SolarWinds Hybrid Cloud Observability Network Monitoring Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions

Question 1:

Which three of the following actions are considered native log entry actions? (Choose three.)

A. add a tag to the log entry
B. continue rule processing but do not save
C. halt further rule processing for the log entry
D. send an email notification

Answer: A, B, C

Explanation:

In the realm of log management and processing systems—such as SIEM, network monitoring, or security platforms—native log entry actions are predefined operations that can be directly applied to individual log entries during their processing lifecycle. These actions influence how logs are categorized, handled, or filtered before final storage or alerting.

Option A, adding a tag to the log entry, is a fundamental native action. Tagging helps to label and classify logs based on attributes like severity, source, or event type, which is essential for efficient searching and filtering in complex systems. Tagging is embedded within the core log processing workflow.

Option B describes continuing rule processing without saving the log entry. This native action is valuable because it allows the system to evaluate multiple rules against a log entry without committing that entry to persistent storage, especially if the log is deemed non-essential or redundant for retention. It ensures thorough filtering while managing storage and processing efficiency.

Option C, halting further rule processing for the log entry, is also native and important. When certain conditions are met (such as detecting a critical event), stopping further processing prevents unnecessary additional checks or modifications, streamlining handling and avoiding conflicts from subsequent rules.

Option D, sending an email notification, although common in alerting workflows, is generally not considered a native log entry action. Instead, it is an alerting or secondary action triggered by processed logs. Email notifications are often configured separately from the core log entry processing steps.

In summary, native log entry actions focus on direct modifications or control over the log entry itself during processing, which includes A, B, and C, but excludes alerting functions like D.

Question 2:

If a NetFlow collector service is showing a “down” status, which two of the following steps are valid troubleshooting actions? (Choose two.)

A. Confirm the database connection is up and server has free resources.
B. Delete and re-add NetFlow collector service.
C. Start or restart SolarWinds’ collector service.
D. Start or restart SolarWinds’ NetFlow service from Orion service manager.

Answer: A, C

Explanation:

When troubleshooting a NetFlow collector service that is down, the main focus should be on verifying essential dependencies and restarting core services to restore operation.

Option A is a crucial first step. The NetFlow collector relies on a healthy database connection to store collected flow data. If the database connection is down or the server is resource-constrained (low CPU, memory, or disk space), the collector will fail to operate properly. Checking these fundamentals ensures the environment can support the collector.

Option C involves starting or restarting the SolarWinds collector service itself. This service is directly responsible for collecting flow data. Restarting it can clear transient errors or hung processes, often resolving the “down” status. It’s a straightforward and recommended initial troubleshooting action.

Option B, deleting and re-adding the NetFlow collector service, is generally a last resort. It’s invasive and may be necessary only if configuration corruption or persistent faults exist. It’s not a typical first step because it risks losing configurations and interrupts monitoring longer than needed.

Option D refers to restarting the NetFlow service from the Orion service manager. While relevant to NetFlow functionality, this option is more specific to the service managing flow processing rather than the collector itself. Since the issue described specifically mentions the collector service status, restarting the NetFlow service alone might not address the problem.

Therefore, the best initial troubleshooting steps are to verify the database connection and system resources (option A) and to restart the collector service (option C), making these the correct choices.

Question 3:

What is the minimum required amount of RAM for setting up log collection in a hybrid cloud observability environment?

A. 4 GB
B. 8 GB
C. 16 GB
D. 32 GB

Answer: B

Explanation:

In hybrid cloud observability, where log data is collected, monitored, and analyzed across both cloud and on-premises environments, the system’s hardware specifications significantly impact performance and reliability. One key hardware metric is RAM, which affects the ability to process and store logs efficiently in real time.

Option A (4 GB) is typically too low for practical hybrid cloud log collection. Modern environments generate large volumes of logs requiring memory to buffer, parse, and index entries quickly. Insufficient RAM leads to slow processing, dropped logs, or system instability.

Option B (8 GB) represents the minimum recommended RAM for such setups. This baseline supports moderate log volumes and allows the observability platform to handle incoming data without performance degradation. It balances resource usage with expected operational demands in many hybrid environments.

