• Home
  • CWNP
  • PW0-070 Certified Wireless Technology Specialist Dumps

Pass Your CWNP PW0-070 Exam Easy!

100% Real CWNP PW0-070 Exam Questions & Answers, Accurate & Verified By IT Experts

Instant Download, Free Fast Updates, 99.6% Pass Rate

Archived VCE files

File Votes Size Date
File
CWNP.Certkey.PW0-070.v2011-06-01.by.Ansley.247q.vce
Votes
2
Size
770.25 KB
Date
Jun 01, 2011

CWNP PW0-070 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps

CWNP PW0-070 (Certified Wireless Technology Specialist) exam dumps vce, practice test questions, study guide & video training course to study and pass quickly and easily. CWNP PW0-070 Certified Wireless Technology Specialist exam dumps & practice test questions and answers. You need avanset vce exam simulator in order to study the CWNP PW0-070 certification exam dumps & CWNP PW0-070 practice test questions in vce format.

Mastering the PW0-070 Exam: Foundations of Wireless Security

The PW0-070 exam, formally known as the Certified Wireless Security Professional (CWSP) certification, represents a significant milestone for any IT professional specializing in wireless networking. This certification validates an individual's deep understanding of the security principles and practices that govern modern wireless local area networks (WLANs). Passing this exam demonstrates an ability to secure enterprise-grade Wi-Fi networks against a wide array of threats and vulnerabilities. The curriculum is comprehensive, covering everything from legacy security protocols to advanced intrusion prevention systems, making it a challenging yet rewarding endeavor for candidates.

Preparing for the PW0-070 Exam requires a structured approach and a thorough grasp of its objectives. The exam does not merely test theoretical knowledge; it assesses the practical application of security concepts in real-world scenarios. Candidates are expected to know how to design, implement, and manage secure wireless network architectures. This includes a mastery of cryptographic standards, authentication protocols, and the tools used to monitor and defend against malicious activity. A successful candidate is one who can think critically about security policies and make informed decisions to protect sensitive data transmitted over the airwaves.

Understanding WLAN Security Threats

Wireless networks are inherently more vulnerable than their wired counterparts due to their broadcast nature. Anyone within range of a signal can potentially intercept data packets, making robust security measures essential. The PW0-070 Exam places a heavy emphasis on identifying and mitigating these threats. Common threats include unauthorized access, where malicious actors connect to a network without permission, and eavesdropping, where data is passively captured and analyzed. Understanding the mechanics behind these threats is the first step toward building a resilient defense strategy for any wireless deployment.

Beyond simple unauthorized access, WLANs face sophisticated attacks such as Denial-of-Service (DoS), where the network is flooded with traffic to make it unusable for legitimate users. Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks are another critical threat, where an attacker secretly relays and possibly alters the communication between two parties who believe they are directly communicating. Rogue access points, which are unauthorized APs connected to a network, can also be used to bypass security controls. The PW0-070 Exam requires candidates to understand how these attacks work and the countermeasures needed to prevent them.

The threat landscape is constantly evolving, with attackers developing new techniques to exploit vulnerabilities in protocols and implementations. This includes session hijacking, where an attacker takes over a valid user session, and the deployment of evil twins, which are fraudulent access points that mimic legitimate ones to trick users into connecting and revealing their credentials. A comprehensive understanding of this diverse threat landscape is a fundamental requirement for anyone aspiring to pass the PW0-070 Exam and become a certified wireless security professional. It is this knowledge that informs the creation of effective and layered security policies.

The Evolution of IEEE 802.11 Security Standards

The history of wireless security is a story of continuous improvement in response to discovered vulnerabilities. The original security standard, Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP), was introduced with the first 802.11 standard but was quickly found to have serious cryptographic flaws. The PW0-070 Exam expects candidates to know why WEP failed, including its use of a weak and static encryption key and a flawed implementation of the RC4 stream cipher. Understanding these historical weaknesses provides context for the more robust security mechanisms that followed and why they are necessary.

In response to the failure of WEP, the Wi-Fi Alliance introduced Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) as an interim solution. WPA implemented the Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP), which was designed to be a wrapper around WEP to fix its most critical vulnerabilities without requiring a hardware upgrade. TKIP introduced per-packet key mixing, a message integrity check, and a re-keying mechanism. While it was a significant improvement, TKIP was still based on the flawed foundations of WEP and was ultimately seen as a temporary fix pending a more permanent solution.

The permanent solution arrived with the ratification of the IEEE 802.11i amendment, which became known as WPA2. WPA2 replaced TKIP with a much stronger cryptographic protocol called Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol (CCMP), which is based on the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). This marked a monumental leap forward in wireless security. The PW0-070 Exam requires a deep understanding of the differences between WEP, WPA, and WPA2, particularly the cryptographic protocols that underpin each standard, as this knowledge is crucial for designing secure networks.

