....Tuesday, December 10, 2013 7:42 AM UTsatchmo Anonymous's dump. Somebody just passed with it.Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:09 AM UTUser today. Score 606<br /> Not recomend use this dump and pass this exam while sombody update dump.Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:03 AM UTNikel thank you Satchmo, your explanations were very helpful.Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:24 AM UTsatchmo Nikel from Russian Federation - Aug 25 2013, 2:35 PM Report Spam<br /> Ex.B Q1 <br /> Second part of answer is "SmtpRejectMessageRejectStatusCode".I'm suppose that is wrong answer. <br /> <br /> <br /> NEEDS REVIEWING<br /> RejectMessageEnhancedStatusCode. OR USE SMTPRejectMessageRejectStatusCode<br /> THAT IS THE QUESTION<br /> 5.7.3 IS A VALID CODE FOR BOTH and BOTH ARE VALID FOR EXCHANGE 2013<br /> THEY ARE VERY SIMILAR BUT MICROSOFT HAS INSTALLED BOTH AS AN ANSWER OPTION TO HIGHLIGHT THOSE WHO KNOW THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TWO.<br /> <br /> Re: Nikel from Russian Federation - Aug 25 2013, 10:17 PM Report Spam<br /> Ex.D Q2. I tend to think, provided answer - "Install CAS.." is wrong. Anti-spam agents would be enabled on Mailbox server only. <br /> <br /> SOME DEBATE AS TO CORRECT ANSWER (INSTALL THE MAILBOX SERVER 1ST OR INSTALL THE CAS SERVER 1ST)<br /> AS THERE IS AN EXCHANGE SERVER 2010 SETUP THERE MUST BE A MAILBOX SERVER IN THE INTERNAL NETWORK ALREADY<br /> Install the Client Access Server to replace EX3 for a properly organised Exchange 2013/2010 network<br /> Install the anti-spam agents on the existing mailbox server<br /> Run the Restart-Service MSExchange Transport command on the mailbox server<br /> <br /> I still think is OK.<br /> Good you passed but I am not issuing anymore updates and ARE RECOMMENDING THAT FORUM PARTICIPANTS USE ANOTHER VCE INSTEAD OF THIS ONE AS TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE FAILED THIS EXAM.<br /> I have no intention of participating in this forum until a new vce is issued.<br /> <br /> <br /> SATCHMOTuesday, August 27, 2013 6:32 AM UTNikel with 750+. It was tricky.) Four studies, all ?'s from the dump. 33 ordinary questions - 3 new.<br /> <br /> thanks Satchmo, your dump is awful but it helps to learn necessary things :)Tuesday, August 27, 2013 5:25 AM UTDrExchange Satchmo and all,<br /> <br /> I wanted to comment on the question where you are replacing the CAS Server and installing antispam agents and send/receive email from Internet.<br /> <br /> If that server you are installing is the only 2013 server, you MUST install both the Client Access Server and Mailbox Server roles since they need at least one of each. I think maybe this is a trick question from Microsoft because even though it says you need minimum server roles, technically don't you at least need 1 of each so that would be minimum, no?<br /> <br /> SO you can install CAS, Mailbox, and Install Anti-Spam agents.<br /> <br /> What do others think.? Just an idea.Monday, August 26, 2013 4:27 AM UTNikel Q2. I tend to think, provided answer - "Install CAS.." is wrong. Anti-spam agents would be enabled on Mailbox server only.<br /><br /> So Anonymous was right.Sunday, August 25, 2013 10:17 PM UTNikel Q1<br /> Second part of answer is "SmtpRejectMessageRejectStatusCode".I'm suppose that is wrong answer.<br /> <br /> Technet article says:<br /> The RejectMessageEnhancedStatusCode parameter specifies an enhanced status code to provide when rejecting messages. Valid values are 5.7.1 or between 5.7.1 and 5.7.999.<br /> <br /> If an enhanced status code isn't specified, and only the RejectMessageReasonText parameter is used, the enhanced status code 5.7.1 is used. This parameter is used to define a rule action.<br />, August 25, 2013 2:35 PM UTNikel for Ex.B Q9 seems to be correct.