Pass Your Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Exam Easy!

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

$79.99

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File: 306 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 12, 2026

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Course: 223 Video Lectures

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 PDF Study Guide: 411 Pages

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download VCE exam simulator click here
Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle
Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium Bundle

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File: 306 Questions & Answers

Last Update: Oct 12, 2026

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Course: 223 Video Lectures

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 PDF Study Guide: 411 Pages

$79.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Bundle gives you unlimited access to "AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01" files. However, this does not replace the need for a .vce exam simulator. To download your .vce exam simulator click here

Amazon AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Test 28

Question 270

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A Direct Connect link shows frequent BGP flapping every few minutes and packet loss coincides with routing transitions. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Correlate VIF state, BGP events and physical interface errors to isolate the recurring reset.
  2. Restore the missing approved summary in the Direct Connect gateway TGW association.
  3. Inspect VPC and TGW prefix specificity, propagated/static routes and AWS hybrid route priorities.
  4. Review BGP local preference and route advertisements on the customer's WAN routing policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Repeated route control-plane churn can disrupt traffic even without continuous hardware failure. Confirm the change by checking that BGP uptime stabilizes and the corresponding application packet loss disappears.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An association change can alter BGP-originated reachability without deleting the physical VIF. In this situation, repeated route control-plane churn can disrupt traffic even without continuous hardware failure. The proposed change does not ensure BGP uptime stabilizes and the corresponding application packet loss disappears.

C:

Multiple healthy links can compete for the same destination; configuration controls the selected route. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: repeated route control-plane churn can disrupt traffic even without continuous hardware failure. Verify BGP uptime stabilizes and the corresponding application packet loss disappears.

D:

Failback requires explicit routing preference rather than assuming an active link automatically dominates. It does not directly achieve the required result: BGP uptime stabilizes and the corresponding application packet loss disappears. The constraint is that repeated route control-plane churn can disrupt traffic even without continuous hardware failure.

Question 271

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: An instance's NetworkOut metric spikes but the team has no clue which remote subnet caused the increase. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Correlate CloudWatch NetworkOut with relevant VPC Flow Logs or packet telemetry.
  2. Set approved CloudWatch Logs or S3 lifecycle retention for the required audit period.
  3. Check the instance listener process, host firewall and application health after confirming VPC policy.
  4. Analyze the packets and bytes fields with start and end times instead of counting rows as packets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Interface byte totals measure volume while flow records attribute traffic to IPs and ports. Confirm the change by checking that the spike is associated with a specific destination range from collected flow records.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Generating records does not guarantee they remain accessible for regulatory evidence duration. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: interface byte totals measure volume while flow records attribute traffic to IPs and ports. Verify the spike is associated with a specific destination range from collected flow records.

C:

Network-layer admission can succeed even when the destination application does not accept connections. In this situation, interface byte totals measure volume while flow records attribute traffic to IPs and ports. The proposed change does not ensure the spike is associated with a specific destination range from collected flow records.

D:

Aggregation windows combine multiple packets from a flow into one record. It does not directly achieve the required result: the spike is associated with a specific destination range from collected flow records. The constraint is that interface byte totals measure volume while flow records attribute traffic to IPs and ports.

Question 272

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A private database hostname resolves inside one VPC but cannot be resolved by workloads in a second VPC. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Update the registrar delegation to the Route 53 hosted zone's authoritative name servers.
  2. Create an inbound Resolver endpoint and have corporate DNS forward the AWS private suffix to its IP addresses.
  3. Enable Route 53 Resolver DNSSEC validation for the intended VPC where supported.
  4. Associate the private hosted zone with the second authorized VPC and verify resolver paths.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Publishing a private hosted zone alone does not expose its records to every VPC in an organization. Confirm the change by checking that workloads in the authorized VPCs resolve the private hostname while public recursive queries cannot.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Creating records in an unused hosted zone does not cause global resolvers to query it automatically. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: publishing a private hosted zone alone does not expose its records to every VPC in an organization. Verify workloads in the authorized VPCs resolve the private hostname while public recursive queries cannot.