Most recently, the industry has moved toward WPA3, which offers even greater security enhancements. WPA3 introduces Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE), providing more robust protection against offline dictionary attacks that could plague WPA2-Personal networks using weak passphrases. It also offers improved cryptographic strength for enterprise networks and introduces features for more secure connections on open networks. While PW0-070 may focus on WPA2, awareness of WPA3 is important for a modern security professional. The evolution from WEP to WPA3 illustrates the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between security protocol designers and malicious actors.

Core Components of a Secure Wireless Network

A secure wireless network is not built on a single technology but is a layered system of interacting components. The first component is the client device, or supplicant, which requests access to the network. Securing the client is paramount, as a compromised client can be a gateway for an attacker. This involves ensuring the device has up-to-date software, properly configured security settings, and that the user is educated on safe online practices. The PW0-070 Exam often includes questions that test a candidate's understanding of client-side vulnerabilities and hardening techniques.

The second core component is the access point (AP), which acts as the authenticator in the 802.1X framework. The AP enforces the security policy by allowing or denying access to clients based on their credentials. Securing the AP itself is critical. This involves changing default administrator passwords, disabling unused management interfaces, using secure management protocols like SNMPv3 and HTTPS, and ensuring the AP firmware is kept current to patch any known vulnerabilities. The physical security of the access point is also a consideration to prevent tampering or theft.

The third and most central component in an enterprise security model is the authentication server, typically a RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service) server. The authentication server is responsible for making the final decision on whether to grant a client access to the network. It maintains the database of user credentials and security policies. The communication between the AP and the RADIUS server must be secured to prevent eavesdropping or modification. A deep understanding of the roles of the supplicant, authenticator, and authentication server is a foundational concept for the PW0-070 Exam.

The Role of a Certified Wireless Security Professional

A Certified Wireless Security Professional is more than just a network administrator; they are a specialist tasked with safeguarding one of the most critical and vulnerable assets of an organization: its wireless network. Their role extends beyond simple configuration and involves a proactive approach to security. This includes conducting regular security audits, performing vulnerability assessments, and staying abreast of the latest wireless threats and countermeasures. The professional must be able to translate business requirements into a coherent and enforceable wireless security policy.

The responsibilities covered in the PW0-070 Exam curriculum are extensive. A professional in this role is expected to design and implement multifaceted security solutions that often involve integrating various technologies. This can include setting up enterprise-level authentication using 802.1X/EAP, deploying a Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (WIPS) to monitor the airwaves for malicious activity, and configuring secure guest access. They are the go-to expert for all matters related to WLAN security, from troubleshooting connectivity issues to responding to security incidents.

Furthermore, a key part of the role is communication and documentation. The security professional must be able to clearly articulate security risks to management and provide recommendations for mitigation. They are responsible for creating and maintaining comprehensive documentation of the network's security architecture, policies, and procedures. This documentation is vital for compliance purposes and for ensuring the consistent application of security controls across the organization. The PW0-070 Exam validates that an individual possesses the breadth of skills needed to fulfill this critical and challenging role within an IT team.

Navigating the PW0-070 Exam Objectives

To succeed on the PW0-070 Exam, a candidate must have a clear understanding of the official exam objectives. These objectives are the blueprint for the exam, outlining all the topics that may be covered. The domains typically include WLAN security concepts, security policies and procedures, wireless security architecture, monitoring and analysis, and intrusion and attack response. Breaking down your study plan to align with these domains is the most effective way to ensure comprehensive coverage of the material. Each objective should be treated as a critical piece of knowledge.

A significant portion of the exam focuses on the technical details of security protocols. This means you must move beyond a high-level understanding of WPA2 and delve into the specifics of CCMP, AES, and the 802.1X/EAP framework. You will need to know the different types of EAP, such as EAP-TLS, PEAP, and EAP-TTLS, and understand the use cases and security implications of each. Rote memorization is not enough; the PW0-070 Exam will test your ability to apply this knowledge to solve security challenges in various scenarios.

Another key area is the practical aspect of security monitoring and attack mitigation. The exam objectives will likely cover the use of tools like protocol analyzers and spectrum analyzers to identify wireless threats. You should be familiar with the signatures of common attacks, such as deauthentication floods or evil twin APs, and know the appropriate steps to take when such an attack is detected. Preparing for these topics may involve hands-on practice in a lab environment to reinforce the theoretical concepts with practical skills. A thorough review of the exam objectives is the first and most important step in your preparation journey.

Physical Security Considerations for WLANs

While much of the PW0-070 Exam focuses on protocol-level security, the physical security of wireless network components is an equally important and often overlooked aspect. Access points are the most visible part of the wireless infrastructure and can be targets for theft or tampering. An attacker with physical access to an AP could potentially reset it to factory defaults, connect to its console port to gain network access, or replace it with a malicious device. Therefore, APs should be installed in secure locations, such as in locked enclosures or above drop ceilings with tamper-proof brackets.