<br />, August 24, 2013 10:39 PM UTAndrey today with 637. About 5 new questions. Many questions in this dump are wrong.Friday, August 23, 2013 7:48 AM UTDrExchange Satchmo,<br /> <br /> Hello Satchmo, <br /> <br /> Thank for the upload. As I sent my message last night, shortly there after, the VCE posted so I again I appreciate your work. <br /> <br /> One question. On one of the ?'s, about what to do to restore all mailboxes if a DB Fails. Can you quickly explain how that would be done using Set-mailbox instead of new-mailboxrestorerequest? <br /> <br /> Thanks againFriday, August 23, 2013 7:20 AM UTthe g think it is more a case of a badly worded question tbh<br /> <br /> and centres on whether All other email means just from the Group2Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:11 PM UTthe g am not convinced on the answer/explanation to 16 of 26 ( misc section Ver4)<br /> The questions has a statement/requirement in the text<br /> <br /> "All other email must be moderated by a user named Admin1"<br /> <br /> But a reason given for it not being answer A in the notes is <br /> <br /> "NOT A, This means that all email sent to Group2 will be moderated" <br /> <br /> That statement conflicts with the requirements as stated in the question i.e.<br /> <br /> "All other email must be moderated by a user named Admin1"Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:08 PM UTsatchmo has been uploaded to a free ftp web site<br /><br /> login satchmo<br /> password satchmo<br /> USE SSLThursday, August 22, 2013 10:59 AM UTsatchmo,<br /> Happy to help you out just provide me with your email.<br /> Current time is 20:20 pm Australian Eastern Standard Time.<br /> I can look out for it for the next 2 hours. Otherwise it will be in the morning.Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:22 AM UTtester wrong with this dump. Did the exam yesterday and got over 900 points. A few new questions but there not difficult.<br /> <br /> Thnx satchmo!Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:59 AM UTDrExchange Satchmo,<br /> <br /> I know this might be too much to ask. If at possible, would there be anyway you can email me the newest .VCE? I have a deadline to take the test and I was hoping to do one last review prior to exam. I might have to go in 1 day and I'm not sure it'll be up by then. Ive reviewed inside out on all the concepts, so to me it's me knowing the types of ?s , rather then actual ?. If possible, if you can email it to me direct, I can provide an email. If not, I guess im just going to have to wait. Thanks again.Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:12 AM UTOcean satch,<br /> <br /> okay good work maybe try upload from different ip adress if its not there in few daysThursday, August 22, 2013 5:02 AM UTsatchmo I can only suggest to NOT to take any further exams in this topic until the forum has had a chance to review my 4th revision. This is proving to be not an easy exam to pass.You must know some theory behind the supplied answers in case the question changes somewhat.<br /> <br /> Also ayaan from India was going to put through some new questions. <br /> Again there are some 7 incomplete questions that need attending to.<br /> <br /> Forum participants can always go back to Anonymous's base vce if they want to.Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:30 AM UTsatchmo criticisms are looked at. Need to get everything right.<br /> <br /> I have just uploaded V4 under the name Mo. I believe that the forums will allow you to upload 3 vce's in a row but not 4 so I had to change my name slightly in order to attend to the requested file.<br /> <br /> It contains explanatory notes on all 91q supplied by Anonymous. I have corrected 7 of these questions with help from the forum with 4 of them. The other 84 answers are the same as Anonymous. Added new questions as supplied to the forum. Please review the Incorrect section in this vce and post your comments.<br /> <br /> Upload Complete<br /> Your file has been uploaded successfully. It may take up to 3 days before your file is published.<br /> File name:<br /> <br /> Drexchange your comments are addressed in this vce.<br /> Hi DrExchange,<br /> <br /> Exchange 2013 requires Active Directory<br /> <br /><br /> Each organization requires at a minimum one Client Access server and one Mailbox server in the Active Directory forest. Additionally, each Active Directory site that contains a Mailbox server must also contain at least one Client Access server.<br /> If you're separating your server roles, we recommend installing the Mailbox server role first.<br /> <br /> Install the Client Access Server to replace EX3<br /> Install the anti-spam agents on the existing mailbox server<br /> Run the Restart-Service MSExchange Transport command on the mailbox server<br /> <br /> This answer was corrected from Anonymous to the above answer<br /> <br /> This corrected answer still seems OK<br /> <br /> TheSoup from US needs to look at the Incorrect section and post comments.Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:07 AM UTDrExchange Satchmo,<br /> <br /> Is there any news on the latest dump 0819V4? Is it expected in the next day?<br /> I am sorry to be rude in asking. I've done an inside outside review of all the topics and was going to re-test in 2 days, just wanted to perform one last review. Again, great work. I think these dumps are great references and do help a lot. You definitely need to know Exchange and know the concepts , not just the answers to these questions, or else I feel its tough. Thanks again as always.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:20 PM UTipsec from Australia<br /> Thank you for the great Job<br /> <br /> TheSoup from United States<br /> You said you compared the dumps and found many mistakes. We will appreciate if you can tell what the mistakes are.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:13 PM UTJack - There is n o training yet. I've been looking and the first ones aren't due out until September. My research has indicated that after a new release, reputable training isn't commercially available until nearly a year after it's released to the public. If you have a way to log in to Microsoft's Partner portal with access to the training module, there are some training videos there. Aside from that, you're just going to have to wait.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:20 PM UTthe g Satchmo<br /> <br /> re Fabrikam -- I will revisit, as obviously the stateless nature of the new CAS service means that is obviously cannot have any agents on it<br /> <br /> it is a stated architectural design goal to do all the mail processing on the mbx service/roleWednesday, August 21, 2013 11:56 AM UTTheSoup failed twice with 6xx/1000 using this dump. Myself and other classmate used the 2013-08-05 102q to pass with a 7xx/1000. Something isn't quite right with this dump. We compared the two and found many mistakes on this dump.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:37 AM UTAKAAG guys great work and wonderful effort keep it up, can anyone point me to video training like CBT nuggets i cant seem to find it online thanksWednesday, August 21, 2013 11:17 AM UTDrExchange Satchmo,<br /> <br /> In Q6 of Q50 (Under Misc)<br /> <br /> It talks about installing a new server with minimum roles. It also mentions to install AntiSpam Agents. I'm a little confused. The answer says . <br /> 1. Install CAS Role<br /> 2. Install Anti-Spam agents.<br /> 3. Restart MS-ExchangeTransport.<br /> <br /> By question is, why would you install CAS Role . you can't install the AntiSpamAgents on a CAS Server in 2013. It does state all email flows in and out of server, but you can just let your Mailbox Server do that and not use a Proxy. Can you clarify on this if possible. Thanks again. I honestly appreciate all your help.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:34 AM UTsatchmo URL's for Fabrikam Q10<br /> <br /> <br /><br /> <br /> Malware protection settings, Exchange 2013 includes a brand-new enhanced feature for malware protection, by default this feature is enabled on Exchange Mailbox Servers, but if you want you can also disable it.<br /> <br /><br /> <br /> In Exchange 2013, the anti-spam agents can only be installed on the Mailbox role. But, the connection filtering which is very useful in fighting spam emails is not available in 2013. <br /> Same goes for the attachment filter. Even though CAS proxies emails back and forth (if setup correctly), it is a stateless proxy and can't have any anti-spam agents on it.<br /> <br /> <br /><br /> You can't enable the anti-spam agents on an Exchange 2013 Client Access Server<br /> <br /><br /> The Malware Filter runs on every 2013 Mailbox server to protect against malware and viruses.<br /> <br /> <br /><br /> THIS IS ONLY SOMEONES BLOG BUT SUPPORTS ANON AND CERTCLICK.COM<br /> Client Access Server<br /> On this server there is no mail flow and there are no databases present. In this case no malware protection is necessary or even useful. It only handles client protocols and none of them are scanned by Exchange aware solutions, that I know of.