route's target to the appropriate hybrid attachment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Gateway attachments are route targets; incorrect associations can blackhole return flows despite healthy tunnels. Confirm the change by checking that packet path analysis shows traffic returning through the intended hybrid gateway.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A BGP route to a network does not grant permission through intermediate stateful firewalls. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: gateway attachments are route targets; incorrect associations can blackhole return flows despite healthy tunnels. Verify packet path analysis shows traffic returning through the intended hybrid gateway.

B:

A healthy VPN tunnel does not automatically install every required prefix into every TGW routing domain. It does not directly achieve the required result: packet path analysis shows traffic returning through the intended hybrid gateway. The constraint is that gateway attachments are route targets; incorrect associations can blackhole return flows despite healthy tunnels.

C:

A generic default advertisement cannot replace required more-specific route intent in every hybrid design. The needed control instead targets the TGW routing table must select the VPN or Direct Connect attachment for the on-premises destination; it succeeds when packet path analysis shows traffic returning through the intended hybrid gateway.

Question 351

In an AWS networking assessment, an enterprise needs to record which VPC attempted to resolve prohibited names while preserving account-level evidence. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Hybrid on-premises-to-AWS queries require an inbound Resolver endpoint, not an outbound endpoint.
  2. Route 53 Resolver forwarding rules operate for VPCs explicitly associated with the rule.
  3. Resolver forwarding requires applicable DNS domain rules and associations, not merely an endpoint.
  4. Route 53 Resolver query logging associations determine which VPC DNS queries are delivered to the log destination.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configuring a log destination alone does not start collection from unassociated VPC resolvers. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that events from every intended VPC appear in the central query log.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inbound and outbound endpoint directions describe where queries enter or leave the VPC DNS service. The reported evidence instead concerns Route 53 Resolver query logging associations determine which VPC DNS queries are delivered to the log destination: configuring a log destination alone does not start collection from unassociated VPC resolvers.

B:

Creating a rule on a shared outbound endpoint does not cause every VPC to use it automatically. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; configuring a log destination alone does not start collection from unassociated VPC resolvers.

C:

An outbound endpoint is a transport mechanism; rule matches determine which names use that transport. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; configuring a log destination alone does not start collection from unassociated VPC resolvers.

Question 352

In an AWS networking assessment, a backend rollout must stop new requests to a target but let existing in-flight requests finish during deregistration. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. ALB target-group deregistration delay controls connection draining behavior during removal.
  2. Client-IP preservation depends on NLB protocol and target-group configuration.
  3. An ALB health check evaluates target responses on the configured protocol, port, and path.
  4. ALB forward actions can use weighted target groups for controlled request distribution.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Deregistering a target can allow in-flight work to finish rather than immediately interrupting every request. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that a controlled rollout completes active requests before the old target is removed from service.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The source identity visible to a target can differ based on transport and load-balancing configuration. For the stated conditions, deregistering a target can allow in-flight work to finish rather than immediately interrupting every request. The more specific mechanism is ALB target-group deregistration delay controls connection draining behavior during removal.

C:

Instance running state is distinct from the health check HTTP response required by the target group. The decisive technical distinction is ALB target-group deregistration delay controls connection draining behavior during removal; deregistering a target can allow in-flight work to finish rather than immediately interrupting every request.

D:

Weighted target-group routing is distinct from Route 53's DNS-record weighting and operates per ALB request decisions. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; deregistering a target can allow in-flight work to finish rather than immediately interrupting every request.

Question 353

In an AWS networking assessment, a network team provisions AWS Direct Connect but omits the matching VPC routes to its virtual private gateway. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. The TGW routing table must select the VPN or Direct Connect attachment for the on-premises destination.
  2. Routing from application subnets needs destination entries targeting the correct hybrid gateway path.
  3. Direct Connect virtual interfaces require matching VLAN tagging on the customer router and connection.
  4. A Direct Connect gateway can connect eligible VPC gateway associations from a private VIF across Regions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

An active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that application packets take the gateway path toward the corporate network.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Gateway attachments are route targets; incorrect associations can blackhole return flows despite healthy tunnels. The decisive technical distinction is routing from application subnets needs destination entries targeting the correct hybrid gateway path; an active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions.

C:

A physical link does not select the intended VIF without the matching VLAN encapsulation. For the stated conditions, an active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions. The more specific mechanism is routing from application subnets needs destination entries targeting the correct hybrid gateway path.

D:

A private VIF can terminate at a gateway abstraction without one VIF per VPC when constraints permit. The decisive technical distinction is routing from application subnets needs destination entries targeting the correct hybrid gateway path; an active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions.