The physical security of your network closets and data centers, where wireless LAN controllers and RADIUS servers reside, is also critical. These centralized components manage the security of the entire wireless network. Unauthorized physical access to a WLAN controller could allow an attacker to reconfigure the entire network, disable security features, or create rogue SSIDs. Similarly, access to a RADIUS server could compromise the entire user credential database. Standard physical security measures, including locked doors, access control systems, and surveillance cameras, are essential.

Cabling that connects access points to the wired network also presents a physical security risk. An attacker could potentially tap into an Ethernet cable or unplug an AP and connect their own device to the port. This could grant them direct access to the wired network, bypassing all wireless security measures. Using port security features on switches, such as MAC address filtering or 802.1X for wired ports, can help mitigate this risk. The PW0-070 Exam expects professionals to adopt a holistic view of security that includes these crucial physical layer considerations.

Developing a Robust Wireless Security Policy

A wireless security policy is the foundational document that governs how a wireless network is to be used and secured. It is not merely a technical document but a high-level framework that defines the organization's stance on wireless security. The PW0-070 Exam emphasizes the importance of policy as the driver for all technical security controls. The policy should clearly define acceptable use, data protection requirements, and the roles and responsibilities of users, IT staff, and management. A well-crafted policy provides the authority needed to enforce security measures.

The policy should be comprehensive and cover all aspects of the wireless lifecycle, from deployment to decommissioning. It should specify the minimum security standards for all company-owned and personal devices that connect to the network. This includes mandating the use of strong authentication, such as WPA2-Enterprise, and requiring that devices have up-to-date antivirus software and operating system patches. The policy should also outline procedures for reporting lost or stolen devices and for responding to security incidents. It serves as a guide for both users and administrators.

Finally, a wireless security policy is a living document. The threat landscape and business requirements change over time, and the policy must be reviewed and updated regularly to remain relevant and effective. This process should involve stakeholders from across the organization, including IT, security, legal, and human resources. The ability to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive wireless security policy is a key skill for any professional preparing for the PW0-070 Exam. It demonstrates a strategic understanding of security that goes beyond simple device configuration.

Legacy Security: The Flaws of WEP

To truly appreciate modern wireless security, it is essential to understand the failures of its predecessors. Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) was the first attempt to secure 802.11 networks, but its name proved to be a misnomer. The PW0-070 Exam requires a detailed understanding of WEP's cryptographic weaknesses. Its core problem was the use of a short, 24-bit Initialization Vector (IV) concatenated with a static, pre-shared key. This small IV space meant that IVs would inevitably be reused, a catastrophic flaw for a stream cipher like RC4, which WEP employed.

The reuse of the IV, combined with known properties of the RC4 algorithm, created vulnerabilities that allowed attackers to recover the secret key. Several well-known attacks, such as the Fluhrer, Mantin, and Shamir (FMS) attack, exploited these weaknesses. These attacks could collect encrypted packets and, through statistical analysis, deduce the WEP key in a matter of minutes. This meant that an attacker could gain full access to the network and decrypt all traffic. The PW0-070 Exam expects candidates to be able to explain exactly why and how these attacks were possible.

Another significant flaw in WEP was its lack of a robust message integrity mechanism. It used a simple Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC-32) for integrity, which was not cryptographically secure. An attacker could intercept a message, modify both the data and the CRC value in a predictable way, and forward it without the changes being detected. This allowed for active attacks where malicious data could be injected into the network. The complete breakdown of confidentiality and integrity made WEP utterly unsuitable for securing any sensitive information, a crucial lesson for any security professional.

The Transitional Protocol: WPA and TKIP

Following the public failure of WEP, the industry needed an immediate solution that could run on existing hardware. This led to the creation of Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) and its underlying cryptographic protocol, the Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP). A key topic in the PW0-070 Exam is understanding TKIP's role as a firmware-upgradable patch for WEP. TKIP was designed to address WEP’s most critical flaws without requiring new and more powerful processing capabilities that older hardware lacked. It was a wrapper, not a complete replacement.

TKIP introduced several key improvements. First, it implemented a per-packet key mixing function. For each packet, it combined the base key, the transmitter's MAC address, and a 48-bit IV to create a unique 128-bit encryption key. This prevented the weak key attacks that plagued WEP. Second, it replaced WEP's insecure CRC-32 integrity check with a much stronger Message Integrity Code (MIC), nicknamed Michael. This MIC was designed to prevent an attacker from tampering with packets in transit, thus protecting data integrity far more effectively.