<br /> <br /> <br /><br /> In Microsoft Exchange Server 2013, you can disable or bypass malware filtering of all email messages in transit on a server. This must be done on a Mailbox server.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:36 AM UTsatchmo are appreciated both negative and positive. <br /> It all helps to promote the best answers for each question .Negative criticisms should be accompanied with details as to the reasons for the negativity.<br /> <br /> <br /> Re: The g from United Kingdom - Aug 20 2013, 10:44<br /> re the Fabrikam question 10 (anti spam/malware agents) <br /> I understand your reasoning and you have alluded to an interesting point. The difference between mailbox servers and cas servers with the implementation of anti-malware and anti-spam features.<br /> <br /><br /> In Microsoft Exchange Server 2013, you can disable or bypass malware filtering of all email messages in transit on a server. This must be done on a Mailbox server.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /><br /> QUESTION NO: 5 <br /> You need to install and configure anti-spam and antimalware filtering. <br /> Which servers should you install the anti-spam agents and enable the anti-spam and antimalware filtering? <br /> (Choose two). <br /> A. You should install the anti-spam agents on the Client Access Servers only. <br /> B. You should install the anti-spam agents on the Mailbox serversonly. <br /> C. You should install the anti-spam agents on the Client Access Servers and the Mailbox Servers. <br /> D. You should enable antimalware filtering on the Client Access Serversonly. <br /> E. You should enable antimalware filtering on the Mailbox serversonly. <br /> F. You enable antimalware filtering on the Client Access Servers and the Mailbox Servers. <br /> Answer: B,E <br /> ANONYMOUS'S ORIGINAL ANSWER FITS INTO THIS ANSWER REGIME. ONLY CHOOSE MAILBOX SERVERS<br /> <br /> Consequently I believe that the answers are mailbox servers for both parts (Choose EX1.Ex4) <br /> This covers both offices.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:31 AM UTDrExchange All, <br /> <br /> Greak work Satchmo. Here's one more ? I remember guys.<br /> <br /> What type of load balancer is recommended if you want to detect when a specific URL on a CAS Server is down? (Not in these words exactly, but basically they want an LB solution that looks when a specific URL is down).<br /> <br /> There were the usual choices. I chose<br /> 1. Layer 7 Load Balancer<br /> <br /> They also had Layer 4, DNS Round Robin, Windows NLB, and CAS Array.<br /> <br /> What you think Satchmo? Has anyone seen this same question? Now that I think of it, maybe if you want you create a DNS round robin, that points lets say to 2 different IP's, and if one is down, itll go to other. What do you guys think?Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:22 AM UTTripo stop complaining, satchmo you are doing a great job. thank for all you effort, recently I passed 70-417 thanks to you..Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:16 AM UTAyaan can email me at<br /> <br /> We all have to understand, these are just a practice questions. You cannot completely rely on this when we have no idea about Microsoft exam techniques.Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:53 AM UTsatchmo is a lousy score in any Microsoft exam. It basically demonstrates appalling understanding of Exchange.<br /> <br /> Thus far 3 people have reported they passed and 3 people have reported they have failed. How can someone fail with 4/5 new questions.<br /> <br /> Of course the 3 people that have failed are really emotive about it. Only suggest that for people that have failed go back to the Anonymous dump. Did they bother to check their answers before the test ended. Not wise to leave early.<br /> <br /> Microsoft Exam techniques<br /> 1. Slightly change the wording of the question resulting in a completely different answer<br /> 2. Add more options which could change the answer.<br /> 3. Present answer options that are for the previous version of the software program<br /> 4. Of course subtle differences between 2 answer options<br /> 5. Answer option commands that do not exist.<br /> 6. Heavily penalise you for part correct answers. 2/3 correct means 1/3 correct for Microsoft.<br /> Remember in computing you are either 100% correct or it will not work.