B:

Inbound endpoints bring permitted DNS queries into the VPC resolver, unlike outbound endpoints sending them out. The needed control instead targets Route 53 private hosted zone visibility depends on explicit associations with the querying VPCs; it succeeds when workloads in the authorized VPCs resolve the private hostname while public recursive queries cannot.

C:

Authoritative signing and recursive validation occur at different ends of the DNS trust workflow. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: publishing a private hosted zone alone does not expose its records to every VPC in an organization. Verify workloads in the authorized VPCs resolve the private hostname while public recursive queries cannot.

Question 273

In an AWS networking assessment, a VPN connection using dynamic BGP routing needs a route-preference design when the primary Direct Connect path fails. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Dynamic Site-to-Site VPN routing requires consistent BGP capabilities and ASN configuration on the peers.
  2. Hybrid failover depends on routing advertisements and route selection across Direct Connect and VPN paths.
  3. AWS Direct Connect provides a dedicated physical connection for supported private and public virtual interfaces.
  4. A single dedicated Direct Connect connection remains a potential point of physical failure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A backup tunnel's presence does not guarantee traffic will switch unless routing reacts appropriately. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that after the primary circuit fails, return traffic and outbound traffic converge through the backup VPN.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A static routing arrangement does not automatically form BGP adjacencies or exchange advertisements. For the stated conditions, a backup tunnel's presence does not guarantee traffic will switch unless routing reacts appropriately. The more specific mechanism is hybrid failover depends on routing advertisements and route selection across Direct Connect and VPN paths.

C:

Dedicated connectivity avoids relying exclusively on public internet paths but does not inherently encrypt payloads. The decisive technical distinction is hybrid failover depends on routing advertisements and route selection across Direct Connect and VPN paths; a backup tunnel's presence does not guarantee traffic will switch unless routing reacts appropriately.

D:

A redundant hybrid design must address circuit, location and device failure domains independently. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; a backup tunnel's presence does not guarantee traffic will switch unless routing reacts appropriately.

Question 274

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A public ALB has a trusted certificate but accepts TLS handshakes with weak client authentication controls. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Configure an NLB TLS listener with ACM certificate and appropriate target protocol.
  2. Configure supported ALB mutual TLS when client-certificate authentication is mandated.
  3. Request an ACM certificate for the actual application hostnames and update the ALB listener.
  4. Use an NLB TCP listener forwarding TLS bytes to the application-controlled TLS endpoint.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Mutual TLS verifies client certificate identity separately from the listener's server certificate. Confirm the change by checking that requests without approved client certificates are denied and valid clients authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

NLB TLS termination is different from a TCP listener passing encrypted data through to targets. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: mutual TLS verifies client certificate identity separately from the listener's server certificate. Verify requests without approved client certificates are denied and valid clients authenticate.

C:

A certificate for example.com does not necessarily cover api.sub.example.com without a matching SAN or wildcard. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: mutual TLS verifies client certificate identity separately from the listener's server certificate. Verify requests without approved client certificates are denied and valid clients authenticate.

D:

Load-balancer TLS termination could change where mutual authentication occurs. It does not directly achieve the required result: requests without approved client certificates are denied and valid clients authenticate. The constraint is that mutual TLS verifies client certificate identity separately from the listener's server certificate.

Question 275

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A newly updated network stack is marked complete, but a later console edit removes a required route. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Run scheduled drift detection and relevant network configuration monitoring on managed resources.
  2. Use environment-specific subnet parameters or lookups when defining Resolver endpoints.
  3. Add pipeline policy checks for disallowed 0.0.0.0/0 internet routes and associated resources.
  4. Use appropriately permissioned StackSets to deploy the approved baseline network components.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A completed stack records one deployment state rather than permanently locking every operator console. Confirm the change by checking that the missing route is detected and restored through controlled infrastructure change.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Subnets and network interface IDs are scoped to a VPC and Region, not globally interchangeable. It does not directly achieve the required result: the missing route is detected and restored through controlled infrastructure change. The constraint is that a completed stack records one deployment state rather than permanently locking every operator console.