However, TKIP was intentionally designed with compromises. To ensure it could operate on legacy hardware, it still used the RC4 stream cipher, which was known to have inherent weaknesses. The Michael MIC algorithm was also designed to be computationally inexpensive, which made it vulnerable to certain active attacks, though it did include countermeasures to detect and thwart them. The PW0-070 Exam requires candidates to recognize WPA/TKIP as a crucial but temporary step in the evolution of wireless security. It was deprecated because it could not provide the long-term, robust protection offered by AES-based systems.

The Gold Standard: WPA2 and AES-CCMP

The true successor to WEP and the long-term solution for wireless security came with the IEEE 802.11i standard, marketed as Wi-Fi Protected Access II (WPA2). WPA2 mandated a complete departure from the legacy RC4 cipher. Instead, it required support for the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), a block cipher considered the gold standard in cryptography worldwide. The specific mode of operation used in WPA2 is called Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol (CCMP). Understanding the components of CCMP is a central requirement for the PW0-070 Exam.

CCMP provides robust security services for wireless networks. For confidentiality, it uses AES in Counter Mode (CTR). This mode essentially turns the AES block cipher into a stream cipher, making it efficient for encrypting network traffic of varying lengths. For data integrity and authentication, it uses Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code (CBC-MAC). By combining these two functions, CCMP ensures that data is not only encrypted but also protected from tampering. Any unauthorized modification to a packet will be detected when the integrity check fails at the receiver.

The implementation of AES-CCMP represented a massive leap forward in security. Unlike TKIP, it was not built upon the flawed foundation of WEP. It was a completely new and powerful cryptographic protocol designed from the ground up for robust security. WPA2, through its mandatory use of CCMP, has been the bedrock of wireless security for over a decade. A deep, technical understanding of how CCMP uses AES to provide both confidentiality and integrity is absolutely essential for anyone preparing for the PW0-070 Exam and aiming to design and manage secure enterprise WLANs.

Understanding the 802.1X Framework for Port-Based Network Access Control

While strong encryption is vital, it is only one half of the security equation. The other half is authentication: ensuring that only authorized users and devices are allowed to connect to the network. For enterprise environments, the PW0-070 Exam focuses heavily on the IEEE 802.1X standard. 802.1X is a port-based network access control (PNAC) framework that provides a mechanism for robust authentication. It is not an authentication protocol itself but a framework for transporting authentication messages between a client and an authentication server.

The 802.1X framework involves three main components. The first is the supplicant, which is the client device (e.g., a laptop or smartphone) seeking to connect to the network. The second is the authenticator, which is the network device that controls access, typically a wireless access point or a switch. The third is the authentication server, which makes the access decision, usually a RADIUS server. Initially, the authenticator's port is in an unauthorized state, only allowing 802.1X traffic to pass to the authentication server. All other traffic is blocked.

Once the supplicant provides its credentials, they are passed through the authenticator to the authentication server. The server verifies the credentials against its database. If the credentials are valid, the server sends an access-accept message back to the authenticator. The authenticator then places the port into an authorized state, allowing the supplicant's data traffic to flow freely onto the network. If authentication fails, the port remains unauthorized. This framework is the foundation of WPA2-Enterprise security and is a critical topic for the PW0-070 Exam.

Deep Dive into Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Types

The 802.1X framework uses the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) to carry the actual authentication information. EAP is a flexible protocol that supports various authentication methods, known as EAP types. The PW0-070 Exam requires candidates to be familiar with the most common EAP types and their respective security characteristics. Choosing the right EAP type is a critical design decision, as it impacts both the security of the network and the user experience. Each type has its own requirements for credentials, such as passwords, tokens, or digital certificates.

One of the most secure methods is EAP-TLS (Transport Layer Security). It provides the strongest security through mutual authentication using digital certificates. Both the client and the authentication server must have a certificate from a trusted certificate authority. While it offers excellent security, the administrative overhead of issuing and managing certificates for every client device can be substantial. For this reason, other methods were developed to simplify the deployment process for clients. These alternatives often involve creating a secure tunnel for less secure authentication methods.

PEAP (Protected EAP) and EAP-TTLS (Tunneled TLS) are two such tunneling methods. In both cases, the authentication server presents a certificate to the client to establish an encrypted TLS tunnel. Once the tunnel is secure, the client authenticates using a weaker, legacy method inside the tunnel. PEAP typically uses MS-CHAPv2 for the inner authentication, which is based on usernames and passwords. EAP-TTLS is more flexible and can support various inner methods like PAP, CHAP, or MS-CHAP. The PW0-070 Exam expects you to know the differences, security implications, and use cases for these and other EAP types like EAP-FAST.

Implementing RADIUS for Centralized Authentication

In any large-scale enterprise wireless deployment, authentication must be centralized. The Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) is the de facto standard protocol for providing this centralized Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) management. For the PW0-070 Exam, understanding the role and configuration of a RADIUS server is non-negotiable. The RADIUS server acts as the authentication server in the 802.1X framework, maintaining the central database of all user credentials. This can be a local database or it can integrate with an existing directory service like Active Directory.