Question 354

In an AWS networking assessment, an operator changes a DNS record but recursive resolvers still return the prior target for several minutes. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Recursive DNS caching respects record TTL values until cached entries expire.
  2. Route 53 health-aware failover requires a routing policy and health checks that participate in record selection.
  3. Route 53 DNSSEC signing uses a key-signing configuration and a chain of trust through the parent DS record.
  4. Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoints receive external recursive queries for VPC-associated private names.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Changing a record at the authoritative source does not retroactively purge recursive caches. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that recursive answers converge on the new address after their previously cached TTL periods expire.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Simple routing alone does not make Route 53 suppress failed records based on application health. For the stated conditions, changing a record at the authoritative source does not retroactively purge recursive caches. The more specific mechanism is recursive DNS caching respects record TTL values until cached entries expire.

C:

Signing a hosted zone alone does not establish validation if the parent delegation lacks the needed DS chain. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; changing a record at the authoritative source does not retroactively purge recursive caches.

D:

Inbound endpoints bring permitted DNS queries into the VPC resolver, unlike outbound endpoints sending them out. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; changing a record at the authoritative source does not retroactively purge recursive caches.

Question 355

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A network organization connects Transit Gateways in two different Regions and expects route advertisements to propagate automatically across the peering. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Evaluate Cloud WAN core networking and define policy-based segment connectivity for the required Regions.
  2. Configure static routes in the relevant Transit Gateway route tables for remote Region prefixes.
  3. Add a direct A-to-C peering connection or adopt a suitable transit architecture.
  4. Enable authorized propagation to the correct associated TGW table or add a supported static route.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

TGW peering does not automatically propagate all local routes between peer gateways. Confirm the change by checking that workloads in the permitted regional VPCs reach the expected remote prefixes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Central policy can coordinate multi-region connectivity at a higher level than one regional Transit Gateway route table. In this situation, tGW peering does not automatically propagate all local routes between peer gateways. The proposed change does not ensure workloads in the permitted regional VPCs reach the expected remote prefixes.

C:

An intermediary peering link does not forward packets between two separately peered VPCs. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: tGW peering does not automatically propagate all local routes between peer gateways. Verify workloads in the permitted regional VPCs reach the expected remote prefixes.

D:

A route propagated into one TGW table may be invisible to another attachment using a different table. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: tGW peering does not automatically propagate all local routes between peer gateways. Verify workloads in the permitted regional VPCs reach the expected remote prefixes.

Question 356

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A network team provisions AWS Direct Connect but omits the matching VPC routes to its virtual private gateway. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Add the approved on-premises static route to the VPN configuration and route tables.
  2. Associate supported virtual private gateways to the Direct Connect gateway and confirm each prefix scope.
  3. Replace the broad allowed prefix list with the specific approved summary prefixes supported by the association.
  4. Install approved VPC subnet route entries to the hybrid gateway for corporate CIDRs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

An active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions. Confirm the change by checking that application packets take the gateway path toward the corporate network.

Incorrect Answers

A:

No BGP propagation exists to fill missing route entries in a static-only configuration. In this situation, an active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions. The proposed change does not ensure application packets take the gateway path toward the corporate network.

B:

A private VIF can terminate at a gateway abstraction without one VIF per VPC when constraints permit. In this situation, an active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions. The proposed change does not ensure application packets take the gateway path toward the corporate network.

C:

Overbroad BGP originations can redirect corporate traffic beyond intended AWS destinations. It does not directly achieve the required result: application packets take the gateway path toward the corporate network. The constraint is that an active VIF and BGP session do not automatically override VPC subnet forwarding decisions.

Question 357

In an AWS networking assessment, a company has one Direct Connect circuit and no other path, and the network architect calls it fully redundant. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. A single dedicated Direct Connect connection remains a potential point of physical failure.
  2. Hybrid failover depends on routing advertisements and route selection across Direct Connect and VPN paths.
  3. A public virtual interface provides BGP routing to supported public AWS service prefixes.
  4. A Direct Connect gateway supports approved connections to virtual private or transit gateway associations across Regions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A redundant hybrid design must address circuit, location and device failure domains independently. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that a controlled circuit failure leaves an approved independent AWS connectivity path active.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A backup tunnel's presence does not guarantee traffic will switch unless routing reacts appropriately. The reported evidence instead concerns a single dedicated Direct Connect connection remains a potential point of physical failure: a redundant hybrid design must address circuit, location and device failure domains independently.

C:

Public VIF traffic uses public AWS addresses even when the physical transport is dedicated. The decisive technical distinction is a single dedicated Direct Connect connection remains a potential point of physical failure; a redundant hybrid design must address circuit, location and device failure domains independently.