C:

IaC syntax validity does not establish compliance with organizational network policy. It does not directly achieve the required result: the missing route is detected and restored through controlled infrastructure change. The constraint is that a completed stack records one deployment state rather than permanently locking every operator console.

D:

One organization's manual copy/paste cannot maintain consistent revisions as account counts grow. It does not directly achieve the required result: the missing route is detected and restored through controlled infrastructure change. The constraint is that a completed stack records one deployment state rather than permanently locking every operator console.

Question 276

In an AWS networking assessment, a network health dashboard reports only averages and hides severe p99 latency spikes affecting customers. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Configuration-based network reachability does not establish application health or protocol correctness end to end.
  2. Metric percentiles expose tail latency that an arithmetic mean can mask.
  3. VPC Traffic Mirroring can copy selected packet traffic to supported network inspection targets.
  4. VPC Flow Logs capture network-flow metadata with ACCEPT and REJECT actions for supported interfaces.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Large outliers may have little effect on the mean but violate strict tail-latency service goals. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that the p99 graph exposes the spike and allows correlation with affected transactions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A permitted virtual network path can coexist with a crashed application or failed TLS handshake. The reported evidence instead concerns metric percentiles expose tail latency that an arithmetic mean can mask: large outliers may have little effect on the mean but violate strict tail-latency service goals.

C:

Mirroring supports packet-level inspection, unlike flow logs that summarize connection metadata. The reported evidence instead concerns metric percentiles expose tail latency that an arithmetic mean can mask: large outliers may have little effect on the mean but violate strict tail-latency service goals.

D:

Flow records summarize packet flows and disposition rather than full application payloads. For the stated conditions, large outliers may have little effect on the mean but violate strict tail-latency service goals. The more specific mechanism is metric percentiles expose tail latency that an arithmetic mean can mask.

Question 277

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A backup VPN is active but on-premises traffic takes a less-preferred path after a Direct Connect circuit recovers. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Compare before/after neighbor advertisements and revise summarization with the corporate routing team.
  2. Restore the intended prefix advertisement and verify its relative path preference.
  3. Review BGP local preference and route advertisements on the customer's WAN routing policy.
  4. Inspect VPC and TGW prefix specificity, propagated/static routes and AWS hybrid route priorities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Failback requires explicit routing preference rather than assuming an active link automatically dominates. Confirm the change by checking that traffic returns to the intended primary hybrid path after convergence.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Coarse summarization can hide reachability differences and route withdrawals from downstream peers. In this situation, failback requires explicit routing preference rather than assuming an active link automatically dominates. The proposed change does not ensure traffic returns to the intended primary hybrid path after convergence.

B:

A viable physical circuit may carry no traffic for a destination whose specific route was withdrawn. It does not directly achieve the required result: traffic returns to the intended primary hybrid path after convergence. The constraint is that failback requires explicit routing preference rather than assuming an active link automatically dominates.

D:

Multiple healthy links can compete for the same destination; configuration controls the selected route. The needed control instead targets BGP route preference determines whether recovered hybrid paths resume primary traffic; it succeeds when traffic returns to the intended primary hybrid path after convergence.

Question 278

In an AWS networking assessment, an on-premises DNS administrator expects a public Route 53 CNAME target to be resolved as a private address in an unrelated private hosted zone. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. A public CNAME does not automatically cross into private hosted zone scope for internet resolvers.
  2. Hybrid on-premises-to-AWS queries require an inbound Resolver endpoint, not an outbound endpoint.
  3. Route 53 Resolver forwarding rules operate for VPCs explicitly associated with the rule.
  4. Reverse DNS requires an appropriate in-addr.arpa or ip6.arpa zone or delegated resolver authority.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Private zone associations determine internal visibility independently of public recursive resolution. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that public and internal clients each obtain only the addresses intended for their resolver contexts.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inbound and outbound endpoint directions describe where queries enter or leave the VPC DNS service. The reported evidence instead concerns a public CNAME does not automatically cross into private hosted zone scope for internet resolvers: private zone associations determine internal visibility independently of public recursive resolution.