When a client attempts to connect, the access point (acting as a RADIUS client) forwards the authentication request to the RADIUS server. All communication between the AP and the RADIUS server is encrypted using a shared secret. This is crucial to protect the authentication exchange as it travels over the wired network. The RADIUS server processes the request, validates the user's credentials, and checks policies to determine the user's level of access. It then sends a response back to the AP, either an Access-Accept or an Access-Reject message.

Beyond simple accept or reject decisions, a RADIUS server can provide powerful policy enforcement. It can send specific attributes back to the AP along with the Access-Accept message. These attributes can instruct the AP to place the user into a specific VLAN, apply a particular Quality of Service (QoS) policy, or set a session timeout. This ability to dynamically assign network policies on a per-user basis is a cornerstone of modern, secure network design. A thorough knowledge of RADIUS functionality is essential for success on the PW0-070 Exam.

Pre-Shared Keys (PSK) vs. Enterprise Authentication

Wireless networks offer two primary modes of authentication: Personal mode, which uses a Pre-Shared Key (PSK), and Enterprise mode, which uses the 802.1X/EAP framework. The PW0-070 Exam requires a clear understanding of the pros and cons of each. PSK, also known as WPA2-Personal, is simple to configure. All users and devices on the network use the same passphrase to connect. This simplicity makes it suitable for home and small office environments where administrative resources are limited. However, this simplicity comes at a significant security cost.

The primary weakness of PSK is the shared nature of the key. If the passphrase is ever compromised, the entire network is at risk. Furthermore, managing the key is difficult. When an employee leaves the organization, the passphrase must be changed on every single device connected to the network to revoke their access, which is often operationally infeasible. This lack of individual accountability and difficult revocation makes PSK unsuitable for most enterprise environments. A compromised PSK allows an attacker to decrypt traffic from other users on the network.

WPA2-Enterprise, using 802.1X, solves these problems by providing unique credentials for every user. Each user authenticates with their own username and password or a digital certificate. This means that access can be granted or revoked on an individual basis without affecting any other user. It also provides a clear audit trail, as network activity can be logged and tied to a specific user account. While it is more complex to set up, requiring a RADIUS server, the superior security, scalability, and manageability of WPA2-Enterprise make it the mandatory choice for any security-conscious organization.

Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) in Wireless Networks

Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) plays a critical role in the most secure forms of wireless authentication. PKI is a system of hardware, software, policies, and procedures used to create, manage, distribute, use, store, and revoke digital certificates. In the context of the PW0-070 Exam, PKI is the foundation for EAP-TLS and for the server-side authentication used in PEAP and EAP-TTLS. It provides a way to establish trust between devices that have no prior relationship, based on a trusted third party known as a Certificate Authority (CA).

A digital certificate is an electronic document that binds a public key to an identity, such as a user, a device, or a server. In an EAP-TLS deployment, both the RADIUS server and every client device must be issued a certificate from a CA that is trusted by both parties. When a client connects, it presents its certificate to the server, and the server presents its certificate to the client. Each party verifies the other's certificate by checking the signature of the trusted CA. This process of mutual authentication ensures that both the client and the server are legitimate.

Even in tunnel-based EAP methods like PEAP, PKI is essential. The client device must be able to verify the identity of the RADIUS server before it sends its password-based credentials through the TLS tunnel. It does this by validating the server's certificate. If the client does not validate the server certificate, it becomes vulnerable to evil twin and man-in-the-middle attacks, where an attacker could impersonate the legitimate network and capture the user's credentials. Understanding the role of PKI and certificate management is a key competency for a wireless security professional.

The Future: An Introduction to WPA3

While the PW0-070 Exam may have a strong focus on WPA2, a forward-looking security professional must be aware of the next generation of security: WPA3. WPA3 addresses several of the known limitations of WPA2, particularly in Personal mode. The most significant improvement is the replacement of the PSK with Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE). SAE is a key exchange protocol that is resistant to offline dictionary attacks. Even if an attacker captures the authentication handshake, they cannot mount an offline attack to guess the passphrase, which was a major vulnerability of WPA2-PSK.

For open, unencrypted networks like those found in coffee shops and airports, WPA3 introduces Opportunistic Wireless Encryption (OWE). OWE provides individualized data encryption between each client and the access point, even without any authentication. This means that even on a public network, each user's traffic is encrypted and protected from passive eavesdropping by other users on the same network. This is a massive improvement in privacy for networks where using a passphrase is not practical.

In Enterprise mode, WPA3 enhances security by requiring the use of Protected Management Frames (PMF), which was optional in WPA2. PMF protects certain types of management traffic from being forged, preventing attacks like the deauthentication flood. WPA3 also introduces an optional 192-bit security mode, aligning with the Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite for handling sensitive government and industrial data. Familiarity with these enhancements shows a comprehensive understanding of the wireless security landscape, which is beneficial for any security professional.