D:

The gateway decouples connection location from eligible attached private networks under documented rules. For the stated conditions, a redundant hybrid design must address circuit, location and device failure domains independently. The more specific mechanism is a single dedicated Direct Connect connection remains a potential point of physical failure.

Question 358

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A VPC application connects to a stateful database but a team tightens NACLs expecting security groups to handle every return packet. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Introduce supported stateful rule groups and verify traffic traverses the stateful inspection engine.
  2. Change the NACL priority of an unrelated allowed subnet while leaving the blocked response-port range unchanged.
  3. Limit the interface endpoint ingress to authorized workload CIDRs or security groups.
  4. Permit necessary NACL response port ranges while retaining least-privilege security-group rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Stateful SG return allowance does not override a separate NACL blocking the return direction. Confirm the change by checking that approved database sessions complete and unwanted subnet traffic stays denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Independent per-packet checks cannot enforce policies requiring full flow context by themselves. The needed control instead targets security groups and NACLs enforce distinct stateful and stateless network boundaries; it succeeds when approved database sessions complete and unwanted subnet traffic stays denied.

B:

Rule order matters only for matching rules. Changing another subnet’s unrelated entry leaves the stateless return-traffic rule unchanged, so response packets are still denied.

C:

Endpoint private addressing does not automatically enforce least-privilege client access. It does not directly achieve the required result: approved database sessions complete and unwanted subnet traffic stays denied. The constraint is that stateful SG return allowance does not override a separate NACL blocking the return direction.

Question 359

In an AWS networking assessment, a hybrid network uses BGP dynamic routes over Site-to-Site VPN but the customer gateway is configured for static-only paths. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Hybrid connection resilience requires considering customer equipment and site-level failure domains.
  2. AWS Site-to-Site VPN provides encrypted tunnels between a customer gateway and an AWS gateway.
  3. Dynamic Site-to-Site VPN routing requires consistent BGP capabilities and ASN configuration on the peers.
  4. Hybrid failover depends on routing advertisements and route selection across Direct Connect and VPN paths.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A static routing arrangement does not automatically form BGP adjacencies or exchange advertisements. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that the VPN BGP sessions establish and approved on-premises prefixes appear in AWS routing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Two provider circuits through one router may still fail together when that router or facility fails. The reported evidence instead concerns dynamic Site-to-Site VPN routing requires consistent BGP capabilities and ASN configuration on the peers: a static routing arrangement does not automatically form BGP adjacencies or exchange advertisements.

B:

IPsec provides confidentiality and integrity across a transport that may use the public internet. For the stated conditions, a static routing arrangement does not automatically form BGP adjacencies or exchange advertisements. The more specific mechanism is dynamic Site-to-Site VPN routing requires consistent BGP capabilities and ASN configuration on the peers.

D:

A backup tunnel's presence does not guarantee traffic will switch unless routing reacts appropriately. The reported evidence instead concerns dynamic Site-to-Site VPN routing requires consistent BGP capabilities and ASN configuration on the peers: a static routing arrangement does not automatically form BGP adjacencies or exchange advertisements.

Question 360

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A security team needs packet transfer counts and flow direction to assess a suspected data-exfiltration path. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Collect and correlate CloudTrail NACL change events alongside traffic-flow records.
  2. Capture the supported extended flow fields and correlate with the suspected ENI and time range.
  3. Correlate AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress and RevokeSecurityGroupIngress events with principal identity.
  4. Enable scoped VPC or subnet Flow Logs and preserve required audit fields.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Network-flow metadata can indicate volume and routing context without revealing encrypted payload contents. Confirm the change by checking that records identify the suspicious destination and its approximate transferred volume.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Traffic logs cannot identify the API principal responsible for a policy change by themselves. It does not directly achieve the required result: records identify the suspicious destination and its approximate transferred volume. The constraint is that network-flow metadata can indicate volume and routing context without revealing encrypted payload contents.

C:

The effective group configuration alone does not reveal which operator or workflow changed it. In this situation, network-flow metadata can indicate volume and routing context without revealing encrypted payload contents. The proposed change does not ensure records identify the suspicious destination and its approximate transferred volume.

D:

Packet-flow metadata is separate from CloudTrail API configuration activity. The needed control instead targets VPC Flow Logs extended fields can support traffic-path and packet count analysis; it succeeds when records identify the suspicious destination and its approximate transferred volume.


AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File

Premium File
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File
306 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Video Course

Training Course
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Video Course
223 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Study Guide

Study Guide
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Study Guide
411 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.