Options C (16 GB) and D (32 GB) provide greater capacity and are ideal for larger-scale deployments or environments with heavy logging requirements, complex analytics, or longer retention policies. However, these are above the minimum necessary specifications.

In conclusion, 8 GB of RAM is the minimum amount required for effective log collection in hybrid cloud observability, providing adequate performance for most typical scenarios without excessive resource allocation.

Question 5:

You need to build probes to test Office 365 connectivity from two different geographic locations. How should this be done?

A. Create a probe, duplicate it, and change the source agent to the agent in another location.
B. Create both probes on the hybrid cloud observability (HCO) server and designate each location.
C. Create two probes and assign each to an agent in each location.
D. Create two probes and assign each to an agent in one location.

Answer: C

Explanation:

To effectively test Office 365 connectivity from multiple locations, each probe must be associated with a source agent located at the testing site. Creating two separate probes and assigning each to an agent in each respective location ensures that connection tests originate from the correct geographic points. This provides accurate visibility into network performance and user experience across different sites.

Option A suggests duplicating a probe and changing the source agent afterward. Although technically possible, this method risks configuration errors and reduces clarity in probe management. Creating distinct probes for each location is more straightforward and less error-prone.

Option B mentions creating probes on a hybrid cloud observability server and designating locations. This is more specific to certain monitoring platforms and doesn’t universally apply. The essential factor is that each probe must be tied to an agent physically located where the tests will run.

Option D proposes assigning both probes to agents in the same location, which defeats the purpose of testing from multiple geographic sites. Tests would not reflect network conditions from different locations if all probes are run from the same place.

Therefore, option C is the best practice, as it ensures geographically relevant and independent testing by assigning each probe to a distinct agent located in the target testing environment.

Question 6:

Flow data is not appearing in the web console from a device, even though Wireshark confirms flows are sent to the poller and not blocked by the firewall. 

Why is the flow data missing from the web console?

A. Device is not monitored by hybrid cloud observability (HCO) features
B. Device is using IPv6 and HCO only supports IPv4
C. Missing source address field in flow configurations
D. Flow monitoring was not enabled as device type in web console settings

Answer: D

Explanation:

The issue involves flow data being successfully sent and received but not displayed in the web console, which indicates a problem with how flow data is processed or presented rather than with data transmission.

Option A suggests the device isn’t monitored by HCO features. While HCO covers broader monitoring, the fact that flow data reaches the poller shows the device is at least partially monitored. This option doesn’t explain why data is absent in the console.

Option B raises the possibility of IPv6 incompatibility. However, modern observability tools typically support IPv6, and Wireshark’s confirmation of data transmission indicates protocol compatibility.

Option C points to missing source address fields in flow configurations. Although incomplete flow configurations can cause issues, Wireshark’s successful capture implies flow data formatting is correct.

Option D is the most plausible explanation: if flow monitoring is not enabled for the device type in the web console, the flow data, despite being received, won’t be processed or visualized. This configuration step is essential to activate flow visibility in the console.

Hence, the absence of flow data in the web console is most likely due to the lack of enabling flow monitoring for that device type in the console settings, making D the correct answer.

Question 7:

Which two tasks are necessary to monitor servers and connections in a load-balancing environment? (Choose two.)

A. Add Cisco Nexus device in network device configuration manager
B. Add Cisco Nexus device in network health/performance monitoring
C. Enable CLI polling
D. Enable F5 iControl polling

Answer: B, D

Explanation:

In a load-balancing environment, monitoring both the network devices and load balancers is crucial for maintaining optimal performance and reliability.

Option B involves adding Cisco Nexus devices to network health and performance monitoring. Cisco Nexus switches often play a significant role in data center networking and traffic management. Including them in health and performance monitoring allows administrators to track device status, network throughput, and any issues that might impact load balancing or server connectivity.

Option D refers to enabling F5 iControl polling. F5 devices are widely used load balancers and application delivery controllers. iControl is F5’s API that enables detailed monitoring of load balancer status, server health, and connection metrics. Enabling iControl polling provides deep visibility into the load balancing process and server connections.

Option A relates to adding devices to a configuration manager, which primarily manages device configurations rather than monitoring real-time performance or connections. This task supports device management but is not directly required for monitoring load balancing.