Introduction to Wireless Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (WIDS/WIPS)

A core component of a modern wireless security architecture, and a key topic for the PW0-070 Exam, is the Wireless Intrusion Detection and Prevention System, often abbreviated as WIDS or WIPS. A WIDS is a system designed to monitor the radio frequency spectrum for malicious activity and policy violations. It acts like a burglar alarm for the wireless network. A WIPS takes this a step further by not only detecting threats but also actively taking steps to mitigate them. These systems are essential for providing real-time defense against an ever-evolving landscape of wireless attacks.

The primary function of a WIDS/WIPS is to provide 24/7 visibility into the wireless environment. A standard wireless network infrastructure is only aware of the clients and access points that are part of its own system. It has no visibility into rogue devices, ad-hoc networks, or attacks being launched by nearby devices that are not associated with the network. A WIDS/WIPS fills this gap by constantly scanning all Wi-Fi channels to identify and classify every wireless device it can hear. This provides a complete picture of the RF environment.

These systems work by comparing the observed activity against a database of known attack signatures and by using anomaly detection to identify unusual behavior that may indicate a new or unknown threat. For example, a WIDS can detect a deauthentication flood attack by observing an abnormally high number of deauthentication management frames. Upon detection, it can alert administrators to the threat. A WIPS might take the additional step of trying to contain the attack, for example, by sending packets to disconnect the malicious device. Understanding their role is fundamental.

WIDS/WIPS Architecture and Deployment Models

To be effective, a WIDS/WIPS must be deployed correctly. The PW0-070 Exam will expect candidates to understand the different architectural models for these systems. The most common model is the integrated architecture, where the WIDS/WIPS functionality is built directly into the enterprise wireless LAN infrastructure. The access points themselves perform the security scanning. This can be done by having the APs dedicate some of their time to scanning (time-slicing) or by having APs with a dedicated third radio used exclusively for security monitoring. This approach is often cost-effective and easier to manage.

Another deployment model is the overlay architecture. In this model, a completely separate set of sensors is deployed alongside the existing wireless network. These sensors are dedicated solely to security monitoring and do not provide any client connectivity. While this approach is typically more expensive, it provides the most comprehensive and accurate security coverage. Because the sensors are dedicated to scanning, they can monitor all channels continuously without impacting the performance of the client-serving access points. This is often the preferred model for high-security environments.

A third model is a hybrid approach, which combines elements of both integrated and overlay architectures. For example, an organization might use the integrated WIPS capabilities of its primary WLAN system for general coverage and then deploy dedicated overlay sensors in high-risk areas, such as lobbies, data centers, or executive offices. The choice of architecture depends on the organization's specific security requirements, budget, and risk tolerance. A candidate for the PW0-070 Exam should be able to evaluate these factors and recommend an appropriate deployment model for a given scenario.

Signature-Based vs. Anomaly-Based Detection

WIDS/WIPS solutions use two primary methods for identifying malicious activity: signature-based detection and anomaly-based detection. A deep understanding of how these methods work is crucial for the PW0-070 Exam. Signature-based detection is the more traditional approach. It works by maintaining a database of known attack patterns, or signatures. The system continuously compares the traffic it observes against this database. If a match is found, it triggers an alert. For example, a signature could be created for a specific tool that generates malformed packets.

The main advantage of signature-based detection is that it is very accurate and produces a low rate of false positives. If it detects a signature, you can be highly confident that the specific attack it is designed to identify is occurring. However, its major weakness is that it can only detect known attacks. It is completely blind to new, zero-day attacks for which a signature has not yet been created. Therefore, the signature database must be constantly updated by the vendor to remain effective against the latest threats.

Anomaly-based detection, on the other hand, works by first establishing a baseline of normal network behavior. It profiles traffic patterns, protocols used, and device behaviors over a period of time. Once this baseline is established, the system monitors the network for any deviations. An alert is triggered if activity occurs that is statistically significant or falls outside the established norms. The key advantage of this method is its ability to potentially detect novel, zero-day attacks. However, it can also be prone to a higher rate of false positives, as legitimate but unusual network activity could trigger an alert.

Common Wireless Attack Vectors

A wireless security professional must have an encyclopedic knowledge of the various ways a wireless network can be attacked. The PW0-070 Exam covers a wide range of these attack vectors. One of the most common is the deployment of a rogue access point. This is an unauthorized AP connected to the corporate wired network. A rogue AP can be set up by a malicious attacker or even by a well-meaning but ignorant employee. It creates a massive security hole, as it typically bypasses all the security controls of the managed wireless network.