<br /> <br /> The most controversial Microsoft technique could be falsely representing your pass score because of these forums and their associated vce's. If you fail you fail but if you pass Microsoft could reduce your pass mark somewhat in order to confuse these forums as regards the correct supplied answers.<br /> Unsubstantiated but just an interesting remark.<br /> <br /> <br /> There are still some missing tables/information from these questions.<br /> Still need more input from forum participants.<br /> <br /> Ayaan from Hong Kong thanks for your comments. Best to provide your email and I will respond to you. Some members of the forum are becoming hot-headed.Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:52 PM UTjoeshmo a 444 today memorizing this dump word for word.. DONT USE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:31 PM UTAyaan,<br /> <br /> Please let me know your email address so that i can draft it properly. I find it bit difficult to put it in the comments.<br /> <br /> ThanksTuesday, August 20, 2013 5:39 PM UTsa with 662. 4 Case studies and 33 questions.4 or 5 new questions.Tuesday, August 20, 2013 1:45 PM UTthe g great work satchmoTuesday, August 20, 2013 10:45 AM UTthe g the Fabrikam question 10 (anti spam/malware agents) - I think the question is actually testing you knowledge of the difference between funtionality of legacy Edge and 2013 CAS<br /> <br /> so I actually think EX5 (witch must be a 2013 CAS box) is ment to be used in the answer, maybe just once in each sectionTuesday, August 20, 2013 10:44 AM UTsatchmo ExamTester from Netherlands -<br /> <br /> Your comment will suffice for NOT B though<br /> But the Fabrikam case asks that users must be able to add and remove themselves from the distribution group. This is not possible using a dynamic group since membership is dynamically calculated based on attributes<br /> <br /> Thanks for the effort that you are putting into this forumTuesday, August 20, 2013 9:43 AM UTsatchmo l comments are welcome<br /> <br /> Ayaan from Hong Kong<br /> Not sure if you have gotten the question right or not.<br /> NOT SURE IF HE HAS GOT IT RIGHT BUT I PUT IT IN ANYWAY.<br /> A COMPLETE DISABLEMENT WOULD DISABLE THE UPDATES AND CAUSE THE EXCHANGE TRANSPORT SERVER TO RESTART<br /> THEREFORE SOUNDS LIKE A BYPASS WHICH WOULD MEAN SET-MALWAREFILTERINGSERVER WITH THE BYPASSFILTERING $TRUE<br /> (WITH ENGINE UPDATES STILL BEING DOWNLOADED)<br /> <br /> NOT Disable-Antimalwareagent.ps1 <br /> Command does not exist<br /> <br /> Disable-Antimalwarescanning.ps1.<br /> Does exist but no engine updates or downloads possible<br /> <br /> DrExchange from United States -<br /> You do not use VSS Snapshots for Backups of virtual machines<br /> New-MailboxRestoreRequest refer to Misce Q11<br /> <br /> ExamTester from Netherlands<br /> <br /> Fabrikam questions were the hardest in the vce <br /> My explanations are correct for A and NOT D<br /> FOR NOT B<br /><br /> A mail-enabled Active Directory global or local group object. Mail-enabled non-universal groups were discontinued in Exchange Server 2007 and can exist only if they were migrated from Exchange 2003 or earlier versions of Exchange. You can't use Exchange Server 2013 to create non-universal distribution groups.<br /> Yet<br /><br /> implies the opposite.<br /> <br /> For your further comments.<br /> <br /> I am not sure of how to completely explain that it is NOT B given these 2 articles.Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:35 AM UTExamTester 5<br /> <br /> You need to recommend which type of group must be used for the planned departments lists.<br /> <br /> Answer is correct, explanation is not:<br /> <br /> You can in fact create a dynamic distribution group in Exchange 2013:<br /><br /> <br /> But the Fabrikam case asks that users must be able to add and remove themselves from the distribution group. This is not possible using a dynamic group since membership is dynamically calculated based on attributes.Tuesday, August 20, 2013 8:10 AM UTDrExchange All,<br /> <br /> One question I remember from my test today..<br /> Storage Solutions for VM's.<br /> <br /> 1. Pass-Through Disks for Storage<br /> <br /> Backup of VM's<br /> <br /> 1. Not sure if answer is VSS Snapshots of Backup of Virtual Hard Drive?<br /> <br /> Most ?'s were word for word identical. Great post Satchmo. I messed up on a few easy ones and maybe 2-3 new ?'s, other than same.