Option C suggests enabling CLI polling, which is less efficient and less specialized than API-based polling (such as F5 iControl). CLI polling can be useful in some contexts but is not optimal for comprehensive load balancing and server connection monitoring.

Therefore, the two essential tasks for monitoring in this context are B and D because they focus on health/performance monitoring of key devices and enabling advanced polling methods specific to load balancing.

Question 8:

What could happen if the top talking optimization value is decreased?

A increased storage requirement
B reduced database performance
C reduced page load times
D slower reporting speed

Answer: B

Explanation:

The top talking optimization value generally refers to a performance tuning setting designed to optimize the handling of the most frequent or resource-intensive queries and operations, often in a database or monitoring platform. When you decrease this value, you are essentially reducing the level of optimization applied to these "top talking" queries or processes.

Option A suggests increased storage requirement, but this is unlikely since optimization values usually affect how data is processed or queried rather than increasing the amount of data stored. Storage demands do not directly correlate with this setting, so this option is less relevant.

Option B—reduced database performance—is the most direct consequence of lowering this optimization value. Optimizations typically improve efficiency by streamlining query execution, caching, or indexing. By reducing this value, you may decrease the system’s ability to efficiently manage high-traffic queries or data requests, leading to slower query response times and overall degraded database performance.

Option C suggests reduced page load times, implying faster loads. However, decreasing optimization usually harms performance, which can cause page load times to increase, not decrease. Thus, this option is inconsistent with the expected outcome.

Option D mentions slower reporting speed, which could indeed occur as a secondary effect of reduced database performance since reports rely on database queries. However, this is more of an indirect effect rather than the primary consequence.

In summary, the most logical and immediate impact of decreasing the top talking optimization value is a drop in database performance, making B the correct answer.

Question 9:

Which two troubleshooting steps should be taken if a node shows as “up” but no data appears in the SolarWinds platform web console? (Choose two.)

A Add a remote site node and ensure firewall rules allow SNMP traffic.
B Ping the device from the polling engine assigned to it via command line.
C Verify hardware health sensors provide both status and values.
D Wait ten minutes after adding the device and refresh the screen.

Answer: B and D

Explanation:

When a node status is “up” in SolarWinds but data is not visible, it indicates the device is reachable but data collection might be delayed or blocked.

Option B is a key troubleshooting step. Pinging the device from the polling engine confirms network connectivity from the polling source to the device. Even if the node is up, network issues or routing problems might prevent data collection, so confirming reachability via ping is essential.

Option D addresses a common situation where data may not immediately appear after a device is added. The SolarWinds platform can take several minutes to begin polling and populating the data on the console. Waiting about ten minutes and refreshing the view allows time for initial data collection to complete.

Option A involves adding a remote site node and configuring firewall rules for SNMP traffic, which is relevant only if dealing with new remote sites or nodes not yet added or reachable. Since the node is already “up,” this step is unnecessary at this stage.

Option C focuses on verifying hardware health sensors. While important for device monitoring, if the node is already “up,” lack of sensor data is unlikely the cause of missing data in the console. Sensor health verification is more related to device status than to data visibility issues.

Therefore, the two most appropriate steps for troubleshooting missing data despite an “up” node status are B and D.

Question 10:

Which tool allows you to see the physical layout of interfaces on graphical stencils?

A device studio
B device view
C NetPath
D network insight

Answer: B

Explanation:

Device View is a SolarWinds tool designed specifically to display the physical layout of device interfaces on graphical stencils. It helps network administrators visualize how physical ports and connections appear on network devices, supporting troubleshooting, network mapping, and documentation.

Option A, Device Studio, is mainly for customizing device templates and configurations but does not focus on graphical interface layouts.

Option C, NetPath, is used for network path analysis and troubleshooting the path data packets take across the network. It is useful for identifying performance bottlenecks but does not provide a physical interface layout visualization.

Option D, Network Insight, offers detailed monitoring and analytics for network devices and environments but does not specifically provide graphical stencil views of physical interfaces.

Thus, Device View is the tool dedicated to visually representing the physical interface layout, making B the correct choice.