Another prevalent attack is the evil twin. In this attack, a malicious actor sets up an access point with the same SSID and security settings as a legitimate corporate AP. They then broadcast a stronger signal to entice users to connect to their fraudulent AP instead of the real one. Once a user connects, the attacker can execute a man-in-the-middle attack, capturing all of the user's traffic, including sensitive credentials and data. This is a particularly insidious attack because it is very difficult for the average user to detect.

Other attack vectors include various forms of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. These are not aimed at stealing data but at disrupting the availability of the wireless network. This can be achieved by flooding the RF spectrum with noise (RF jamming) or by exploiting protocols. A deauthentication flood, for example, involves sending spoofed deauthentication frames to clients, forcing them to disconnect from the network. The PW0-070 Exam requires a thorough understanding of the mechanics of these attacks and the methods used to detect and mitigate them.

Identifying and Mitigating Rogue Access Points

The threat of rogue access points is one of the most significant risks to a corporate network. A rogue AP can be a cheap, consumer-grade wireless router plugged into an active network jack under an employee's desk. It instantly creates an unsecured backdoor into the corporate network. The PW0-070 Exam places a strong emphasis on the techniques used to find and deal with these devices. A WIPS is the primary tool for automated rogue AP detection. It identifies APs broadcasting on the airwaves and correlates them with the known, managed APs on the wired network.

When a WIPS detects an AP that it does not recognize, it can classify it in several ways. If the AP is not connected to the corporate wired network, it might be classified as a neighboring or external AP, which is generally not a threat. However, if the WIPS determines that the unknown AP is connected to the corporate wired network, it is classified as a rogue. This can be done by sending probes over the wired network to see if the device responds. Once a rogue is confirmed, the WIPS can take immediate action.

Mitigation involves several steps. The first is to pinpoint the physical location of the rogue AP. A WIPS can do this by using triangulation based on the signal strength received by multiple sensors. Once located, the device should be physically removed from the network. A WIPS can also perform a wired-side containment by identifying the switch port the rogue is connected to and shutting it down. Additionally, it can perform a wireless-side containment by sending deauthentication packets to any clients connected to the rogue AP, forcing them to disconnect.

Understanding Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks in WLANs

Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks in the wireless realm aim to make the network unavailable to legitimate users. The PW0-070 Exam covers both physical layer and MAC layer DoS attacks. At the physical layer, the most straightforward attack is RF jamming. This involves using a device to transmit a powerful signal that overwhelms the frequencies used by the Wi-Fi network, effectively creating so much noise that legitimate devices cannot communicate. This type of attack is simple but can be very effective at shutting down a network in a specific area.

At the MAC layer, attackers can exploit the 802.11 management frames, which are typically unauthenticated and unencrypted. The deauthentication attack is a classic example. An attacker sends a flood of spoofed deauthentication frames that appear to come from the legitimate AP, telling all clients to disconnect. The clients obey, and then immediately try to reconnect, only to be disconnected again. This can be used to disrupt service or as a prelude to an evil twin attack, encouraging users to connect to the attacker's network instead.

Another MAC layer attack targets the virtual carrier sense mechanism, Clear Channel Assessment (CCA). Devices use this to determine if the medium is busy before transmitting. An attacker can manipulate the NAV (Network Allocation Vector) timer in other devices by sending frames with a very long duration value. This tricks the other devices into thinking the medium is busy for an extended period, preventing them from transmitting. A WIPS is crucial for detecting these protocol-level attacks by identifying the anomalous volume or nature of the management frames.

Tools for Wireless Network Analysis and Monitoring

To effectively monitor and troubleshoot a wireless network, a security professional needs to be proficient with a specific set of tools. The PW0-070 Exam will test your knowledge of these tools and their applications. The most fundamental tool is a wireless protocol analyzer, also known as a Wi-Fi sniffer. This tool consists of a wireless network adapter operating in promiscuous or monitor mode and software that can capture and decode 802.11 frames. It allows you to see exactly what is happening on the airwaves at the frame level.

Using a protocol analyzer, you can diagnose connectivity issues, analyze security handshakes, and identify malicious activity. For example, you could capture traffic and filter for an excessive number of deauthentication frames to detect a DoS attack. You could also examine the EAP exchange to troubleshoot an 802.1X authentication failure. Proficiency with a protocol analyzer is a non-negotiable skill for a wireless security expert. It provides the ground truth about what is happening on the network, unfiltered by any management system.

Another essential tool is a spectrum analyzer. While a protocol analyzer understands the 802.11 protocol, a spectrum analyzer operates at the physical layer and has no knowledge of protocols. It simply shows the raw radio frequency energy present in a given spectrum. This is invaluable for identifying sources of RF interference that could be impacting network performance. A spectrum analyzer can identify non-Wi-Fi interference from sources like microwave ovens, cordless phones, or even a malicious RF jamming device. It helps you see the invisible RF world.