<br /> <br /> On one of the ?'s which talks about Restoring all Mailboxes after DB fail..<br /> <br /> Do you know why we use Set-Mailbox and not New-MailboxRestoreRequest?<br /> <br /> Thanks againTuesday, August 20, 2013 3:55 AM UTAyaan completely support Satchmo. <br /> <br /> I passed the exam today. I can remember few from my exams.<br /> <br /> 1- How would you disable the anti malware filtering and ensure that engine updates from microsoft is downloded and updated.<br /> Disable-Antimalwareagent.ps1<br /> Set-malwarefilteringserver<br /> <br /> i will try to draft some more questions that were present in my exam later today.Monday, August 19, 2013 1:14 PM UTOcean try to remember Q's as im going to try this one. Im hoping for 700's<br /> Can hardly understand dumps answers are wrong, possibly indeed rewording of Q's. So study those carefully.Monday, August 19, 2013 12:47 PM UTsatchmo people have a problem with this dump then I suggest you go back to Anonymous's original dump and see if you can pass from that one.<br /> <br /> The satchmo series was uploaded to encourage public debate. I too want to pass this exam but very few people are putting in the effort (Anonymous, DNS53, ipsec , Ocean and myself).<br /> If there are mistakes then where are they . No good just complaining or learning the answers off by heart.<br /> In the exam did <br /> 1) Microsoft add more choices. This can change the answer<br /> 2) Reword some questions slightly which could change the answer<br /> 3) The above 2 are common Microsoft initiatives.<br /> DNS53 offered 8 new questions with 4 incomplete ones included.<br /> Some exhibits are missing.<br /> Somebody must know something about them.<br /> More effort please, instead of throwing it back to me to check everything again. That is why the explanatory notes were put in. To see how the answer was arrived at and if it checked out OK.<br /> This apparently is one of the harder exams to pass.Monday, August 19, 2013 9:42 AM UTMDS I took test and failed. I prepared from dumps that recently updated by satchmo. I found 5 to 6 Questions different.<br /> <br /> While keeping good grip on recent dumps, I am failed and that is beyond my understanding.<br /> I think some question anwears are wrong in dumps, Please review it once again may be there is mistake.!!!Monday, August 19, 2013 8:33 AM UTsatchmo is V3 of the satchmo series<br /> <br /> Upload Complete<br /> Your file has been uploaded successfully. It may take up to 3 days before your file is published.<br /> File name:<br /> File size: 15491734 bytes<br /> Thank you for your contribution!<br /> <br /> I have added the 4th update in the satchmo series to the Forum. I have completed the analysis of all of the 91 questions from Anonymous, corrected incorrect answers, added new questions (via DNS53 from United States), included the reviews of other forum participants and added explanatory notes for each question.<br /> There were 8 incorrect answers from Anonymous's work and 8 new questions were added. Take time to review the incorrect answers to make sure that you agree with them and inform the forum of what you think about these answers. There are only 16 questions which need forum participants to review. Any effort anybody can make in these questions is much appreciated by all.<br /> The way to complete these vc e's is :<br /> 1. Somebody adds the base vce to the forum<br /> 2. Another person adds the explanatory notes to both check the correct answers and to provide alternative answers for the incorrect answers.<br /> 3. Another person adds the new questions if any appear at a later date<br /> It is not an easy exam and extra effort is required by forum participants in these vce's to add to the quality of these vce's.Monday, August 19, 2013 12:06 AM UTvanelli test yesterday. Just barely passed! :) I had extensively crammed this dump. Feels like 5-6 questions completely were new, and a few had wording changed/possible different answers. Of course there's still argument about a number of answers already. <br /> <br /> Thanks for all your work on these Satchmo!Sunday, August 18, 2013 2:26 PM UTOcean Satchmo,<br /> <br /> The explanations of the questions are very complete, with a lot of correct documented information. thanks for this awesome dump, keep it up!Sunday, August 18, 2013 12:06 PM UT