C:

Creating a rule on a shared outbound endpoint does not cause every VPC to use it automatically. For the stated conditions, private zone associations determine internal visibility independently of public recursive resolution. The more specific mechanism is a public CNAME does not automatically cross into private hosted zone scope for internet resolvers.

D:

Forward hostname A records do not automatically create reverse PTR data for every address. The decisive technical distinction is a public CNAME does not automatically cross into private hosted zone scope for internet resolvers; private zone associations determine internal visibility independently of public recursive resolution.

Question 279

In an AWS networking assessment, a cloud team needs evidence of traffic passing through Transit Gateway attachments rather than only packets on individual workload ENIs. Which technical explanation BEST accounts for the observed condition?

  1. Transit Gateway Flow Logs provide metadata for traffic associated with transit gateway attachments.
  2. CloudFront access logs record viewer request metadata and edge response outcomes.
  3. ALB access logs include load-balancer and target status codes for request diagnosis.
  4. Route 53 Resolver query logs capture DNS queries from VPC resolvers under configured associations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Central transit metadata complements VPC ENI flow records when multiple VPCs share a hub. This explains the observed network behavior, which can be checked by verifying that attachment and direction fields appear in the centralized traffic records.

Incorrect Answers

B:

CDN access logs can distinguish edge-visible request patterns from only origin server events. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; central transit metadata complements VPC ENI flow records when multiple VPCs share a hub.

C:

The load balancer's status can differ from the response produced or not produced by a backend target. The reported evidence instead concerns Transit Gateway Flow Logs provide metadata for traffic associated with transit gateway attachments: central transit metadata complements VPC ENI flow records when multiple VPCs share a hub.

D:

Query logging reveals requested names and resolver behavior rather than full application HTTP transactions. That property alone cannot account for the reported symptom; central transit metadata complements VPC ENI flow records when multiple VPCs share a hub.

Question 280

An AWS network engineer must address this specific condition: A web distribution uses HTTPS from viewers to CloudFront but fetches origin content over HTTP due to a permissive origin protocol policy. Which implementation or operational change BEST meets the requirement?

  1. Enforce valid HTTPS/TLS certificate verification for the application inside the VPN.
  2. Request or import the correct matching ACM certificate in us-east-1 for the distribution.
  3. Issue or import a valid certificate in ACM and associate it with the ALB HTTPS listener.
  4. Require HTTPS-only origin protocol policy and validate origin certificate trust.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Secure viewer-to-edge traffic does not protect origin traffic when the origin connection remains cleartext. Confirm the change by checking that origin requests use validated HTTPS while clients continue using HTTPS to the distribution.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Network peer authentication cannot independently prove that a particular HTTPS hostname is the intended app server. That adjustment does not address the controlling condition: secure viewer-to-edge traffic does not protect origin traffic when the origin connection remains cleartext. Verify origin requests use validated HTTPS while clients continue using HTTPS to the distribution.

B:

CloudFront's certificate region requirements differ from those of regional ALB listeners. It does not directly achieve the required result: origin requests use validated HTTPS while clients continue using HTTPS to the distribution. The constraint is that secure viewer-to-edge traffic does not protect origin traffic when the origin connection remains cleartext.

C:

HTTPS transport encryption does not establish server identity when its certificate is invalid or expired. It does not directly achieve the required result: origin requests use validated HTTPS while clients continue using HTTPS to the distribution. The constraint is that secure viewer-to-edge traffic does not protect origin traffic when the origin connection remains cleartext.


AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Practice Tests

Purchase Individually

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File

Premium File
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Premium File
306 Q&A
$76.99$69.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Video Course

Training Course
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Training Video Course
223 Lectures
$27.49$24.99

AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Study Guide

Study Guide
AWS Certified Advanced Networking - Specialty ANS-C01 Study Guide
411 PDF Pages
$27.49$24.99

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.