Log Management and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Integration

Effective security monitoring is not just about real-time alerts; it is also about collecting, correlating, and archiving security event data over time. The PW0-070 Exam recognizes the importance of a comprehensive logging strategy. All network security devices, including wireless LAN controllers, RADIUS servers, and WIPS, generate logs of their activity. These logs contain a wealth of information about authentications, configuration changes, and detected threats. It is crucial that these logs are centrally collected and stored securely.

A Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system is a powerful tool for this purpose. A SIEM aggregates log data from multiple sources across the entire IT infrastructure, not just the wireless network. It can then correlate events from different systems to identify more complex and subtle attack patterns. For example, a SI-EM could correlate a WIPS alert about a suspicious client with a firewall log showing that the same client is attempting to communicate with a known malicious command-and-control server on the internet.

Integrating your wireless security systems with a SIEM provides a holistic view of your organization's security posture. It enables long-term trend analysis, facilitates incident response by providing a centralized repository of evidence, and helps meet compliance requirements for data retention and reporting. The ability to understand how wireless security events fit into the larger enterprise security monitoring framework is a key competency for a professional who has passed the PW0-070 Exam. It demonstrates a mature and comprehensive approach to security.

Designing Secure Wireless Guest Access

Providing wireless access to guests, contractors, and other visitors is a common business requirement, but it introduces significant security risks if not handled properly. A critical topic for the PW0-070 Exam is the design of a secure guest access solution. The fundamental principle of secure guest networking is network isolation. Guest traffic must be completely segregated from the internal corporate network at all times. Under no circumstances should a guest user be able to access internal resources like file servers, databases, or printers.

The most common method for achieving this isolation is through the use of VLANs (Virtual LANs). When a guest user connects to the guest SSID, the wireless system should tag their traffic and place it onto a dedicated guest VLAN. This VLAN should then be routed directly to the internet, completely bypassing the internal corporate network. Firewall rules must be implemented at the network edge to strictly enforce this separation, ensuring that no traffic from the guest VLAN can be initiated towards any internal network subnet. This creates a secure, isolated tunnel for guest traffic.

Another key consideration is the user experience and authentication method. While providing a simple shared passphrase might be easy, it lacks accountability and can be difficult to manage. A better approach is to use a captive portal. A captive portal intercepts the guest's first web request and redirects them to a special login page. On this page, they might be required to accept an acceptable use policy, enter a temporary username and password provided by a sponsor, or register through a self-service portal. This process provides a layer of accountability and control.

The Role of Captive Portals in Guest Networking

Captive portals are a ubiquitous feature of guest wireless networks and an important concept for the PW0-070 Exam. As mentioned, their primary function is to intercept a user's web browser and present a specific web page before granting them broader network access. This page can serve multiple purposes. At its simplest, it can display a terms and conditions or acceptable use policy that the user must agree to before proceeding. This provides a degree of legal protection for the organization providing the access.

For more controlled environments, the captive portal can require some form of authentication. This might involve self-registration, where the user provides their name and email address to create a temporary account. Another popular method is sponsored guest access, where an employee must approve the guest's access request, which then generates a unique, time-limited credential for the guest. This adds a layer of accountability, as every guest on the network is tied to a sponsoring employee. Social media logins are also becoming a common option.

It is critical to understand the security implications of captive portals. The portal itself should be secured using HTTPS to encrypt the login process. Furthermore, it is important to recognize that a captive portal is not a replacement for strong encryption on the wireless link itself. While the portal handles authentication, the traffic over the air should still be encrypted to prevent eavesdropping. Even on an "open" guest network, technologies like Opportunistic Wireless Encryption (OWE) in WPA3 are designed to provide this layer of protection for user privacy.


Go to testing centre with ease on our mind when you use CWNP PW0-070 vce exam dumps, practice test questions and answers. CWNP PW0-070 Certified Wireless Technology Specialist certification practice test questions and answers, study guide, exam dumps and video training course in vce format to help you study with ease. Prepare with confidence and study using CWNP PW0-070 exam dumps & practice test questions and answers vce from ExamCollection.

Read More


Top CWNP Certifications

Top CWNP Certification Exams

Site Search:

 

VISA, MasterCard, AmericanExpress, UnionPay

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

ExamCollection Premium

ExamCollection Premium Files

Pass your Exam with ExamCollection's PREMIUM files!

  • ExamCollection Certified Safe Files
  • Guaranteed to have ACTUAL Exam Questions
  • Up-to-Date Exam Study Material - Verified by Experts
  • Instant Downloads
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code
A Confirmation Link will be sent to this email address to verify your login
We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

Use Discount Code:

MIN10OFF

A confirmation link was sent to your e-mail.
Please check your mailbox for a message from support@examcollection.com and follow the directions.

Next

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.